1
PIECING TOGETHER THE PERSONALITY PUZZLE
The chicken-and-egg dilemma has its parallel in education. It is the question of whether good teachers are born or if they are made: the nature versus nurture question. Our answer to that controversy is, fittingly, an enigma itself. Generally speaking, we believe good teachers are born, but more important, we believe itโs better for everyone involved if we were to believe that they could be made. Interestingly, this book is predicated on a rejection of the question. The question is rather moot. What is relevant is the belief that there are traits, even personality character traits, that anyone can improve on to enhance his or her effectiveness as a master teacher, as a legend.
Personality is generally defined as the set of an individualโs distinguishing character traits, attitudes, and habits. Looking more deeply into the definition, one can clearly see that personality is the single most significant feature that distinguishes one individual from another individual or, in the setting of the school, one teacherโs success from anotherโs. There are certainly as many types of personalities as there are teachers in any given school system, and just as obviously, there is no single, specific type of teacher personality or trait that could be classified as preferable in all situations all the time. But there are instructors, legends in education, who seem to have the personalities most able to make a difference in the lives of children on a daily basis.
Before getting into the personality components of a legend, one must first be ready to master the interpersonal skills that will allow him or her to open all the possible venues for educational excellence. In this first chapter, we focus on the three parts of the definition that clearly distinguish the legendโs personality from that of his or her less successful peers: character traits, strong attitudes, and good habits.
A COMMON SCENARIO
Reality Sets In
The hands on the face of the clock in the classroom seem to be stuck; a persistent fear drifts in and out of the young teacherโs mind, โWhat am I doing here? Why did I become a teacher?โ As she looks at the pile of papers she will have to tackle at home that evening, after she has supervised a home basketball game, after sheโs fixed supper for her family, and after sheโs helped her husband do the dishes, she begins to understand why her all-knowing parents responded with a quizzical โTeacher?โ when she told them what career path she had decided to follow. Just about the time she has absolutely had it with the negative attitude of two especially aggravating students in her fourth-period class, the bell rings, saving both her and the students from what could only be a mutually destructive confrontation. Now at least she has lunch, a 30-minute duty-free time slot, her only respite from the intellectual wrestling others call โteaching.โ
The Shock
As she enters the cafeteria, the teacher is overwhelmed by a sea of children, each of whom is either screaming at someone or pushing someone else (and for the overachieversโboth). The noise is deafening; she accelerates her pace so that she can get quickly through the cafeteria line and gulp down her Tylenol-laced lunch in the teacherโs lounge, in hopes of quelling the acidic buildup of her stomach and the throbbing veins of her forehead.
As she battles her way into the lunch line, the teacher is taken aback by the sight of two renegades from her last class standing in line engaging in polite conversation with another teacherโand no, heโs not a coach! As she pauses to take in this image (which suddenly seems to have theological implications), her feelings move from wonder
โโHow does he do that?โ
to awe
โโLook, theyโre smiling!โ
to anger
โโWhy donโt they treat me that way?โ
and finally to suspicion
โโWho is this guy and what did he do?โ
An Epiphany of Sorts
As the conversation continues, despite her resentment, the teacher canโt help but be aware of the positive interaction that is occurring, and unwillingly (and perhaps even unconsciously) she begins to wonder how any teacher could ever have a relationship with those two students. Turning away from the conversation, she enters the lunch line, gets her food, and heads toward the faculty lounge with a pair of queries riddling her mind: โWhat kind of meat is this really?โ and, most important, โWhat do those two students see in that teacher that I donโt have?โ
The answer is probably not a better pedagogy; the answer is probably not a more interesting curriculum; the answer is probably not a more modern technology; the answer is probably not that the teacher she witnessed is a โpushoverโ in the classroom. Instead, the answer (and this is not necessarily a terrible thing for her to come to grips with) is personality. For our discussion, we have chosen to break down the larger concept of personality into four areas:
Identifying desirable character traits
Promoting strong attitudes
A DISCLAIMER
Admittedly, this is not a very impressive way to start a book on education, but as we moved this chapter from our brains on to the page, the scenario troubled us greatly because the first few drafts sounded as though they were presenting a panacea to education, and although we donโt believe in panaceas, we do believe in education.
What bothered us as we considered personality was the adage that opposites attract. If thatโs true, and there are a zillion types of personalities (which is, incidentally, about as close to mathematical analysis as we get in this work), then the sad truth is that no one teacherโs personality could ever appeal to every type of student. Follow this logic:
It must be assumed that each student brings to class a very different personality of his or her own and very distinct set of needs.
It also must be assumed that every teacher can fill those needs to some degree.
It is, however, impossible for any single teacher to present a personality that will be attractive to all students.
But while admitting that no individual teacher can have a personality that is naturally attractive to all students, one must recognize that every teacher can make certain that his or her personality does not include any traits that would preclude learning for any students. Although not everyone will become a teacherโs friend, it is safe to assume that none need become the teacherโs enemy. That simple observation is why we chose to begin this book with a discussion of personality: The teacherโs personality is the single most significant trait in promoting educational success. The teacher is more important to the education of his or her students than pedagogy, technology, curriculum, facilities, and textbooks.
How does oneโs personality become the key to opening the door to touching the lives of students? We return to the question of whether legends are born or made; as we suggested earlier, it is in the best interest of education to operate under the assumption that they are not bornโthat it is possible for every teacher to nurture personality traits that will help him or her establish an environment more conducive for learning for all students. This then is our next taskโan examination of aspects of a teacherโs personality that are most conducive to student success.
IDENTIFYING DESIRABLE CHARACTER TRAITS
Almost every adult in America can identify a special or favorite teacher who had a tremendously positive effect on his or her life. Each of us looks back to that one teacher who motivated us, cared for us, taught us, and helped us to grow more than the others. When asked to identify a few phrases that best describe their favorite teacher, most adultsโ lists include the following:
We al...