1. Introduction
The modern global economy has entered the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Though it is at an early stage and breakthrough (revolutionary) digital technologies are still being developed and tested, the widespread interest in new technologies and the opportunities that they bring means that the leading economies are now fully embracing the transition to Industry 4.0. Germany was the first country to establish a national industrial strategy for Industry 4.0 in 2012, followed by the UK, which has adopted Industry 4.0 as the leading sphere of growth for industry and envisages âEight great technologiesâ.
The United States proclaimed Industry 4.0 to be the critical tool for implementing its national strategy of innovational development. France has based its industrial reform program on the technologies of Industry 4.0 (Ministère de lâEconomie et des Finances, 2015). Japan has determined Industry 4.0 as a top-priority in implementing its plan of scientific and technological modernization. The recently implemented initiatives of China for the development of industry through the application of technologies of Industry 4.0 and the creation of a digital economy based on the technologies of Industry 4.0 shows that the involvement of new and emerging markets in the Fourth Industrial Revolution and its truly global scale.
These national economic strategies and programs generally have a 2022â2025 time horizon. Therefore, the next five to seven years are likely to see the first transformation processes in global industry, and, in the next 10â15 years, radical transformations created by the technologies of Industry 4.0. These developments will make redundant current technologies (belonging to technological mode 3.0). The disruptions caused by the formation of Industry 4.0 in the next 10â15 years will completely change the structure of the global economy.
2. About the Transformation Processes
Number of employees rate in the industry according to OECD (2019) and share of industry in GDP according to World Bank (2019a, 2019b) are shown in Table 1.1 (as of 2018).
The data from Table 1.1 show the absence of visible interconnection between the number of employees and the level of development of industry in the leading countries as to manufacture of industrial products, their share in GDP (Top 10) as of 2018.
The data from Table 1.1 show the absence of a visible connection between the number of employees and the level of development of industry in the leading manufacturing countries and their share of global GDP (Top 10). The data also show a high unemployment rate in this industrial sector.
Table 1.1: Number of Employees in the Industry and Share of Industry in GDP (as of 2018).
Country | Employment in Industry (in Thousands) | Share of Industry in GDP |
Australia | 2,459 | 23.03 |
Austria | 1,062 | 25.27 |
Belgium | 964 | 19.75 |
Canada | 3,519 | 27.53 |
Chile | 1,882 | 29.96 |
Czech Republic | 1,987 | 33.46 |
Denmark | 525 | 19.86 |
Finland | 547 | 23.97 |
France | 5,435 | 17.36 |
Germany | 11,418 | 27.60 |
Greece | 575 | 14.79 |
Hungary | 1,394 | 26.44 |
Ireland | 412 | 19.66 |
Israel | 654 | 18.67 |
Italy | 5,986 | 21.36 |
Japan | 15,823 | 29.30 |
Korea | 6,602 | 35.87 |
Latvia | 21 | 19.52 |
Lithuania | 343 | 26.42 |
Luxembourg | 23 | 11.58 |
Mexico | 13,377 | 30.04 |
Netherlands | 1,282 | 17.53 |
New Zealand | 532 | 20.44 |
Norway | 512 | 29.90 |
Poland | 5,180 | 28.93 |
Portugal | 1,177 | 19.41 |
Slovak Republic | 940 | 30.97 |
Slovenia | 317 | 28.77 |
Spain | 3,776 | 21.61 |
Sweden | 908 | 22.14 |
Switzerland | 928 | 25.17 |
Turkey | 7,483 | 29.16 |
United Kingdom | 5,796 | 18.57 |
United States | 28,849 | 18.88 |
Colombia | 4,306 | 26.64 |
Russian Federation | 19,480 | 30.05 |
Source: Compiled by the authors based on OECD (2019) and World Bank (2019a, 2019b).
The importance of studying the transformation processes that are expected to take place in the context of the formation of Industry 4.0 is emphasized by the fact that this topic is already well studied. A content analysis of existing work and a systematization of accumulated scientific knowledge allowed us to perform classification of conceptual approaches to determining potential scenarios for the development of industry in the context of the formation of Industry 4.0 according to the criterion of dominating technologies. The comparative analysis and a description of these distinct approaches are given in Table 1.2.
As seen in Table 1.2, the first conceptual approach to determining scenarios for the development of industry in the context of the formation of Industry 4.0 envisages AU. During the organization of production, this means a full AU of the production process. At present, there are examples of fully automatized industrial production, for example, the car-maker Opel (RĂźsselsheim, Germany). AU envisages preliminary programming by a human of separate production operations and their general sequence, as well as the further execution of these operations in a set sequence by an automatized production system.
The role of the human is reduced to technical maintenance (including diagnostics and repairs) of such an automated production system. The current worker who performs manual, mechanized, or partially automatized production will not be required within this future scenario.
With the organization of distribution, the future scenario envisages full AU (including logistics, supply, and sales). The role of the human will be reduced to technical maintenance (including diagnostics and repairs) in such an automated distribution system. The current professions of logistician and sales assistant, conducting manual or computerized roles in the logistical planning and sale of industrial products, will be in low demand in this future scenario.
Table 1.2: Scenarios for the Development of Industry in the Context of the Formation of Industry 4.0.
Source: Compiled by the authors.
The management of industrial production within this scenario, envisages the usage of Big Data technologies (technologies for the automatized processing of large arrays of data) and cloud technologies (technologies for storing information in the virtual environment, which reduces the risk of its loss during failures of hardware and software). The role of the human is reduced to monitoring and control over the work of these technologies. The real professions of the manager and HR manager will be in low demand in this future scenario. Further analysis of this scenario is presented in the works: Bogoviz (2019), Kuo, Ting, Chen, Yang, and Chen (2017), Moeuf, Pellerin, Lamouri, Tamayo-Giraldo, and Barbaray (2017), Popkova (2019), Popkova, Ragulina, and Bogoviz (2019), Bauer, Pokorni, and Findeisen (2019), Dostatni, Diakun, Grajewski, Wichniarek, and Karwasz (2019), GalvĂŁo et al. (2019), and Wrobel-Lachowska, Polak-Sopinska, and Wisniewski (2019).
The second conceptual approach to determining scenarios for the development of industry in the context of the formation of Industry 4.0 envisages the creation and distribution of AI. During the organization of production, this means the usage of 3D printing (three-dimensional printing). This technology allows for the rapid manufacturing of industrial products as single items with the help of 3D printers. This ensures the timely execution of individual orders, as there is no necessity for the automatized production process.
The role of the human in such a scenario is reduced to design, impl...