Chapter 1
The Boost of Change Leadership
When Captain David Marquet took command of a Navy submarine for the first time in 1999, it was both a dream come true and a leadership nightmare. David had always wanted to be a submarine captain. He graduated near the top of his class at the U.S. Naval Academy. He trained for a year to take the helm at the USS Olympia. But at the very last moment, he was instead assigned to take the command of the USS Santa Fe, a much newer and faster ship, but also a ship with the worst performance track record in the Navy. In his first stint as a submarine captain, David found himself leading a vessel about which he knew nothing.
Taking his command, he discovered another problem: he noticed that people blindly followed directions from above and blamed âthemâ if the result fell short of the objective. This problem hit home one day when David gave a command (âtwo-thirds aheadâ) thatâunlike on the Olympiaâwas technically impossible to execute on the Santa Fe. The command was relayed forward by David's senior officer, but stalled when the helmsman sheepishly informed his captain that there was no âtwo-thirdsâ on the Santa Fe. When David asked his senior officer if he was aware of this fact, the response was, âYes, but you gave the order.â
It was high time for a change.
That evening, David gathered his officers and told them, âUnless you start announcing your intent rather than blindly repeating orders, this submarine is simply going to drive in a straight line.â David added, âIn fact, I am not going to give orders.â He also abolished the word âthey,â asking his people to instead say âwe.â
What changed? Everything. David's team of 135 sailors beganâfirst with skepticism and then with commitmentâto assume ownership, think about what they were doing, and strive for excellence rather than the mere avoidance of mistakes. Within a year, the crew went from the worst performing in the U.S. submarine fleet to the best, winning awards for performance and effectiveness while drastically increasing retention. Indeed, David had such lasting influence that the ship continued to win awards long after he moved on to new assignments. âThe trick is not to think yourself into a different way of acting,â David told me, âbut to act yourself into a different way of thinking.â1
David was unambiguously in charge of his ship, and he saw a need for change. He drove the change with purpose, and built a fundamentally different culture in doing so: one of performance and accountability. What he learned along the way was that everybodyâliterally everybodyâcan take ownership of his or her area of expertise. And when he or she is allowed to do so, âthe goodness is no longer tied to you as a person; it is tied to people and what they do.â The goodness, in other words, is tied to the culture. This is change leadership at work.
Change Leadership
Change leadership is about transforming and aligning an organization through its people to drive for improvement in a new and challenging direction. This competency creates a wave of change that allows any one person to have impact beyond his or her individual remit. Change leadership is not just about identifying necessary changes personally. It is possible, in fact, for someone to be a reasonably effective change leader without being a strategist. This competency is about driving change through the organization, getting others to want to change, and encouraging them to innovate themselves. What's more, it is not about forcing change on people but rather getting them on board and cultivating their willingness to accept, drive, and lead change. A critical element is the ability to engage people so that they want to change. And as we'll see in Chapter 6, engaging people means making them feel different about the need for change. It means finding something they truly care about.
An individual with a low level of the change leadership competency is someone who tends to think of the status quo as effective. This person may fail to see the need for change, but could still accept it if pressed. Others with low levels of this competency may accept that change is normal and think well of it in general termsâbut not be eager or proactive around the topic. An individual with midlevel competency in change leadership is one who begins to actively challenge the status quo, pointing out what needs to changeâthough not howâand tries to help people who are struggling with this concept. This person may also define a positive direction for change and make a case others can buy into, using logic to persuade people.
Those who have a highly developed change leadership competency actively promote change with an array of approaches to start mobilizing individuals to change. They build coalitions, foster diversity of thought, coordinate the change effort across multiple individuals, and take a more long-term, sophisticated approach to introducing change. They create champions who will mobilize others to change, ultimately creating organization-wide momentum around change. Those at the highest level of this competency cultivate this quality of change across highly complex organizations, or create a culture capable of constant change for improved results.
Change leadership is a critical competency at the early stage of sustainability transformation because it is so vital in building the momentum needed to get going. Owens Corning and its chief sustainability officer, Frank O'Brien-Bernini, provide a rich case study of this competency in action.
How Frank Rejuvenated Owens Corning
Frank O'Brien-Bernini remembers the moment he began his evolution in becoming a change leader. Standing in the office of his CEO, talking to the boss about the general need to embrace sustainability issues, something in the air shifted.
In fact, Frank recalls, there may not have been any pronouncements made. âIt was very short and sweet, led by the CEO's body language at that meeting. It was: OK, I've got it. I don't understand it, but I hear what you are saying and I trust that this is important.â It was unspoken but understood. Frank knew he had his marching orders.
With that, Frank both headed the company's R&D function and became its chief sustainability officer, even though no one had really clarified what that second title entailed. At the time, Owens Corning was operating under bankruptcy protection, so sustainability meant more than the traditional âgreenâ efforts. The very sustainability of the organization itself was on the line. Would Owens Corning emerge a viable business concern? Would it be a healthy, thriving organization in the future? Could it be, in this very stark business sense, sustainable? Frank believed that the âgreenâ sustainability and the business sustainability goals were necessarily and uniquely intertwined. One would open the door to the other.
Frank decided that to drive change, he needed muscle. From all corners of the company, he tapped individuals to serve on the company's first Sustainability Council. The members came from different divisions, critical functions, and different places on the hierarchy; notably, they did not share any one vision for the definition of sustainability. What they did share was organizational respect and influence: they were people who could get things done. This was a key decision by Frank. He didn't want a council full of tree-huggers. Instead, he wanted a diversity of opinion as to how sustainability should play out in a manufacturing environment. It was a challenging collection of individuals, not all of whom were willing. Frank recalls, âI had one person come to me and ask, âWhy am I here? I don't need to be here.ââ But if the council was to fulfill its role as part of the change process, that person did need to be there. The initial council was made up of a select cross-functional subset of the organization's most influential business leadersâtypical of the lean structure of the best newly minted sustainability teams.
Frank's first task was to help the council understand its mandate. There was plenty of debate around the table during those early meetings, he recalled. âWhen we would get together, it was a learning thing. Few knew what it was all about.â Many had questions like, âWhat is sustainability? Why does it matter? What is our role? Do our customers, employees, investors care? And the ultimate and potentially disempowering question: is our top leadership really committed to this?â
This kind of debate is not an uncommon or even undesirable part of a company's transformation process. In fact, it's essential as any organization moves along the sustainability continuum in pursuit of a culture of purpose. But it is also a bit of a danger zone because too often, ...