eBook - ePub
Beyond the Grammar Wars
A Resource for Teachers and Students on Developing Language Knowledge in the English/Literacy Classroom
Terry Locke, Terry Locke
This is a test
- 326 pages
- English
- ePUB (adapté aux mobiles)
- Disponible sur iOS et Android
eBook - ePub
Beyond the Grammar Wars
A Resource for Teachers and Students on Developing Language Knowledge in the English/Literacy Classroom
Terry Locke, Terry Locke
DĂ©tails du livre
Aperçu du livre
Table des matiĂšres
Citations
Ă propos de ce livre
Are there evidence-based answers to the broad question "What explicit knowledge about language in teachers and/or students appears to enhance literacy development in some way"? Distinguished by its global perspective, its currency, and its comprehensiveness, Beyond the Grammar Wars:
-
- provides an historical overview of the debates around grammar and English/literacy teaching in four settings: the US, England, Scotland and Australia
-
- offers an up-to-date account of what the research is telling (and not telling) us about the effectiveness of certain kinds of grammar-based pedagogies in English/literacy classrooms
-
- takes readers into English/literacy classrooms through a range of examples of language/grammar-based pedagogies which have proven to be successful
-
- addresses metalinguistic issues related to changes in textual practices in a digital and multimodal age, and explores the challenges for educators who are committed to finding a "usable grammar" to contribute to teaching and learning in relation to these practices.
All of the contributors are acknowledged experts in their field. Activities designed for use in language and literacy education courses actively engage students in reflecting on and applying the content in their own teaching contexts.
Foire aux questions
Comment puis-je résilier mon abonnement ?
Il vous suffit de vous rendre dans la section compte dans paramĂštres et de cliquer sur « RĂ©silier lâabonnement ». Câest aussi simple que cela ! Une fois que vous aurez rĂ©siliĂ© votre abonnement, il restera actif pour le reste de la pĂ©riode pour laquelle vous avez payĂ©. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Puis-je / comment puis-je télécharger des livres ?
Pour le moment, tous nos livres en format ePub adaptĂ©s aux mobiles peuvent ĂȘtre tĂ©lĂ©chargĂ©s via lâapplication. La plupart de nos PDF sont Ă©galement disponibles en tĂ©lĂ©chargement et les autres seront tĂ©lĂ©chargeables trĂšs prochainement. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Quelle est la différence entre les formules tarifaires ?
Les deux abonnements vous donnent un accĂšs complet Ă la bibliothĂšque et Ă toutes les fonctionnalitĂ©s de Perlego. Les seules diffĂ©rences sont les tarifs ainsi que la pĂ©riode dâabonnement : avec lâabonnement annuel, vous Ă©conomiserez environ 30 % par rapport Ă 12 mois dâabonnement mensuel.
Quâest-ce que Perlego ?
Nous sommes un service dâabonnement Ă des ouvrages universitaires en ligne, oĂč vous pouvez accĂ©der Ă toute une bibliothĂšque pour un prix infĂ©rieur Ă celui dâun seul livre par mois. Avec plus dâun million de livres sur plus de 1 000 sujets, nous avons ce quâil vous faut ! DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Prenez-vous en charge la synthÚse vocale ?
Recherchez le symbole Ăcouter sur votre prochain livre pour voir si vous pouvez lâĂ©couter. Lâoutil Ăcouter lit le texte Ă haute voix pour vous, en surlignant le passage qui est en cours de lecture. Vous pouvez le mettre sur pause, lâaccĂ©lĂ©rer ou le ralentir. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Est-ce que Beyond the Grammar Wars est un PDF/ePUB en ligne ?
Oui, vous pouvez accĂ©der Ă Beyond the Grammar Wars par Terry Locke, Terry Locke en format PDF et/ou ePUB ainsi quâĂ dâautres livres populaires dans Education et Education General. Nous disposons de plus dâun million dâouvrages Ă dĂ©couvrir dans notre catalogue.
Informations
Chapter 1
Introduction
âGrammar Warsâ and Beyond
Terry Locke
For me as editor, this book has had a multiplicity of prompts. Some of these stem from dilemmas I faced as a classroom teacher and Head of English in a number of New Zealand secondary schools; others stem from conversations subsequent to my involvement as an educational researcher in perhaps the biggest ever review of the impact of two kinds of formal grammar teaching (syntax and sentence-combining) on the quality of student writing (see Andrews et al., 2004a, 2004b). In this introduction, I will be aware of donning a variety of hats at different times: former classroom teacher, teacher educator and educational researcher. This is appropriate, I think, since my co-contributors and I would see ourselves as addressing a broad audience: English/literacy/L1 teachers, pre-service teachers, teacher educators and members of the academic community with an interest in this topic.
The over-riding question driving this book is: What explicit/implicit knowledge about language in teachers and/or students appears to enhance literacy development in some way? It is a question which takes many forms depending on context. It is also the question that has arguably generated more acrimonious debate than any other among English/literacy teachers, linguists and educationalists in the last five decades (see Locke, 2009).
The acrimony is reflected in the kinds of metaphors used to draw attention to the various ways this question has been framed, and the attack and defense mode of much of the argumentation. Urszula Clark (2001) played on this when she entitled her account of language, history and the disciplining of English, War Words. In a Bernsteinian analysis of the âGrammar Warsâ in England, Clark (2005 and in this book) views the conflict in terms of Conservative government attempts starting in 1984 to reverse a curriculum trend that âhad become increasingly decentralized, relocated from the government to the teaching profession, with both content and assessment becoming increasingly deregularizedâ and
to pull control over education back towards the centre even more. The curriculum envisaged by this reversal amounted to a restoration of a grammar school curriculum, with the privileged text in English returning to the teaching of Standard English, its grammar and its literature. (2005, p. 37)
In the United States, a major focus of conflict has been the position and positioning of grammar within American classrooms. As Kolln and Hancock argue in their chapter in this book, a range of forces (again, the military metaphor) in the United States signaled the demise of a systematic focus on grammar in US classrooms and a shut-down to dialogue between linguists and educationalists in respect of ways in which grammar could be used in the service of literacy acquisition. For these authors, these forces include NCTE policy, âminimalistâ grammar and its anti-knowledge stance, whole-language approaches to language acquisition, the ascendancy of process approaches within composition and the primacy of literature within English curriculums at all levels. Interestingly, Kolln and Hancock view Constance Weaver, who also contributes to this book, as associated with the first two items on this list. In the New Zealand context, as Elizabeth Gordon has described, while there have been pressures to accord traditional grammar knowledge the same kind of status in the educational system as that advocated by conservatives in England, a different kind of âgrammar warâ was fought in the early 1990s, when it was suggested that the indigenous language, Maaori (an official language), be used as a comparison language for enhancing studentsâ understandings of the workings of English (see Gordon, 2005).
What makes the âgrammar warsâ in the Australian context interesting, as Frances Christie explains in her chapter, is that it involved the kind of debate that Kolln and Hancock lament the lack of in the United States. In Australia, the debate was between two versions of subject English, both of which offered a social, âprogressiveâ view of English but which viewed the place of explicit grammatical knowledge and what constituted such knowledge (i.e. whose knowledge) very differently. The central issue, to use Christieâs words, was âWhat knowledge about language should be taught in the name of subject English?â
Activity: Reflecting on the Teaching of Grammar as Controversial
Is the teaching of grammar a controversial issue in your own educational setting? If so, identify some of the positions that appear to be in conflict in your setting. What sorts of beliefs about the teaching of grammar do advocates of opposing positions have?
Some of my own prompts in initiating this project have their origins close to home â in my experiences as a teacher, teacher educator and researcher in the New Zealand context. It is a context that has had its own share of social upheaval and educational âreformâ in the last 20 years (Locke, 2001, 2004). As in other settings, reform drivers were often underpinned by discourses of crisis and a panic about falling standards, especially literacy standards. In the New Zealand setting, the panacea was less a turn back to traditional grammar (as educational conservatives would have it), but rather a turn to a focus on pre-specified learning outcomes (as neo-liberals driving an extrinsic accountability agenda would have it). In the larger context of struggles over administrative, curriculum and assessment policy and practice, questions of âgrammarâ and âlanguageâ were minor blips on the radar screen.
I was, however, one of a generation of teachers that was asked to implement a sociolinguistic approach to language study in the senior secondary English class in the 1980s. My university English degree had not prepared me for this role, though the core degree still required majors to do âlanguageâ papers and had yet to suffer the slings and arrows of critical theory. The sociolinguistic resources teachers worked with came with plenty of terminological baggage â you couldnât analyze the language of conversation without talking about anacoluthons, could you? This metalanguage was certainly a different breed from the traditional grammar I was subjected to as a student in the 1950s and 1960s as I worked my way through endless, decontextualized parsing exercises. But while it aroused in some students and teachers an interest in the way language worked in situ, it didnât appear to be designed to help students write better and seemed marginally related to reading, especially literary reading.
As a secondary teacher in the late 1980s and early 1990s, I had little linguistic training, some knowledge of traditional grammar (augmented by my learning of additional languages) and no clue whatsoever in respect of the place of knowledge about language in the English/literacy classroom. I identify with a recollection of Richard Andrews (2005), who writes: âAs a practicing English teacher ⊠I created my own mix of top-down (research-informed) and bottom-up (pragmatic, inventive, intuitive) approaches to the teaching of writing, and employed whichever method seemed right for the learners I was teachingâ (p. 69). Nevertheless, in 1992, as a recently appointed HOD English of a large, rather multilingual secondary school, I was struck by the realization that ignorance about language was widespread. Undeterred by my own shortcomings, I wrote and published a small book entitled Every Studentâs English Language Manual. The first part of the book covered âElements of Languageâ (morphology, diction, spelling, punctuation, word classes and syntax) and the second âApplicationsâ, by relating language use to particular genres (for example, formal letters, reports, essays, display ads and lyric poems). If you had asked me to indicate how âresearch-informedâ the book was, I would have mentioned Halliday and Hasan (1985), Andrewsâ work on rhetoric and argumentation (1992, 1993) and the work of Australian genre theorists such as Jim Martin that had snuck across the Tasman Sea in the dead of night (Cope & Kalantzis, 1993). But I couldnât have told you whether or not English teachers should teach âgrammarâ in their classrooms.
Activity: Identifying Sources of Knowledge
Do you identify with the quotation from Richard Andrews above? Identify a course of action you took as a teacher in relation to your language/English teaching that you might describe as intuitive. In addition, identify a âtop-downâ source that has influenced your teaching or your thinking about teaching. This source might be a textbook, or a model lesson you have observed, or some other kind of document or practice.
The âExploring Languageâ project was initiated by the New Zealand Association for the Teaching of English (NZATE)1 and led to a book of the same title (Ministry of Education, 1996). However, there was never an adequate professional development program, underpinned by coherent theory and sound research, to help teachers know how to use in classrooms that âknowledge about languageâ the big blue book contained. Meanwhile, as I write, pedagogical practice in respect of language in New Zealand schools is being increasingly shaped by the availability of cheap, write-on, âbasic Englishâ texts, diagnostic testing regimes such as AsTTle2 and ways in which worthwhile knowledge (including knowledge about language) is being shaped by high-stakes, summative assessment regimes such as the National Certificate of Educational Achievement (NCEA).
So much for prompts from my own backyard. In respect of the bigger stage, I was (perhaps) fortunate enough to be involved in an English Review team, based at the University of York and chaired by Richard Andrews, which undertook two systematic reviews in association with the Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Coordinating Centre (EPPI-Centre) on (1) whether the formal teaching of sentence grammar or (2) whether instruction in sentence-combining was effective in helping 5- to 16-year-olds write better (see Andrews et al., 2004a, 2004b). Andrewsâ take on this project and the debate that has occurred in its aftermath are a focus of his chapter in this book.
For my own part, involvement in the project raised many questions in my own mind about the virtues of systematic reviews and how they construct âbest evidenceâ.3 In respect of grammar and knowledge about language, I was left with the uneasy sense that our published reviews begged a lot of questions. For instance, the framing of our research questions encouraged a separation of sentence-level grammar considerations from a wider view of what âgrammar knowledgeâ might mean. A definition such as the following from Cope and Kalantzis (1993, p. 20) would have fallen outside this frame:
âGrammarâ is a term that describes the relation of language to metalanguage; of text to generalizations about text; of experience to theory; of the concrete world of human discursive activity to abstractions which generalize about the regularities and irregularities in that world.
In addition, because the focus of the review was on effectiveness, there was a tendency to favor studies reporting trials that were controlled in various ways, but whose measures of writing effectiveness were constrained, narrow and sometimes fatuous. This tendency also led to a selection of studies which focused on
1. NZATE is the professional association of New Zealand secondary English teachers and is equivalent to such organizations as AATE, NATE and NCTE.
2. AsTTle is a system of diagnostic testing for a range of competencies, including reading comprehension.
3. I am broadly sympathetic to Maggie MacLureâs assault on systemic reviews in MacLure, M. (2005). âClarity bordering on stupidityâ: Whereâs the quality in systematic review? Journal of Education Policy, 20(4), 393â416.
the intervention proper, as if such interventions were neutral and separable from the classroom teacher and his/her professional knowledge (including knowledge about language) and value system.
My own list of questions subsequent to the English Review Groupâs having done its work was included in the rationale for a special issue on âKnowledge about Language in the English/Literacy Classroomâ for the journal English Teaching: Practice and Critique.4 They were:
âą What is meant by âknowledge about languageâ?
âą Whose knowledges are we talking about when we refer to âknowledge about languageâ?
âą In what ways is âknowledge about grammarâ subsumed under the term âknowledge about languageâ?
âą What relationships exist (as productive or non-productive) between the development of linguistics as an academic domain and educational policy and practice in respect of the presence of âknowledge about languageâ in the English/literacy classroom?
âą What (if any) justifications exist for the inclusion of âknowledge about languageâ in an âintendedâ curriculum as knowledge worth knowing for itself?
âą How is knowledge about language affected by the technologized nature of its object?
âą Put another way, how does metalanguage need to change under pressure from the increased digitizing and graphicization of texts and text-based practice?
âą Are there any sustainable arguments for a positive relationship between knowledge about language (however understood) and increased effectiveness in some aspect of textual practice (reading/viewing or production)?
âą What is the relationship between metalanguage and metacognition?
âą What pedagogical frameworks or approaches appear to render âknowledge about languageâ effective or ineffective as a component of literacy teaching and learning?
The chapters in this book address these questions and others in different ways and out of different contexts. The pivotal question, of course, is: What is meant by knowledge about language? Once a meaning is attributed to the term, then claims can be made for a relationship between either explicit or implicit knowledge and the enhancement of some aspect of literacy acquisition, for example, writing. If a positive relationship is claimed, more particular claims can be made in respect of whether explicit or simply implicit knowledge is needed for students to develop the sorts of literacies deemed to be desirable in terms of an intended curriculum or the requirements of a fulfilling life and citizenship, and the kinds of explicit knowledge deemed to be a desirable aspect of a teacherâs content a...
Table des matiĂšres
Normes de citation pour Beyond the Grammar Wars
APA 6 Citation
[author missing]. (2010). Beyond the Grammar Wars (1st ed.). Taylor and Francis. Retrieved from https://www.perlego.com/book/1607083/beyond-the-grammar-wars-a-resource-for-teachers-and-students-on-developing-language-knowledge-in-the-englishliteracy-classroom-pdf (Original work published 2010)
Chicago Citation
[author missing]. (2010) 2010. Beyond the Grammar Wars. 1st ed. Taylor and Francis. https://www.perlego.com/book/1607083/beyond-the-grammar-wars-a-resource-for-teachers-and-students-on-developing-language-knowledge-in-the-englishliteracy-classroom-pdf.
Harvard Citation
[author missing] (2010) Beyond the Grammar Wars. 1st edn. Taylor and Francis. Available at: https://www.perlego.com/book/1607083/beyond-the-grammar-wars-a-resource-for-teachers-and-students-on-developing-language-knowledge-in-the-englishliteracy-classroom-pdf (Accessed: 14 October 2022).
MLA 7 Citation
[author missing]. Beyond the Grammar Wars. 1st ed. Taylor and Francis, 2010. Web. 14 Oct. 2022.