Pre-Obstetric Emergency Training

A Practical Approach

Mark Woolcock

• Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
• Year: 2018
• Print ISBN: 9781119348382
• eBook ISBN: 9781119348511
• Edition: 2
• Topic: Medicine
• Subtopic: Emergency Medicine & Critical Care

Pre-Obstetric Emergency Training: A Practical Approach, 2nd Edition

Fully revised and now in full colour, the new edition of Pre-Obstetric Emergency Training (POET) will help practitioners identify and manage a range of time-critical obstetric emergencies, specifically in the pre-obstetric department setting.

Providing structured examination and assessment techniques as an aid to determine what treatment should be provided before transport, this practical manual equips the practitioner with the knowledge necessary to save the mother and fetus in life-threatening circumstances before admission to the hospital. New to the second edition are chapters covering non-technical skills and communication, as well as complicated labour and delivery.

Designed to accompany the associated Advanced Life Support Group training course, Pre-Obstetric Emergency Training serves as an authoritative guide for a range of pre-hospital practitioners dealing with specialist situations.

CHAPTER 1
Obstetric services

---

Learning outcomes

After reading this chapter, you will be able to:

• Discuss the relationship between the different professional groups involved in the management of the obstetric patient
• Describe the function and importance of hand‐held records and how to use them effectively

---

1.1 Organisation of obstetric services, epidemiology of obstetric emergencies and role of the ambulance service, general practitioner and midwife

Organisation

Around 700 000 women a year use obstetric services. The birth rate in the United Kingdom (UK) has slowed in recent years following a rise throughout the last decade. Multidisciplinary teams provide maternity services with midwifery and obstetric medical staff working together to provide optimal care. Community midwives perform the majority of care in the out‐of‐hospital setting. Inpatient antenatal care is now uncommon and not usually for long periods. Similarly, the postnatal length of stay for all women, including those delivered by caesarean section, has been reduced with the majority of care occurring in the community.

General practitioners (GPs) have in recent years become less and less involved in all aspects of pregnancy care, although there are still a small number who are involved in care in labour.

Place of delivery

The Maternity Matters report confirmed that women should be the central focus of obstetric care, emphasising the need for those providing obstetric services to support women in making informed choices and to provide easy access to care (DoH, 2007). Women undergo a risk assessment prior to delivery to help them choose where to deliver. This assessment is undertaken by their midwife in conjunction with medical staff, if required, and will involve assessment of previous medical history, previous obstetric history and the progress of the current pregnancy. The women will then be offered advice to help them choose the place of birth.

A woman may choose to have a home birth; deliver in a midwife‐led unit, which may be either ‘stand‐alone’ or attached to a consultant‐led unit (co‐located); or deliver in a consultant‐led unit. Women may also choose to ‘free birth’: a growing phenomenon in which the baby is delivered unassisted and unattended by a healthcare professional. Whilst this is perfectly legal, one should note it is illegal for someone without midwifery qualifications to assist in the birth unless in an emergency.

The 2011 Birthplace in England study identified that nulliparous women (those having their first baby) were more at risk for adverse perinatal outcomes (stillbirth, neonatal encephalopathy, brachial plexus injury, clavicle fracture, etc.) with a planned home birth than multiparous women (BECG, 2011). There was no statistical increase in risk for adverse outcomes for nulliparous women delivering in a midwife‐led unit. It was found that for multiparous women, there is no increased risk for adverse outcomes between each planned place of delivery. It was also found that women who plan to deliver at home or in a midwife‐led unit are more likely to have a ‘natural’ birth with reduced interventions compared with those who deliver in an obstetric unit. Choosing an appropriate place of delivery relies on effective communication between healthcare professionals and women regarding any specific risk factors.

In the majority of cases, women choose the appropriate place to deliver their baby. Midwives have a duty of care to support the woman’s final choice of place for delivery even if there are factors that make this a high‐risk decision. Occasionally this causes difficulties, for example, in home delivery where access is poor, there is no phone signal or the home environment is less than ideal. Some women with a high‐risk pregnancy also request home delivery. As long as the woman has capacity (see Chapter 2), is informed of the risks to herself and her baby and is not under duress, she is entitled to make that decision.

Mode of delivery

The majority of deliveries are uncomplicated, however the national caesarean section rate is 26.2% of births. In contrast, the rate in 1990 was only 12%. Caesarean section delivery requires major surgery and can have significant associated risks for both mother and baby.

Common pre‐hospital emergencies

• Labour +/− delivery (term or preterm)
• Bleeding antenatally or postnatally (including miscarriage) and postoperative vaginal haemorrhage
• Abdominal pain other than labour
• Pre‐eclampsia and eclampsia (this is now less common: 2:10 000 cases due to the use of magnesium sulphate in hospital in at‐risk cases; however, this does mean that one of the more common places to have a convulsion will be in the community)
• Prolapsed umbilical cord

Transfer

Transfer may be necessary where risk factors develop before or during labour and after birth that necessitate moving the woman or baby from one location to another. Transfer may be required from all places of delivery.

In the 2011 Birthplace in England study, it was found that for the three non‐obstetric unit settings (home, stand‐alone midwifery unit and co‐located midwifery unit), transfer rates were much higher for nulliparous women (36–45%) than for m...

Table of contents

• Cover
• Table of Contents
• Foreword to second edition
• Preface to second edition
• Preface to first edition
• CHAPTER 1: Obstetric services
• CHAPTER 2: Legal and ethical issues
• CHAPTER 3: When things go wrong – a review of the MBRRACE‐UK and Ireland Maternity Mortality Reports 2014–17
• CHAPTER 4: Getting it right – non‐technical skills and communications
• CHAPTER 5: Anatomical and physiological changes in pregnancy
• CHAPTER 6: Structured approach to the obstetric patient
• CHAPTER 7: Collapse, cardiac arrest and shock in pregnancy
• CHAPTER 8: Emergencies in early pregnancy (up to 20 weeks)
• CHAPTER 9: Emergencies in late pregnancy (from 20 weeks)
• CHAPTER 10: Trauma, surgical and medical emergencies
• CHAPTER 11: Normal labour and delivery
• CHAPTER 12: Complicated labour and delivery
• CHAPTER 13: Emergencies after delivery
• CHAPTER 14: Resuscitation of the baby at birth
• CHAPTER 15: Assessment and management of the post‐gynaecological surgery patient
• Abbreviations
• Glossary
• References
• Further reading
• Index
• End User License Agreement