eBook - ePub
Richard Dawkins
Ransom Poythress
This is a test
Partager le livre
- English
- ePUB (adapté aux mobiles)
- Disponible sur iOS et Android
eBook - ePub
Richard Dawkins
Ransom Poythress
DĂ©tails du livre
Aperçu du livre
Table des matiĂšres
Citations
Ă propos de ce livre
Dawkins has popularized the gene-centered approach to evolution yet is better known for his rejection of a supernatural creator. Poythress presents and critiques Dawkins' ideas with a Reformed theological apologetic.
Foire aux questions
Comment puis-je résilier mon abonnement ?
Il vous suffit de vous rendre dans la section compte dans paramĂštres et de cliquer sur « RĂ©silier lâabonnement ». Câest aussi simple que cela ! Une fois que vous aurez rĂ©siliĂ© votre abonnement, il restera actif pour le reste de la pĂ©riode pour laquelle vous avez payĂ©. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Puis-je / comment puis-je télécharger des livres ?
Pour le moment, tous nos livres en format ePub adaptĂ©s aux mobiles peuvent ĂȘtre tĂ©lĂ©chargĂ©s via lâapplication. La plupart de nos PDF sont Ă©galement disponibles en tĂ©lĂ©chargement et les autres seront tĂ©lĂ©chargeables trĂšs prochainement. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Quelle est la différence entre les formules tarifaires ?
Les deux abonnements vous donnent un accĂšs complet Ă la bibliothĂšque et Ă toutes les fonctionnalitĂ©s de Perlego. Les seules diffĂ©rences sont les tarifs ainsi que la pĂ©riode dâabonnement : avec lâabonnement annuel, vous Ă©conomiserez environ 30 % par rapport Ă 12 mois dâabonnement mensuel.
Quâest-ce que Perlego ?
Nous sommes un service dâabonnement Ă des ouvrages universitaires en ligne, oĂč vous pouvez accĂ©der Ă toute une bibliothĂšque pour un prix infĂ©rieur Ă celui dâun seul livre par mois. Avec plus dâun million de livres sur plus de 1 000 sujets, nous avons ce quâil vous faut ! DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Prenez-vous en charge la synthÚse vocale ?
Recherchez le symbole Ăcouter sur votre prochain livre pour voir si vous pouvez lâĂ©couter. Lâoutil Ăcouter lit le texte Ă haute voix pour vous, en surlignant le passage qui est en cours de lecture. Vous pouvez le mettre sur pause, lâaccĂ©lĂ©rer ou le ralentir. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Est-ce que Richard Dawkins est un PDF/ePUB en ligne ?
Oui, vous pouvez accĂ©der Ă Richard Dawkins par Ransom Poythress en format PDF et/ou ePUB ainsi quâĂ dâautres livres populaires dans Geschichte et Historische Biographien. Nous disposons de plus dâun million dâouvrages Ă dĂ©couvrir dans notre catalogue.
Informations
Sujet
GeschichteSous-sujet
Historische Biographien1
DAWKINS REVEALED
To learn the specifics of Dawkinsâs colorful life, you can read his weighty and detailed memoirs. He chronicles his early years in his first memoir, An Appetite for Wonder (2013). His second memoir, Brief Candle in the Dark (2015), focuses on the later years, including his books and public influence.
Clinton Richard Dawkins was born in Kenya in 1941. Although he was raised with a sense of religious duty by Anglican parents,1 he claims to have emphatically rejected religion fairly early, due to discomfort with doctrines like original sin and supernatural claims.2 For Dawkins, learning about Darwinâs theory of evolution by natural selection hammered the final nail in Godâs coffin.3
Dawkins studied at Balliol College (Oxford, UK) and received a doctoral degree from Oxford University in 1966.4 He researched ethology (animal behavior) and evolutionary biology under Nobel Prize winner Niko Tinbergen. He focused on ways to mathematically model the pecking decisions of chickens.5 After a brief stint of teaching at the University of CaliforniaâBerkeley, he returned to Oxford as a lecturer in zoology, a position he held for twenty years.
During his time as a professor at Oxford, he published his first book, The Selfish Gene (1976). In that book, he posits that evolution is not driven by what is best for a group of organisms, but rather by what is best for individual genes. He argues that âwe, and all other animals, are machines created by our genes.â6 A scientific reader may see the direct correlation between this reasoning and Dawkinsâs study of chicken pecking. The thinking goes something like this: âIf we can program a computer to accurately predict a chickenâs behavior, then what is the difference between a chicken and a complex computer? By extension, what is the difference between a human and a very complex computer? Therefore, humans are nothing more than gene machines, doing what they need to survive.â Although we may not agree with this extrapolation and the assumptions contained within it, we can at least develop a plausible understanding of where these ideas came from.
The Selfish Gene changed the way people thought about evolution, and Dawkins has since capitalized a great deal on the success and renown of that book. It still impacts biology more than forty years later,7 even being voted recently as more inspiringthan Darwinâs Origin of Species.8 Dawkins followed with roughly one book every four years, expanding on the ideas in The Selfish Gene. What began as an effort to solidify evolutionary biology gradually morphed into an anti-theist ideology. Dawkins argues that if evolution is true, then certain consequences naturally follow. Not only is a Creator unnecessary for ultimate explanations, but evolution actually provides evidence against a personal God. He argues in The Blind Watchmaker (1986) that âevolution reveals a universe without design.â9
In the volumes that followed The Blind Watchmaker, Dawkins vehemently contends that evolution âsolvesâ religious questions that were unanswerable until now. For example, he is convinced that the beauty he sees and the wonder he feels in the world are more magnificently attributable to natural causes than to a personal God. Unweaving the Rainbow (1998) is an ode to this very sentiment.
The slow march from atheism toward anti-theism reached its culmination in 2006 with the printing of Dawkinsâs The God Delusion and the dawn of the New Atheist movement. The God Delusion was published at about the same time as several other anti-theist books by other authors:
- The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason, by Sam Harris (2004)
- Atheist Manifesto: The Case against Christianity, Judaism, and Islam, by Michel Onfray (2005)
- Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon, by Daniel Dennett (2006)
- God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything, by Christopher Hitchens (2007)
- God: The Failed HypothesisâHow Science Shows That God Does Not Exist, by Victor Stenger (2007)
Since then, Dawkins has spent a good deal of his time campaigning for his reasoning in The God Delusion, including speaking tours, interviews, and public debates. New Atheism landed cover stories in Time magazine10 and Wired.11 At this point, the reader may want to pause and ask: âWe know that atheism has been around for a long time, so what is really new about New Atheism? And what has made it so attractive now?â I will try to address the first question here, and tackle the second question in the next chapter.
At its core, there may not be anything new about New Atheism. One critic contends that, while Dawkinsâs âbook is written with rhetorical passion and power, the stridency of its assertions merely masks tired, weak and recycled arguments.â12 So why the âNewâ moniker? One possibility is that the title âNew Atheismâ helps fix it as a particular movement at a particular time in history. However, I believe there is more to it than that.
There are at least three new aspects of New Atheism. First, Dawkins has been mostly a popularizer, gaining at least temporary cultural sway by influencing the masses. He does this by being clear, concise, and simpleâto the point of being simplistic. He has not restricted himself to technical treatises for niche communities. He has been active with op-ed articles, Twitter,13 and a number of other popular forums, employing wit, sarcasm, and withering criticism to draw a clear line in the sand. He understands the importance of imagery, analogy, storytelling, and linguistic clarity. These all appeal to the public consciousness and imagination. Followers are not always won by making the best argument, but by making the argument in the best way. Throughout history, the people who have amassed devoted adherents have been those with charisma, passion, zeal, and vision. Dawkins and the New Atheists have a story to tell, and even though their story may be flawed, it paints a convenient and alluring picture.
Second, Dawkins uses new tools to support old arguments, including a mass of new data from biology that substantiates, he believes, a purely evolutionary story of life. The last few decades have brought tremendous advances in our understanding of genetics and of molecular and cell biology. Dawkins, in particular, with his training as a biologist, seeks to interpret this data to his advantage through storytelling. Later, we shall examine whether this storytelling is complete and coherent, or if Dawkins selectively ignores and distorts evidence to fit a preconceived mold.
Finally, Dawkins is ânewâ in his tone and goals. He is novel âin the intensity of [his] ridicule of religion, not the substance of [his] criticism.â14 His followers are stridently evangelistic. Dawkins says in his preface, âIf this book works as I intend, religious readers who open it will be atheists when they put it down.â15 Dawkins has an almost sweeping intolerance of religious tolerance,16 including agnostic positions. âDawkins does not merely disagree with religious myths. He disagrees with tolerating them.â17 The unambiguous goal is the abolition of religion from the planet.During a symposium in La Jolla, California, in November 2006, physicist Steven Weinberg said, âAnything that we scientists can do to weaken the hold of religion should be done, and may in fact be our greatest contribution to civilization.â18 Dawkins pursues this goal, writing with a passion, zeal, and certainty that would be labeled proselytizing if it came from any other religious tradition.
So after all the podium preaching, letter writing, tweeting, arguing, blogging, and publishing, where do we stand more than a decade after this resurgence of atheism?
In many respects, nothing has changed. There are still atheists, and there are still Christians. Scientists still wrestle with the intersection of science and religion. Questions remain unanswered. There is no majority consensus. Secular biologists possess no testable scenarios for the origin of life;19 secular physicists possess no testable scenarios for the origin of a complex universe; and secular philosophers possess no explanation for the origin of complexity itself.
Yet the landscape has altered in some ways. The militant crusade against religion has relaxed somewhat when met with public resistance and the growing realization that its claims donât reflect reality. Opposition from within the ranks of atheists has contributed to a more tolerant stance. Passion and eloquence may initially stir up zealous followers, but in order to sustain the movement, Dawkins has found it necessary to court favor using opinions more in line with public sentiment.
The seeds of discontent were visible in 2006 during the initial burst onto the scene. At the Cali...