SECTION 1
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT AND THE PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT/HPT MODEL
Chapter 1
Overview of Performance Improvement
âAmerica is a nation where creative approaches yield real solutions to our problems. . . . Itâs clear to me that performance technology is just such an approach.â
President George Bush1
Society, work, and the workplace have changed dramatically. As the Industrial Era emerged from agriculture and craft orientation, people began working in large groups and living in large communities. Gone were the isolation and independence of farming or as craftspersons in small towns supported by and supporting agriculture. Industry brought large-scale machinery operated by large workforces. The industrial workplace emphasized work design and quality.
With the Information Era, the workplace began to focus on information and the people who add value to information. Just as industrial machinery was automated to improve its functionality, much has been done to automate information through software, hardware, and internet innovation. The Information Era brought increasing recognition of the value of people as integrators and users of information. Leaders of progressive organizations successfully envision and promote people and people issues. Although there is considerable emphasis on information, there is an ongoing need for manufacturing, medicine, service, military, government, and many other organizations. There remains more need to coordinate and collaborate because there is great interdependence.
Performance Improvement: Precursors
Performance improvement as a field of study has gradually evolved as the world has evolved. Craftsmanship established standards; work design improved efficiency; quality focused on customer expectations; the ever-widening distribution of information enabled a global economy, and the people became more valuable to their organizations.
Craftsmen and Artisans
Through much of recent history, agriculture provided sufficient productivity to support artisans and craftspeople and to request their services. Architectural masterpieces, such as religious edifices, jewelry, household goods, and so forth were made according to expectations and often based on scientific standards.
Work Design
Work, work processes, and job design took on great importance as people began working together in factories. Efficiency was the goal. The ability to coordinate and control hundreds of employees in one location led to product dominance and business success. Frederick Taylor was a leader in scientific management, also known as Taylorism, based on time and motion studies.2 For example, many small companies could build automobiles, but only Henry Ford, with his assembly line and upgraded labor pay scale, could create vehicles that were affordable by the common man. Maximizing the capability of a larger workforce was a significant competitive advantage.
Quality
As time went on, the ability to coordinate and control workers was not enough. Competitive advantage now moved to the quality of the product. Value was measured by the ability to provide customers with timely, innovative, defect-free, and cost reasonable merchandise. The quality movement flourished and helped unify work practices globally. An American, W. Edwards Deming, over thirty years, helped Japan improve their product quality, spearheading efforts to produce items with little variation and extraordinary reliability.3
Information
Optimizing information became the next competitive edge. Data became readily available for analysis, problem solving, and decision making. Software was written to integrate work, thereby increasing accuracy, reducing time and cost, and extending predictions and planning. For example, Thomas Watson at IBM envisioned the value of computers and helped incorporate them universally in organizations. Bill Gates enabled information to be readily available and usable throughout the world.4
Peter Drucker discussed the origin of the information age:
People
Over the years, truly great organizations have realized the value of people and worked to maximize their potential.6 All the efficient machinery operation, quality control, and information access in the world does not make an organization outstanding. People, with their skills, knowledge, motivation, values, and dreams, make organizations thrive and prosper. For instance, Jack Welsh, CEO of GE, harnessed the value of people to make a world renowned, competitive, innovative, energized organization.7
Just as work design, quality, and information require continuous commitment to achieving maximum competitiveness, people-related performance issues need unwavering attention as well. Thomas Gilbert, the founder of performance technology,8 described peopleâs behavior in terms of âworthyâ or worthwhile performance. In his Behavior Engineering Model, which focused on environmental support and employeesâ repertory of behavior,9 he established the framework for performance improvement outcomes and performance technology.
Performance Improvement: Definition and Scope
Performance improvement (PI), also known as performance technology (PT), human performance technology (HPT), or human performance improvement (HPI), is the science and art of improving people, process, performance, organizations, and ultimately society. Sanders and Ruggles10 use the analogy of alphabet soup and make the case that there are not too many letters in the performance improvement soup. Each letter, expert contributor, or discipline adds flavor or nutritional value to the performance improvement soup pot. (See Tables 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 later in this chapter.)
TABLE 1.1. Theoretical Foundations of Performance Improvement
Source: Adapted from Sanders and Ruggles, 2000, pp, 27â36. Used with permission.
| Discipline | Focus | Contribution |
| Behaviorism | Predicting behavior | Small steps of instruction and feedback |
| | Learn to manipulate and control the environment by the individualâs responses to it |
| Diagnostic and Analytical Systems | Data as basis for understanding behavior | Practitioners use comprehensive analytical tools |
| | Diagnosis is based on gap (difference between desired and actual situation) |
| | Causes of situation are defined before intervention is selected and implemented |
| Instructional Systems Design and Organizational Learning | ADDIE (analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation) model, forerunner of the Performance Improvement/HPT Model | Developed in 1940s and 1950s, responding to need to train thousands of military personnel during World War II |
| | Various instructional methods were found to be valuable, such as role play, video, case study, and lecture |
| Organization Design (OD) and Change Management | Changing performance at organizational and individual levels | OD interventions improve culture, group dynamics, and structure of organization |
| | Change management helps individuals and groups adapt to change through timely information, appropriate resourc... |