1 I have attempted to address the topic of “homiletic theology” in Michael Pasquarello III, Sacred Rhetoric: Preaching as a Theological and Pastoral Practice of the Church (2005; repr., Eugene, Ore.: Wipf & Stock, 2012); Christian Preaching: A Trinitarian Theology of Proclamation (2006; repr., Eugene, Ore.: Wipf & Stock, 2011); We Speak Because We Have First Been Spoken: A “Grammar” of the Preaching Life (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2009).
2 See Isabel Best’s editor’s Introduction in The Collected Sermons of Dietrich Bonhoeffer, ed. Isabel Best, trans. Douglas W. Stott et al. (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2012), xiii–xxvi. I was also encouraged by several earlier works that called attention to Bonhoeffer’s sermons and thinking about preaching, particularly Clyde E. Fant, ed.,Bonhoeffer: Worldly Preaching (Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 1975); Edwin Robertson, The Shame and the Sacrifice: The Life and Martyrdom of Dietrich Bonhoeffer (New York: Scribner, 1988); Frits de Lange, Waiting for the Word: Dietrich Bonhoeffer on Speaking about God, trans. Martin N. Walton (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995).
3 Randi Rashkover, “The Future of the Word and the Liturgical Turn,” in Liturgy, Time, and the Politics of Redemption, ed. Randi Rashkover and C. C. Pecknold (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2006), 3–4.
4 Charles Marsh writes, “Bonhoeffer did not become a practical theologian as such, at least in the sense in which that term is sometimes used to describe a theological field separate from systematic or philosophical theology; although I would say that the kind of writing he forged in the crucible of the church struggle points us toward a style of theological writing beyond conventional types, or perhaps one that moves us closer to the truth of things: a theology that confesses, that preaches, that prays, that rejoices, that proclaims the Amen and the Yes, that encourages and sustains the redemptive practices of the church; a theology, which even should the church fall into ruins, cleaves to the mysteries of Christ’s presence in the world.” Marsh, “Bonhoeffer on the Road to King: ‘Turning from the Phraseological to the Real,’” in Bonhoeffer and King: Their Legacies and Import for Christian Social Thought, ed. Willis Jenkins and Jennifer M. McBride (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2010), 137.
1 Eberhard Bethge, Dietrich Bonhoeffer: Theologian, Christian, Contemporary (London: Collins, 1970), 174.
2 Stephen R. Haynes’ study includes “the radical Bonhoeffer,” “the liberal Bonhoeffer,” “the conservative Bonhoeffer,” and “the universal Bonhoeffer.” Haynes, The Bonhoeffer Phenomenon: Portraits of a Protestant Saint (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2004).
3 This argument has been made by Haynes in The Bonhoeffer Phenomenon.
4 John W. de Gruchy, “The Reception of Bonhoeffer’s Theology,” in The Cambridge Companion to Dietrich Bonhoeffer, ed. John W. de Gruchy, Cambridge Companions to Religion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 93–94 (emphasis in original).
5 On the chronology of Bonhoeffer’s writings in relation to his theological development, see Wayne Whitson Floyd Jr., “Bonhoeffer’s Literary Legacy,” in de Gruchy, Cambridge Companion, 71–92.
6 A recent example of this approach is Andrew Root, Bonhoeffer as Youth Worker: A Theological Vision for Discipleship and Life Together (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2014).
7 See Keith L. Johnson, “Bonhoeffer and the End of the Christian Academy,” in Bonhoeffer, Christ, and Culture, ed. Keith L. Johnson and Timothy Larsen (Downers Grove, Ill.: IVP Academic, 2013), 153–74.
8 Rashkover, “Future of the Word,” 3–4.
9 This argument has been made by Haynes in The Bonhoeffer Phenomenon.
10 See Best’s editor’s introduction in Collected Sermons of Dietrich Bonhoeffer, xiii–xxvi. For an older, but still informative, introduction to Bonhoeffer’s thought on preaching, especially his homiletical lectures, see Fant,Bonhoeffer. It is interesting to note that the Cambridge Companion to Dietrich Bonhoeffer does not include a chapter on Bonhoeffer’s homiletical work.
11 A good example is the best-selling biography by Eric Metaxas that portrays Bonhoeffer as an “evangelical” but contains no references to preaching in its index. Metaxas, Bonhoeffer: Pastor, Martyr, Prophet, Spy (Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 2010). For a historical survey of evangelical appropriations of Bonhoeffer, see Timothy Larsen, “The Evangelical Reception of Dietrich Bonhoeffer,” in Bonhoeffer, Christ and Culture, ed. Keith L. Johnson and Timothy Larsen (Downers Grove, Ill.: IVP Academic, 2013), 39–57.
12 Dietrich Bonhoeffer Works: Act and Being; Transcendental Philosophy and Ontology in Systematic Theology, ed. Wayne Whitson Floyd Jr., trans. H. Martin Rumscheidt, Dietrich Bonhoeffer Works (English) 2 (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1996), 133. Hereafter the volume information will be abbreviated as DBWE. DBWE volumes are cited in the notes and bibliography by editor and volume title.
13 Charles Marsh writes, “Bonhoeffer did not become a practical theologian as such, at least in the sense in which that term is sometimes used to describe a theological field separate from systematic or philosophical theology; although I would say that the kind of writing he forged in the crucible of the church struggle points us toward a style of theological writing beyond the conventional types, or perhaps moves us closer to the truth of things: a theology that confesses, that preaches, that prays, that rejoices, that proclaims the Amen and the Yes, that encourages and sustains the redemptive practices of the church; a theology, which even should the church fall into ruins, cleaves to the mysteries of Christ’s presence in the world.” Marsh, “Bonhoeffer on the Road to King: ‘Turning from the Phraseological to the Real,’” in Jenkins and McBride,Bonhoeffer and King, 137.
14 I have attempted to address the topic of “homiletic theology” in Sacred Rhetoric; Christian Preaching; and We Speak Because We Have First Been Spoken.
15 Dietrich Bonhoeffer Works: Barcelona, Berlin, New York, 1928–1931, ed. Clifford J. Green, trans. Douglas W. Stott, DBWE 10 (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2008), 128.
16 I am indebted to David Schnasa Jacobsen for the term “theology on the way.” See Jacobsen’s introduction to Homiletical Theology: Preaching as Doing Theology, ed. Jacobsen, The Promise of Homiletical Theology 1 (Eugene, Ore.: Cascade, 2015), 5.
17 Robert W. Jenson writes of the Trinitarian nature of the conversation: “As the church speaks and hears the gospel and as the church responds in prayer and confession, the church’s life is a great conversation, and this conversation is our anticipatory par...