1
Introduction
Having spent the first half of my engineering career in the design of motion control systems in computer peripheral equipment (digital tape recorders, disc memories and high speed line printers) and the second half in the design, manufacture and application of brushless motors, gearheads and slides, I have been both a user and a supplier of the various components used in high performance servo/control systems.
Time restraints in a typical one or two semester motion control/servo system course require that the text and class time devote a majority of their content to topics such as pertinent mathematics, LaPlace transform, linear system analysis, closed loop control theory and stabilization techniques. Little time can be devoted to a detailed presentation of the system components, which are typically presented in a cursory fashion only as needed to aid in the discussion of the system theory.
This book will extend such course work by providing an introduction to the technology of the major components that are used in every motion system.
A website is available (www.wiley.com/go/moritz) which will allow you to access a number of the figures in this book. You will be able to activate them, observe simulation activity, modify system parameters to observe the effect on system performance and print out the results. For example, in Figure 4.13 you can change the motor parameters (R, L, torque constant, etc.) or the load torque or the PI values to observe the effect on performance and stability. The figures that are accessible are identified throughout the book with (available at www.wiley.com/go/moritz) appended to their captions.
A system designer cannot become an expert in the design of system components. He will never fabricate his own motor or encoder, but he must understand the basics of those components in order to properly apply them and have successful discussions with his component suppliers.
I have found that one of the best sources of information about component technology is from the well written and timely application notes and white papers from component suppliers. Over the years I have accumulated a valuable file of such information and encourage everyone engaged in system design to do the same.
Since the time I used a Bendix G15 computer in the 1960s there have been amazing advances in computer technology and application software that now allow simulation of complete electromechanical systems, including both linear and nonlinear characteristics of all the components. Throughout this book, component and system simulation is used to demonstrate the use of this technology to display system operation. A number of programs, such as MATLAB® and Simulink® by The Mathworks, MapleSim by Maplesoft, Ansys by Ansoft and VisSim by Visual Solutions are available to perform such simulations. The simulations in this book have been created with VisSim.
The book consists of the following chapters:
Chapter 2 – A brief review of servo/motion control theory, including an introduction to the use of simulation for root solving and a review of sampled data technology.
Chapter 3 – Detailed descriptions of the main components used in the fabrication of electromechanical motion control systems.
Chapter 4 – A review of the various system characteristic functions showing how they can be described and analyzed by the use of computer simulation techniques. It also contains a summary of the dynamic equations describing eight basic building blocks, which form the foundation of most motion systems.
Chapter 5 – Contains design notes and simulations of five of the many systems I helped create.
1.1 Targeted Readership
This book will be useful to:
- Students at the senior undergraduate or graduate school level to supplement their standard systems text to provide detailed component and simulation information as an aid in the design and analysis of prototype systems.
- As a reference text for graduate school students in advanced system courses involved in detailed system design and component selection.
- Practicing engineers initiating a system design requiring background information about components unfamiliar to them and/or an introduction in the use of simulation techniques.
1.2 Motion System History
A detailed and complete history of the motion control field would alone require a book larger than this one. Therefore the following just covers some highlights in the field and some of the pioneers and their accomplishments and contributions to motion control.
Since the late 1800s mathematical analysis and design of motion control has been limited to modeling the system in terms of its classical Newtonian differential equations with constant coefficients since no method existed to model nonlinearites (saturation, dead band, hysteresis, etc.) At best, linear approximations of nonlinearities have been made and designs modified once prototype test results are obtained.
This approach resulted in the mathematical representation of the system being mostly correct for small signal excitation and having errors and unpredictability for large signals.
As of 1955, Truxal summed up the status as: “The highly developed design and analysis theories for linear systems, in contrast to the rather inadequate state of the art of analysis of non-linear systems, are a natural result of the well-behaved characteristics of a linear system.Techniques for the description of non-linear systems are still in the early stage of development, with only a limited range of problems susceptible to satisfactory analysis at this time” [1].
A considerable amount of work in analysis was devoted to creating various methods of predicting stability using graphical methods showing the characteristics of the poles and zeros of the system as a result of parameter variations. Once modeled this way, a prototype system was fabricated and tested to determine what modifications to the design were necessary to account for the nonlinearities, and these were then incorporated in the calculations to more closely model the system. As the technology advanced, methods were created to analyze nonlinearities, as represented by Phase-Plane analysis (1945) (limited to second order systems) and Describing Function analysis (1950) (subject to certain system frequency characteristics).
Obviously, the reason for “designing” a system on paper is to specify the various components and predict their ability to provide proper operation before expending the time and funds to actually fabricate the system. The more accurate the “prediction”, the less time it will take to complete the design.
By 1972, Tymshare Inc. of Palo Alto CA provided CSMP (Continuous System Modeling Program) which allowed simulation of systems with both linear and nonlinear blocks, operating from a main frame computer via I/O access by Teletype terminal and X/Y plotter. Bi-directional transmission of data over conventional telephone lines was slow; even a single loop simulation took as long as one hour to run and provide listed and graphical results.
Today, with the advent of the microprocessor, the PC and a wide range of simulation software, it is possible to simulate both the linear and nonlinear functionality of a complete system, combining the electrical and mechanical components and run a simulation in a matter of seconds. The “inadequate state of the art of the analysis of nonlinear systems” has been overcome.
System controllers now have rapid enough processing time such that they can perform their two main functions, that is, axis loop closure and stabilization, together with control of the functionality and interaction of all the machine axes in real time. Controllers are available that can perform such action with up to 64 axes. In addition, they can modify axis characteristics as a result of changing performance requirements; for example, software modification of stability parameters as load inertia changes.
Defining an exact time when the motion control field was started is of course not possible. It is a technology that has evolved over the past 200 years and advanced rapidly starting in the 1900s.
It is interesting that two of the earliest contemporaries in the field were James Watt (1736–1819) and Pierre-Simon, marquis de LaPlace (1749–1827). They most likely did not know each other, certainly did not consider themselves as “motion control designers” and were involved in totally opposite ends of the technology.
Watt was a “hands on” engineer, active in various aspects of the application of steam to industrial requirements. He invented an early feedback device, the fly-ball governor, which regulated the speed of an engine by controlling its supply of steam. The problem with this system was that it was often subject to oscillations; typically resolved by trial and error modifications, with no mathematical analysis involved.
LaPlace, on the other hand, was a famous French mathematician who was deeply involved in celestial mechanics, probability and field theory. He and Simeon-Denis Poisson (1781–1840) were involved with various transforms while working on probability. Although never involved in what we call motion control, one of the transforms named after him, the LaPlace Transform, is used routinely in motion control design and analysis.
Edward Routh (1831–1907) and Adolph Hurwitz (1859–1919) were also contemporaries who were specifically involved in motion control theory. Hurwitz polynomials are those which have all their zeros in the left half of the complex plane. Using this information Routh created the Routh–Hurwitz criteria, which is a simple test to determine whether a polynomial is a Hurwitz polynomial and, in turn, became the first practical test to determine the stability of a feedback control system.
Oliver Heaviside (1850–1925) was a self-educated mathematician who developed an operational calculus to solve differential equations by substituting “p” for the derivative term and thereby converting the differential equation into an algebraic equation. Although used successfully his methods were subject to much criticism by strict academics.
Harry Nyquist (1889–1976) performed work in 1932 on the use of feedback to stabilize telephone line repeater amplifiers used in long distance communications. He developed the well known Nyquist Stability Criteria which carried over into electromechanical system design. During World War II he was active in developing control systems for artillery equipment.
Harold Black (1898–1983) invented the negative feedback amplifier in 1927 which he described in a 1934 paper. He credited using Nyquist Stability Criteria to attack the stability problem created by negative feedback and discussed the effects of negative feedback, namely higher linearity, lower gain, lower distortion, higher bandwidth and reduction of nonlinearities in the forward path.
Hendrick Bode (1905–1982) extended Nyquist’s work on feedback amplifier design and created the well known Bode Gain/Phase plot used to graph the gain and phase of a system as a function of frequency. This allowed the determination of the gain and phase margin of the system or how to determine its conditional stability. In 1939 he worked on military fire control systems. He authored one of the classic texts in the field, Network Analysis and Feedback Amplifier Design.
Walter Evans (1920–1999) developed the technique of Root Locus analysis, which shows the variation of the poles of the closed loop system with changes in the open loop gain, providing a simple means of determining how to add compensation to improve stability and performance. He authored a classic text, Control System Dynamics, McGraw-Hill, 1954.
Nicholas Minorsky (1885–1970) performed extensive work in analysis and design of ship steering technology. In a 1922 paper he analyzed the properties of a “three term” controller which we today call...