Christopher P. Dickenson, Christopher P. Dickenson
This is a test
This is a test
Buch teilen
266 Seiten
English
ePUB (handyfreundlich)
Ăber iOS und Android verfĂŒgbar
eBook - ePub
Public Statues Across Time and Cultures
Christopher P. Dickenson, Christopher P. Dickenson
Angaben zum Buch
Buchvorschau
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Quellenangaben
Ăber dieses Buch
This book explores the ways in which statues have been experienced in public in different cultures and the role that has been played by statues in defining publicness itself.
The meaning of public statues is examined through discussion of their appearance and their spatial context and of written discourses having to do with how they were experienced. Bringing together experts working on statues in different cultures, the book sheds light on similarities and differences in the role that public statues had in different times and places throughout history. The book will also provide insight into the diverse methods and approaches that scholars working on these different periods use to investigate statues.
The book will appeal to historians, art historians and archaeologists of all periods who have an interest in the display of sculpture, the reception of public art or the significance of public monuments.
HĂ€ufig gestellte Fragen
Wie kann ich mein Abo kĂŒndigen?
Gehe einfach zum Kontobereich in den Einstellungen und klicke auf âAbo kĂŒndigenâ â ganz einfach. Nachdem du gekĂŒndigt hast, bleibt deine Mitgliedschaft fĂŒr den verbleibenden Abozeitraum, den du bereits bezahlt hast, aktiv. Mehr Informationen hier.
(Wie) Kann ich BĂŒcher herunterladen?
Derzeit stehen all unsere auf MobilgerĂ€te reagierenden ePub-BĂŒcher zum Download ĂŒber die App zur VerfĂŒgung. Die meisten unserer PDFs stehen ebenfalls zum Download bereit; wir arbeiten daran, auch die ĂŒbrigen PDFs zum Download anzubieten, bei denen dies aktuell noch nicht möglich ist. Weitere Informationen hier.
Welcher Unterschied besteht bei den Preisen zwischen den AboplÀnen?
Mit beiden AboplÀnen erhÀltst du vollen Zugang zur Bibliothek und allen Funktionen von Perlego. Die einzigen Unterschiede bestehen im Preis und dem Abozeitraum: Mit dem Jahresabo sparst du auf 12 Monate gerechnet im Vergleich zum Monatsabo rund 30 %.
Was ist Perlego?
Wir sind ein Online-Abodienst fĂŒr LehrbĂŒcher, bei dem du fĂŒr weniger als den Preis eines einzelnen Buches pro Monat Zugang zu einer ganzen Online-Bibliothek erhĂ€ltst. Mit ĂŒber 1 Million BĂŒchern zu ĂŒber 1.000 verschiedenen Themen haben wir bestimmt alles, was du brauchst! Weitere Informationen hier.
UnterstĂŒtzt Perlego Text-zu-Sprache?
Achte auf das Symbol zum Vorlesen in deinem nÀchsten Buch, um zu sehen, ob du es dir auch anhören kannst. Bei diesem Tool wird dir Text laut vorgelesen, wobei der Text beim Vorlesen auch grafisch hervorgehoben wird. Du kannst das Vorlesen jederzeit anhalten, beschleunigen und verlangsamen. Weitere Informationen hier.
Ist Public Statues Across Time and Cultures als Online-PDF/ePub verfĂŒgbar?
Ja, du hast Zugang zu Public Statues Across Time and Cultures von Christopher P. Dickenson, Christopher P. Dickenson im PDF- und/oder ePub-Format sowie zu anderen beliebten BĂŒchern aus Kunst & Kunst Allgemein. Aus unserem Katalog stehen dir ĂŒber 1Â Million BĂŒcher zur VerfĂŒgung.
Naked except for a pair of Y-fronts, the man lurches unsteadily forward, his weight shifting from the right to the left foot. His arms reach out limply before him, his hands loosely open. The slight paunch, the subtle variations in skin tone, the stretched veins on the backs of the hands, the creased underwear, all work toward a powerful illusion that this is a real man. Yet he does not follow through with his step. His frail hands betray not the slightest hint of a tremor. He does not breath. The tension between the figureâs intense lifelikenessâits hyperreality in the parlance of art historyâand the abject absence of life creates a sense of unease, which can somehow be sensed even on seeing it on a photograph. The brain perceives that this is not a real man at all. But then what is it? A creature that has materialised from a dream? The total lack of muscular tension, the loll of the head and closed eyes tell us that the man is himself dreaming, unaware of his surroundings and unaware of you or me as he staggers forward, sleepwalking. He is âSleepwalkerâ, the creation of American sculptor Tony Matelli (Figure 1.1). In 2014, this piece art achieved worldwide celebrity because of the controversy that arose after it was installed outside the Davis Museum on the campus of the all-women Wellesley College, in Wellesley, Massachusetts, to coincide with an exhibition of works by the artist inside the building.
On the day that the work appeared, an undergraduate student of the college started a petition calling for its removal to inside the museum, explaining:
Within just a few hours of its outdoor installation, the highly lifelike sculpture by Tony Matelli, entitled âSleepwalkerâ, has become a source of apprehension, fear and triggering thoughts regarding sexual assault for some members of our campus community. While it may appear humorous, or thought provoking to some, the âSleepwalkerâ has already become a source of undue stress for a number of Welles ley College students, the majority of whom live, study, and work on campus. As the sculpture was placed in a highly trafficked location, it is difficult for students wishing not to see the âSleepwalkerâ to travel to the campus center and the residential and academic quads.
(emphases added)1
The museumâs director issued an immediate response defending the decision to display the piece at that location on the grounds that art should provoke discussion, that âSleepwalkerâ, far from being an aggressive predator, was a âvulnerableâ and
âprofoundly passiveâ figure and that many students clearly did not find him threatening but were interacting with him in a playful way, posing for selfies beside him.2 The petition eventually gathered some 1,012 signatures, a not insignificant number considering that the collegeâs undergraduate body comprises around 2,700 students; but arguably more striking is how the episode briefly captured the attention of the worldâs media.3 Interest in the controversy was in no small part due to its connection to larger questions about campus free speech, which have been fiercely debated in recent years.4 The widespread popularity of the story, however, surely also had to do with to an inherent fascination for the power that this object, a crafted likeness of a human being, had to provoke such strong emotions and to generate such disagreement. The newspaper articles invariably included a photo of âSleepwalkerâ to spark interest. While the petition referred to the work as a âsculptureâ, the word used to describe it by many newspapers and by many of those who left reasons for signing the petitionâa word Matelli himself has also used of the workâwas âstatueâ.5
The Oxford English Dictionary gives the following definition of the word âstatueâ:
A representation in the round of a person, animal, etc., which is sculptured, moulded, or cast in marble, metal, plaster, or a similar material; esp. such a representation of a god, allegorical figure, or eminent person, usually life-size or larger.
Figurative and in similative use, esp. with reference to being motionless or silent.
More generally: an effigy; an image, a portrait. Obsolete.
Usually in plural. Any of various childrenâs games in which players must stand still in different postures. Also more fully game of statues, statue game, statues game.
Matelliâs âSleepwalkerâ certainly conforms to many aspects of these definitions. Others, however, are more problematic, and if we probe the expectations that we would normally have of a statue a little deeper and test them against this piece of art, the ease of categorizing itâand indeed the possibility of readily defining what exactly a statue isâbegins to break down.
âSleepwalkerâ is most definitely a sculpture in the round, a representation of a man. It is life-size. It isâthough the subtle paint works to convince us otherwiseâmade of metal, bronze, in fact, a material used for creating statues since antiquity.6 But is it a portrait, or even a representation of a real person? The viewer has no way of knowing whether this sculpture was modelled on a real individual or whether it is a figment of the artistâs imagination conjured into reality. Perhaps its dreamlike quality brings it closer to the realm of the gods and encourages us to see it almost as an icon. Yet its costume, stance and the indignity of being caught somnambulating in a state of undress suggest an ordinary everydayness. If it is an image of a real, living person, it would certainly not seem to be an eminent individualâthe manâs dishevelled state and his unflattering circumstances hardly seem celebratory. Perhaps more saliently, the sculpture lacks the tell-tale nametag or inscription that is so often affixed to the bases of statues to tell us who they represent. For this figure has no base. Perched on a pedestal, a statue quite literally elevates its subject above other mere mortals, the base a metaphor for the symbolic elevation inherent in the commemoration.7 But âSleepwalkerâ has been brought down to the ground, not only occupying the same space as us, his viewers, as all sculpture in the round does, but sharing the floor with us, walking among us, inviting us to interact with him.
Surely one of the most common expectations we have of statues encountered on street corners or public squares is that they are not simply works of art but that they have been erected to commemorate someone or something. If the word âsculptureâ is a label that describes an artistic medium, the word âstatueâ tells us something about the cultural meanings bestowed upon particular pieces of sculpture. The word âstatueâ, at least in the way that it has traditionally been used in Western history for the last few hundred years, most often suggests a âmonumentâ. âSleepwalkerâ defies so many of our expectations of what a monument should be still. But is it perhaps still a statue after all?
Statues as Monuments, Statues and Publicness
The power of statues to serve as commemorative monuments surely depends above all on their publicness. Statues have sometimes been set up to honour prominent individuals in private settings, but such works inevitably and quite deliberately refer to statues set up in the public sphere; such statues are also exclusively to be found in the houses of the rich and powerful, who enjoy both the wealth to afford them and the space to display them. Encountering John Rysbrackâs overlife-size statue of QueenAnne in the Library of Blenheim Palace (Figure 1.2) provokes surpriseâas the first Duchess of Marlborough no doubt intended when she had it installedâbecause everything about it, from its pose to the material used to its ornately carved pedestal, evokes the settings of the city square, the courthouse, or the cathedral, where we would expect to see such a sculpture. Indeed, the statue had originally been intended for a more public location at an alms-house in St Albans but had only stood there for a short while before the dowager Duchess had it brought to its current location. But placing the work in the library does more than simply call to mind the public realm. It actively engages in the public sphere, since it was designed to convey a message to an audience beyond the palaceâs walls. Queen Anneâs statue was not placed in the library for the private contemplation of the Marlborough family. It was a statement of the close relationship of friendship and patronage that the family, and the dowager in particular, had enjoyed with the deceased Queen and was intended as a veiled attack on the new reigning House of Hanover.8 It was intended to be noticed by visitors and discussed in polite society. If even such an ostensibly private statue can be thought of as a public monument, it is worth interrogating more deeply the nature of the relationship between statues and publicness for those that stand in settings to which a larger community has access.
Cities throughout history and in all parts of the world have had places where people have gathered together: to trade, to participate in religious festivals, to take part in politics, to be entertained, to talk, to socialize, or to exercise. Spaces might be purpose-built to accommodate such functionsâwe might think of plazas, market halls, thea tres, bathhouses or parksâbut other spaces of interaction, such as streets and areas of unused land between buildings, can develop more organically as areas of communal use. It is convenient to refer to such spaces as âpublicâ, but on closer consideration, truly public space proves impossible to find. There are always conventions, rules and regulations that govern the types of people who have access to particular areas and the types of activities and behaviour that are tolerated there. The power to reshape or transform the appearance or layout of âpublic spacesâ is also always unevenly distributed throughout society. Modern theorists of urbanism have argued that a fundamen tal characteristic of âpublic spaceâ is its contested nature.9 How it is used, who it is used by and what it looks like are always determined by negotiations of power between the different groups with a vested interest in it. The idea that the publicness of space is relative rather than absolute is emphatically stressed by the geographer Don Mitchell, who argues that the âidea [of public space] has never been guaranteed. It has only been won through concerted struggle, and then, after the fact, guaranteed (to some extent) in lawâ (emphasis in original).10
For most of the time the contest for public space proceeds slowly, through subtle acts of deviation or resistance to the societyâs norms, through discussions about the use of space or through changes to the built environment; occasionally, tensions increase rapidly and reach a breaking point, erupting in protests against the ruling authorities or in confrontation between different groups and sometimes in violence. Most of the time there is an underlying, enduring quality to public space that serves to reproduce a societyâs values and existing power structures. Public space acts as an arena in which familiar patterns of behaviour are played out repetitively day after day, sometimes, especially in pre-industrial societies, over many generations. The architecture that constitutes and frames public spaces has a permanence that grounds a community in a shared history. This again is especially true for the pre-globalized world, when people were typically much more rooted to their locales than they often are today. The power of the built environment to shape or influence relations of power has been exploited by authoritarian governments since the dawn of civilisation, and most pronouncedly by modern totalitarian regimes. The political significance of public architecture is more subtle and less straightforward to read for societies with greater political freedom and higher collective participation in government, yet here too the built environment is of profound importance in reinforcing, and at times challenging, existing relations of power. The categories âbuildingâ and âmonumentâ fade easily into one another. It is certainly useful to think of buildings that become particularly charged with meaning and thereby play an important role in reproducing cultural memory as monuments....