1.1 Introduction
It is an impossible task to do full justice, in one book, to the global automotive industry with the pervasive impact, economic significance and cultural status that it brings. As editors, our task is as much one of selective omission as one of collation, to create an account of the business of making, selling and using cars that is both representative and yet respectful of the diversity we know to be a feature of the industry. Moreover, this is an industry in the midst of reinventing itself. It had seemed to some both inside and outside the industry, around the turn of the millennium, that this was a âsunsetâ industry characterized by over-capacity, plant closures, job losses, declining profitability and a product that seemed unsuited to meeting the environmental and social challenges arising from mass car ownership and use. The combination of profound environmental pressures and endemic economic distress appeared to call into question the pre-eminent position enjoyed by the car in providing for personal mobility and the viability of the industry behind this most contradictory of products. These concerns came to a peak with the arrival of the global economic crisis around 2007â2008, which resulted in new car sales falling steeply in the established markets and investment freezing while the entire financial community held its collective breath to see whether the world would plunge into an economic abyss. Those looking closely at urban developments and the changing cultural priorities of young people started to whisper about the concept of âpeak carâ in which the high tide of automobility had been reached in the saturated markets of the European Union, North America, Japan and Korea.
Yet, only a few years later, the industry has reemerged, burnished by the embrace of new technologies and with resurgent sales in the previously moribund West being more than matched by the frenetic growth of sales in China and elsewhere. Regulatory interventions such as the European Union fleet average carbon emissions targets that were once seen as burdensome and punitive have arguably helped stimulate the technological renaissance of the industry alongside the realization that there might be other routes to profitability. Later chapters in the book are more concerned with this recent period of transformation and the possible futures it portends: Chapter 16, for example, is about the impact of the electric vehicle, while Chapter 18 links technology change with possible innovations in business models forced on the industry by such technological changes. Chapter 19 is more speculative, but offers up some signposts for the future of automobility and the automotive industry.
This is not to say that the process of change has been without stress or consequence. Restructuring of the industry has continued apace: the merger of Chrysler and Fiat came as a consequence of several years of corporate turmoil while the rescue of PSA by the French government and by the Chinese company Dongfeng costs the Peugeot family their control over this long established business â the oldest in the industry. The great expectations held for battery electric vehicles remain as yet largely unrealized, despite the highly visible and expensive efforts of companies like Nissan, Renault and BMW alongside the publicity-garnering machine that is Tesla. In the meantime, high-profile failures such as the battery swap business Better Place serve as stark reminders that attempts to reinvent this industry, especially by new entrants, are fraught with hazard. At the same time, markets in the European Union have not really recovered to pre-crisis levels and perhaps never will.
So, despite an apparent âbusiness-as-usualâ attitude permeating the automotive industry at the moment, in reality, it is subject to potentially radical change. Only a few years ago, we saw two of the worldâs largest car manufacturers, General Motors and Chrysler, on the brink of collapse. Having decided both were âtoo big to failâ, they had to be bailed out by the American tax-payer. Ford managed without direct government support, but it is nevertheless quite clear that the collapse of the supply base that would have resulted from a collapse of both their key domestic competitors, GM and Chrysler, would also have dragged down Ford in due course. Within a matter of months, the worldâs most prominent car industry and the oldest mass production car industry could have disappeared; only intervention from the public sector saved this key component of the private sector, underlining that, apart from anything else, the close synergies and intertwined relationships continue to exist between the private and public sectors in developed countries (Mazzucato, 2013). This highlights not only the weaknesses inherent in the close links between the financial and car systems but also indicates that the current mass production system, whether seen as Fordist or Buddist (see below), may well be due for a rethink in several respects.
In Europe, the apparent success of Germany, more recently the UK automotive industry, is easily misunderstood, leading perhaps to overconfidence, but do note that the secret of success in Europe is largely confined to the more upmarket segments, with the Germans the primary beneficiaries, and that this success is very reliant on demand from Asia, particularly China; it has therefore made Europe â and also the United States, particularly GM â very dependent on that far from stable market, as also outlined in more detail in Chapter 10. At the same time, pressures to make the car more environmentally compatible, as we see it, have not only led to cars with much less harmful tailpipe emissions, but the more recent pressure to reduce the carbon footprint of cars, particularly focused on their emissions of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide, has the potential to radically reshape the industry and its products. These regulatory pressures are reviewed in Chapter 14, although the potential impact of this agenda is not yet fully understood, but it has already led to a new wave of alternative powertrain vehicles in the market, ranging from early petrol-electric hybrids â including the now iconic Toyota Prius â via so-called range-extended and plug-in hybrids such as the GM Volt and Ampera, to full battery-electric vehicles such as the Nissan Leaf, Renault Zoe and Tesla Model S. Such developments, as well as the introduction of the even more radical BMW i3, which not only introduces a full battery-electric powertrain, but also houses this within a radical departure from the tried and tested âBuddistâ (see Chapter 5) all-steel body in using a carbon fibre body on an aluminium chassis, are clear signs that business-as-usual is steadily being undermined even from within the established industry.
Despite the size of the industry, car making is in reality a very precarious business. In its present form, it lacks resilience; it is not sustainable. This is true not just in terms of environmental sustainability, where it clearly is not measuring up, but even in terms of basic, economic sustainability. Yet, this industry is still crucially important, representing a significant part of the economy in many industrialized countries, as well as many newly industrializing economies, notably China. In addition, the car-based transport system, or âregimeâ (Geels et al., 2012), which extends well beyond the industry that makes cars to the way in which automobility has become integrated in our societies and cultures, has become so embedded that its removal would lead to widespread social and economic crisis.
In some regards, therefore, this book may be a testimony to a dying era as much as a hymnal to a new one. Thus far the automotive industry has managed to contain the pressures for change, both economic and environmental, within the broad ambit of the long-standing business model of the mainstream vehicle manufacturers. In parallel, those purchasing and using cars in the traditional manner have remained by far the majority compared with more innovative solutions such as car clubs, city car sharing schemes and other alternatives that might presage the end of established automobility cultures. The question is whether the collective and cumulative impact of all the new developments sweeping through the industry will be sufficient to herald the arrival of a new âautomotive ecosystemâ as some have termed it, or âregimeâ, according to others, and one in which the dominance of the established vehicle manufacturers and their entrenched supply chains is challenged by a new order of communications and mobility providers. Some caution on these issues is urged here. The automotive industry is not immune to hype cycles or the fevered imaginations of those professional change-mongers with a vested interest in fermenting and emphasizing the new over the continuous.