CHAPTER
1
ESSAY: THE FIRST VERSEâA FIRST IN HUMAN HISTORY
1.1 In the beginning God created the Heavens and the Earth.1
The first verse of Genesis is, in some ways, the most important verse in the Bible. While many Torah verses influenced history, Genesis 1:1 changed history in monumental ways.
⢠First, the verse posits a Creator of the universe. That means, among many other things, there is meaning to existence. If there is no Creator, there is no ultimate purpose to existence, including, of course, human existence. We humans can make up a meaning because we are the one species that cannot live without meaning. But the fact remains that we made it up.
Of course, atheists argue that believers in God made up God; therefore, God does not really exist. But they donât always apply this rule to the existence of what they acknowledge they made up: meaning. If what we make up (God) doesnât exist, what atheists make up (meaning) doesnât exist.
If there is no God, we know there is no ultimate meaning or purpose to life: that all existenceâincluding, of course, our ownâis the result of random chance. But we do not know there is no Creator. So, unlike those who know they make up meaning, neither we who believe in God nor atheists know we made up God. On the contrary, there are very strong arguments for a Designer of the world, but there are no arguments for an ultimate purpose to life if there is no God.
⢠Second, the word âcreatedâ (bara) implies nothing preexisted Genesis 1:1. When bara is used in the Torah, it is used only with reference to Godâbecause only God can create from nothing. Human beings cannot create; they can only âmake,â like making something from something, such as wood and paper from trees.
⢠Third, everythingâwith the exception of Godâhas a beginning. Prior to Godâs creating, there was nothing. That includes time. Thanks to Einstein, we know that time, too, had a beginning. God, therefore, also created time, which means God exists not only outside of nature but outside of time. God precedes time and will outlive time.
⢠Fourth, for the first time, a creation story has but one Creator. The moral and intellectual consequences of the Torahâs monotheism have changed the world. They are listed in detail in the commentary to Exodus 8:6 (and summarized in the commentary to Genesis 35:2).
⢠Fifth, unlike pre-Bible creation stories, there is complete silence regarding a birth of the deity. The God of Genesis 1:1, the God of the Bible, is not born.
⢠Sixth, for the first time in history, we are presented with a god who is completely separate from natureâbecause God created nature. God, for the first time, is not part of nature.
⢠Seventh, for the first time in history, the Creator and the act of creation are completely desexualized.
All of that is contained in this opening verse of the Bible.
ON THE QUESTION âWHO CREATED GOD?â
As noted above, Genesis 1:1 is completely silent with regard to Godâs origins. All prior creation stories contained descriptions of how the gods came into existence (these are called âtheogoniesâ). Therefore, Genesis 1:1 begins not with Godâs originsâbecause He has noneâbut with God acting (creating the world).
For this reason, the question âWho created God?â while meaningful regarding pagan religion, is meaningless with regard to the God of the Bible. If God were created, God wouldnât be God. Godâs creatorâweâll call him Godâs Dadâwould be God. But the same people who ask âWho created God?â would then ask âWho created Godâs Dad?â And after that, they would ask âWho created Godâs Dadâs dad?â Ad infinitum. People who ask this question would feel intellectually at home in the pagan world where this question was meaningful.
If God were created, God wouldnât be God. Godâs creator would be God. But the same people who ask âWho created God?â would then ask âWho created Godâs Dad?â
The question is akin to asking, âWhat is the highest number?â and after being told âgoogolplex,â asking, âWhat about googolplex plus one?â It is playing with words, not serious thought. The God of Genesisâthe God the Western world came to affirmâis the First Cause, Who always was and always will be. That cannot be said about any other ancient god.
Skeptics will respond that just as the theist posits God always existed, the atheist posits the universe always existed. But this is untenable on both scientific and logical grounds.
Regarding science, the predominant view at this time is the universe did indeed have a beginning, what is popularly known as the Big Bang. This has disturbed scientists committed to atheism. Some have therefore posited an infinite number of Big Bangs and/or the existence of the âmultiverse,â an infinite number of universes. But this is truly a statement of faith because there is no possible way of finding another universe. Nor is there evidence for an infinite number of Big Bangs.
The logical argument is this: How does the atheist explain existence? Why is there anything? To that, the atheist has no answer. The theist has a plausibleânot provable, but easily the most logically compellingâanswer: A Creator. God.
ESSAY: GODâS EXISTENCE
Given the supreme importance of Genesis 1:1âthat is, of Godâs existenceâto life, to meaning, and to morality; and given the Bible rests on this verse and its premise of Godâs existence, a brief review of the rational arguments for Godâs existence is necessary.
The most compelling rational argument is, as noted, the question âWhy is there anything?â Science and atheism have no answer to this question. Nor will either ever have an answer. It is outside the purview of science. Science explains what is. But it cannot explain why what is came aboutâwhy something, rather than nothing, exists. Only a Creator of that something can explain why there is something rather than nothing.
Science cannot explain why something, rather than nothing, exists.
It is true that the existence of a Creator cannot be scientifically proved. Given that a Creator is outside of nature and that science can prove only that which is within nature, the fact that science cannot prove Godâs existence is not meaningful.
Moreover, a Creator remains the only rational explanation for existence. And if only one thing can explain something, it is overwhelmingly likely that one thing is the explanation. The only alternatives are a) creation created itself from nothing or b) creation always existed. But each of these propositions is considerably less rational than a Creator, and neither can ever be proved.
Nor can science explain the emergence of life on earth. It is as mystified by the emergence of life from non-life as it is by the emergence of non-life from nothing. Again, only a Creator can explain that.
And science cannot explain consciousness. Why are human beings (and perhaps, to a much lesser degree, some animals) self-aware? To the best of our knowledge, nothing else in all the universe is self-aware. How did self-aware creatures emerge in a universe of non-awareness?
To be an atheist is to believe the universe came about by itself, life came from non-life by itself, and consciousness came about by itself.
On purely rational groundsâthe grounds on which I believe in Godâthe argument for a God who created the world is far more intellectually compelling than atheism.
It is not belief in the existence of a Creator God that most troubles intellectually honest people; it is the existence of unjust sufferingâboth natural (diseases, earthquakes) and man-made (murder, torture). In other words, the intellectually honest atheist should acknowledge that the existence of the universe, of life, and of consciousness argue for God; and the intellectually honest believer should acknowledge that the amount of unjust suffering challenges faith in a good God.
However, I have never met a believer in God who has not acknowledged this challenge, whereas atheists, by definition, do not acknowledge the overwhelming evidence for a Creator. If they did, they would no longer be atheists; they would be believers or agnostics. To paraphrase the American rabbi and theologian Milton Steinberg (1903-1950), the believer has to account for the existence of unjust suffering; the atheist has to account for the existence of everything elseâfor the world, life, consciousness, beauty, love, art, music. It would seem the believer has the upper hand.
So, then, how do believers in the good God of the Bible rationally affirm their faith?
The primary rational arguments are these:
It does not make rational sense that the Creator wouldnât care about His creations.
It does not seem likely that the Creator of beings who care about good and evil does not Himself care about good and evil.
It does not seem likely caring beings were created by an uncaring Creator.
I believe the most intellectually honest response to all the unjust suffering in the world is not to deny God exists, but to be occasionally angry with God. That is, in fact, one of the reasons I believe in the God of the Bibleâbecause the name of Godâs People is âIsrael,â which means âStruggle with Godâ (see the commentary to Genesis 32:29). The very Book that introduced God to humanity invites us to fight with and even get angry with that God.
If Genesis described exactly how the world was created, it would be unintelligible to us, let alone to all those who preceded us over the past three thousand years.
Finally, I believe God is good because this Bookâthe Bibleâmakes such a compelling case for Godâs goodness. If after reading this commentary, the reader is not persuaded the world is governed by a just and good God, I will have failed my primary task in writing this commentary.
ESSAY: DO SCIENCE AND GENESIS CONFLICT?
A major barrier to many modern men and women taking the Bible seriously is the belief that science and Genesis conflict and, consequently, that religion and science c...