eBook - ePub
Meaning and Argument
An Introduction to Logic Through Language
Ernest Lepore, Sam Cumming
This is a test
Buch teilen
- English
- ePUB (handyfreundlich)
- Ăber iOS und Android verfĂŒgbar
eBook - ePub
Meaning and Argument
An Introduction to Logic Through Language
Ernest Lepore, Sam Cumming
Angaben zum Buch
Buchvorschau
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Quellenangaben
Ăber dieses Buch
Meaning and Argument is a popular introduction to philosophy of logic and philosophy of language.
- Offers a distinctive philosophical, rather than mathematical, approach to logic
- Concentrates on symbolization and works out all the technical logic with truth tables instead of derivations
- Incorporates the insights of half a century's work in philosophy and linguistics on anaphora by Peter Geach, Gareth Evans, Hans Kamp, and Irene Heim among others
- Contains numerous exercises and a corresponding answer key
- An extensive appendix allows readers to explore subjects that go beyond what is usually covered in an introductory logic course
- Updated edition includes over a dozen new problem sets and revisions throughout
- Features an accompanying website at http://ruccs.rutgers.edu/~logic/MeaningArgument.html
HĂ€ufig gestellte Fragen
Wie kann ich mein Abo kĂŒndigen?
Gehe einfach zum Kontobereich in den Einstellungen und klicke auf âAbo kĂŒndigenâ â ganz einfach. Nachdem du gekĂŒndigt hast, bleibt deine Mitgliedschaft fĂŒr den verbleibenden Abozeitraum, den du bereits bezahlt hast, aktiv. Mehr Informationen hier.
(Wie) Kann ich BĂŒcher herunterladen?
Derzeit stehen all unsere auf MobilgerĂ€te reagierenden ePub-BĂŒcher zum Download ĂŒber die App zur VerfĂŒgung. Die meisten unserer PDFs stehen ebenfalls zum Download bereit; wir arbeiten daran, auch die ĂŒbrigen PDFs zum Download anzubieten, bei denen dies aktuell noch nicht möglich ist. Weitere Informationen hier.
Welcher Unterschied besteht bei den Preisen zwischen den AboplÀnen?
Mit beiden AboplÀnen erhÀltst du vollen Zugang zur Bibliothek und allen Funktionen von Perlego. Die einzigen Unterschiede bestehen im Preis und dem Abozeitraum: Mit dem Jahresabo sparst du auf 12 Monate gerechnet im Vergleich zum Monatsabo rund 30 %.
Was ist Perlego?
Wir sind ein Online-Abodienst fĂŒr LehrbĂŒcher, bei dem du fĂŒr weniger als den Preis eines einzelnen Buches pro Monat Zugang zu einer ganzen Online-Bibliothek erhĂ€ltst. Mit ĂŒber 1 Million BĂŒchern zu ĂŒber 1.000 verschiedenen Themen haben wir bestimmt alles, was du brauchst! Weitere Informationen hier.
UnterstĂŒtzt Perlego Text-zu-Sprache?
Achte auf das Symbol zum Vorlesen in deinem nÀchsten Buch, um zu sehen, ob du es dir auch anhören kannst. Bei diesem Tool wird dir Text laut vorgelesen, wobei der Text beim Vorlesen auch grafisch hervorgehoben wird. Du kannst das Vorlesen jederzeit anhalten, beschleunigen und verlangsamen. Weitere Informationen hier.
Ist Meaning and Argument als Online-PDF/ePub verfĂŒgbar?
Ja, du hast Zugang zu Meaning and Argument von Ernest Lepore, Sam Cumming im PDF- und/oder ePub-Format sowie zu anderen beliebten BĂŒchern aus Philosophy & Logic in Philosophy. Aus unserem Katalog stehen dir ĂŒber 1Â Million BĂŒcher zur VerfĂŒgung.
Information
Chapter 1
A Brief Introduction to Key Terms
1.1 Arguments
Arguments crop up in conversations, political debates, lectures, editorials, comic strips, novels, television programs, scriptures, films, graffiti, posters, on the net, and so on. Ordinarily when we argue with others, we try to persuade them of some point. The forms of persuasion are many. We can persuade others by hitting them, by screaming at them, by drugging them, and so on. These kinds of persuasion are, unfortunately, prevalent. However, in this book we will use the term âargumentâ exclusively to pick out sets of statements of the following sort:
Provided the fetus is a person, a fetus has a right to life. Should a fetus have a right to life, it is false that someone has the right to take its life. However, if abortions are moral, someone does have the right to take the life of a fetus. Consequently, if a fetus is a person, abortions are not moral.
Lung cancer is not caused by smoking, and this is so for the following reasons. Lung cancer is more common among male smokers than among female smokers. If smoking were the cause of lung cancer, this would not be true. The fact that lung cancer is more common among male smokers implies that it is caused by something in the male makeup. But if caused by this, it is not caused by smoking.
Anyone who deliberates about alternative courses of action believes he is free. Since everybody deliberates about alternative courses of action, it follows that we all believe ourselves to be free.
What do these passages have in common in virtue of which each is an argument in our sense? In this book an argument is any set of statements â explicit or implicit â one of which is the conclusion (the statement allegedly being defended) and the others are the premises (statements allegedly providing the defense).1 The relationship between the conclusion and the premises is such that the conclusion purportedly follows from the premises. This description of an argument leads us to ask what statements are, and what it means to say that one statement follows from others.
1.1.1 What is a Statement?
A statement is any declarative sentence that is either true or false.2 The following are statements:
Galileo was an astronomer.
Provided the fetus is a person, a fetus has a right to life.
No one but Nixon knew the truth.
Lung cancer is not caused by smoking.
Everybody deliberates about alternative courses of action.
Martin Van Buren was not the ninth president of the United States.
Provided the fetus is a person, a fetus has a right to life.
No one but Nixon knew the truth.
Lung cancer is not caused by smoking.
Everybody deliberates about alternative courses of action.
Martin Van Buren was not the ninth president of the United States.
Interrogatives, imperatives, and exclamations are sentences that are not statements; for example:
Is George Washington president?
Shave yourself!
Wow!
Shave yourself!
Wow!
1.1.2 Premises and Conclusion
A main aim in learning logic is to enhance skills in assessing arguments as we find them. But arguments cannot be assessed unless they are first identified as arguments. Although there are no sure signs of whether an argument is present, fairly reliable indicators exist.
Premise indicators: Premise indicators are terms that indicate that a premise will immediately follow. In the second argument in §1.1 above, the first sentence ends with âthis is so for the following reasonsâ. This clause indicates that the statements which follow are the premises of this argument. The third argument has a second sentence that begins with the word âSinceâ, indicating that a premise is about to be introduced. Other such expressions include âbecauseâ, âforâ, âafter allâ, âgivenâ, âwhereasâ, âalthoughâ, âsupposeâ, âassumeâ, âlet us presumeâ, âgrantedâ, âhere are the factsâ. When a premise indicator starts a clause, then what follows the premise indicator is usually a premise.
Conclusion indicators: Likewise, when a conclusion indicator starts a clause, then what follows is usually a conclusion. In the first argument in §1.1 above, the last sentence begins with the word âConsequentlyâ, indicating that it is the conclusion. Other conclusion indicators include âthereforeâ, âsoâ, âhenceâ, âit followsâ, ââŠprovesâ, ââŠshowsâ, âwe can now inferâ, âit cannot fail to beâ, âlet us concludeâ, âthis impliesâ, âthese facts indicateâ, âthis supports the view or claimâ, âlet us inferâ, âas a consequence we can deduceâ.
Many passages contain arguments but none of these indicators, and some passages contain one or more of them without stating a premise or a conclusion. Indeed, the indicators seen most frequently are often used as neither conclusion nor premise indicators, as in the following sentences.
How long has it been since you last saw him?
He is so good at what he does.
For two years he has been away.
After all these days, you come home.
Let us go hence.
He is so good at what he does.
For two years he has been away.
After all these days, you come home.
Let us go hence.
None of these sentences is being offered as a premise for some conclusion or as a conclusion from some premises. Even though each contains familiar indicator terms, obviously the terms are not being used as indicators in these sentences.
Alternatively, one may simply announce that an argument is forthcoming, and then go on to affirm several statements. In this case, the context makes clear that the last statement is the conclusion and the others are premises. Still, some terms are almost always used as conclusion or premise indicators. Itâs hard to imagine a context in which âon the assumption thatâ is not a premise indicator or âas a consequence it followsâ is not a conclusion indicator.
1.2 Putting Arguments into a Standard Format
Having determined that some piece of discourse contains an argument, the next task is to put it into a standard format. This task may involve all of the following:
i. Identifying the premises and the conclusion.
ii. Placing the premises first. (Order does not matter.)
iii. Placing the conclusion last.
iv. Making explicit any premise or even the conclusion, which may be only implicit in the original but essential to the argument.
So standard forms for the above three arguments are:
Provided the fetus is a person, a fetus has a right to life.
Should a fetus have a right to life, it is false that someone has the right to take its life.
If abortions are moral, someone does have the right to take the life of a fetus.
If a fetus is a person, abortions are not moral.
Should a fetus have a right to life, it is false that someone has the right to take its life.
If abortions are moral, someone does have the right to take the life of a fetus.
If a fetus is a person, abortions are not moral.
The first three statements are premises, and the fourth is the conclusion.
Lung cancer is more common among male smokers than among female smokers.
If smoking were the cause of lung cancer, this would not be true.
The fact that lung cancer is more common among male smokers implies that it is caused by something in the male makeup.
If it is caused by this, it is not caused by smoking.
Lung cancer is not caused by smoking.
If smoking were the cause of lung cancer, this would not be true.
The fact that lung cancer is more common among male smokers implies that it is caused by something in the male makeup.
If it is caused by this, it is not caused by smoking.
Lung cancer is not caused by smoking.
The first four statements are premises, and the fifth is the conclusion.
Anyone who deliberates about alternative courses of action believes he is free.
Everybody deliberates about alternative courses of action.
We all believe ourselves to be free.
Everybody deliberates about alternative courses of action.
We all believe ourselves to be free.
The first two statements are the premises, and the third is the conclusion.
In none of the arguments is a premise or a conclusion missing. Nothing said so far explains exactly how we were able to devise these standard forms based on what we were presented with. So far our process has been rather loose, and it cannot be tightened until we say something substantive about when one statement follows from some others.
1.3 Multiple Conclusions
As we have characterized arguments, no argument can have more than one conclusion. Of course, sometimes we do find passages with more than one conclusion. There are two types of cases. The first occurs when more than one conclusion is drawn from the same set of premises. For such a case we adopt the convention that distinct arguments can have the same premises, but different conclusions. So, for example, (1)â(4) below include two distinct arguments. (1)â(2) are premises, and (3)â(4) are conclusions. So (1)â(3) constitute one argument; and (1)â(2) and (4) constitute another distinct argumen...