Contemporary Photography and Theory offers an essential overview of some of the key critical debates in fine art photography today. Building on a foundational understanding of photography, it offers an in-depth discussion of five topic areas: identity, landscape and place, the politics of representation, psychoanalysis and the event. Written in an accessible style, it introduces the critical literature relevant to photography that has emerged over recent decades. Moving beyond seminal works by writers such as Walter Benjamin, Roland Barthes, and Susan Sontag, it enables readers to explore an extended canon of theorists including Jacques Lacan, Judith Butler and Giorgio Agamben. The book is illustrated throughout and analyses a range of works by established and emergent artists in order to show how these theoretical concepts are central to understanding contemporary photography. These 15 short essays encourage readers to apply critical thinking to both their own work and that of others. They are the perfect starting point for essays as well being of suitable length for assigned readings, making this the ideal resource for learning about contemporary photography and theory.
HĂ€ufig gestellte Fragen
Wie kann ich mein Abo kĂŒndigen?
Gehe einfach zum Kontobereich in den Einstellungen und klicke auf âAbo kĂŒndigenâ â ganz einfach. Nachdem du gekĂŒndigt hast, bleibt deine Mitgliedschaft fĂŒr den verbleibenden Abozeitraum, den du bereits bezahlt hast, aktiv. Mehr Informationen hier.
(Wie) Kann ich BĂŒcher herunterladen?
Derzeit stehen all unsere auf MobilgerĂ€te reagierenden ePub-BĂŒcher zum Download ĂŒber die App zur VerfĂŒgung. Die meisten unserer PDFs stehen ebenfalls zum Download bereit; wir arbeiten daran, auch die ĂŒbrigen PDFs zum Download anzubieten, bei denen dies aktuell noch nicht möglich ist. Weitere Informationen hier.
Welcher Unterschied besteht bei den Preisen zwischen den AboplÀnen?
Mit beiden AboplÀnen erhÀltst du vollen Zugang zur Bibliothek und allen Funktionen von Perlego. Die einzigen Unterschiede bestehen im Preis und dem Abozeitraum: Mit dem Jahresabo sparst du auf 12 Monate gerechnet im Vergleich zum Monatsabo rund 30 %.
Was ist Perlego?
Wir sind ein Online-Abodienst fĂŒr LehrbĂŒcher, bei dem du fĂŒr weniger als den Preis eines einzelnen Buches pro Monat Zugang zu einer ganzen Online-Bibliothek erhĂ€ltst. Mit ĂŒber 1 Million BĂŒchern zu ĂŒber 1.000 verschiedenen Themen haben wir bestimmt alles, was du brauchst! Weitere Informationen hier.
UnterstĂŒtzt Perlego Text-zu-Sprache?
Achte auf das Symbol zum Vorlesen in deinem nÀchsten Buch, um zu sehen, ob du es dir auch anhören kannst. Bei diesem Tool wird dir Text laut vorgelesen, wobei der Text beim Vorlesen auch grafisch hervorgehoben wird. Du kannst das Vorlesen jederzeit anhalten, beschleunigen und verlangsamen. Weitere Informationen hier.
Ist Contemporary Photography and Theory als Online-PDF/ePub verfĂŒgbar?
Ja, du hast Zugang zu Contemporary Photography and Theory von Sally Miller im PDF- und/oder ePub-Format sowie zu anderen beliebten BĂŒchern aus Art & Photography. Aus unserem Katalog stehen dir ĂŒber 1Â Million BĂŒcher zur VerfĂŒgung.
We understand and negotiate the significance of photographs of the self on a daily basis: the portrait is perhaps the most popular form of vernacular and professional photography. However, what does it mean when fine art photographers engage with the genre of portrait photography? The chapters in this section consider how photographic history and writings on subjectivity can help us to understand what connects works by a diverse range of artists including Eileen Perrier, Zoe Strauss, Bettina von Zwehl, Hasan Elahi and Vivian Fu.
Chapter 1 considers the portrait through the categories of the honorific and the subjugated portrait alongside writings on subjectivity to demonstrate how particular kinds of âselfâ are constructed through these categories. Chapter 2 looks at how two contemporary genres of portraiture â the blank portrait and the intimate record â comment upon and extend these early categories of photographic portraiture. To conclude this section, Chapter 3 will examine the impact of digital technology on the production, dissemination and meaning of photographic representations of the self.
1 The honorific and the subjugated portrait
Grace (2000) by Eileen Perrier is a series of twelve colour photographs. The images are all head-and-shoulders portraits taken in a studio with a neutral blue background and soft, flattering lighting. The subjects are posed; they are all seated with their body at a slight angle, their head is turned to the side and they gaze over their shoulder, above and to the left and of the camera. They are all smiling (Figures 1.1 and 1.3a-d).
This simple description belies these imagesâ engagement with the complex history of photographic representations of the self. As outlined in the Introduction, the history and meaning of photography is not singular. As such, photography is best understood by examining the interconnected discourses that give a range of analogue and digital technologies concerned with recording and producing images social, cultural and historical meaning. These discourses are constantly being written and rewritten, with new meanings forged and others abandoned. Many artists who work with photography are not concerned with refining or consolidating these meanings, but commenting upon or contesting them.
Perrierâs work is a good example of this. While, at first, Grace seems to be easily readable within the genre of portraiture â in particular, in relation to the honorific codes descended from painting that have dominated the formal photographic studio portrait since its invention â it does not simply reproduce these conventions but quotes them as a means of commenting upon them. In order to better understand the nature of Perrierâs interventions we need to explore the history of the photographic portrait.
The photographic portrait
Historically, portraiture was a privilege that belonged to the few who could afford to commission a painted likeness. However, the invention of photography allowed for the mass production of portraits. As such, the advent of photography is often seen as a technological development through which the privilege of portraiture was democratized. For example, in The Genius of Photography Gerry Badger writes that âeveryone, thanks to photography, was given an identity â the daguerreotype portrait was a magical proof of existenceâ.1 However, the way in which the photograph was able to function as âproof of existenceâ is complex. While the indexical nature of photography means that it does indeed attest to the physical existence of the subject of photograph. The meaning of the self that is produced through photographic representation is far from straightforward. In short, the identity âgivenâ by the photographic portrait was not the same as that bestowed by the painted portrait. Photography, through its distinct social, cultural, political and economic uses and meanings, offered a new kind of identity to its sitters.
Although the photographic portrait was popular and sought after, the new experience of the self produced by seeing oneâs photographic likeness gave rise to a range of responses from excitement and wonder to ambivalence, dissatisfaction and fear. For some, the pleasure of owning a photographic portrait was sufficient in itself. This can be seen in the account of a portrait photographer who overcame the problem of impatient customers by giving them photographs of previous sitters. He testified that although some demanded another sitting, others were âentirely satisfied with the substituteâ.2 For others, being photographed was a more fraught process: Robert Louis Stevenson remarked of his â yet to be taken â portrait that he dreaded that âit will not be like meâ.3 On seeing his photographic portrait Nathaniel Hawthorne wrote, âI was really a little startled at recognising myself so apart from myselfâ.4 While the actor Charles MacReady suggested an ingenious solution to this problem of photographic likeness: he would send his portrait in oils to be photographed.5
Thus, we can see that photographic likeness, so naturalized in discussions of photography as an indexical medium, is complex: we must learn to recognize ourselves â and others â in photographs.6 As such, rather than âmagicallyâ making the privileges of the portrait available to all, photography transformed the understanding of the self that had been the subject of the painted portrait.
However, it was not only access to the privilege of portraiture that produced the democratizing effect of the carte but the way in which the âmaterial cultureâ of privilege, the dress, gesture, posture and settings of the upper class, became available to everyone in the form of studio backdrops and props. The dispersal of the signs of privilege produced an anxious discussion around class for in the photographersâ studio previously rigid social boundaries suddenly appeared to be little more than âa combination of costumes and stage properties that could easily be simulatedâ.8
Also significant was the way in which the cartes themselves were a part of commodity culture. Cartes were usually purchased by the dozen, with the explicit intention of exchange, and it is estimated that 300 to 400 million cartes were sold in England every year from 1861 to 1867.9 In addition to your own portrait, it was possible to buy a vast array of cartes of public figures and celebrities. Displayed in photographic shop windows, these attracted crowds who were eager to see photographs of politicians, royalty, actresses and courtesans. This was a new pleasure, and several articles at the time drew attention to the disconcerting effect that the display of these disparate collections had. For example, a commentator in Art Journal noted that âthe most curious contrasts may be drawn and the most startling combinations effected ⊠when even the most hurried of passing glances reveals to us the facsimile of Lord Shaftesbury and Cardinal Wiseman, and of the French Emperor and Sims Reeves side-by-sideâ.10 As Rachel Teukolsky has noted, in the photographic shop window the ârigidly divided and stratified Victorian social world became an alarming jumbleâ.11
The way in which the carte circulated is also key to understanding its significance. Previously, portraits either had a limited circulation among acquaintances who had a personal knowledge of each other or were located in specific settings in which the sitter already had an established role. The practices of sharing and consuming central to the culture of the carte meant that the photographic portrait began to circulate beyond the boundaries of personal knowledge or professional context. This meant that there was no certain way of distinguishing between the carte given by the sitter as a token of friendship, affection or esteem and the carte that was purchased. Furthermore, the studio settings and props common to all sittings meant that there was âlittle to distinguish between the cartes de visite of the anonymous and the eminentâ.12 In short, âas a highly mobile, standardized commodity, carte portraits easily slipped the leash of their intended functions to then take on ambiguous and potentially disturbing new meaningsâ13 and precipitate ânovel social encountersâ.14
Central to these novel social encounters was a new kind of public visibility in which âpeople began to report the curious phenomenon of a person being preceded by their photographâ.15 As such, Annie Rudd has argued that âcartes de visite were associated less with a personal, domestic conception of likeness than with a distinctly public oneâ.16 Here the âcartesâ semiotic complexity â their status as both objectified likeness and industrially produced commodityâ17 is key. As Rudd notes the carte was printed on a card that gave the name of the studio rather than the sitter, as such the carte might be seen to be emblematic not the democratization of portraiture but of âthe transformation of oneâs face into a commercial productâ.18 While the use of clothing and props in the photographic studio challenged the understanding of the ânaturalâ superiority of the upper class, it was the performance of the self as a commodified individual that allowed the middle class to emerge as a unique social group. However, the middle class was not the only social group that photography played a key role in establishing.
The subjugated portrait
In his seminal article âThe Body and the Archive,â Allan Sekula argues that the use of photography by institutions, such as the police, that sought to observe, categorize, archive and control meant that âphotographic portraiture began to perform a role no painted portrait could haveâ.19 Sekula proposes that photography is âa double system of representation capable of functioning both honorifically and repressivelyâ.20 In the judiciary and medical uses of photography that emerged during the nineteenth century, the sitter is presented without the flattering or idealizing goals of traditional portraiture. As John Tagg has described the repressive or subjugated portrait, âThe format varies hardly at all ⊠workers, vagrants, criminals, patients, the insane, the poor, the colonised races â are taken one by one: isolated in a shallow contained space; turned full face and subjected to an unreturnable gaze; illuminated, focused, measured, numbered and named; forced to yield to the minutest scrutiny of gestures and features.â21 This directs us to an important caveat in the understanding of the photographic portrait as a democratization of privilege: the identity offered by the photographic portrait is not always desirable.
In order to better understand the subject-effects of the photographic portrait, we need to turn to the writings of the philosopher and historian Michel Foucault. Although Foucaultâs writings encompass a wide range of subjects and them...