eBook - ePub
Love Divine
Studies in 'Bhakti and Devotional Mysticism
Karel Werner
This is a test
Buch teilen
- 248 Seiten
- English
- ePUB (handyfreundlich)
- Ăber iOS und Android verfĂŒgbar
eBook - ePub
Love Divine
Studies in 'Bhakti and Devotional Mysticism
Karel Werner
Angaben zum Buch
Buchvorschau
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Quellenangaben
Ăber dieses Buch
Explores the nature and function of bhakti or devotional involvement in religious practice in India in areas where it is seldom sought or where its existence has been doubted or even denied.
HĂ€ufig gestellte Fragen
Wie kann ich mein Abo kĂŒndigen?
Gehe einfach zum Kontobereich in den Einstellungen und klicke auf âAbo kĂŒndigenâ â ganz einfach. Nachdem du gekĂŒndigt hast, bleibt deine Mitgliedschaft fĂŒr den verbleibenden Abozeitraum, den du bereits bezahlt hast, aktiv. Mehr Informationen hier.
(Wie) Kann ich BĂŒcher herunterladen?
Derzeit stehen all unsere auf MobilgerĂ€te reagierenden ePub-BĂŒcher zum Download ĂŒber die App zur VerfĂŒgung. Die meisten unserer PDFs stehen ebenfalls zum Download bereit; wir arbeiten daran, auch die ĂŒbrigen PDFs zum Download anzubieten, bei denen dies aktuell noch nicht möglich ist. Weitere Informationen hier.
Welcher Unterschied besteht bei den Preisen zwischen den AboplÀnen?
Mit beiden AboplÀnen erhÀltst du vollen Zugang zur Bibliothek und allen Funktionen von Perlego. Die einzigen Unterschiede bestehen im Preis und dem Abozeitraum: Mit dem Jahresabo sparst du auf 12 Monate gerechnet im Vergleich zum Monatsabo rund 30 %.
Was ist Perlego?
Wir sind ein Online-Abodienst fĂŒr LehrbĂŒcher, bei dem du fĂŒr weniger als den Preis eines einzelnen Buches pro Monat Zugang zu einer ganzen Online-Bibliothek erhĂ€ltst. Mit ĂŒber 1 Million BĂŒchern zu ĂŒber 1.000 verschiedenen Themen haben wir bestimmt alles, was du brauchst! Weitere Informationen hier.
UnterstĂŒtzt Perlego Text-zu-Sprache?
Achte auf das Symbol zum Vorlesen in deinem nÀchsten Buch, um zu sehen, ob du es dir auch anhören kannst. Bei diesem Tool wird dir Text laut vorgelesen, wobei der Text beim Vorlesen auch grafisch hervorgehoben wird. Du kannst das Vorlesen jederzeit anhalten, beschleunigen und verlangsamen. Weitere Informationen hier.
Ist Love Divine als Online-PDF/ePub verfĂŒgbar?
Ja, du hast Zugang zu Love Divine von Karel Werner im PDF- und/oder ePub-Format sowie zu anderen beliebten BĂŒchern aus Scienze sociali & Studi sull'etnia. Aus unserem Katalog stehen dir ĂŒber 1Â Million BĂŒcher zur VerfĂŒgung.
Information
1
Bhakti and the áčg VedaâDoes it Appear There or Not?
Introduction
Bhakti is a devotional element in the religious life of a people expressed as an intimate relationship between man and a personal God based on love and it also implies the idea of a God who feels intense love for man. This is the kind of bhakti that comes across from the later scriptures and religious literature of India, and it is not generally considered as playing any decisive role in the Vedas, let alone in the RV. The Vedas are usually studied for their mythological, liturgical, sacrificial, or even social and ethical content, but not for their devotional side, if it exists in them at all. The focus is usually on the ritualistic aspect of the Vedic religion, because the Vedas are seen as the composition of the sacerdotal class. Any personal devotional outpouring that the priests may have given vent to is usually either minimized or ignored altogether. Only seldom do we find an admission that the hymns to Varuna border on bhakti.
However, as many hymns were meant to be chanted at the ritual and were even received as inspired visions and composed during the rites, the inspiration was felt by the poets to be dependent on the graciousness and benevolence of the particular visiting deity. And therein lies plenty of room for the expression of a devotional attitude: the poets refer frequently to their heart, their yearning for the deityâs favour and their exaltation in their vision. I maintain that through an examination of the religious intensity of the áčáčŁis reflected in the hymns, their devotional traits will come to light.
The Problems
The main reason why the occurrence of bhakti in the RV has not been acknowledged has its root in the widely differing atmosphere of this saáčhitÄ as against the later bhakti literature. But there is no real incompatibility between the two. A further reason is the fact that there is often a certain lack of insight into the background of the hymns, insufficient understanding of the inner meaning of some of the words employed and the problem of what the Vedic gods really mean to their worshippers and what is the role of sacrifice in relation to bhakti.
In the process of dealing with these problems one cannot avoid dealing to some extent with the question of what is the heart of the RV and what are its main values, with the problem of the song as the medium of devotion and therefore the vehicle of bhakti in the RV and with the question of the ultimate purpose.
General Comments
The consensus of scholarly opinion about the question of bhakti in the RV is summed up in one sentence by M. Das Gupta: âBhakti involves an attitude of mind hardly compatible with the Vedic and Brahmanic idea of worship and ritualism.â1
Some scholars, however, did seek the origin of the bhakti movement in India in the Vedas. The origins of bhakti as such are, of course, in the human heart, but we may certainly say that the first traces of its expression in India can be found in the Rgvedic hymns and not merely in those addressed to Varuáča. Thus Solomon recognizes that â⊠certain elements in Vedic literature ⊠are similar to the personal devotion and affectionate fellowship with the sacred which characterize Bhaktiâ.2 He further mentions A.B. Keith as having âlocalized the origin of Bhakti in part in the Vedic hymns to Varuáčaâ. This is what Keith says:
The thought of India started from a religion which had in Varuáča a god of decidedly moral character, and the simple worship of that deity with its consciousness of sin and trust in the divine forgiveness is doubtless one of the first roots of Bhakti, a conception the foreign origin of which has now been abandoned generally.3
Bhakti expresses itself in different ways and the ways of the ancient áčáčŁis were of course quite different from the ways of medieval bhaktas who cast aside the sacrificial mould and the priestly language. But what bhakti implies remains ever the same irrespective of conditions under which it flourishes and forms through which it expresses itself: faith, trust, devotion and worship. These stem from the human heart.
NÄrada describes bhakti as âdedication of all acts to God and the intense anguish when one fails, or slips from oneâs absorption in Godâ (Bhakti SĆ«tra 19). The sage Kapila in BP (3.29.7), the purÄáča of bhakti par excellence, says: âThe characteristic of pure devotion to the Supreme Being is that it has no motive and is incessantâ.
That bhakti has no motive might be experienced in its highest stages, but in practice the devotee has always the burning desire to be close to his beloved deity, or to be forgiven in order to draw closer, and his every action is motivated by such desire. This motivation is love and all that it implies. Thus the great Sufi mystic Rabia, described by Attar as the âwoman on fire with loveâ and âconsumed with her passion [for God]â had but one desire, one motive: âO my Lord, if I worship thee from fear of hell, burn me in hell; and if I worship thee from hope of paradise, exclude me thence; but if I worship thee for thine own sake, then withhold not from me thine eternal beauty.â4
It is in the very essence of human weakness to ask, and the devotee is no exception, but his asking centres around the presence of the âBelovedâ. This asking from Godâs beneficence (whether of one or more gods) can be traced back to the áčáčŁis of the RV. Their worship is a complete dedication to their god(s). What one does not find with them is the constant stressing of love for God as the be-all and the end-all of existence as was to be prevalent among the bhaktas of later India and in love mysticism elsewhere, particularly in the Sufi movement.
There is, in the RV, no god-intoxication in the later sense when only God is the sole ultimate reality and life is not worth living except in communion with God; no one-pointed search for God based on the longings of the love-intoxicated heart, the expression of love pure and simple, or love forbidden, or love in separation, or love in union, as e.g. in the poems of a Mahadeviyaka, culminating in complete self-naughting:
He bartered my heart,
looted my flesh,
claimed as tribute
my pleasure, took over
all of me.5
Nor is there in the RV any protest against established rites or customs, any defiance of social hierarchy, as with some bhakti movements, such as VÄ«raĆaivism. But occasionally the bards do rise to heights of ecstatic rapture and pour out their praises on the gods in moments of enthusiasm, though not as passionately as the Äáž»vÄrs among the VaiáčŁáčavite saints of Tamil Nadu, or the NÄyaáčmÄrs among the Ćaivite saints, in later centuries. The tone of the RV is, by comparison, rather sober. The aspiration is, e.g. for the âtrue sunâ or âthe loftiest light beyond the darknessâ (1.50.10) âwhich mortals behold notâ (1.105.16), or for the heavenly light, or for entrance in the divine realms, or for a share of the divine grace or munificence or forgiveness. But appeals to particular gods and dialogues, or simulated dialogues, betraying an intimate attitude full of devotion, are there and have to be recognized. The intimation that the Lord alone is worth aspiring for is still missing, but a strong bhakti does transpire within the song, in the offering to the gods and in the attitude of the áčáčŁis.
The question of grace looms large in the bhakti tradition. It later developed into two schools illustrated by the âcatâ and âmonkeyâ principles, respectively. In the former the soul is saved by Godâs grace without effort on its own part as the kitten is carried by the scruff of its neck, in the latter some effort is needed as in the case of the monkey infant having to cling to its mother when being transported.
Favour or grace implies a certain unpredictability: to all appearances it is a gift, and the devotee never knows when it will be upon him. In the RV the âgraceâ of a particular deity appears as a âfavourâ granted by the deity, or the favourable or auspicious attitude of the god, his benevolence (sumati, bhadra). It manifests itself as blessings bestowed upon the worshipper, for the gods are by their very nature bounteous, munificent, bestowing abundantly (sudÄvanÄáž„), bound to hear the petitioner in his need or distress. But the prayers are not for deliverance from the shackles of this life or for perpetual bliss in the bosom of the deity, though some come close to the bhaktaâs attitude in the oft repeated petition: âBe gracious unto usâ (6.15.9), as especially in the following: âO companions, we beg for the divine graces that the Lord of Prayer may exalt us, that for the bounteous godâhim who gives from afar as a fatherâwe may be sinless (7.97.2; cf. 8.19.4cd & 1.44.14).
Bhakti and Theism versus Henotheism
Some scholars claim that the path of bhakti is a path of utter consecration to one God. Grierson claims that â⊠devotional faith implies not only a personal God but one God. It is essentially a monotheistic attitude of the religious sense.â6
This can be challenged on the ground that from the narrower point of view there is but one God, but on the wider spectrum each worshipper woos a different aspect or form of the Deity with a different name. Due to the limitation of his mind man is incapable of conceiving the Absolute, but conceives one aspect of It, projects it on the screen of the cosmos and calls it God the Unique. Thus for one devotee there is but one God, namely KáčáčŁáča, for another there is equally but one God, namely Ćiva, and for yet a third there is no other God but Allah, or Christ. Each has a completely monotheistic and intransigent attitude, conforming to his particular conception of God which may not correspond to that of the others. An impartial observer, however, may view the phenomenon of bhakti throughout the world and recognize that there is indeed one God for each devotee, but appearing to each one in a different form. KabÄ«r puts it very succinctly:
O Lord Increate, who will serve Thee?
Each votary offers his worship to the God of his own creation;
each day he receives serviceâ
None seek Him, the Perfect, Brahma, the Indivisible Lord.
They believe in ten Avatars; but no Avatar can be the Infinite
Spirit, for he suffers the results of his deeds;
The Supreme One must be other than this.
The Yogi, the Sannyasi, the Ascetic, are disputing one with another:
KabÄ«r says, âO brother! He who has seen that radiance of love, he is saved.â7
The many gods of the áčáčŁis did not produce the intransigence of later monotheists. In the moment of worship or need there is, for the áčáčŁi, only one particular god he is addressing, though he may be aware at the back of his mind of the other manifestations to whom he may turn in due time. This awareness of the many masking the One is often expressed, e.g.: âSeers speak in many ways of what is One in nature; they call it Agni, Yama, MatariĆvanâ (1.164.46). But while worshipping one particular god, the devotee gives to him his complete attention, his heart, his sacrificial offering. His devotional attitude is truly the same as is found in later bhakti. Even Grierson admits (ibid.):
We occasionally come across what is difficult to distinguish from bhakti even in Vedic hymns, especially those dedicated to Varuáča. But this incipient monotheism fell still-born from the singerâs lips. The origin of monotheism from which bhakti sprang must be sought elsewhere than among the Brahmans of Northern India.
In emphasizing monotheism as a criterion of bhakti Grierson ignores the fundamental meaning of devotion which is inherent to human nature and can be shown to mother and father, brother and sister, and lover. The áčáčŁis display true attitude of love to their gods which cannot be dismissed as âstill-bornâ only because it does not fit the monotheistic pattern. The evidence of devotion is obvious in the RV in many monologues and also in many dialogues between man and god. A personal relationship is established between them in the appeals, offerings and lively and loving or friendly communications which fully fall within the range of bhakti.
Henotheism is not, as M. Das Gupta put it, âmendacious flatteryâ, but rather, as contended by MacNicol, âthe worshipperâs vivid realization of the presence and personality of one particular deity to whom he bows his headâ.8 Or, as expressed by A.C. Bose, â⊠in henotheism there is a general devotional attitude towards the Divine and this attitude remains unchanged even if the Deities addressed are changedâ.9
For the Vedic devotee even all the divine names are worthy of homage, praise and worship since they are the various aspects of what is one in nature (cf. 10.63.2; 10.114.5; 1.164.46). The idea of oneness recurs many times in different saáčhitÄs: âMighty is the one godhead of the shining onesâ (RV 3.55.1). âIn him all the gods become the one aloneâ (AV 12.4.21; cf. also RV 3.54.17). The devotee gives his worship to the various aspects, forms and names of that which he knows is âthat state of Being hidden in secret, wherein all find one resting-place; in That all this unites, from That all issue out. Omnipresent, It is warp and woof amidst creatures (YV 32.8; cf. also YV 40.8. and AV 4.16.8).
That Beingâsat or state of beingâto which the sages referred simply as tat, âThatâ, âwhose shadow is death, whose shadow is immortalityâ (RV 10.121.2) is itself beyond worship, imagina...