eBook - ePub
John Wesley, Practical Divinity and the Defence of Literature
Emma SalgÄrd Cunha
This is a test
Partager le livre
- 200 pages
- English
- ePUB (adapté aux mobiles)
- Disponible sur iOS et Android
eBook - ePub
John Wesley, Practical Divinity and the Defence of Literature
Emma SalgÄrd Cunha
DĂ©tails du livre
Aperçu du livre
Table des matiĂšres
Citations
Ă propos de ce livre
John Wesley (1703â1791), leader of British Methodism, was one of the most prolific literary figures of the eighteenth century, responsible for creating and disseminating a massive corpus of religious literature and for instigating a sophisticated programme of reading, writing and publishing within his Methodist Societies. John Wesley, Practical Divinity and the Defence of Literature takes the influential genre of practical divinity as a framework for understanding Wesley's role as an author, editor and critic of popular religious writing. It asks why he advocated the literary arts as a valid aspect of his evangelical theology, and how his Christian poetics impacted upon the religious experience of his followers.
Foire aux questions
Comment puis-je résilier mon abonnement ?
Il vous suffit de vous rendre dans la section compte dans paramĂštres et de cliquer sur « RĂ©silier lâabonnement ». Câest aussi simple que cela ! Une fois que vous aurez rĂ©siliĂ© votre abonnement, il restera actif pour le reste de la pĂ©riode pour laquelle vous avez payĂ©. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Puis-je / comment puis-je télécharger des livres ?
Pour le moment, tous nos livres en format ePub adaptĂ©s aux mobiles peuvent ĂȘtre tĂ©lĂ©chargĂ©s via lâapplication. La plupart de nos PDF sont Ă©galement disponibles en tĂ©lĂ©chargement et les autres seront tĂ©lĂ©chargeables trĂšs prochainement. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Quelle est la différence entre les formules tarifaires ?
Les deux abonnements vous donnent un accĂšs complet Ă la bibliothĂšque et Ă toutes les fonctionnalitĂ©s de Perlego. Les seules diffĂ©rences sont les tarifs ainsi que la pĂ©riode dâabonnement : avec lâabonnement annuel, vous Ă©conomiserez environ 30 % par rapport Ă 12 mois dâabonnement mensuel.
Quâest-ce que Perlego ?
Nous sommes un service dâabonnement Ă des ouvrages universitaires en ligne, oĂč vous pouvez accĂ©der Ă toute une bibliothĂšque pour un prix infĂ©rieur Ă celui dâun seul livre par mois. Avec plus dâun million de livres sur plus de 1 000 sujets, nous avons ce quâil vous faut ! DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Prenez-vous en charge la synthÚse vocale ?
Recherchez le symbole Ăcouter sur votre prochain livre pour voir si vous pouvez lâĂ©couter. Lâoutil Ăcouter lit le texte Ă haute voix pour vous, en surlignant le passage qui est en cours de lecture. Vous pouvez le mettre sur pause, lâaccĂ©lĂ©rer ou le ralentir. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Est-ce que John Wesley, Practical Divinity and the Defence of Literature est un PDF/ePUB en ligne ?
Oui, vous pouvez accĂ©der Ă John Wesley, Practical Divinity and the Defence of Literature par Emma SalgĂ„rd Cunha en format PDF et/ou ePUB ainsi quâĂ dâautres livres populaires dans Theology & Religion et Christian Denominations. Nous disposons de plus dâun million dâouvrages Ă dĂ©couvrir dans notre catalogue.
Informations
1Methodist literary culture
Literacy and grace
Over the last decade, increased interest in the relationship between religion and print in the eighteenth century has resulted in an increase too in our knowledge of Methodist book production and distribution. In part this is due to the improved accessibility of more ephemeral material relating to early Methodism. Research has also been advanced by the realisation that Methodism was a literary as well as a religious phenomenon. The 2003 Wesley Tercentenary Essays contained several essays focussing on the literary or print history of Methodist evangelicalism.1 A series of chapters and articles by Isabel Rivers and Michael Suarez have addressed the significance of religious print in the eighteenth-century book market, in the development of institutional religious education, and in the reading experiences of ordinary lay people. Archival research carried out at Duke University has in the past few years resulted in the creation of electronically accessible texts of both manuscript and published edited works of John and Charles Wesley, especially abridged and extracted texts which are often separated from Wesleyâs authorial corpus and so excluded from scholarly editions. Other studies have addressed in different ways Wesleyâs contributions and debts to the literary sphere: his use of scripture and of other sources, his engagement with contemporary scientific and philosophical writing, his late periodical Arminian Magazine and its relationship to contemporary publishing strategies.2 Most recently, studies of the Methodist influence on popular literature â plays, novels, satirical and controversial writing â have appeared. As in the seminal work by Phyllis Mack, Misty Andersonâs Imagining Methodism maps out the impact of Methodism through a study of its literary manifestations, especially in the imaginations of outsiders to the movement. Anderson figures the Methodist movement as both a threatening and a seductive model for an alternative, transgressive personal identity For Anderson, Methodismâs spectral presence in the literary sphere, in novels, satirical writings and prints, in music, and in autobiographical writing, expressed a growing literary concern for previously suppressed elements in experience and identity.
Andersonâs description of Methodism in the popular imagination puts a new twist on the critical fascination with the psychological and social contexts for the rise of the novel â perhaps especially the work of J. Paul Hunter. Hunterâs view of Methodism as a âcultural eventâ, which responded to an âabiding cultural lonelinessâ, has the unfortunate result of reducing the meaning of the evangelical âsingle moment of experienceâ to a cultural desire to divorce individual experience from narratives of causality or of human progress. By his account, the discovery of supreme meaning in the instantaneous conversion looks either fantastical or pathological. Despite this, Hunterâs incorporation of Methodist experience into the story of the early novel does provide a useful first step in acknowledging the pervasiveness of Methodism as both a religious and as a social phenomenon. It also points to the preoccupation with intuition versus reason, emotion versus thought, which characterised eighteenth-century Methodist testimony and coloured contemporary reactions to Wesleyâs Societies.
Brett McInellyâs analysis of anti-Methodist literature also discusses this entrenched connection between emotionalism and enthusiasm in popular conceptions of Methodism, especially demonstrating how the pejorative charge of religious enthusiasm was teamed with worries about the stability of the Church of England in the face of attacks from new forms of dissenting and evangelical worship.3 McInelly asserts that a âreadingâ of early Methodism is only possible in relation to its literary culture and textual reception:
[W]e need to see the revival as participating in and being produced by a rich textual culture that includes both pro- and anti-Methodist productions [âŠ] Methodism [needs to] be understood and approached as a rhetorical problemâas a point of contestation and debate resolved, at least in part, through discourse.4
Literary analyses of Wesleyâs evangelical strategies are apt given that the rise of Methodism occurred within a society suffused with religious books. Religion was an integral part of daily life and, unsurprisingly therefore, an integral part of the eighteenth-century literary diet. Around a fifth of all works published in the 1750s were on explicitly Christian themes.5 Writing and publishing were a normal and desirable aspect of a clergymanâs role, and were increasingly a possibility for the religiously-minded layman. Although âAugustanâ Christianity has often been depicted as restrictive and utilitarian in its outlook, even a cursory glance at some of the many different types of literature in circulation shows a culture which applied itself eagerly to thinking on a huge range of religious topics â from everyday devotion to the controversies of Protestant doctrine, and from church politics to mysticism and millennialism.
Religious literature was not a homogenous field. Despite the âestablishedâ nature of the Church of England at the turn of the eighteenth century, the institution covered many versions of Protestantism, including branches of radical Calvinism, Arminianism, Unitarianism and (by the mid-century) Methodism. The rise of dissenting schools and the gradual relaxation of governmental attitudes towards nonconformity (as well as the controversy this provoked) encouraged a flourishing market in religious publications aimed specifically at minor denominations, adding another branch to the already large and profitable religious book trade.6 The republication and circulation of sixteenth- and seventeenth-century religious books written by Christian authors from many different sects also contributed to the heterodoxy of the religious literary marketplace. Controversial writing, including a very copious range of anti-Methodist literature, was resoundingly popular. Christianity was not merely a context, but in many cases the stimulus for the very existence of works of literature.
As Ian Green admits at the beginning of his important study of Protestant publishing in the seventeenth century, it can often be difficult for literary historians to draw a meaningful line between the religious and secular literature of the period at all.7 A great deal of apparently secular writing â from political tracts, medical articles, and advice on running a household, to meditative lyric, nature poetry and philosophical essays â was fundamentally concerned with the same questions as were addressed in more explicitly theological works such as prayers, sermons or meditations. Indeed, our designations of âreligiousâ or âsecularâ (taking the latter in its now most common sense of âexcluding religionâ, rather than âconcerned with the worldâ) must be fluid and flexible in approaching the period. Novels and poetry might be read for religious or moral counsel. Classical texts were also used as improving literature for Christian readers. Practices such as anthologising and common-placing effaced the boundaries between the heterogeneous literary snippets they brought together in one binding. Even the most âprofaneâ texts show the marks of a society in which some variety of Protestant belief was an expected norm.
Wesley created a great deal of original material, much of it liturgical (sermons and hymns), catechetical (including letters and instructions to his followers, his preachers, and his students at Kingswood) and autobiographical (diaries, journals and other accounts of the rise of Methodism and significant incidents in his spiritual development). However, it is when we include his editorial activity, such as his republication of poetry, his solicitation and publication of letters and autobiographical narratives from his followers, and his abridgements of religious and philosophical tracts, that we get a true sense of the massive scope of his literary work. Rivers cautions us to avoid attaching modern notions of authorship to Wesley â his repurposing of other authorsâ work under his own name (or none) cannot carry the same ethical connotations as today, and as we shall see the borrowing and repurposing of other religious works was common practice across denominations:
We need to be cautious in applying to eighteenth-century editorial practices our modern proprietorial concern with the integrity of the author and his or her control over the original textâwhat is now known as âthe moral rights of the authorâ. It is anachronistic to accuse editors such as Edwards or Fawcett or Wesley (as some modern commentators doâthough ironically this criticism tends to be levelled at Wesley by admirers of Edwards) of violating the texts they reshaped to fit the needs of their own audiences. In order to write the history of early evangelicalism we need to add this awareness to our proper sense of the eclecticism and fluidity of evangelical culture.8
We see this clearly in the example of Wesleyâs Paradise Lost. His anonymous extraction of the work displays a sense that it is a commonly available resource for the furthering of Christianity, and that the original, âauthorialâ text is separable from abridged editions which apply themselves to a different purpose or readership. Yet Wesley was sensitive to issues of literary reputation and of what we might call intellectual as well as legal property, and he took care to prohibit unauthorised republication of his works even inside the Societies. He valued individual creativity and acknowledged poetic genius, and he was especially protective of the hymns written by his brother (though the issue of their co-authorship was also fraught at times). If nothing else, we need to bear in mind that the authorial and proprietary connotations of editing, abridging, publishing, distributing and performing or using were more fluidly applied within the reading culture of the eighteenth century than in our own.
Fundamentally, religious writing was of central importance to the creation of Methodism. Wesley showed a clear desire to use the technologies of print publication as a persuasive and educative tool for Christian ministry. Writing and publishing were significant to early Methodism in terms of the time, energy and professed religious objectives of its leaders and adherents. But when we address Wesleyâs commitment to literature as a function of his evangelical theology, discrepancies soon appear. In particular, I want to argue that Wesleyâs âpractical divinityâ, his focus on the spiritual journey of the individual towards conviction and grace, is not compatible with either the educative or aesthetic processes we usually equate with the production and reception of literature.
One simple way to imagine literature as a necessary tool in Methodism is to link it to its aims as an educational and pastoral organisation. It is persuasive to think of Wesleyâs investment in religious publishing in particular as a pragmatic use of the technology of print with a straightforward educational purpose, and thus to tie the expansion of the Methodist press to a wider cultural concern with Christian mission and evangelism. Wesley was canny enough to understand at once the value of print as a geographically and temporally unlimited form of preaching â wherever he was not, wherever his preachers were not, his words could still make an impact in written form. Just as his American contemporary, Jonathan Edwards, saw the potential for the expansion of the revival he saw around him in 1720s Northampton by swiftly publishing witness accounts on both sides of the Atlantic, Wesley too saw the possibility of creating a body of literature which reported, and in so doing furthered, his evangelical cause. The suggestion that he understood his literary responsibilities primarily as a furthering of the gospel message is also evidenced by his (and his fatherâs) association with the Society for the Propagation of Christian Knowledge (SPCK) and the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel (SPG), under whose auspices he first travelled as a missionary to the Georgian colonies in 1735.9 The most influential of the religious tract societies, the SPCK was an Anglican evangelical and philanthropic organisation founded in 1698, which functioned from the principle that reading was key to improving both the religion and the morals of the poor and uneducated at home and abroad. Its charitable book-donation program emphasised the practicality and usefulness of the reading mat...