Chapter 1
Lifeworthy Learning: Where Knowledge Goes in Learnersâ Lives
When fourth graders, high school sophomores, or college freshmen ask, âWhy do we need to know this?â we know what they are worried about. They donât see the meaningfulness of the topic on the table, at least not the meaningfulness for them. Theyâd like to feel that what theyâre learning today is knowledge for the future. Theyâd like to feel that it would contribute significantly to the lives they are likely to live. They are looking for what might be called, to borrow a phrase from business, return on investment (ROI), not just in monetary but in any termsâprofessional, civic, family, involvement with the arts, or understanding better the world we encounter daily.
Sometimes they are wrong to be skeptical. They canât see beyond the horizon of the week or month to how a particular bundle of knowledge might serve them well in the future in some way.
But sometimes they may be right. They may share an unease expressed by John Dewey in his 1916 work, Democracy and Education: âOnly in education, never in the life of farmer, sailor, merchant, physician, or laboratory experimenter, does knowledge mean primarily a store of information aloof from doing.â They may well suspect that the complicated steps of mitosis (the process of asexual cell division, in case youâve forgotten), details of the Boxer Uprising (in China at the end of the eighteenth century, opposing Western intrusions and influences), or multiple linear equations will not come up significantly or even often in the lives they are likely to live.
Likely to matter in the lives learners are likely to live: thatâs a very useful phrase, but itâs also a bit of a mouthful. So letâs attach a single word to it: lifeworthy, that is, likely to matter in the lives learners are likely to live.
Lifeworthy as Key
Whatâs lifeworthy learning is a broad qualitative judgment, and itâs one that young students in particular are not in a very good position to make. The complaining students might be right or wrong for that moment. But certainly the question of lifeworthiness is right for education broadly. How often is a particular fact, understanding, or skill likely to come up? With what importance? Would it grow in breadth and depth and significance over timeâor do we simply forget it?
When teachers expand the range of education to explore those six beyondsâintroducing twenty-first-century skills, new advances in the disciplines, interdisciplinary studies, and so onâthey display a concern with lifeworthy learning. They foresee that a curriculum of much wider than traditional scope speaks more powerfully to the lives learners are likely to live.
Indeed, educating for lifeworthy learning has always been central to what makes human beings human. David Christian, writing about âbig historyâ (which begins with the big bang and progresses by stages to the emergence of humans, early civilizations, and modernity), contrasts humans with other primates. Creatures like chimpanzees, for example, bright as they are in some ways, are living today essentially the same way that they did 1 million years ago. If, for an interesting measure, you estimate the share of energy they use from the overall flow of energy from the sun striking Earth, it remains essentially the same per chimp.
The story is radically different for human beings. Contemporary lifeways for human beings are hardly anything like their lifeways of 100,000 or even 500 years ago. The average energy use by each human and his or her activities (including electricity, heating, and goods that required energy for their manufacture) is several orders of magnitude higher than the energy share of our human ancestors, an attainment that comes with a dark side: our huge and precarious impact on the environment.
What has made this possible? Big brains? Sure. Speech? Certainly. The later development of writing? Absolutely. But most centrally, Christian urges, it is collective learningâin other words, education in its broadest sense of passing on lifeworthy learning to others. Itâs this that has allowed the human species to share, accumulate, and extend knowledge generation after generation. Itâs this that enables people today to search for the Higgs boson in physics or live out parts of their lives in Second Life, the vast online environment that itself constitutes a kind of culture, or simply have coffee at Starbucks made from beans from the other side of the world. Chimpanzees and a number of other creatures learn quite well, even with a measure of insight, but they show very little collective learning.
Education in its broadest sense gives knowledge much more of a lifeworthy future than it would otherwise have, dying with the learner. Early forms of educationâthe young in hunter-gatherer groups at the feet of the elders, the private tutors of the Roman elite, apprenticeship practices in the medieval guildsâsought in various ways to leverage collective learning toward a greater return on investment. Todayâs educational systems, despite our complaints that they are not doing as well as we would like, have a breadth simply astounding by the measure of even the recent past. Participation in education, as student, as teacher, as parent, as planner, as policymaker, as developer of materials, is participation in a fundamental aspect of what it is to be human.
Lifeworthy at Risk
Recognizing this, we also need to recognize a weirdness in formal education today that goes back to the uppity question. The lifeworthiness of the multitudinous facts and ideas in the typical curriculum is spotty. It seems not to have been thought through very carefully.
The default mind-set goes something like this: âThese are the things good to know. After all, they are there in the textbooks, and someone put them in the textbooks for some reason.â So most educational initiatives focus on signs of short-term success: doing well on assignments and scoring well on tests in the course of the school year, without much thinking about the long-term return on investment.
A more sophisticated defense of at least some conventional education would go something like this: âThese ideas are fundamental to our understanding of the world; they figure centrally in science, history, mathematics, literature.â Thatâs certainly better than âsomeone put them in the textbooks.â However, what if many of these ideas, central though they might be to particular disciplines or professions, hardly ever come up in significant ways in the lives most learners are likely to live? Are they truly worth learning?
It depends what we mean by worth. Maybe they are worth learning in some intrinsic sense, that is, good to know in principle. But that answer works only if they stay known. The hard fact is that our minds hold on only to knowledge we have occasion to use in some corner of our livesâpersonal, artistic, civic, something else. Overwhelmingly knowledge unused is forgotten. Itâs gone. Whatever its intrinsic value might be, it canât be lifeworthy unless itâs there.
Maybe we need to get beyond a presumptive âgood to know.â Knowledge is good to know only if there are occasions that call on it and keep it alive and available. To be worth knowing, knowledge has to go somewhere.
When Lifeworthy Thrives
Try This
What did you learn during your first twelve years of education that matters in your life today?
You might find it interesting to take a minute to jot down two or three topics or skills in answer to this question. But donât make it too easy for yourself. Letâs not count basic literacy and numeracy. Of course, those figure all the time in peopleâs lives. They are lifeworthy learning, no question. Such basics are not at issue here.
At the other end of education, letâs not count specifically professional knowledge. Iâm reminded here of the Gary Larson cartoon where, in the midst of surgery, one surgeon wonders aloud how many chambers the heart has. Of course, specifically professional learning is lifeworthy for that life. So not counting the most basic basics and not counting professional knowledge, what did you learn that matters in your life today?
To ask such a question is to look for knowledge that has already yielded a return on investment in our own experience. Iâve put this query informally to several dozen individuals over the past several years. The good news is that people often have exciting and even inspiring answers.
Here are a couple of favorite examples. One person pointed to the French Revolution, about the last thing I would have expected to hear, since my student experience of the French Revolution gave me little to celebrate. But here was this personâs comment: âThrough the French Revolution, I was able to understand the generalities of world conflictâfor instance, how the lack of freedom, poverty, overtaxation, weak economies, the struggle between the Church and state, or social inequity has always been a reason to engage in war.â Clearly for this learner, the French Revolution became much more than a pile of facts. It functioned as a lens through which he could see the troubles of the world in many other venues. For him, it was certainly lifeworthy learning.
Here is another example: âUnderstanding of energy and climate change issues . . . has not only proven useful in everything from everyday decisions about my transport and consumer choices, but also in political decisions, social interactions, and life philosophy.â We live in an age of ecological concern, but itâs questionable how many people take the dilemmas of our planet to heart. This person plainly does, and schooling contributed to the mind-set.
What people have to say about knowledge that has been important to them ranges from historical perspectives through ecological concerns to political responsibility, leadership skills, and on and on. Hereâs yet another example:
Of course, these examples celebrate the experience of particular individuals. Other students with very similar school experiences might not have made nearly as much of them. However, the point is that learning about the French Revolution or ecological concerns or the arts carries the potential for knowledge that lasts and matters to peopleâs lives.
Moreover, a close look at these examples reveals a key ingredient: these learners all generalized the significance of their experiences well beyond the obvious reach, to other facets of the world and to aspects of their personal beliefs and behavior.
When Lifeworthy Falters
The quadratic equation, that venerable and universal feature of algebra 1, offers a cautionary tale. Hereâs an activity I have done with a number of groups in various parts of the world.
Try This
- Question 1. How many people in the room at one time or another in the course of their precollege education studied quadratic equations? [Here, virtually all the hands in the room go up. Did your hand go up?]
- Question 2. How many people have used a quadratic equation in the last ten years? [Here, maybe only 5 percent or 10 perce...