eBook - ePub
Berkeley's Principles
Expanded and Explained
George Berkeley,Tyron Goldschmidt,Scott Stapleford
This is a test
Partager le livre
- 260 pages
- English
- ePUB (adapté aux mobiles)
- Disponible sur iOS et Android
eBook - ePub
Berkeley's Principles
Expanded and Explained
George Berkeley,Tyron Goldschmidt,Scott Stapleford
DĂ©tails du livre
Aperçu du livre
Table des matiĂšres
Citations
Ă propos de ce livre
Berkeley's Principles: Expanded and Explained includes the entire classical text of the Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge in bold font, a running commentary blended seamlessly into the text in regular font and analytic summaries of each section. The commentary is like a professor on hand to guide the reader through every line of the daunting prose and every move in the intricate argumentation. The unique design helps today's students learn how to read and engage with one of modern philosophy's most important and exciting classics.
Foire aux questions
Comment puis-je résilier mon abonnement ?
Il vous suffit de vous rendre dans la section compte dans paramĂštres et de cliquer sur « RĂ©silier lâabonnement ». Câest aussi simple que cela ! Une fois que vous aurez rĂ©siliĂ© votre abonnement, il restera actif pour le reste de la pĂ©riode pour laquelle vous avez payĂ©. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Puis-je / comment puis-je télécharger des livres ?
Pour le moment, tous nos livres en format ePub adaptĂ©s aux mobiles peuvent ĂȘtre tĂ©lĂ©chargĂ©s via lâapplication. La plupart de nos PDF sont Ă©galement disponibles en tĂ©lĂ©chargement et les autres seront tĂ©lĂ©chargeables trĂšs prochainement. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Quelle est la différence entre les formules tarifaires ?
Les deux abonnements vous donnent un accĂšs complet Ă la bibliothĂšque et Ă toutes les fonctionnalitĂ©s de Perlego. Les seules diffĂ©rences sont les tarifs ainsi que la pĂ©riode dâabonnement : avec lâabonnement annuel, vous Ă©conomiserez environ 30 % par rapport Ă 12 mois dâabonnement mensuel.
Quâest-ce que Perlego ?
Nous sommes un service dâabonnement Ă des ouvrages universitaires en ligne, oĂč vous pouvez accĂ©der Ă toute une bibliothĂšque pour un prix infĂ©rieur Ă celui dâun seul livre par mois. Avec plus dâun million de livres sur plus de 1 000 sujets, nous avons ce quâil vous faut ! DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Prenez-vous en charge la synthÚse vocale ?
Recherchez le symbole Ăcouter sur votre prochain livre pour voir si vous pouvez lâĂ©couter. Lâoutil Ăcouter lit le texte Ă haute voix pour vous, en surlignant le passage qui est en cours de lecture. Vous pouvez le mettre sur pause, lâaccĂ©lĂ©rer ou le ralentir. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Est-ce que Berkeley's Principles est un PDF/ePUB en ligne ?
Oui, vous pouvez accĂ©der Ă Berkeley's Principles par George Berkeley,Tyron Goldschmidt,Scott Stapleford en format PDF et/ou ePUB ainsi quâĂ dâautres livres populaires dans FilosofĂa et Historia y teorĂa filosĂłficas. Nous disposons de plus dâun million dâouvrages Ă dĂ©couvrir dans notre catalogue.
Informations
Of the Principles of Human Knowledge: Part I
The objects of human knowledge are ideasânothing else is or can be perceived. The proper object of perception differs for each sensory modality: Sight perceives light and colours, hearing perceives sounds, smell perceives odours and so on. Clusters of ideas regularly perceived in unison are treated as objects and typically given a name. They trigger positive or negative emotions in us depending on whether we find them pleasing or displeasing.
1. Let us reflect on what is present to the conscious mind. What sorts of things do we perceive? Weâll call the things we perceiveâthe things that are immediately present to the conscious mindâthe âobjects of human knowledgeâ. It is evident to any one who looks inside his own mind and takes a survey of these objects of human knowledge that they fall into three distinct groups. When I focus on the objects before me, it is clear that they are either (1) ideas actually imprinted on and coming from the senses, or else (2) such objects as are perceived by attending to the passions I undergoâsuch as a feeling of satisfaction or desireâand concentrating on the operations of the mind while it is working, or lastly (3) ideas formed by the help of memory and imagination, either uniting and compounding sensory data, or dividing it, or else reproducing through recollectionâwhat you might call âbarely representingââthose things originally perceived in the aforesaid ways. Here I am partly in agreement with my English predecessor, John Locke (1632â1704), who calls them (1) ideas of sensation, (2) ideas of reflection and (3) ideas of the imagination (which includes the ideas of memory). A point of disagreement concerns (2): As will become clear shortly, there are no ideas of reflection, but only what I will later call notions (see Sections 27 and 143). Weâll talk about the third group in Sections 28 to 33. For now, we should direct our attention to the first groupâthe ideas of sensation. We have five senses and each of them gives us a certain type of idea. By sight I have the ideas of light and colours with their several degrees of intensity and variations in hue. By touch I perceive, for example, hard and soft, heat and cold, motion and resistance, and of all these qualities I perceive more and less either as to their quantityâthe number of things moving, for instanceâor their degreeâmore swiftly, say, or very slow. Smelling furnishes me with odours; the palate supplies me with tastes, and hearing conveys sounds to the mind in all their variety of tone and composition. And as several of these are observed to accompany each other regularly in my experience, they come to be marked by one name, and so to be reputed, or viewed as, one individual thing. Thus, for example, a certain colour, taste, smell, figure and consistence having been observed to go together on various occasions, are accounted and regarded as one distinct thing, signified and set off from all others by the name âappleâ. The object itself is just this cluster of ideas which we pick out with that word as a matter of convenience. Other collections of ideas constitute a stone, a tree, a book, and so on. For what I say of the apple holds, likewise, for all other sensible things; which things, insofar as they are pleasing or disagreeable to us, stir up and excite the passions of love, hatred, joy, grief, and so forth, causing us to seek them out or to avoid them, as the case may be.
The subject of human knowledge is the mindâalso called the âsoulâ, âspiritâ or âselfâ. It is the thinking thing which has ideas and in which they exist. It is neither reducible to ideas nor built up out of them. The mind is an active being that can perceive, will, imagine and remember.
2. But besides all that endless variety of ideas there are in the mind or soul, above and beyond all the objects of human knowledge, there is likewise the mind itself, something which knows ideas or perceives them. In addition to knowing and perceiving, moreover, the mind manipulates ideas in various ways and exercises diverse operations, such as willing (I may call up the idea of red), imagining (I imagine eating an apple), and remembering (I remember reading a book). The mind evidently has this power to perceive ideas, to recollect and think about them when they are no longer present in sensation, to break them apart, as it were, and reassemble them in new combinations (see Introduction, Section 10). This perceiving, active being that wills, imagines, recalls and reassembles is what I call a âmindâ, âspiritâ, âsoulâ or âmy selfâ. Though others may invest these terms with different meanings, I use them interchangeably. By which wordsââmindâ, âsoulâ, âspiritââtherefore, I do not mean to pick out or denote any one of my ideas, but a thing entirely distinct from them, that very thing wherein they exist. The mind is thus the receptacle of ideas or, putting it more plainly, it is that which âhasâ them. To say that the mind âhasâ ideas is the same as saying that it is the thing, whereby they are perceived; for the existence of an idea consists solely in being perceived by a mind.
No one supposes that a mere thought, an emotion or something imagined can exist outside the mind and unperceived. The same thing holds for sensations: They cannot exist outside of a mind perceiving them. In order to grasp this truthâthat no idea of sensation can exist unperceivedâwe need only understand what an idea is. Understanding what an idea is involvesâat least in partâunderstanding the existence conditions for ideas. And since sensible objects are collections of sensory ideas (see Section 1), their existence conditions are the same as those for ideas. To understand that the being of sensible objects consists in their being perceived, therefore, you need only understand what it means to say that an ideaâor a collection of ideasâexists. Berkeley identifies three existence conditions here in support of his idealist principle that no sensible object can exist outside of a mind perceiving it.
3. Consider a thought (that 12 is greater than seven, for instance), a passion (say, a feeling of happiness) and an idea formed by the imagination (maybe the idea of Medusa or Pegasus). That none of these thingsâneither our thoughts, nor passions, nor ideas formed by the imagination, whether we take the examples just given or othersâexist without the mind, is what every body believes and will certainly allow to be true. For who could suppose that bare ideas like these exist outside the mind independently of being perceived? Their existence is reducible to our perception of themâthey are mere ideas, after all. And it seems no less evident to me that the same thing must hold for ideas of sensation, taken individually or in combination. What I mean to say is that the various sensations or ideas imprinted on the mind by the five senses, however they are blended or combined together (that is, whatever objects they composeâan apple, a tree, a book or whatever) cannot exist otherwise than in a mind perceiving them. Some truths are as clear as daylight to anyone who thinks them through. That ideas cannot exist outside of minds perceiving them is a case in point. I think a clear and intuitive knowledge may be obtained of this obvious truth, by any one that shall attend to his thoughts carefully and consider what is meant by the term âexistâ when it is applied to sensible things. I ask you, what does it mean to say that a sensible object exists? What are we asserting when we claim that something sensible is? Here I am in my study with papers spread out before me. The table I write on, I say, exists, and to say that is no more than to say that I perceive it, that I see and feel it; and even if I were to go out of my study and head downstairs to the kitchen, I should still say it existed, meaning thereby, not that I perceive it now, but that if I was in my study I might perceive it, indeed, that I would perceive it, or that some other spirit actually does perceive itâit could be God or just some other person, such as my maid or my servant. Itâs not as if thereâs a table perceived and a table unperceived. I donât even understand the expression âa table unperceivedâ. And I doubt that my reader does either. Consider the claim: âThere was an odourâ. By this, I mean only that I had a perception of smellâthat is to say, that it, the odour, was smelled; when I say there was a sound, I mean only that I perceived something by hearingâthat is to say, that it, the sound, was heard; and when I say there was a colour or figure, I just mean that I had a visual or tactile sensation and thus that it, the colour or figure, was perceived by sight or touch. This is all that I can understand by these and the like expressionsâthey are simply reports on perceptions I had. They make no reference to things existing apart from the mind or perception. For as to what is said by some philosophers of the material or absolute existence of unthinking things outside the mind and without any relation to their being perceived, that seems to me perfectly unintelligible and totally meaningless. For sensible objects, to be is to be perceived, plain and simple. Their esse is percipi, in other words, nor is it possible they should have any existence, outside of the minds or thinking things which perceive them. So I am not denying that a table exists. I am explaining what it means to say that a table exists. And the only sense I can put on that expression is in terms of actual and possible perceptions. Thatâs what we all mean, and the only thing we can mean, by âexistâ when applied to objects of the senses.
Philosophers believe that the things around usâordinary objects such as apples and oranges, tables and chairsâexist outside our minds. But this is a mistake. For the objects around us are what we perceive by sense. And what we perceive by sense are ideas, as explained already in Section 1. Thus, the objects around us are id...