eBook - ePub
The Art of Childhood and Adolescence
The Construction of Meaning
John Matthews
This is a test
Partager le livre
- 198 pages
- English
- ePUB (adapté aux mobiles)
- Disponible sur iOS et Android
eBook - ePub
The Art of Childhood and Adolescence
The Construction of Meaning
John Matthews
DĂ©tails du livre
Aperçu du livre
Table des matiĂšres
Citations
Ă propos de ce livre
The Art of Childhood and Adolescence is composed of completely new research on the development of representational thinking from infancy through to adolescence. It makes an important contribution to the theory of children's development and to practitioners' understanding, as well as suggesting new paths of inquiry. The book draws on highly detailed longitudinal studies, conducted over 24 years (20 in London and 4 in Singapore). Line drawings and photographs are used to illustrate important concepts. Matthews, highly respected internationally, also sheds light on current debates, such as the opposition of culturally specific and universal development in children the world over.
Foire aux questions
Comment puis-je résilier mon abonnement ?
Il vous suffit de vous rendre dans la section compte dans paramĂštres et de cliquer sur « RĂ©silier lâabonnement ». Câest aussi simple que cela ! Une fois que vous aurez rĂ©siliĂ© votre abonnement, il restera actif pour le reste de la pĂ©riode pour laquelle vous avez payĂ©. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Puis-je / comment puis-je télécharger des livres ?
Pour le moment, tous nos livres en format ePub adaptĂ©s aux mobiles peuvent ĂȘtre tĂ©lĂ©chargĂ©s via lâapplication. La plupart de nos PDF sont Ă©galement disponibles en tĂ©lĂ©chargement et les autres seront tĂ©lĂ©chargeables trĂšs prochainement. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Quelle est la différence entre les formules tarifaires ?
Les deux abonnements vous donnent un accĂšs complet Ă la bibliothĂšque et Ă toutes les fonctionnalitĂ©s de Perlego. Les seules diffĂ©rences sont les tarifs ainsi que la pĂ©riode dâabonnement : avec lâabonnement annuel, vous Ă©conomiserez environ 30 % par rapport Ă 12 mois dâabonnement mensuel.
Quâest-ce que Perlego ?
Nous sommes un service dâabonnement Ă des ouvrages universitaires en ligne, oĂč vous pouvez accĂ©der Ă toute une bibliothĂšque pour un prix infĂ©rieur Ă celui dâun seul livre par mois. Avec plus dâun million de livres sur plus de 1 000 sujets, nous avons ce quâil vous faut ! DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Prenez-vous en charge la synthÚse vocale ?
Recherchez le symbole Ăcouter sur votre prochain livre pour voir si vous pouvez lâĂ©couter. Lâoutil Ăcouter lit le texte Ă haute voix pour vous, en surlignant le passage qui est en cours de lecture. Vous pouvez le mettre sur pause, lâaccĂ©lĂ©rer ou le ralentir. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Est-ce que The Art of Childhood and Adolescence est un PDF/ePUB en ligne ?
Oui, vous pouvez accĂ©der Ă The Art of Childhood and Adolescence par John Matthews en format PDF et/ou ePUB ainsi quâĂ dâautres livres populaires dans Didattica et Didattica generale. Nous disposons de plus dâun million dâouvrages Ă dĂ©couvrir dans notre catalogue.
Informations
Chapter 1
Chaos and Order: The Genesis of Expressive and Representational Thought
Introduction
The scene is a nursery class. A group of eight children, average age three years, are sitting around a table drawing five models intended to represent human figures. Each model is made of two plasticine ovoid volumes, attached in a vertical alignment, the top ovoid smaller than the lower, representing the âheadâ; the larger, lower ovoid representing the âbodyâ. The âlegsâ of these figures are made from two rods, inserted into the lower ovoid. There are no âarmsâ. The children have arrived at various solutions for drawing these figures. Some just draw elliptical shapes from vigorous rotational movements of their drawing hands. Some of these children are singing as they draw, the cadences of their voices matched to the emphatic thrusts of their pencils. Other children have found a way of showing two, joined, roundish volumes, by overlapping two rotational or closed shapesâroughly circular linear closures. Other children draw series of straightish, parallel lines. Perhaps they are drawing the legs of the figures.
A few children draw a single closed shape with two lines attachedâknown as the âtadpoleâ figureâeven though the three-dimensional models have two connected round forms. Similarly, even though there are only two rods attached to the three-dimensional model before them, some children do not stop when they have attached two lines to their single closure, but go on to add many more. It is as if they find the repeated action of attaching these rays to the perimeter of a closed shape irresistible.
A few of the children make drawings in which two elliptical or circular closures are attached along a vertical axis, with two vertical, parallel lines adjoined to the underside of the lower oval. These drawings could be said to visually correspond to a notional view of the objects. Other children however, do not seem to look at the models at all, and their drawings seem in no way to resemble them. For example, a girl called Wen Hui makes a zigzag line.
Other drawing actions seem, at first glance, to be quite haphazard, and easily influenced by random events, as if the children have difficulty concentrating on a single task. Some childrenâs drawing seems influenced by subtle, barely detectable events. Sounds and movements in the environment seem to repeatedly deflect the course of their drawing. Other children, who initially capture in their drawings some of the observable characteristics of the objects (two linked closures with two straight lines), seem to quickly lose track of the original task of drawing the model figures. They repeatedly draw these components with great enthusiasm, but as isolated elements, without any apparent regard for the observable models.
Given the nature of some of random disturbances that occur, it is not always surprising that childrenâs drawing procedures should sometimes be affected. One such disturbance is a sudden flash of lightning, followed quickly by a crash of thunder, and heavy, falling rain. Immediately upon hearing this, a boy called Evan makes a sudden drawing action involving his pencil being pressed hard against the paper and then pulled and pushed vigorously to and from his body. As he makes this mark he says, âAaaaaaaaâŠâ. Then, he raises his pencil high above his head and, with an over-arm action, aims it down into the pencil box on the table, saying âAaaaaaâŠâ as his moving hand describes a descending arc in space and âBfff!â at its moment of impact, after which he lets the pencil go. He then presses his palms down flat on his drawing, pursing his lips in a pressured, concentrated way whilst screwing up his eyes. His mien suggests a suppressed shout is about to burst from his lips. He then raises both hands together back to his shoulder level and, still making his extraordinary grimace, brings both arms down together to land palms down on his drawing, at which point he relaxes his facial muscles into a smile.
Sitting next to him, his friend Aaron echoes these actions, making vigorous pushpulling actions of his pencil, whilst intoning âAaaaaaaaaâŠâ. Then, with a similar overarm action, he aims his pencil into the box, saying âAaaaaaaaâŠâ as his hand descends, and âBfff!â when the pencil arrives in the box and is released from his hand. Then he moves both hands up together into the air for a brief moment, rotates them in unison so that they are palm uppermost, before allowing them to fall, as if lifeless, palm uppermost, onto his drawing.
Evan succeeds in drawing two rotational marks, which he differentiates in colour. Then he says very quietly, âFireâ. A teacher happens to be nearby and hears this. âDid you say âfireâ?â she asks. Evan explains: âOne of the giants is on fire,â as he makes vigorous horizontal arcs of his empty palm over the drawing. The teacher says: âOrange is a good colour.â Evan then draws four lines; three vertical and one horizontal. âAll the rest of the men!â he says. âBop! Fire! Booooo! Ooooooh!!!â he exclaims, making a variety of marks. His actions seem to quickly influence his friends. Pei Ji, sitting next to him, to his left, has made a closed shape in which she places a rotational mark. She leans over to Evan to tell him she is drawing a âfireâ. Evan leans across and, with a light, downward tap of his pencil, makes a little mark inside her closed shape. She smiles happily.
The teacher asks: âWhy do you keep saying âfireâ? Thereâs no fire.â Evan looks up at her and, touching the rotational shape on the paper, says, âThereâs the orange fireâ. Then, Evan and his friend Aaron almost in unison make intense rotational marking movements, rhythmically chanting as they do so: âFire fire fire fire fire fire fire fire fireâŠâ
âI thought you said they look like snowmen?â their teacher tries to remind them. (Earlier, she had suggested that the models looked like snowmen.) She seems to be trying to divert them back to the original task of drawing the models. Although he does not look up, Evan is in fact listening, for he slows up his drawing action and, with the pencil held vertically against the paper, makes a strong lateral line to the left and then back to his right, resulting in a long, sharply pointed closure.
âCan you look at these things and draw? Evan? Evan?â the teacher persists, trying to gain his attention. âYes!â He squeaks excitedly, nodding his head enthusiastically, making sudden fanning motions from side to side with his crayon. A fourth child, Jia Hao, who has also succeeded in drawing two vertically aligned elliptical closed shapes, now joins in, making combinations of arcing lines and dynamic zigzags over his original drawing in time to Pei Jiâs, Aaronâs and Evanâs chanting, âFire fire fireâŠâ and his own, more moaning vocalization.
âAre you looking at these things, Evan? Aaron?â asks the teacher. There is a momentary pause. Evan screws up his eyes and, with his head and neck retracted in exaggerated tension, his lips taut, with an outsretched arm, raises the pencil above his head and brings it down in a forceful yet controlled trajectory to the paper. As the point of the pencil touches the paper, he starts a âShssshhhhhhhhhhhh!â sound that is continued over the ensuing arcing movements of his pencil. âDonât forget to look at these things and draw,â the teacher is saying. âFire fire fire fire,â says Aaron as he makes an orange rotational mark. Evan says: âFiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiire!â This vocalization is prolonged over five seconds, as he makes horizontal arcing movements at frenetic speed, whilst shaking his head from side to side very fast. These arcing movements are momentarily translated into rotational elliptical marks before suddenly, with a light tap of his pencil, his drawing comes to an end. He looks up. The fire has âcaught onâ, so to speak, and other children murmur âFire, fire, fire, fireâ. But Evan has finished.
The teacher, perhaps a trifle relieved, asks: âWhat happened? Did they die already? Whereâs the snowmen?â Evan desperately tries to express something in words and finally manages to say, âThe wind blow the snowmen awayâ. Aaron picks up the theme, saying, âThe wind blow the snowmen and so they fallâ. As he says this, he mimes gracefully with his hand, a slow-motion rising, turning over, and falling of his hand, which impacts with the table to coincide with his saying the word âfallâ.
Discussion
This above description is derived from a microanalysis of a video-recorded observation of nursery children in a drawing experiment designed by the present writer. The sequence was recorded in Singapore and involved predominantly Chinese children, with a few Malays and Indians. However, the actions presented by the children are essentially identical to those recorded and analysed by the author in London, England (Matthews 1990, 1994a). At a deep level of description there is a universality about these actions. Later, we will look deeply into this controversial idea, and analyse what it is which is universal, and what it is which is culturally specific. For the observation above is part of a longer study of the origin, nature and development of visual representation and expression.
In fact it is unusual for very young children to draw directly from observable objects in their spontaneous drawing and it is a somewhat artificial situation to ask them to do so. Studies of childrenâs art and drawing based solely upon experimental data always distort descriptions of development. This being so, the intention of the present study is to identify the uses to which children themselves, spontaneously, put visual media. Artists, psychologists and lay-persons all have their own ideas about what constitutes a âgoodâ visual representation, but what are childrenâs priorities and issues when they paint, draw, construct with clay or blocks, or even when they dance and sing? To try to find some the answers to these questions, this book is based on naturalistic observational work in an attempt to locate the development of visual representation within the context of the development of representational and expressive thought as a whole.
Experimental work, as in the observation with which we started, was occasionally involved to tease out and highlight certain issues that are sometimes difficult to see in naturalistic situations. Additionally, I wanted to test some of the assumptions behind the experimental work of others. For example, much experimental work on childrenâs drawing investigates how children learn to draw recognizable pictures of recognizable objects. Many psychologists are especially interested in how children learn to draw objects and human beings. Some of the most dominant ideas about development in visual representation derive from studies of how children learn to draw objects and human beings. But how reliable are these ideas? Do they really tap childrenâs true motivations? Do such studies, which assume that the path of development is toward recognizable pictures of recognizable objects, really capture the significance of childrenâs visual representation and expression?
I made my own experiments, in which children were encouraged to draw human figures, or to draw objects from observation, but I was able to place these findings within a theory derived from my naturalistic studies of childrenâs spontaneous visual expression and representation. I compared these findings with other interpretations, made by other people, which were based solely on experimental studies.
The book describes and reinterprets the origin, nature and development of representation and expression. By ârepresentationâ, I mean when we use an object, or an action, or a shape, or a process or event to stand for something other than itself. This âsomethingâ could be another object or an event. Representations may be âre-presentationsâ of prior events or existing objects, but they need not be so. âRepresentationâ here means the active and creative construction of the world in a range of media.
The structure of a ârepresentationâ derives from a knowable aspect (or aspects) of objects or events. This means that that a letter, or word, or numeral is not a representation but is a symbol or sign, since the structure of a letter or word or numeral is arbitrary and conventional. A representation is different from a symbol or sign. Anything may be used to symbolize or signify something else but structures that form a representation must resemble, in one way or another, the structure of an entity or entities in the world. The ways in which representational structures resemble structures in the world are many and can be subtle and complex. The term âresemblanceâ is not solely tied to the notion of pictorial resemblance.
By âexpression,â I mean when an action, an object, a shape, a process, or event is used to convey, communicate, or simply release an emotion, feeling or mood. We will start from an analysis of childrenâs actions that most adults consider meaningless, including forms of visual representation most adults do not recognize. We will see that these apparently chaotic actions form the basis of all later symbolic and representational thinking. Furthermore, we will see that this development requires a special kind of support from the interpersonal and social environment if it is to fully flourish. Lacking these certain optimal conditions for growth, we jeopardize childrenâs intellectual and emotional development.
Meaningless Actions or the Beginnings of Representational Thought?
For many people, including lay-persons, psychologists, artists and educators alike, most of the actions described above are random, impulsive, chaotic; devoid of any educational value in any serious sense. Some of the actions might be grudgingly termed âplayâ and therefore allowable in certain circumstancesâperhaps as a relaxation from the important process of education. Other actions described above would not even be accorded this dubious status. The shouting and wild arm and body movements in the âfireâ scenario, for example, would be considered by some as even more lowly than âplayâ â a mere âmucking aboutâ. While some observers might concede the presence of an embryonic meaning, this is often in terms of supposed âprimitiveâ beginnings of the more âadvancedâ cognitive behaviours supposed to come.
The childrenâs specific drawing actions will serve as an example here. Many people assume a route from apparently meaningless âscribblingâ to recognizable depictions of recognizable objects. These people might be alert to a few milestones on this long march to âcorrectâ âvisual realismâ. One of these might be what is often thought to be the first recognizable depiction of the human figure, the âtadpoleâ figure. This is a single, roughly circular closed shape with two parallel vertical lines attached beneath it. A second landmark might be spotted further down this roadâthe so-called âconventionalâ figureâa drawing in which two roughly circular shapes are connected in vertical alignment, with two vertical parallel lines beneath.
In the observation above, we can see that a few children seem to draw the observable objects, in the sense that their drawings capture some of the characteristics of the models as if seen from a notional viewpoint or âstation-pointâ. These drawings are similar, in some respects, to the âconventionalâ figure. Are the other children merely failing? Are we correct to assume a single, ânaturalâ route towards recognizable configuration, with so-called random âscribblingâ giving way to charming but essentially incompetent figure drawings? Do these, in turn (perhaps with the help of instruction), gradually attain increasing verisimilitude to the âway things really lookâ? In this book, I am going to challenge these assumptions.
Consider, for a moment, a small detail of this supposed development. Is it simply axiomatic that the âtadpoleâ figure is âinferiorâ to the figure with âhead and bodyâ? Only if we accept a certain adultomorphic hierarchy based on naive paradigms of both anatomy and representation per se. The human figure may be conceptualized and differentiated in many ways. A dancer, an anatomist, a Tai Chi player, and an Australian aboriginal artist may all have different representations of the human body. The âconventionalâ figure is a convention only when naive realism meets naive anatomyânot in the minds of children but in the minds of certain experimental psychologists. But there are other underlying assumptions concerning the nature of representation, which may obscure our understanding of its genesis in infancy.
Many accounts of the development of childrenâs drawing seem to assume that some of the childrenâs actions described above are simply irrelevant to drawing proper. In our sample observation, the childrenâs apparent âscribblingâ, their repetitive vocalizations, their impulsive body and limb movements, their extraordinary grimacesâall such actions are usually considered âover inclusiveâ actions, extraneous to the drawing act proper (Laszlo and Broderick, 1985).
Such notions derive from an unexamined assumption that drawing is necessarily about the unambiguous depiction of objects and scenes as observed from a particular position in space, or âstation-pointâ. This derives from a largely western-ethnocentric paradigm but, as we shall see in later chapters, some non-western societies have different but equally limiting expectations of childrenâs imagery. What these different exemplars have in common is that they all derive from naive conceptions of picturing. If capturing âfrozenâ visual arrays (Gibson, 1979) was really the sole purpose of drawing, then clearly most of the children in the observation are failing utterly to achieve this objective. But is this the whole story? Could it be that something very important about the beginnings of representational thought is being concealed by this unquestioned paradigm?
This book will probe below the surface of these unexamined assumptions about the nature and role of representation. What does it mean to talk about âthe way things really lookâ? What is the true shape of a cat or a cloud? (Marr, 1982). We will be finding out whether it is possible to describe such things, and whether, by studying human development, we may gain some insights about visual representation and the arts. Conversely, we might find out whether by studying the development of representation we may learn something about human development.
It will be shown that childrenâs actions like those described above, far from being chaotic, have an internal structure and systematicity. They are not meaningless, but play an important part in cognitive and affective development. Such actions are part of the formation of complex descriptions of a reality, which have visual, haptic, kinaesthetic and kinematic aspects. The book will show that the childâs representation of the observable characteristics of objects and regions within the visual field is part of a much larger project, requiring the coordination of a range of attributes, which includes the structure of objects and their appearance within the visual field, but which also includes, mass, weight, movement, duration, speed, amplitude, rhythm, tempo, stress and cadence. Children detect and exploit these as expressive characteristics inherent in visual media (Smith, 1983, 1992) and also organize them as components in a complex representation of reality. The book will show that children bring to media of very different typesâfrom dance to drawing, from traditional paint to electronic paintâthe same deep, underlying strategies (Matthews and Jessel, 1993a).
The book will focus particular attention on the example of childrenâs visual representation in drawing. We will see that childrenâs complex descriptions of reality are not merely abandoned in fav...