Ethics in Forensic Psychology Practice
Randy K. Otto, Alan M. Goldstein, Kirk Heilbrun
- English
- ePUB (mobile friendly)
- Available on iOS & Android
Ethics in Forensic Psychology Practice
Randy K. Otto, Alan M. Goldstein, Kirk Heilbrun
About This Book
AN AUTHORITATIVE GUIDE TO THE CURRENT SPECIALTY GUIDELINES FOR FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY
Ethics in Forensic Psychology Practice is a comprehensive and authoritative resource that addresses major concerns of professionals who conduct evaluations, provide treatment, carry out research, as well as a guide for those who teach and train in diverse legal contexts. Including on the American Psychological Association's current Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychology, the standard measure for ethical and legal conduct, this important volume is organized around substantive practice issues that cut across various functions and roles. The authors include a range of topics such as training, business practices, roles, privacy, confidentiality, report writing, testifying, and more.
Frequently asked questions
Information
CHAPTER 1
Introduction
Overview and Context
Therapeutic Role | Forensic Examination Role | Forensic Treatment Role | |
Client | Service recipient | Referral source | Service recipient (and sometimes referral source) |
Decision maker | Service recipient | Examiner and referral source | Service recipient (and sometimes referral source) |
Goals of service | Improve client's functioning | Provide information to referral source about examinee's functioning as it relates to a legal issue | Improve service recipient's functioning as it relates to a legally relevant capacity, issue or mandate |
Psychologist's role | Aligned as advocate | Neutral | Aligned as advocate |
Psychologist's obligation | Assist therapy client | Provide information to referral source about examinee's functioning as it relates to a legal issue | Assist service recipient and provide information to referral source |
Confidentiality | Traditional psychologistâclient confidentiality | None if court ordered; Limited under some circumstances in a retained case | More limited than traditional psychologistâclient confidentiality |
Privilege | Traditional psychotherapistâpatient privilege | Attorney-client privilege in some retained cases | More limited than traditional psychotherapistâpatient privilege |
Sources of information | Client (with perhaps limited reliance on collateral data and informants) | Examinee (with considerable reliance on collateral data and informants) | Service recipient (with considerable reliance on collateral data and informants) |
Importance of diagnosis | Significant insofar as it directs treatment decision making | Limited (depending on legal question) | Significant insofar as it directs treatment decision making |
Utility of traditional psychological assessment tools | Significant insofar as it informs diagnostic formulation | Limited, with greater reliance on assessment tools designed for forensic assessment contexts | Significant insofar as it informs diagnostic formulation |
Some Preliminary Matters
Challenging Forensic Psychology's Historical Emphasis on Assessment and Neglect of Treatment
Although some therapeutic services can be considered forensic in nature, the fact that therapeutic services are ordered by the court does not necessarily make them forensic.In determining whether a therapeutic service should be considered the practice of forensic psychology, psychologists are encouraged to consider the potential impact of the legal context on treatment, the potential for treatment to impact the psycholegal issues involved in the case, and whether another reasonable psychologist in a similar position would consider the service to be forensic and these Guidelines to be applicable.