I. Alexander Pope
In An Essay on Criticism, the young Alexander Pope observes that: âTrue Ease in Writing comes from Art, not Chance,/As those move easiest who have learnâd to danceâ (ll. 362â3). There is an element of pathos in this elegant couplet from the crippled, dwarfish (from spinal tuberculosis) Pope (no dancer he!). But the larger lesson Pope draws is that writing (and especially verse) is an acquired skill, a professional technique, a hard won mastery. At the same time, Pope links the highest literary craft to the larger cultural and social world compactly evoked in learning to dance, thereby demystifying poetry to some extent as an exalted or privileged cultural practice. Popeâs poem outlines the difficulties of acquiring that skill, dispensing advice not just to wouldâbe critics and appreciators of verse but to poets themselves, who are urged to âFirst follow Natureâ (l. 68), that is to imitate the natural order and regularity of the cosmos, qualities enshrined in the ancient âRULES of old,â which were not, he reminds us, arbitrarily âdevisâdâ but âdiscoverâdâ (l. 88) by the ancient writers. So one must study the classics, especially Homer: âBe Homerâs Works your Study, and Delight,/Read them by Day, and meditate by Nightâ (ll. 124â5) and Virgil, âAnd let your Comment be the Mantuan Museâ (l. 129). But the crucial next step from the general imperatives of observing âNatureâ and imitating the classics is the hard work of specific poetic elaboration and articulation: âTrue Wit is Nature to advantage drest,/What oft was thought, but neâer so well Exprestâ (ll. 297â8), as Pope puts it in a famous summarizing couplet.
Popeâs emphasis is on the form of poetry rather than its content, although among the errors in judgment he condemns is judging âby Numbers,â that is by metrical smoothness (ll. 337â8). Such âtuneful Foolsâ seek only to please their Ear:
Not mend their Minds; as some to Church repair,
Not for the Doctrine, but the Musick there.
(ll. 342â3)
Overall, however, for Pope poetry would seem to be the art of memorable and forceful ârestatement,â as it were. Samuel Johnson remarked to James Boswell in 1781 of Popeâs virtuosity as a poet, as a peerless master of technique: âSir, a thousand years may elapse before there shall appear another man with a power of versification equal to that of Pope.â1 In his âLife of Popeâ in The Lives of the Poets (1779â81), Johnson finds in Popeâs An Essay on Man (1733â4), a poem he disliked as banal and selfâsatisfied, an extraordinary triumph of form over nearly empty subject matter, a perfect exemplification of what oft was thought but neâer so well expressed:
Popeâs work represents the poetic high point of the first half of the eighteenth century, recognized as such by Johnson, the greatest critic of the latter part of the century. Johnsonâs praise of Popeâs skill emphasizes his command of stylistic and tonal variations from dignity to softness; the âcontractionâ and âamplificationâ he so admires speak to Popeâs control and sense of pacing, his avoidance of the monotony and clockwork predictability to which the rhyming couplet in lesser hands is prone. At the beginning of his âLife of Pope,â Johnson muses on Popeâs beginnings as a poet who recognized that he was the heir to the style of verse that Dryden had perfected: âDryden died May 1, 1701 [actually 1700], some days before Pope was twelve, so early must he therefore have felt the power of harmony, and the zeal of geniusâ (XXIII, 1041). Johnson quotes Dryden on the affinities between poetry and music, the latter being for Dryden âinarticulate poetry,â and thus says Johnson âamong the excellencies of Pope, therefore, must be mentioned the melody of his metreâ (XXIII, 1225). In his âLife of Dryden,â Johnson quotes Popeâs praise of Dryden in An Essay on Criticism: âWaller was smooth; but Dryden taught to join/The varying verse, the fullâresounding line,/The long majestick march, and energy divine.â For Johnson Dryden is nothing less than the inventor of modern English verse in its fullness and metrical sweetness: âDryden knew how to chuse the flowing and the sonorous words; to vary the pauses, and adjust the accents; to diversify the cadence, and yet preserve the smoothness of the metreâ (XXI, 491).
Johnsonâs âmelodyâ of versification is, largely, a subjective feature that is hard to pin down (the âsmoothnessâ he speaks of might be a better, less metaphorical term), but one always hears in reading Pope and his great predecessor, Dryden, language and rhythms that to our contemporary ears sound unforced, invariably eloquent and stylized speech, but restrained and controlled, creating to some extent a cultivated and always urbane voice speaking to us rather than shouting or hectoring. Although bombast and declamatory excess are common enough in lesser eighteenthâcentury verse, as we shall see, Pope we may say could learn from reading Dryden how to avoid it.
Consider as two examples of what Pope would have absorbed from his predecessor but at the same time altered by his distinctive style. First, here are the opening lines of Drydenâs satire, Mac Flecknoe (1681), an attack on his rival dramatist and poet, Thomas Shadwell. Flecknoe muses about who shall succeed him as the emperor, as it turns out, of dull and supremely bad writing:
All humane things are subject to decay,
And, when Fate summons, Monarchs must obey:
This Fleckno found, who, like Augustus, young
Was callâd to Empire, and had governâd long:
In Prose and Verse, was ownâd, without dispute
Through all the Realms of Nonâsense, absolute.
Drydenâs poem is a mockâheroic satire, employing in these opening lines the tone and diction of heroic verse (the âmelodyâ or the smoothness that Johnson praised in his verse), with its dignified evocations of timeless truths as they apply to the mortality even of monarchs ironically inappropriate for what will be revealed as inane, utterly worthless and nonsensical writing, and of course in the reference to Augustus Dryden invokes what seems at first like a temporarily resonant equation between Flecknoeâs empire of (bad) writing and t...