In the early 20th century, Freud provided a theory of âmourning and melancholiaâ that distinguished between ânormalâ and âpathologicalâ mourning. He suggested that relinquishing emotional ties with the object of attachment involved obsessive remembering followed by a complete severance of emotion to the loved one and re-attaching that emotion to another person. While this other person is only a substitute for the lost loved one, the mourner eventually internalizes the reality of the loss, extinguishes the emotional energy expended on the lost loved one, and, in turn, frees it to be directed toward another. Freud also believed that the psychological identification with the lost person is internalized so that aspects of that person become part of the mournerâs psychological make-up thus making the grief process challenging yet survivable (Berzoff, 2004; Freud, 1917).
Freud also distinguished healthy mourning from pathological mourning and differentiated between âmourning and melancholia.â In both cases, the emotional experience is similar; however, with melancholia the mourner has a lack of self-esteem, is self-critical, and eventually develops pathological melancholia (depression) or grief. Freud postulated that this prolonged depression that accompanied the grief process was due to unconscious conflicts with the person who died which led to a more complicated mourning period. Threads of Freudâs theory of mourning can be found in more recent theories and frameworks that guide current practice. Clearly, Freudâs theory furthered our understanding of the grief process; however, his focus on the intrapsychic and unconscious elements of a personâs psyche failed to account for environmental influences that impact the mournerâs coping capacities.
Bowlbyâs Theory of Attachment
John Bowlbyâs theory of attachment developed from his early research on infants separated from their mothers and the emotional, cognitive, developmental, and biological consequences of attachment versus separation. Attachment refers to the innate tendency for humans to develop close affectionate bonds with others who are central to their lives. When the attachment bonds are threatened or broken, emotional distress ensues. According to Bowlby, life span development of attachment involves the formation of a bond (i.e. falling in love), maintenance of the attachment (i.e. loving someone), and disruption (i.e. grief and mourning) (Bowlby, 1980). He wrote extensively on his theory over the course of three volumes about how attachment behaviors maintain the affectional bond and, therefore, a state of homeostasis or balance. When loss of the attachment figure occurs and the bond is disrupted, the person experiences distress, fear, and insecurity as represented by crying, clinging, and angry behaviors in an attempt to regain the connection. When these behaviors are repeatedly unsuccessful they gradually diminish but do not stop completely.
Bowlby (1980) hypothesized that the grief process is a reflection of this basic attachment dynamic. He further described the psychological reorganization that must take place following a loss as involving four phases. The first phase entails a period during which the mourner experiences numbness and denial that serves to deflect the anguish and despair accompanying the loss. This phase can be periodically disrupted by extreme and physically exhausting emotions. The second phase is characterized by yearning and searching as the mourner begins to confront the loss. Common behaviors during this phase include interpreting events as signs from the loved one and seeking out evidence of the loved oneâs presence. When these activities are unsuccessful, anger and frustration ensue. The third phase is predominated by feelings of disorganization and desolation. The realization that the attachment bond has been severed and the activities of prior phases have failed is integrated by the mourner. The person experiences a depletion of energy and a sense of being overwhelmed. This prompts a re-evaluation of the mournerâs identity and self-concept which can lead to massive psychological upheaval. The final phase, according to Bowlby, involves gradual movement toward reorganization. There is growing acceptance of the permanence of the separation and the need to construct a life despite the absence of the loved one. These phases may be experienced multiple times during the grieving process and may take days, months, or years.
In conclusion, Bowlbyâs theory of attachment and loss lends itself to modern understanding and interventions currently used in practice. Bowlbyâs thorough examination of attachment provides us with insight into the nature of behaviors associated with separation and loss and has been foundational to our understanding of grief and the mourning process. The advanced understanding of interpersonal neuroscience has added scientific validity to attachment theory (Cozolino, 2014; Montgomery, 2013; Siegel, 2012). The result is a growing awareness of how attachment styles that originated in childhood influence the course of bereavement later in life including the support seeking strategies that mourners use. For example, individuals with an anxious attachment style are likely to grieve in a manner that is highly emotional with lots of crying, wailing, and other outward expressions of inner pain. Individuals with an avoidant attachment style are more reserved. They are uncomfortable expressing emotions, often insisting they are all right. This knowledge may help explain why some mourners navigate significant loss more successfully than others and provides guidance on how to best help mourners with varying attachment styles (Kosminsky & Jordan, 2016). Knowledge of attachment theory adds an additional lens for viewing other models of grief and provides greater understanding of complicated grief. It allows practitioners to tailor their interventions according to the individual attachment style of the mourner. Kosminsky and Jordan (2016) provide an excellent discussion of grief from an attachment perspective in their book, Attachment-Informed Grief Therapy: The Clinicianâs Guide to Foundations and Applications. Attachment theory also plays a role in understanding interpersonal trauma and will be discussed further in subsequent chapters.
KĂŒbler-Ross and Stages of Grief
Although Lindemann was a pioneer in crisis intervention, death and dying were still taboo subjects when the United States was forced to confront the mass destruction of the Vietnam War. It was the 1960s and 70s, and America was a âsociety bent on ignoring or avoiding deathâ (KĂŒbler-Ross, 1969, p. 25) despite the fact that death and trauma were occurring on a monumental scale due to the Vietnam War, the Kennedy assassinations, the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr., and the Kent State student protest and shootings. Elisabeth KĂŒbler-Rossâs work was revolutionary in that it opened the doors to discussion about death and dying as well as grief and loss â subjects that were stigmatized in American culture during the middle of the 20th century. Originating from her experiences as a physician of terminally ill persons, her first book, On Death and Dying (1969), included a stage model of the psychological coping process experienced by those who were terminally ill. Later, this model was applied to the grief experience and was the accepted paradigm for many years. KĂŒbler-Rossâs model included five stages of grief: 1) denial and isolation, 2) anger, 3) bargaining, 4) depression, and 5) acceptance.
During the stage of denial and isolation, the person has difficulty comprehending the loss and the reality that death is imminent. The person could be considered to be in a state of shock â numb to the emotional ramifications of loss. Isolation or withdrawal was noted as a common behavioral component of this initial reaction to a terminal diagnosis (KĂŒbler-Ross, 1969).
In the second stage, denial fades as anger and rage over the terminal prognosis take over. Often the person feels as if the terminal diagnosis is unfair or a cruel turn of fate. At times, this experience may take on irrational proportions and be difficult for others to comprehend. The anger then yields to the third stage called âbargainingâ (KĂŒbler-Ross, 1969).
During the bargaining phase, the person attempts to âstrike a dealâ with a higher being for a postponement of the inevitable death. For example, the person may secretly promise to be âgoodâ in exchange for more time on Earth. Bargaining eventually leads to the fourth stage, âdepressionâ (KĂŒbler-Ross, 1969).
KĂŒbler-Ross (1969) says depression is experienced as âa sense of great lossâ (p. 97) and suggests that there are two types of depression: reactive and preparatory. In reactive depression, the person experiences the multiple losses resulting from the terminal illness (e.g. financial, employment, family roles, physical deterioration). In preparatory depression, the person grieves the impending losses associated with the knowledge that death is imminent. Loss of significant others, loss of physical self, loss of the material world, and the final separation from others are all components of preparatory depression. In this sense, KĂŒbler-Ross links depression and grief as similar emotional experiences.
The final stage of this model is âacceptance,â during which the person resolves their feelings of anger and sadness. While not necessarily content, they await their death with âquiet expectationâ (KĂŒbler-Ross, 1969, p. 124). She suggests that during this stage, the person may experience an absence of emotion and be âvoid of feelingsâ (KĂŒbler-Ross, 1969, p. 124).
Though introduced as a model to assist health professionals in understanding their dying patients, KĂŒbler-Rossâs work has been applied to the experience of bereaved persons after the death of a loved one. Her framework has been considered the hallmark for understanding death and dying and many elements of her conceptualization are still used by professionals today. The primary criticism of this model was the fixed and sequential aspect of the stages.
David Kessler, a renowned expert on grief and collaborator with KĂŒbler-Ross, added a sixth stage to the model: finding meaning (2019). This can take many forms such as advocating for a cause connected to the loved one, recalling memories of them, doing things they enjoyed, or helping others in honor of the deceased. Kessler explains that this process involves âfinding a way to sustain your love for the perso...