Chapter 1
Astrophysical black holes
Pedro R. Capelo
Center for Theoretical Astrophysics and Cosmology
Institute for Computational Science
University of Zurich
Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 ZĆ¼rich, Switzerland
[email protected] In this chapter, we introduce the concept of a black hole (BH) and recount the initial theoretical predictions. We then review the possible types of BHs in nature, from primordial, to stellar-mass, to supermassive BHs. Finally, we focus on the latter category and on their intricate relation with their host galaxies.
1.The concept of a black hole and the first predictions
All objects in the Universe are gravitational āholesā. Given the mass and size of a system, there is always a finite speed that needs to be overcome in order to escape its gravitational well. This is the well-known Newtonian concept of the escape velocity, which can be derived by equating the sum of the kinetic and gravitational potential energy of a particle at the surface of the object to zero, and applies to all matter ā from apples to planets, from stars to galaxies. Such a simple calculation was performed by Michell (1784) ā see also Laplace (1796) ā when considering light particles with a finite mass and speed, to speculate on the existence of objects (so-called ādark starsā) from which light could not escape. These objects must therefore have a radius smaller than
where Mā¢ is the mass of the object, G is the gravitational constant, c is the speed of light in vacuum, and the subscript āSchwā refers to Schwarzschild, for reasons that will become apparent below.
The key feature of these objects is not their mass nor their size, but their compactness C, defined as the ratio between the value given by Equation (1) and the actual size of the system. Planets, stars, and galaxies have values of C of the order of 10ā9ā10ā6, whereas the known stellar compact objects ā white dwarfs and neutron stars ā have C ~ 10ā4ā10ā1. Only when C reaches 1 do we have a system in which gravity is strong enough that nothing can escape (assuming that c cannot be overcome).
Michellās remarkable intellectual achievement, made using simple Newtonian physics (and assuming the corpuscular theory of light), was confirmed a little more than a century later, shortly after the publication of the theory of general relativity (GR; Einstein, 1915, 1916), when the first exact vacuum solution to Einsteinās field equations was found by Schwarzschild (1916) ā see also Droste (1917); Weyl (1917) ā for the case of a spherical, non-electrically charged, non-rotating system. The Schwarzschild metric can be described by (Hilbert, 1917)
where ds2 is the space-time line element and the solution is written in spherical coordinates (t, r, Īø, and Ļ), using the LandauāLifshitz spacelike convention (Landau and Lifshitz, 1962; Misner et al., 1973).
Even though the right-hand side of Equation (2) diverges at both r = 0 and rSchw, only the former is a true physical singularity (i.e. the Riemann curvature tensor is infinite only at r = 0), with the space-time being nonsingular at the so-called Schwarzschild radius.a However, the Schwarzschild radius is of fundamental importance, as the radial coordinate of a particle travelling towards the centre changes from spacelike to timelike when crossing rSchw, meaning that the only possible future of that particle is the singularity.b Meanwhile, an external static observer will never observe such a boundary (or event horizon) crossing, as the observed time will be infinite (even though the proper time of the particle is finite). Moreover, any radiation sent from such particle and reaching any external observer will be infinitely redshifted. In other words, a photon sent from rSchw would need infinite energy to reach the observer, effectively making the space-time region within the event horizon causally disconnected from the rest of the Universe. For these reasons, objects with an event horizon (i.e. with C = 1) are called BHs.
After the publication of the Schwarzschild solution, other exact solutions to Einsteinās field equations were found, in the case of electrically charged (Reissner, 1916; Nordstrƶm, 1918), rotating (Kerr, 1963), and rotating, electrically charged BHs (Newman et al., 1965). One peculiarity of BHs is that they are extremely simple. In fact, they can be described at most by three parameters: mass, spin (i.e. angular momentum), and electric charge ā this is referred to as the āno hairā theorem (see, e.g. Israel, 1967). Moreover, in typical astrophysical environments, it is believed that electrically charged BHs cannot exist, as any existing electric charge would be quickly cancelled by the charges in the surrounding plasma (or by spontaneous production of pairs of oppositely charged particles; see, e.g. Gibbons, 1975; Blandford and Znajek, 1977). For this reason, the most complete description for an astrophysical BH is the Kerr metric, which depends only on mass and spin.
Using the BoyerāLindquist (Boyer and Lindquist, 1967) coordinates, one can write down the Kerr metric such that the radial coordinate of the event horizonc is
where
a ā”
c/(
) is the BH spin and
its angular momentum. The value of |
a| can vary between 0 (recovering the Schwarzschild BH) and 1 (for a maximally spinning BH
d), and its sign depends on the particle orbit we consider: 1 and
ā1 for corotating and counterrotating orbits (with respect to the BH angular momentum), respectively. If we take a BH with |
a| = 1,
the radial coordinate of the event horizon is half of that of a Schwarzschild BH (i.e.
rKerr =
rSchw/2).
More importantly, the orbits of massive particles around Kerr BHs vary depending on the value of a. When a = ā1, 0, and 1, the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO) a massive particle can have is of a radius rISCO = 4.5, 3, and 0.5 Ć rSchw, respectively. For r < rISCO, a particle can only spiral inwards (or outwards, if it has enough velocity to do so) and cannot maintain a stable circular orbit.e
The position of the ISCO has significant consequences on how much gravitational energy can be extracted from the gas in the vicinity of the BH (via accretion processes; e.g. Shakura and Sunyaev, 1973; Blandford and Payne, 1982), as the energy lost by particles increases as the distance from the BH decreases.f
In other words, the radiative efficiency
(i.e. how much of the rest energy of the accreting particle is released), given by
where
L and
ā¢accr are the accretion power (or luminosity) and the mass accretion rate, respectively, depends on the BH spin (e.g. in a NovikovāThorne disc, 0.06
0.42 for 0 ā¤
a ā¤ 1; Novikov and Thorne, 1973).
Indeed, astrophysical accreting BHs are believed to be normally surrounded by accretion discs (e.g. Shakura and Sunyaev, 1973), in which matter diffe...