1
Introduction
The maintenance or improvement of the postharvest life and quality of fresh fruit and vegetables is becoming increasingly important. This has been partly as a response to a free market situation where the supply of good quality fruit and vegetables constantly exceed demand. Therefore to maintain or increase market share there is increasing emphasis on quality. Also consumer expectation in the supply of all types of fresh fruit and vegetables throughout the year is often taken for granted. This latter expectation is partly supplied by long-distance transport but also long-term storage of many crops. With growing awareness and concern for climate change, long-distance transport of fruit and vegetables is being questioned.
Controlled atmosphere (CA) storage has been shown to be a technology that can contribute to these consumer requirements in that in certain circumstances, with certain cultivars of crop and appropriate treatments, the marketable life can be greatly extended. An enormous amount of interest and research has been reported on CA storage and modified atmosphere (MA) packaging of fruit and vegetables to prolong their availability and retain their quality for longer. This book seeks to evaluate the history and current technology reported and used in CA storage and MA packaging and its applicability and restrictions for the use in a variety of crops in different situations. While it is not exhaustive in reviewing the enormous quantity of science and technology that has been developed and published on the subject, it will provide an access into CA and MA for those applying the technology in commercial situations. The book can also be used as a basis for determination of researchable issues in the whole area of CA storage and MA packaging.
The scientific basis for the application of CA technology to the storage of fresh fruit and vegetables has been the subject of considerable research, which seems to be progressively increasing. Some of the science on which it is based has been known for over 200 years but was refined and applied commercially for the first time in the first half of the 20th century.
History of the Effects of Gases on Crops
The effects of gases on harvested crops have been known for centuries. In eastern countries some types of fruit were taken to temples, where incense was burned, to improve ripening. Bishop (1996) indicated that there was evidence that Egyptians and Samarians used sealed limestone crypts for crop storage in the second century BCE. He also quoted from the Bible suggesting that the technology might have been used in Old Testament Egypt when Joseph prevented famine by storing grain for 7 years. Dilley (1990) mentioned the storage of fresh fruit and vegetables in tombs and crypts. This was combined with the gas-tight construction of the inner vault so that the fruit and vegetables would consume the oxygen (O2) and thus help to preserve the crops. An interpretation of this practice would indicate that knowledge of the respiration of fruit pre-dates the work described in the 19th century (Dalrymple, 1967). Wang (1990) quotes a Tang dynasty 8th century poem which described how litchis were shown to keep better during long-distance transport when they were sealed in the hollow centres of bamboo stems with some fresh leaves. Burying fruit and vegetables in the ground to preserve them is a centuries-old practice (Dilley, 1990). In Britain crops were stored in pits, which would have restricted ventilation and may have improved their storage life. Currently CA research and commercial CA storage is used in many countries, some of which are described in this chapter.
France
The earliest documented scientific study of CA storage was by Jacques Etienne Berard at the University of Montpellier in 1819 (Berard, 1821), who found that harvested fruit absorbed O2 and gave out carbon dioxide (CO2). He also showed that certain types of fruit stored in atmospheres containing no O2 did not ripen, but if they were held for only a short period and then placed in air they continued to ripen. These experiments showed that storage in zero O2 gave a shelf-life of about 1 month for peaches, prunes and apricots and about 3 months for apples and pears. Zero O2 was achieved by placing a paste composed of water, lime and iron sulfate in a sealed jar which, as Dalrymple (1967) pointed out, would also have absorbed CO2. Considerable CA research has been carried out over the intervening period in France. Berardâs method of achieving an atmosphere that had no O2 and likely had CO2 absorbed as well is still in use today. There are commercial sources of âoxygen absorbersâ available on e-commerce sites that will absorb virtually all O2 in a sealed container. The product consists of food-safe sachets containing iron powder which consumes O2 to form iron oxides. At least one of the products contains activated carbon, which can serve to absorb CO2 (though the supplier does not make this claim) (Robert Prange, personal communication).
USA
In 1856 Benjamin Nyce built a commercial cold store in Cleveland, Ohio, using ice to keep it below 34°F. In the 1860s he experimented with modifying the CO2 and O2 in the store by making it airtight. This was achieved by lining the store with casings made from iron sheets, thickly painting the edges of the metal and having tightly fitted doors. It was claimed that 4000 bushels (about 72.6 t; see Glossary) of apples were kept in good condition in the store for 11 months. However, he mentioned that some fruits were injured in a way that Dalrymple (1967) interpreted as possibly being CO2 injury. The carbonic acid level was so high in the store (or the O2 level was so low) that a flame would not burn. He also used calcium chloride to control the moisture level in the mistaken belief that low humidity was necessary.
Dalrymple (1967) stated that R.W. Thatcher and N.O. Booth working in Washington State University around 1903 studied fruit storage in jars containing different gases. They found that âthe apples which had been in CO2 were firm of flesh, possessed the characteristic apple colour, although the gas in the jar had a slight odour of fermented apple juice, and were not noticeably injured in flavourâ. The apples stored in hydrogen, nitrogen (N2), O2 and sulfur dioxide (SO2) did not fare so well. They subsequently studied the effects of CO2 on raspberries, blackberries and loganberries and âfound that berries which softened in three days in air would remain firm for from 7 to 10 days in CO2.
Fulton (1907) observed that fruit could be damaged where large amounts of CO2were present in the store, but strawberries were âdamaged little, if any . . . by the presence of a small amount of CO2 in the air of the storage roomâ. Thatcher (1907) published a paper describing work in which he experimented with apples sealed in boxes containing different levels of gases and concluded that CO2 greatly inhibited ripening.
G.R. Hill Jr reported work carried out at Cornell University in 1913 in which the firmness of peaches had been retained by storage in inert gases or CO2. He also observed that the respiration rate of the fruit was reduced and did not return to normal for a few days when removed from storage in a CO2 atmosphere to air. C. Brooks and J.S. Cooley, working for the US Department of Agriculture, stored apples in sealed containers in which the air was replaced three times each week with air plus 5 kPa CO2. After 5 weeks storage they noted that the apples were green, firm and crisp, but were also slightly alcoholic and had âa rigor or an inactive condition from which they do not entirely recoverâ (Brooks and Cooley, 1917). J.R. Magness and H.C. Diehl in 1924 described a relationship between apple softening and CO2 concentration in that an atmosphere containing 5 kPa CO2 slowed the rate of softening with a greater effect at higher concentrations, but at 20 kPa CO2 the flavour was impaired. Work on CA storage that had been carried out at the University of California at Davis was reported by Overholser (1928). This work included a general review and some preliminary results on Fuerte avocados. In 1930 Overholser left the University and was replaced by F.W. Allen, who had been working on storage and transport of fresh fruit in artificial atmospheres. Allen began work on CA storage of âYellow Newtownâ apples. âYellow Newtownâ, like âCoxâs Orange Pippinâ and âBramleyâs Seedlingâ grown in England, was subject to low-temperature injury at temperatures higher than 0°C. These experiments (Allen and McKinnon, 1935) led to a successful commercial trial on Yellow Newtown apples in 1933 at the National Ice and Cold Storage Company in Watsonville. Thornton (1930) carried out trials where the concentration of CO2 tolerated by selected fruit, vegetables and flowers was examined at six temperatures over the range of 0â25°C. To illustrate the commercial importance of this type of experiment the project was financed by the Dry Ice Corporation of America.
From 1935 Robert M. Smock worked in the University of California at Davis on apples, pears, plums and peaches (Allen and Smock, 1938). In 1936 and 1937 F.W. Allen spent some time with Franklin Kidd and Cyril West at the Ditton laboratory in England and then continued his work at Davis, while in 1937 Smock moved to Cornell University. Smock and his PhD student, Archie Van Doren, conducted CA storage research on apples, pears and stone fruit (Smock, 1938; Smock and Van-Doren, 1938, 1939). New England farmers in the USA were growing a number of apple cultivars, particularly âMcIntoshâ. âMcIntoshâ is subject to chilling injury and cannot be stored at or below 0°C. It was thought that if the respiration rate could be slowed, storage life could be extended, lengthening the marketing period, and CA storage was investigated to address this problem (Smock and Van-Doren, 1938). Sharples (1989a) credited Smock with the âbirth of CA storage technology to North Americaâ. In fact it was apparently Smock who coined the term âcontrolled atmosphere storageâ as he felt it better described the technology than the term âgas storageâ which was used previously by Kidd and West. Smock and Van-Doren (1941) stated: âThere are a number of objections to the use of the term gas storage as the procedure is called by the English. The term controlled atmosphere has been substituted since control of the various constituents on the atmosphere is the predominant feature of this technique. A substitute term or synonym is modified atmosphere.â The term âcontrolled atmosphere storageâ was not adopted in Britain until 1960 (Fidler et al., 1973). Smock also spent time with Kidd and West at the Ditton laboratory. The CA storage work at Cornell included strawberries and cherries (Van Doren et al., 1941). A detailed report of the findings of the Cornell group was presented in a comprehensive bulletin (Smock and Van Doren, 1941) which gave the results of research on atmospheres, temperatures and varietal response of fruit as well as store construction and operation. In addition to the research efforts in Davis and Cornell in the 1930s, several other groups in the USA were carrying out research into CA storage. CA storage research for a variety of fruit and vegetables was described by Miller and Brooks (1932) and Miller and Dowd (1936). Work on apples was described by Fisher (1939) and Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station (1941), work on citrus fruit by Stahl and Cain (1937) and Samisch (1937) and work on cranberries by Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station (1941). Smock's research in New York State University was facilitated in 1953 with the completion of large new storage facilities designed specifically to accommodate studies on CA storage. During the intervening years the work at Davis has been prolific, with an enormous number of publications (many are referred to in subsequent chapters), and the campus has become a widely recognized world leader in CA science and technology.
Commercial CA storage of apples in the USA began in New York State with âMcIntoshâ. The first three CA rooms with a total capacity of 24,000 bushels were put into operation in 1940 with Smock and Van Doren acting as consultants. This had been increased to 100,000 bushels by 1949, but the real expansion in the USA began in the early 1950s. In addition to a pronounced growth in commercial operation in New York State, CA stores were constructed in New England in 1951, in Michigan and New Jersey in 1956, in Washington, California and Oregon in 1958, and in Virginia in 1959 (Dalrymple, 1967). According to Love (1988) the delayed adoption in Washington State in the 1940s and early 1950s may have been due to the high cost of CA installation and management coupled with a certain scepticism among USDA postharvest researchers. But after 1957, the Washington apple industry increased CA technology at a rapid rate. Washingtonâs initial reluctance to adopt CA technology changed with new economic developments and new USDA scientific leadership in postharvest horticulture. A CA store for âRed Deliciousâ was set up in Washington State in the late 1950s in a Mylar tent where some 1000 bushels were stored with good results. By the 1955â1956 season the total CA storage holdin...