My interest here lies in presenting a limited and preliminary exploration of various issues related to the reception of music by two distinct populations of audiences for American war films. First, I consider those in the late nineteenth century who attended Love and War (1899; James H. White), a film about the SpanishâAmerican War, and those who saw âBreak the News to Motherâ (1897/1899; Charles K. Harris), an illustrated song slide show about the Civil War. Then I discuss modern audiencesâ experience listening to the music in Clint Eastwoodâs Flags of our Fathers (2006), a film about the battle for Iwo Jima. There is no way of determining if anyone in 1899 saw both the film and the slide slow. It is possible that a viewer of Eastwoodâs film might have seen one of the earlier works. In a way it does not really matter, because what is important is realizing what occurs as a viewer/auditor âhearsâ certain music in war films. My speculative and provisional hypothesis is that the way music was used in the earliest war films establishes a kind of paradigmatic model, making music into a text, a site onto which various examples of cultural and political history are inscribed. Audiences hearing music in the works from the nineteenth century and in Eastwoodâs from our own twenty-first can both be understood as experiencing the musical, auditory equivalent of a palimpsest. That is, like the mystic writing pad that retains traces of what was âwritten,â some music in war films continues to show impressions of the wars in which it figured and in some cases films in which it appeared, thus generating dynamic interaction between audiences and history.1
As I have indicated elsewhere, the war film genre can be said to have begun in 1898 during the SpanishâAmerican War, which was the subject of three kinds of film. First, âactualities,â such as Burial of the Maine Victims (1898), were essentially newsreel accounts of events. In at least one venue, New York Cityâs Proctorâs Theater, this film was accompanied by an orchestra and the playing of âTapsâ on a trumpet. According to one report, this produced a powerful reaction in the audience:
Second, âreenactmentsâ were films in which staged battles recreated specific encounters, such as US Infantry Supported by Rough Riders at El Caney (1899). Finally there were narratives, such as Love and War. This work can certainly be claimed not only as the first narrative war film, but, as far as I can tell, the first narrative film of any sort to use the word âwarâ in its title.3
This three-minute film, as it exists now in the Library of Congress print, has six scenes, each presented in a continuous shot from a stationary camera: (1) a youth leaves his anxious family to go to war; his brother holds the departing soldierâs rifle; (2) his mother, sitting next to the brother, reads the newspaper for accounts of him; (3) his father and another man come in with news that the soldier has been killed or wounded, producing anguish for all; (4) the brave soldier engages in battle, is wounded, and is rescued by his courageous comrade who dies saving him; (5) he is taken to a field hospital where a nurse prays over him; (6) he returns home and reunites with his family and girlfriend.
Exactly what audiences in November in 1899 saw during the presentation of this film is difficult to determine since the film available to us now differs from the one described both in the Edison Catalogue and in the advertisement for the film published in The New York Clipper, a well-known trade publication, seven days after the film was copyrighted.4 According to the Catalogue, Love and War is
The advertisement in the New York Clipper, a trade journal at the time, uses some of the language of the Edison Catalogue and adds two sentences:
The disparity between the film we have and the printed descriptions in the Edison Catalogue and the New York Clipper is made even more problematic by the explanation offered by the Library of Congress: âOnly four of the scenes described in the Edison Catalogue were submitted for copyright under the title Love and War and thus survive in the Libraryâs paper print copy; two other scenes were likely produced and, perhaps, copyrighted as separate films but then added to the Love and war picture sing and sold to fill out the description.â6 The advertisement does not mention the language from the Edison Catalogue about using soloists or presenting stereopticon slides. But both the Catalogue and Clipper describe the film as an âillustrated songâ and âsong picture.â According to Rick Altman, âillustrated songsâ had begun to appear as early as 1863 when the producer âTony Pastor bought lantern slide portraits of Civil War generals ⌠to illustrate his song âHeroes of the War.ââ He explains their history:
Since the illustrated song was focused on only one work, it is not clear why the Edison Catalogue gives this label to Love and War even as it identifies six illustrated songs within the film. In addition, the advertisement makes a claim that cannot be supported historically in regard to having âat last succeeded in synchronizing music and moving pictures.â Edison himself had already done this in the 1894 or 1895 short, The Dickson Experimental Sound Test, in which two men dance with each other. Shown originally on the kinetophone, the music was supplied by a wax cylindrical tube.8
An ...