Whispering the Word

Hearing Women's Stories in the Old Testament

Jacqueline E. Lapsley

• Éditeur: Westminster John Knox Press
• Année: 2005
• ISBN:
  9781611644432
• Sujet: Teología y religión
• Sous-sujet: Estudios bíblicos

Many Christian feminists wonder if they can simultaneously maintain their commitment to principles of gender equality and their faith in the Scriptures, particularly the Old Testament. Writing in response to feminist biblical scholars who approach the Old Testament with a hermeneutic of suspicion, Jacqueline Lapsley offers Christian feminists strategies to hear the subtle ideas and voices of the less powerful within the Old Testament texts. Reading and interpreting a number of Old Testament narratives in which women are prominent, Lapsley considers how these stories may reflect God's word for us. In doing so, she demonstrates how the narrative often attempts to shape the moral response of the reader by revealing the intricacy and complexity of the moral world evoked. In this gentle shaping of the reader's ethical sensibilities, she argues, is where God may be whispering a word for us.

Chapter One

Introduction

The Word That Whispers

Not another book on women in the Old Testament?! This was the reaction of a retired Episcopal priest I know when I described my book project to him. Since this reaction may not be restricted to crotchety curmudgeons, it seems prudent to address this issue at the outset. I hope, of course, that this is not simply another book on women’s stories in the Old Testament. Ultimately I hope to offer not simply four particular interpretations of some biblical stories, but rather a guide to how to read women’s stories (and finally any biblical story) faithfully, as a word from God to us.

This book was born out of the experience of teaching a seminary class on women in Old Testament narratives in which we read many feminist interpretations of women’s stories in the Old Testament, most of which were intelligent, scholarly, and nuanced. Yet, while I had been familiar with feminist biblical scholarship for many years, it was only in the context of that class that the degree to which theological issues were absent from the vast majority of that scholarship hit me with full force. When theological concerns were addressed, it was usually to assert that the theological appropriation of the particular biblical text under discussion has been and continues to be bad for women.

The kinds of theological questions—how is this story a word of God for us?—that lie at the heart of reading the Bible for me and my students were largely absent.¹ So while we benefited from the excellence of the readings in the secondary material, we were left alone to do the hard constructive theological work that, as far as we were concerned, was the point of reading Scripture. Thus the interpretations offered here, and indeed the strategies for reading themselves, rest on two assumptions: that the narratives we read in the Old Testament are Scripture and engage us as a word from God, and that a critical feminist perspective (more on this below) is necessary if we are to read faithfully.

In this book I look at four stories in the Old Testament that feature women in a significant way, but the book is not really about those stories. They are, rather, case studies for the real focus, which is to offer three strategies for reading not only these stories, but other stories about women and other biblical stories generally: (1) attending to women’s words, (2) attending to the narrator’s perspective, and (3) attending to textual worldview. These strategies are not meant to be comprehensive—attending to all of these areas will not always and everywhere lead to profound theological illumination, nor do they by any means exhaust theological meaning. Moreover, not every strategy is right for every text; the text itself must shape the kind of reading strategy most appropriate to it. So, in the chapters that follow, I pair each text with a strategy that I think it helpfully illumines.

The book is a modest, but still significant, effort to suggest some ways to deepen our ability to read Scripture, and especially stories in Scripture, theologically. Stories pose particular problems for reading theologically, for they do not make the same kinds of truth claims that, say, biblical laws do (although even these are not as self-evident as is frequently assumed). My assumption and motivation in offering these reading strategies are not that one moral claim or message can be extracted from a story, but that if we pay attention, if we listen for a sometimes soft voice, God encounters us in these stories. The Holy Spirit is operative at all levels of textual production and interpretation, and the reading strategies sketched here are simply ways of paying attention, tuning in, to what the Spirit is doing. My focus on women’s stories emerges in part from what I perceive as the acute need for attention in this area, as described above, but my underlying aim in this book is to foster certain habits of reading—habits of mind, really— that help us to be fully alert as we encounter God in Scripture.

In the rest of this chapter I will introduce the kind of feminist perspective that informs these reading strategies, paying particular attention to how my approach fits into the broader stream of feminist biblical scholarship. I also explain some of the assumptions undergirding the proposed reading strategies, including the importance of narrative ethics, a conscious biblical anthropology of ourselves as readers, and developing a hermeneutic of trust.

Feminist Perspectives

Many feminist scholars have attempted to categorize the wide variety of approaches to biblical texts that lay some claim to being “feminist,” so it does not seem helpful here to churn up that same ground.² It is crucial to be aware, however, that the terrain has long been marked by considerable dissent and conflict of ideology, methodology, and theology, and so a crude typology may serve to orient a reader new to the field. Feminist interpretation of the Bible can helpfully be divided into three broad categories of approach. One approach has been to acknowledge the biblically legitimated oppression of women as a problem, but to locate the problem in the interpretation of the Bible, not in the text itself. Feminist scholars who adopt this position are termed “loyalists.” A second approach is “revisionist,” which acknowledges the patriarchal aspects of the text but does not view them as definitive.³ The revisionist approach includes looking for “countertraditions” within the Bible, that is, muted traditions and voices that offer alternatives to the dominant biblical strains, but that must be teased out in order to be heard.⁴ The theological commitments of the “revisionists” are quite varied since the approach itself is adaptable to a variety of positions. A third group of interpreters completely reject the Bible as authoritative (“rejectionists”).⁵ While some overlap exists among these three groups, the strategies offered in this book share many of the assumptions of the revisionists, and benefit most from the work done in discerning “countertraditions.”

The fault lines in the topography of feminist biblical scholarship I have just sketched are not so much methodological as theological; that is, the widening rift between the Christian tradition and feminist scholarship helps to explain the significant disagreements between the loyalists and revisionists on the one hand, and the rejectionists on the other. Many feminist biblical scholars disallow the possibility of ascribing authority to Scripture at all, either in its traditional Christian form or in newer formulations articulated by feminist Christian theologians.⁶ It has become an increasingly difficult and embattled task to occupy the space that is both Christian and feminist in reading the Bible. I do not attempt to offer a sustained feminist theology of the authority of Scripture, or to examine the history of interpretation for the critique it might afford feminist biblical scholarship today.⁸ Although these are significant aspects of the larger task of recovering a strong feminist Christian voice both within the academy and within the church, for the most part they are the work not of biblical scholars but of feminist Christian theologians. Instead, the reading strategies I propose contribute to this larger task from the biblical scholarship side of that conversation, in the hopes that readers of the Bible (both men and women) will feel empowered to read the whole of Scripture with ears tuned to the whisperings of the text that affirm both women’s experience and Christian faith.⁹

The intersection of Christian faith and feminist experience is the perspective undergirding my work here, a perspective that describes a disturbingly small minority of voices within biblical studies. Thus my driving motivation is to offer to both feminist biblical scholarship and the church an alternative voice to those dominating the field, many of which claim that the patriarchal character of the Bible is its defining characteristic. According to this dominant perspective, no reading of the Bible may proceed until this central feature is addressed. This fundamental, and largely sacrosanct, assumption of much feminist biblical scholarship has functioned both to forge the identity of many feminist scholars of the Bible and to obscure the possibilities of biblical interpretation that lie beyond consideration of the problems inherent in patriarchy.

I begin with two different assumptions: (1) the defining feature of the Bible, here specifically the Old Testament, is that, in a complex way, it is a word from God for the church; and (2) the task of interpretation is to better hear and understand that word.¹⁰ Working outward from these assumptions it is possible to reflect both on the patriarchal nature of the text and on what else might be going on in the text that people who understand themselves as Christian and as feminist would benefit from hearing.

What I have described as the status quo of feminist biblical scholarship does not mean that exceptions do not exist.¹¹ But a look at one recent and significant volume on feminist biblical scholarship illustrates that the centrality of patriarchy as the defining feature of the Bible leads to fairly uniform and predictable results, and makes it difficult to reflect on the Bible theologically, except in a negative sense. A Feminist Companion to Reading the Bible: Approaches, Methods and Strategies, edited by Athalya Brenner and Carole Fontaine, constitutes an enormous contribution to feminist biblical scholarship, with twenty-nine essays on topics ranging from intertextuality to rabbinic interpretation.¹² The first section of the book, “Metacritics,” offers essays reflecting on the relationship between feminist biblical criticism and the fields from which it was born—feminist criticism and biblical studies.

A foray into a couple of these essays reveals how the aims of much feminist biblical criticism are deeply shaped by the appraisal of the Bible as patriarchal, and how those aims either do not include theological reflection or specifically exclude it. Pamela Milne, for example, laments the lack of connection between feminist biblical criticism and the broader area of feminist criticism and hopes that more feminist biblical scholarship might be done in “non-theological” contexts.¹³ She traces the considerable suspicion with which feminist biblical criticism is regarded by wider feminist criticism to efforts by feminist biblical scholars, like Trible, to “defend [the Bible’s] religious authority and spiritual value.”¹⁴ Milne is heartened that while feminist biblical scholarship was often characterized by theological commitments in the 1980s, the situation has changed considerably now, such that a new, third, phase has dawned, in which more work is being done in secular, academic contexts, and the possibility of feminist biblical criticism being embraced by feminist criticism is on the horizon.¹⁵ In short, Milne views the future of feminist biblical scholarship as a happily nonconfessional endeavor.¹⁶

Other essays in the volume have similar aims. Heather McKay, for example, seeks a “gender-neutral, or better, a both-gender friendly, climate of discussion in biblical studies.”¹⁷ McKay essentially dismisses feminist biblical scholars who have theological convictions because they “are constrained in what they write by what they believe must be true about the Bible.”¹⁸ McKay’s view requires a response that is both feminist and confessional. First, theological convictions need not prevent one from naming patriarchy in the text, or from telling the truth about texts that damage women; on the contrary, feminist theological convictions require these. Second, feminist biblical scholars who take the patriarchy of the Bible as the starting point for their own work also labor under the constraints that such belief imposes upon them. It is a fallacy to see these scholars as somehow “free” from bias. Carole Fontaine, by contrast, operates quite self-consciously out of her Christian context, and her essay on the way the Bible motivates and sustains the abuse of women in congregations and society is painful to read.¹⁹ Yet at the end of the essay one is left to wonder whether it is possible to read the Bible as a Christian and as a feminist, and still find something in the text besides the dismal traces and consequences of patriarchy. The general drift of these essays is apparent: the idea that feminist analysis might focus on something other than the patriarchy of the Bible (while still acknowledging it) is intellectually and morally suspect.

I undertake this book convinced, in contrast, that confessional biblical interpretation is not a throwback to the “second phase” of feminist biblical criticism of the 1970s and 1980s, but should instead form a vocal, if distinctive, tradition within the feminist biblical criticism of the future. While I am concerned about the trend to exclude faith convictions from feminist biblical interpretation, it is important to acknowledge the significance of the last several decades of feminist biblical scholarship. The benefits of the explosion of feminist scholarship in the last twenty years are unquestionable. Once neglected or subjected to superficial or misogynistic readings, many of the stories about women in the Old Testament have been illuminated in their depth and complexity by the sustained and critically reflective attention of feminist scholars, some of whom I have mentioned. One exciting result is that the women of the Old Testament, and their stories, appear more interesting and vital than ever before. Yet another result, more problematic in its implications, is that the difficulties inherent in reading an ancient text shaped so powerfully by a patriarchal culture have been exposed and explored in all their complexity. For some readers, as I have suggested above, the patriarchal nature of the text is so monolithic that nothing of value to a present-day feminist can be recovered from it. Worse, the patriarchal interpretation of these texts has done more harm than good in Christian communities and in the wider culture; for example, the abuse of metaphorical women in Ezekiel and Hosea has been understood as legitimating the abuse of real women.²⁰

“Feminist” is a contested term. It seems to bear widely varying, sometimes opposing, meanings depending on who is speaking. In certain contexts on both the theological and political left and right, to put “Christian” and “feminist” together creates an oxymoron that leaves the one who identifies herself this way in an irresolvable state of conflict. The self-identified feminist Christian occupies shifting, disappearing, and sometimes dangerous ground. Many Christians who call themselves feminist wonder whether they can simultaneously maintain their faith in feminist principles of gender equality and their faith that God is speaking to them and to the church through the Scriptures, especially the Old Testament. Yet many feminist Christians also affirm that the very notion of gender equality is to be found in Scripture. Thus, for the numerous Christian and Jewish readers of the Old Testament who do not wish to reject the authority of Scripture, the now widely acknowledged patriarchal character of these stories has created a serious theological conundrum.

How do we make some positive theological sense out of the patriarchal character of these stories? How can these stories be a word from God for the church today? Lest the gravity and force of feminist biblical scholarship make it appear as though the Bible has only had a negative impact on women’s lives, we need to recall that the Bible has also been an enormous source of power and inspiration to women throughout history.²¹ This book seeks to continue that tradition of women reading the Bible and finding within it a divine word that provides both sustenance and challenge for the spirit.

That women do not always find this an easy task is a painful reality. A student in my class on women in the Old Testament reported that in a fit of disgust she had thrown her Bible across the room the night before as the patriarchal character of the Bible momentarily overwhelmed her. It is thus a presupposition of everything to follow in this book that the critical issues raised by the feminist scholarship surveyed above must be taken very seriously by the church. As Sarah Lancaster avers, what is needed is “a way to affirm the authority of the Bible without at the same time denying the authority of women to speak truly about the problem...