Nutritional Management of Hospitalized Small Animals

Daniel L. Chan

• Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
• Year: 2015
• Print ISBN: 9781444336474
• eBook ISBN: 9781119052968
• Edition: 1
• Topic: Medicine
• Subtopic: Veterinary Medicine

Nutritional Management of Hospitalized Small Animals offers veterinarians, veterinary students and technicians a comprehensive reference to the latest information relating to the principles and practice of nutritional support in small animals that require hospitalization.

• Represents the definitive resource for small animal veterinarians in providing optimal nutritional support for their patients during hospitalization
• Discusses and demonstrates the most up-to-date techniques available for successfully implementing nutritional support for hospitalized small animal patients
• Provides step-by-step pictorial instructions on how to implement the most appropriate techniques for particular patients
• Reveals expected outcomes and possible complications along with strategies to minimize risk of complications

CHAPTER 1
Nutritional assessment in small animals

Kathryn E. Michel

Department of Clinical Studies, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Introduction

It is generally believed that hospitalized patients experiencing malnutrition are at greater risk of morbidity and mortality. There is ample evidence in human patients that this is the case, and while this association has not been clearly established in small animal patients, caloric intake has been found to be positively associated with hospital discharge (Mullen et al., 1979, Brunetto et al., 2010). Despite the lack of a proven direct causal relationship between impaired nutritional status and poor clinical outcome, the assumption is that the prevention or correction of nutritional deficiencies should minimize or eliminate the risk of nutritionally associated morbidity and mortality.

Inadequate food intake is a very common presenting complaint in small animal practice and only a minority of dogs and cats achieve adequate voluntary food intake during hospitalization (Remillard et al., 2001). The task of identifying and determining the magnitude of malnutrition in a patient and deciding whether steps need to be taken to address the problem is complicated by several factors. First, the degree of malnutrition and its impact on a patient’s body composition, metabolism and functional status varies considerably with the extent of insufficiency of calorie and nutrient intake, the patient’s illness and other physiological demands (See Chapter 11). Furthermore, as many of the parameters used to assess the nutritional status of patients are substantially affected by illness and injury, it is therefore difficult, if not impossible, to gauge the extent to which malnutrition, as opposed to the underlying disease, has contributed to changes in any given parameter. Alterations in visceral proteins (e.g., albumin, transferrin), markers of immune function (e.g., total lymphocyte counts, intradermal skin testing), and body composition (e.g., weight loss, skin fold thickness, body condition scoring) have all been explored as markers of nutritional status in both human and small animal patients (Mullen et al., 1979, Otto et al., 1992, Michel 1993). Additionally, functional tests such as grip strength and peak expiratory flow rate and sophisticated body composition analysis using dual X-ray absorptiometry, bioelectrical impedance and other modalities have been investigated in human patients (Hill, 1992). Ultimately, however, the diagnostic accuracy of these tests remains unknown because there is still no universally accepted “gold standard” of malnutrition with which these tests can be compared.

The recognition that a true “diagnostic test” for malnutrition might not be forthcoming caused a shift in perspective on nutritional assessment. Many of the parameters used to assess malnutrition have been found to be associated with clinical outcome. While they might not be specific markers of nutritional status (many could be deranged for reasons other than malnutrition), they could be used as prognostic indicators. Thus nutritional assessment has evolved into a prognostic, rather than a diagnostic instrument. The techniques that are used to assess nutritional status are those known to be associated with malnutrition, and these have proven to be useful in predicting which patients are more likely to suffer complications. Patients are selected for nutritional support not simply because they are malnourished but rather on the basis of whether nutritional support might have an impact on their clinical outcome. The corollary is that there are malnourished patients for whom providing nutritional support, with its inherent risks and cost, will confer no benefit.

Indications for nutritional assessment

The importance of nutritional assessment is receiving growing recognition in small animal medicine (Freeman et al., 2011). All hospitalized patients should undergo nutritional assessment as part of their initial work up. Given the likelihood that the majority of patients will have inadequate voluntary food intake throughout their hospitalization, the task of nutritional assessment will allow early identification of that subset of patients who are truly at risk, and thus enable prioritization of time and resources for addressing the needs of those patients. The process of nutritional assessment can also facilitate decision-making with regard to selecting an appropriate diet for the patient, deciding whether assisted feeding is indicated and, if it is indicated, determining the best route of assisted feeding for that patient. Furthermore, a properly done nutritional assessment will permit the clinician to anticipate potential complications and develop a feeding plan that will monitor for and minimize the risk of those complications.

Methods of nutritional assessment

There have been only limited investigations of prognostic markers of nutritional status in small animal patients. Admission serum albumin concentration has been shown to correlate with risk of mortality in critically ill dogs (Michel, 1993). In the same population, admission body condition score and lymphocyte count did not correlate with outcome. Intradermal skin testing has been shown to be a feasible means of evaluating cell-mediated immunity in cats but whether this test is associated with nutritional status or is predictive of clinical outcome has not yet been investigated (Otto et al., 1992). Also noted in feline patients is an association between elevation of serum creatinine kinase activity and anorexia which resolves upon reintroduction of food (Fascetti, Mauldin and Mauldin, 1997).

For human patients a rapid, simple, ‘bedside’ prognostic tool for nutritional assessment called subjective global assessment (SGA) has been in use for approximately 3 decades (Baker et al., 1982). The technique was designed to utilize readily available historical and physical parameters to identify malnourished patients who are at increased risk for complications and who will presumably benefit from nutritional intervention. The assessment involves determining whether nutrient assimilation has been restricted because of decreased food intake, maldigestion or malabsorption, whether any effects of malnutrition on organ function and body composition are evident, and whether the patient’s disease process influences its nutrient requirements. The findings of the historical and physical assessment are used to categorize the patient as A: well nourished, B: moderately malnourished or at risk of becoming malnourished, and C: severely malnourished. SGA has been investigated for its ability to identify patients at risk of medical complications in diverse patient populations, and has been shown to have excellent inter-observer agreement and better predictive accuracy than traditional markers of nutritional status (Keith, 2008).

The SGA can easily be adapted to veterinary patients. The patient history should be assessed for indications of malnutrition, including evidence of weight loss and the time frame in which it has occurred, sufficiency of dietary intake including the nutritional adequacy of the diet, the presence of persistent gastrointestinal signs, the patient’s functional capacity (e.g., evidence of weakness, exercise intolerance) and the ...

Table of contents

• Cover
• Title page
• Table of Contents
• Contributors
• Preface
• Acknowledgements
• CHAPTER 1: Nutritional assessment in small animals
• CHAPTER 2: Estimating energy requirements of small animal patients
• CHAPTER 3: Routes of nutritional support in small animals
• CHAPTER 4: Nasoesophageal feeding tubes in dogs and cats
• CHAPTER 5: Esophagostomy feeding tubes in dogs and cats
• CHAPTER 6: Gastrostomy feeding tubes in dogs and cats
• CHAPTER 7: Jejunostomy feeding tubes in dogs and cats
• CHAPTER 8: Minimally invasive placement of postpyloric feeding tubes
• CHAPTER 9: Tube feeding in small animals: diet selection and preparation
• CHAPTER 10: Intravenous access for parenteral nutrition in small animals
• CHAPTER 11: Parenteral nutrition in small animals
• CHAPTER 12: Pathophysiology and clinical approach to malnutrition in dogs and cats
• CHAPTER 13: Appetite stimulants in dogs and cats
• CHAPTER 14: Adverse food reactions in small animals
• CHAPTER 15: Nutritional management of short bowel syndrome in dogs and cats
• CHAPTER 16: Refeeding syndrome insmall animals
• CHAPTER 17: Feeding small animal patients with gastrointestinal motility disorders
• CHAPTER 18: Immune modulating nutrients in small animals
• CHAPTER 19: Nutritional management of superficial necrolytic dermatitis in dogs
• CHAPTER 20: Nutritional support in acute kidney injury in dogs and cats
• CHAPTER 21: Nutritional support in hepatic failure in dogs and cats
• CHAPTER 22: Nutritional management of the septic patient
• CHAPTER 23: Nutritional support during acute pancreatitis
• CHAPTER 24: Nutritional support in the mechanically ventilated small animal patient
• CHAPTER 25: Nutritional support in exotic pet species
• Index
• End User License Agreement