1
ON PARISIAN BOULEVARDS
Behold! The caravan of civilization has been ambushed. Everywhere fools are in charge.
âJALALADDIN RUMI
WINTER 2015
Pale morning light. Early Saturday. November 14. I stare out my window, stunned as a storm sweeps in from the east. News comes in from Paris. Dead citoyens lie scattered across the city. On Boulevard Voltaire, in Le Carillon bar and La Belle Equipe restaurant, outside à la Bonne BiÚre café, inside the Bataclan theater. Here, in Florence, the Arno churns with rainfall from the night before. Tears for the fallen.
âWhat now?â I ask myself. Yet, I know the answer. It is ISIS, the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. And the hunt for those responsible will lead police and journalists to Brussels, Europeâs epicenter of Wahhabism, where it has been incubating for decades.
I search the internet. I Google the word Wahhabi. Only four articles appear, all from 2014. One is posted on an Indian website, the other by British journalist Patrick Cockburn in The Independent, another by David Kirkpatrick in the New York Times, and the last in The Economist. Nothing else.
By noon, the body count growsâ130 dead and 368 injured.
ISIS has claimed responsibility for the murders. But who are these people? And who has inspired and funded ISIS?
For the average citizen, this answer seems lost in the mists of time, in the distant fog of Middle Eastern wars that began with the American invasion of Iraq and later spread across Syria. This region of the world, now cursed with anarchy, leaves most questions unanswered.
Searching for clues, I open Kirkpatrickâs New York Times article, âISISâ Harsh Brand of Islam Is Rooted in Austere Saudi Creed,â in which he writes:
For their guiding principles, the leaders of the Islamic State ⊠are open and clear about their almost exclusive commitment to the Wahhabi movementâŠ. The group circulates images of Wahhabi religious textbooks from Saudi Arabia in the schools it controls. Videos from the groupâs territory have shown Wahhabi texts plastered on the sides of an official missionary van. Bernard Haykel of Princeton has described al-Baghdadiâs creed as âa kind of untamed Wahhabism.â
Other clues lay inside the Economist article, âThe Other Beheaders:â
There is not much difference between a death sentence in the jihadistsâ âIslamic Stateâ and in Saudi Arabia, a country seen as a crucial Western ally in the fight against ISIS. Nor, indeed, is there much difference between the two entities in other applications of a particularly merciless brand of sharia, or Islamic law, including public whippings and the right for victims of crime to claim eye-for-an-eye revenge. Dissidents in Raqqa, the Syrian town that is ISISâs proto-capital, say all 12 of the judges who now run its court system, adjudicating everything from property disputes to capital crimes, are Saudis. The group has also created a Saudi-style religious police, charged with rooting out vice and shooing the faithful to prayers. And as in ISIS-ruled zones, where churches and non-Sunni mosques have been blown up or converted to other uses.
I begin writing an article full of fury and anguish, but not with the venom of Oriana Fallaci or her uncontrollable hate. I write with deep affection for these ancient lands where I lived for over thirty years. I write with urgency to speak on behalf of these people, family and friends that I have known and loved my entire life. And I write for a troubled world under threat.
After finishing the piece, I sent it to my friend Stanley Weiss, chairman emeritus of Business Executives for National Security and expert on international politics. Stanleyâs reaction was unusualâhe was upset.
âWhy havenât I heard anything about this?â he asked over the telephone. A sophisticated, cosmopolitan gentleman with long security experience and a global awareness of looming dangers, Stanley does not enjoy being taken by surprise. He ended with, âThis may be the most important article that Iâve read this year.â
A month later in December on the BBC, five experts are posed the question âIs Saudi Arabia to Blame for the Islamic State?â Saudi-born Madawi al-Rashid, visiting professor at the Middle East Centre at the London School of Economics, answered with yet more clues:
The Wahhabis were given full control of the religious, social and cultural life of the kingdom. As long as the Wahhabi preachers preached that Saudis should obey their rulers, the al-Saud family was happy. In the 1960s and 1970s the Arab world was full of revolutionary ideas. The Saudi government thought the Wahhabis were a good antidote, because they provide an alternative narrative about how to obey rulers and not interfere in politics. In the 1980s, King Fahd established a printing press to publish Korans, sent for free to different parts of the world. They established Al-Madinah University to teach religion to students from around the world.
When Afghanistan was invaded by the Soviet Union, Wahhabism was instrumentalized by the Saudi regime. It inspired young Muslim men to go to Afghanistan to fight a jihad against the Russian infidels. Wahhabism benefitted from the arrival of the Muslim Brotherhood, who were exiled from places like Egypt, Syria and Iraq in the 1950s and 1960s. Saudi Arabia welcomed them. A lot of them became religious teachers so the fusion between this Wahhabi tradition, and the organizational skills of other Islamists, led to the emergence of a new trend in Saudi Arabia; the Islamist trend, what is referred to as the Islamic awakening.
Soon after, my article was published in the Huffington Post on January 14, 2016. Stanleyâs comment introduced the piece.
FIVE SAUDI IMPERIAL PROJECTS THE WEST HAS SLEPT THROUGH
By Stanley A. Weiss and Terence Ward
Horrified by the news that Saudi Arabia would set a record for beheadings in 2015 while continuing to fund radical Islamic groups across the world, I wrote a column last October arguing that it was time for the United States to reconsider its seventy-year relationship with the kingdom in Riyadh. After the piece was posted, one of the friends I heard from was Terence Ward, author of the internationally praised memoir, Searching for Hassan. Ward knows about Saudi Arabia: while born in Colorado, he spent his childhood in Saudi Arabia and Iran. Not only does he have a rich understanding of the deep conflicts within Islam and between nations in the Middle East, but as a man who speaks six languagesâincluding Arabic and Farsiâhis understanding of the subtleties of those conflicts go well beyond that of most Westerners. As tensions between Iran and Saudi Arabia have rapidly escalated this month over Riyadhâs execution of a high-profile Shiite cleric, Ward reached out with a thoughtful perspective on Saudi Arabia and the West. I print it in full. âŠ
Since 2001, Western leaders have discretely avoided the naked truthâtodayâs Islamic terrorism is deeply rooted in the Saudi Wahhabi faith. First with al-Qaedaâs 9/11 attacks and now with ISIS bombings in Brussels and slaughter in Paris, the Westâs rush for revenge ignores those roots yet again.
Both al-Qaeda and ISIS needed failed states to create their base: in Afghanistan, and in northern Iraq and eastern Syria, respectively. But to flourish, they needed funding and ideology, which were imported from Saudi Arabia.
To be blunt, where is decapitation a public sport? Only in Riyadh and Raqqa. Growing up in Saudi Arabia, I witnessed crowds gather on Friday in âchop-chop squareâ to watch the medieval spectacle. The recent forty-seven beheadings remind us again of this uniquely Saudi custom. Now, it has now been exported to Syria where YouTube clips spread the spectacle to the world. But they share more than executions. Few know that as Syrian and Iraqi towns fell to ISIS, Saudi textbooks replaced what was in classrooms before. So, if any Western leaders seriously want to end the radicalization of young Muslims, they must look no further than the father of the radical faith followed by both terror groupsâfound in the Saudi religious industrial complex. Wahhabism. In Saudi Arabia, there are no churches, synagogues, or Hindu temples. Wahhabism is not a religion of tolerance. The chilling fact is that in three decades, the Saudis have launched five imperial projects in support of Wahhabismâall sources of todayâs jihadists.
The first project in Pakistan began when General Zia ul-Haq, after seizing power in 1977, imposed sharia law and then gave carte blanche to create countless Saudi-funded Wahhabi madrasasâIslamic schoolsâacross the country to indoctrinate young children and fill the gap of a collapsed education system. Targeting refugee camps full of vulnerable Afghans fleeing the Soviet invasion, the Wahhabi movement found its base.
The second project in Afghanistan was born in these refugee camps when a new generation came of age, calling themselves âthe studentsâ or âTaliban.â In 1994, Mullah Omar and fifty madrasa students launched out from Quetta as a fighting force crossing the border, seizing Kandahar, and then taking Kabul in 1996. By 1997, Saudi employees were traveling for free as tourists on government-paid holidays to visit the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan with their families so they could witness the âtrue Islam.â Mullah Omar was invited on Hajj by the Saudi monarch in 1998. He then ordered the Bamiyan Buddhas blown apart in March 2001, in keeping with the iconoclast Saudi vision. The free tourist trips from Riyadh ended abruptly on September 11 that same year.
The third project was al-Qaedaâs global jihad financed by Wahhabi funders that began with financing foreign fighters in Soviet-occupied Afghanistan and climaxed with the Twin Towers attack. Itâs enough to remember that fifteen of the nineteen hijackers, as well as al-Qaedaâs founder Osama bin Laden, hailed from Saudi Arabia.
The fourth imperial project is named ISIS, also known as ISIL (Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant), or DAESH (an acronym formed from the Arabic transliteration of ISIS). Its mother was Americaâs Iraq invasion. Its father was Saudi Arabiaâs eager Wahhabi funders and a defiant ideology that capitalized on the Sunni humiliation in Iraq and Syria. Now, the SunniâShia conflagration is tearing apart both countries and the region is ablaze with four civil wars. Of course, Saudis argue this was all started to combat Iranâs imperial ambitions, but the truth is that Sunnis, not the Shia, have mastered their macabre monopoly on suicide bombings. This is the terror that was exported to Paris.
The fifth imperial project lies in Western Europeâin all madrasas funded by Saudi money and staffed with Wahhabi-trained imams from Paris to Brussels, Antwerp and Rotterdam, from Marseilles to Birmingham. Thousands of mosques and schools have trained a new generation of Muslims in the rigid and intolerant faith imported from Riyadh, without any local government supervision. And now these seeds planted by Saudi Arabia are bearing fruit under a newly re-named Salafist banner. This Salafi term has been cleverly promoted to disguise any connection to Wahhabism or the Saudi origins, and it has worked. International journalists now solely use the word Salafi as if describing a widespread conservative current in Islam today.
Over forty years ago, Belgiumâs King Baudouin cut a deal with Saudi Arabiaâs King Faisal. In exchange for cheap oil, Baudouin gave the Saudis a ninety-nine-year lease on the former Oriental Pavilion for the Grande Mosque. At the same time, the Belgians allowed Saudi trained imams to preach to the growing numbers of Maghrebi immigrants coming into the country. This gave the House of Saud carte blanche for three generations to spread their doctrine of Wahhabism in rigid religious schools, setting up tension between the more moderate Tunisian and Moroccan traditions and the Saudi-financed teachings. Today, there are seventy-seven mosques in Brussels, which is not only the capital of the Europe Union and NATO, it is also the capital of European Wahhabism and Islamic terrorism.
From the 2001 assassination of Ahmad Shah Massoudâthe famed Afghan anti-Taliban leaderâto the 2004 Madrid train bombings, from the Paris shootings at the Charlie Hebdo offices, to last yearâs killings at the Jewish museum in Brussels and this summerâs foiled shooting spree on a high-speed train, from the Paris massacres and the recent bombings in Brussels, all investigatorsâ lines of inquiry have led to Europeâs âground zeroâ of terrorismâthe Brussels suburb of Molenbeek. This should not be surprising. Only last year, Belgium was riveted by the trial of forty-six people who were found guilty of belonging to Sharia4Belgium, a group that recruited volunteers to fight in Syria with ISIS. And Belgium has the other dubious honor of sending ISIS more foreign fighters per capita than any other country in Europe.
The element that all five imperial projects share is the Wahhabi doctrineâextremist, fundamentalist, and exclusionist. This creed is surprisingly new to Islam. Only two hundred years old, it carries the name of its firebrand founder, Muhammad Abdul Wahhab. The Christian equivalent would be a union of two groups: the Jehovah Witness and the American racist Christian group, the Ku Klux Klan. The Wahhabi doctrine views all other Muslims as deviant, decadent, and dangerous heretics, deserving no mercy. Moderate Sunnis, Sufis, Shia, Ismailis, Druze, Yazidis, Alawites, even the whirling dervishes are all enemiesâimpure, fallen Muslims. Apostates all. Of course, non-Muslims fall under the same umbrella of loathing. No common humanity exists. There is no possible dialogue. Their sharia is the only covenant. All non-Wahhabi believers are expendable. It is high time to point out publically the differences existing between the many variants of traditional Islam and the virulent hostility with which the newly created Wahhabi sect views everyone else, be they Muslims or not.
Make no mistake; the Saudi Wahhabis are on a global mission of conversion. Their dream is to change forever a faith that once was tolerant, back when Christians, Jews, and Muslims lived side by side in the cosmopolitan Levantâs multi-cultural mĂ©lange of dialects and faiths along the Eastern Mediterraneanâfrom Alexandria to Beirut, from Damascus to Istanbul.
In the non-Arabic world of Southeast Asiaâin Indonesia with over 190 million Muslim faithfulâthe mood is still reminiscent of those more tolerant times. Islam arrived there with Persian and Gujarati merchants who sailed into tropical ports with their mystical and very tolerant Islam. Their faith was grounded in open-minded Sufi beliefs and traditions. This is why Islam spread so quickly across the archipelago. Had these early merchants offered instead, a rigidly austere Wahhabi âdesert-bound message,â there would have been few takers.
Now, it is only in Indonesia that a forceful repudiation of the Islamic State has surfaced. It has come from the powerful Nahdlatul Ulama party, called NU, that counts as members over fifty million Muslims. Their recent film of ISIS beheadings features the voice-over of their revered leader and former Indonesian president, Abdurrahman Wahid, singing a Javanese mystical poem: âMany who memorize the Quran and Hadith love to condemn others as infidels while ignoring their own infidelity to God, their hearts and minds still mired in filth.â
This campaign for a liberal, pluralistic Islam comes from a country with a rich Hindu and Buddhist past, where Sunnis and Shias live together in harmony. This tradition of Islam stresses nonviolence, inclusiveness, and acceptance of other religions. It was borne from the Sufi tradition. All commentators and pundits who have been asking for a âreformation in Islam,â neednât look further. The Islam that they are searching for exists in Indonesia. And it is the antidote to jihadism.
It is this faith that historically spread across the islands of Indonesia, Malaysia, and Bengal. And it is this faith that was also rooted in the beating heart of the Islamic world: Mecca. Few Westerners know that for one thousand years the holy city of Mecca was the center of the Sufi universe, where music, dance, and ecstatic prayer celebrated the divine and faithful gathered at shrines and graves of saints.
When the Wahhabi-backed House of Saud conquered the Hejaz, Mecca, and Medina in 1924, the state of Saudi Arabia was declared, and Wahhabism was proclaimed the official religion. In less than one hundred years, the Saud family and their Wahhabi benefactors erased the cityâs rich, mystic past, including historical sites like the Prophetâs house in Mecca, along with that of his daughter Fatimeh. Homes of the Prophetâs wives are now parking lots. All those pilgrims who embark on their Hajj arrive in Mecca only to find a city that has been cleansed of its diverse layers of Islamic history.
Alas, virtually every aspect and corner Islam today has now been penetrated by Wahhabi influence, thanks to 200 billion dollars spent over the last thirty years in a strategic campaign to promote Wahhabism around the world. Thousands of Saudi-funded madrasas have indoctrinated countless young minds with the Wahhabi doctrine in Belgium, France, Holland, Germany, Bosnia, Kosovo, and the UK, as well as across the Arab world. At the moment, the economies of t...