THE CONCEPT OF MINDFULNESS
Mindfulness has become something of a boom industry over the last few decades, thanks largely to the work of Jon Kabat-Zinn (1990) who developed a Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) programme in his work at the Massachusetts Medical School in 1979. Since then the work of Kabat-Zinn and associates (Kabat-Zinn, 2005; Segal, Williams and Teasdale, 2002; Williams et al., 2007; Williams and Kabat-Zinn, 2013) has been responsible for a massive global expansion of interest in mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) in a diverse range of domains including work in schools, prisons, workplaces and hospitals, in addition to wide applications in psychology, psychotherapy, education and medicine. An Internet search on the concept of mindfulness retrieves around 18 million items and, in terms of publications, numbers have grown from one or two per year in 1980 to around 400 per year in 2011 (Williams and Kabat-Zinn, 2013, p. 3; the growth of mindfulness publications has been exponential over the last few years, see American Mindfulness Research Association, https://goamra.org/).
In accounting for this burgeoning interest in the idea of mindfulness we are immediately faced with questions of definition, meaning and interpretation. What is the relationship between the concept of mindfulness which informs Buddhist traditions and that which is utilised in the treatment of addictions and chronic pain sufferers? Moreover, is there a coherent concept which connects mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) programmesâfor example, the treatment of cancer sufferers (Bartley, 2012), addiction therapy (Baer, 2006) and care of elderly people in nursing hoems (Langer, 1989)âwith the use of mindfulness in education (Hyland, 2011)?
Thich Nhat Hanh (1999)âthe renowned Vietnamese Buddhist teacher and campaigner for world peace and justiceâdescribes mindfulness as being âat the heart of the Buddha's teachingsâ. It involves âattention to the present momentâ which is âinclusive and lovingâ and âwhich accepts everything without judging or reactingâ (p. 64). Kabat-Zinn (1990, 1994) and associates have been largely responsible for transforming the original spiritual notion (i.e. the training of the mind to alleviate suffering in ourselves and others) into a powerful and ubiquitous therapeutic tool based on forms of meditation and mindful practices. Mindfulness simply means âpaying attention in a particular way: on purpose, in the present moment and non-judgmentallyâ in a way which ânurtures greater awareness, clarity, and acceptance of present-moment realityâ. Such practiceâwhether this involves breathing or walking meditation or giving full non-judgmental attention to everyday activitiesâcan offer a âpowerful route for getting ourselves unstuck, back in touch with our own wisdom and vitalityâ (Kabat-Zinn, 1994, pp. 4â5).
Bodhi (2013) explains that the original sati (the Pali word for mindfulness, smirti in Sanskrit) meant memory or recollection as originally interpreted by Rhys Davids the founder of the Pali Text Society in 1910. Another layer of meaning relating to âlucid awarenessâ using all the senses was added later and this forged the connection between the âtwo primary canonical meanings: as memory and as lucid awareness of present happeningsâ (ibid., p. 25).
Bodhi (2013) also points to the role of mindfulness (in addition to being the seventh strand of the path) in integrating other elements of the noble eightfold path, a role which Hanh (1999) also highlights in observing that:
There are, however, two aspects of the secular therapeutic conception of mindfulnessâas âbare attentionâ and non-conceptual, non-judgmental awarenessâwhich require explanation in terms of their difference from Buddhist traditional notions. Buddhist accounts of the awareness involved in sati indicate an awareness which is cognitive, discursive and goes beyond pre-conceptual bare attention to include the âperception of the body's repulsiveness, and mindfulness of deathâ. Moreover, there is âlittle evidence in the Pali canon and its commentaries that mindfulness by its very nature is devoid of conceptualizationâ (Bodhi, 2013, p. 28, original italics).
In addition, the work of Dreyfus (2013) on the cognitive dimensions of mindfulness has suggested that the non-judgmental features of the modern mainstream interpretation need to be modified in the light of original Buddhist emphases. Echoing aspects of Bodhi's analysis, Dreyfus contends that the âunderstanding of mindfulness/sati as present-centred non-evaluative awareness is problematic for it reflects only some of the ways in which these original terms are deployedâ (p. 45). Using Buddhagosa's (the 5th century Indian Buddhist scholar) commentaries, he concludes that:
Although many modern representations of mindfulness in the context of MBSR/MBCT programmes (Williams et al., 2007; Crane, 2009) implicitly contain this additional active dimension of awareness, Dreyfus is concerned to foreground and emphasise the important cognitive features of meditation. Through constant practice such insightful awareness uses evaluation of mental states to âgain a deeper understanding of the changing nature of one's bodily and mental states so as to free our mind from the habits and tendencies that bind us to sufferingâ (Dreyfus, 2013, p. 51). The crucial importance of developing such deeper insights into the nature of suffering are present in the literature on MBSR/MBCT but, as Teasdale and Chaskalson (2013) argue, they deserve much greater attention.
Gethin (2013) suggests that contemporary secular therapeutic mindfulness approaches could be said to portray a âminimalistâ account of the process and that the:
However, notwithstanding the presence of slightly different interpretations of mindfulness between older Buddhist traditions and modern strategies, the vast majority of commentators welcome the extension of mindfulness to therapeutic applications (Williams and Kabat-Zinn, 2013). Indeed, in the context of mindfulness practice in education, health services, psychology and psychotherapy, it could be argued that the new applications represent a dynamic and optimistic new wave of Western dharma comparable to earlier developments in Eastern traditions as the basic teachings travelled out from India to China, Sri Lanka, Tibet and Japan (Batchelor, 2011; Bazzano, 2014). Arguably, the efficacy of mindfulness practices in the historically neglected domain of the education of the emotionsâconcerned with fostering affective resilience and holistic mind/body wellbeingâin itself provides a powerful justification for the introduction of MBIs into schools and colleges (Siegel, 2007; Hyland, 2011, 2014a).
MINDFULNESS, MORALITY AND FREEDOM
Mindful practices such as breath meditation, walking meditation and mindful movement have been demonstrated to have positive impacts on the behaviour of people of all ages from school to lifelong learning (Burnett, 2011; Langer, 2003; Hyland, 2011). On the basis of fifteen years of utilising mindfulness techniques in American schools and colleges, Schoeberlein and Sheth (2009) argue that:
The suggestionâin both Buddhist contemplative traditions and modern therapeutic interpretationsâis that the practice of mindfulness leads naturally to the moral principles underpinning the noble eightfold path (Keown, 2005). Direct connections are made between the inner clarity that Siegel (2010) calls âmindsightââthe âfocused attention that allows us to see the internal workings of our own mindsâ (p. xi)âand the foundations of morality. This is brought out clearly in Kabat-Zinn's (2005) discussion of mindfulness and the moral life. As he suggests, the âwholesome mind and body statesâ resulting from the practice include:
All this seems both over-simplistic and not quite complete. We feel the same uneasiness here when faced with such notions as the Socratic idea that the truly wise man can never commit evil or that complete faith in God's goodness will guarantee a morally just society. Moreover, what of Aristotle's discussion of akrasiaâexamined in painstaking detail from a moral education perspective by Straughan (1982)âand the inevitable gap between thoughts, intentions and actions?
Many of these dilemmas have been raised in recent literature in response to Harrisâ The Moral Landscape (2010) which posits the idea that moral problems can be solved in just the same way that scientific or other everyday questions are answer...