Software Testing

A Craftsman's Approach, Fourth Edition

Paul C. Jorgensen

• Éditeur: Auerbach Publications
• Année: 2018
• ISBN:
  9781315360409
• Édition: 4
• Sujet: Computer Science
• Sous-sujet: Information Technology

This updated and reorganized fourth edition of Software Testing: A Craftsman's Approach applies the strong mathematics content of previous editions to a coherent treatment of Model-Based Testing for both code-based (structural) and specification-based (functional) testing. These techniques are extended from the usual unit testing discussions to full coverage of less understood levels integration and system testing.

The Fourth Edition:

• Emphasizes technical inspections and is supplemented by an appendix with a full package of documents required for a sample Use Case technical inspection
• Introduces an innovative approach that merges the Event-Driven Petri Nets from the earlier editions with the "Swim Lane" concept from the Unified Modeling Language (UML) that permits model-based testing for four levels of interaction among constituents in a System of Systems
• Introduces model-based development and provides an explanation of how to conduct testing within model-based development environments
• Presents a new section on methods for testing software in an Agile programming environment
• Explores test-driven development, reexamines all-pairs testing, and explains the four contexts of software testing

• 
  
  

Thoroughly revised and updated, Software Testing: A Craftsman's Approach, Fourth Edition is sure to become a standard reference for those who need to stay up to date with evolving technologies in software testing. Carrying on the tradition of previous editions, it will continue to serve as a valuable reference for software testers, developers, and engineers.

I

A MATHEMATICAL
CONTEXT

Chapter 1

A Perspective on Testing

Why do we test? The two main reasons are to make a judgment about quality or acceptability and to discover problems. We test because we know that we are fallible—this is especially true in the domain of software and software-controlled systems. The goal of this chapter is to create a framework within which we can examine software testing.

1.1 Basic Definitions

Much of testing literature is mired in confusing (and sometimes inconsistent) terminology, probably because testing technology has evolved over decades and via scores of writers. The International Software Testing Qualification Board (ISTQB) has an extensive glossary of testing terms (see the website http://www.istqb.org/downloads/glossary.html). The terminology here (and throughout this book) is compatible with the ISTQB definitions, and they, in turn, are compatible with the standards developed by the Institute of Electronics and Electrical Engineers (IEEE) Computer Society (IEEE, 1983). To get started, here is a useful progression of terms.

Error—People make errors. A good synonym is mistake. When people make mistakes while coding, we call these mistakes bugs. Errors tend to propagate; a requirements error may be magnified during design and amplified still more during coding.

Fault—A fault is the result of an error. It is more precise to say that a fault is the representation of an error, where representation is the mode of expression, such as narrative text, Unified Modeling Language diagrams, hierarchy charts, and source code. Defect (see the ISTQB Glossary) is a good synonym for fault, as is bug. Faults can be elusive. An error of omission results in a fault in which something is missing that should be present in the representation. This suggests a useful refinement; we might speak of faults of commission and faults of omission. A fault of commission occurs when we enter something into a representation that is incorrect. Faults of omission occur when we fail to enter correct information. Of these two types, faults of omission are more difficult to detect and resolve.

Failure—A failure occurs when the code corresponding to a fault executes. Two subtleties arise here: one is that failures only occur in an executable representation, which is usually taken to be source code, or more precisely, loaded object code; the second subtlety is that this definition relates failures only to faults of commission. How can we deal with failures that correspond to faults of omission? We can push this still further: what about faults that never happen to execute, or perhaps do not execute for a long time? Reviews (see Chapter 22) prevent many failures by finding faults; in fact, well-done reviews can find faults of omission.

Figure 1.1 A testing life cycle.

Incident—When a failure occurs, it may or may not be readily apparent to the user (or customer or tester). An incident is the symptom associated with a failure that alerts the user to the occurrence of a failure.

Test—Testing is obviously concerned with errors, faults, failures, and incidents. A test is the act of exercising software with test cases. A test has two distinct goals: to find failures or to demonstrate correct execution.

Test case—A test case has an identity and is associated with a program behavior. It also has a set of inputs and expected outputs.

Figure 1.1 portrays a life cycle model for testing. Notice that, in the development phases, three opportunities arise for errors to be made, resulting in faults that may propagate through the remainder of the development process. The fault resolution step is another opportunity for errors (and new faults). When a fix causes formerly correct software to misbehave, the fix is deficient. We will revisit this when we discuss regression testing.

From this sequence of terms, we see that test cases occupy a central position in testing. The process of testing can be subdivided into separate steps: test planning, test case development, running test cases, and evaluating test results. The focus of this book is how to identify useful sets of test cases.

1.2 Test Cases

The essence of software testing is to determine a set of test cases for the item to be tested. A test case is (or...