eBook - ePub
Cormac McCarthy
A complexity theory of literature
Lydia R. Cooper, Sharon Monteith, Nahem Yousaf
This is a test
Partager le livre
- 248 pages
- English
- ePUB (adapté aux mobiles)
- Disponible sur iOS et Android
eBook - ePub
Cormac McCarthy
A complexity theory of literature
Lydia R. Cooper, Sharon Monteith, Nahem Yousaf
DĂ©tails du livre
Aperçu du livre
Table des matiĂšres
Citations
Ă propos de ce livre
Combining the fields of evolutionary economics and the humanities, this book examines McCarthy's literary works as a significant case study demonstrating our need to recognise the interrelated complexities of economic policies, environmental crises, and how public policy and rhetoric shapes our value systems. In a world recovering from global economic crisis and poised on the brink of another, studying the methods by which literature interrogates narratives of inevitability around global economic inequality and eco-disaster is ever more relevant.
Foire aux questions
Comment puis-je résilier mon abonnement ?
Il vous suffit de vous rendre dans la section compte dans paramĂštres et de cliquer sur « RĂ©silier lâabonnement ». Câest aussi simple que cela ! Une fois que vous aurez rĂ©siliĂ© votre abonnement, il restera actif pour le reste de la pĂ©riode pour laquelle vous avez payĂ©. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Puis-je / comment puis-je télécharger des livres ?
Pour le moment, tous nos livres en format ePub adaptĂ©s aux mobiles peuvent ĂȘtre tĂ©lĂ©chargĂ©s via lâapplication. La plupart de nos PDF sont Ă©galement disponibles en tĂ©lĂ©chargement et les autres seront tĂ©lĂ©chargeables trĂšs prochainement. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Quelle est la différence entre les formules tarifaires ?
Les deux abonnements vous donnent un accĂšs complet Ă la bibliothĂšque et Ă toutes les fonctionnalitĂ©s de Perlego. Les seules diffĂ©rences sont les tarifs ainsi que la pĂ©riode dâabonnement : avec lâabonnement annuel, vous Ă©conomiserez environ 30 % par rapport Ă 12 mois dâabonnement mensuel.
Quâest-ce que Perlego ?
Nous sommes un service dâabonnement Ă des ouvrages universitaires en ligne, oĂč vous pouvez accĂ©der Ă toute une bibliothĂšque pour un prix infĂ©rieur Ă celui dâun seul livre par mois. Avec plus dâun million de livres sur plus de 1 000 sujets, nous avons ce quâil vous faut ! DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Prenez-vous en charge la synthÚse vocale ?
Recherchez le symbole Ăcouter sur votre prochain livre pour voir si vous pouvez lâĂ©couter. Lâoutil Ăcouter lit le texte Ă haute voix pour vous, en surlignant le passage qui est en cours de lecture. Vous pouvez le mettre sur pause, lâaccĂ©lĂ©rer ou le ralentir. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Est-ce que Cormac McCarthy est un PDF/ePUB en ligne ?
Oui, vous pouvez accĂ©der Ă Cormac McCarthy par Lydia R. Cooper, Sharon Monteith, Nahem Yousaf en format PDF et/ou ePUB ainsi quâĂ dâautres livres populaires dans Literatura et CrĂtica literaria norteamericana. Nous disposons de plus dâun million dâouvrages Ă dĂ©couvrir dans notre catalogue.
Informations
Sujet
LiteraturaSous-sujet
CrĂtica literaria norteamericana1
Cars, trucks, and horses: man in the age of the machine
It is our view that crisis and change in the Detroit region can be situated in the context of the reorganization of capitalism on a world scale that is the central theme of this book.
(Robert J. S. Ross and Kent C. Trachte, Global Capitalism: The New Leviathan)
Through all our history the self-made man was the exception not the rule. ⊠These are facts, but do men order their lives according to fact alone? ⊠Belief in the self-made man requires only an act of faith, and, as every Sunday School boy knows, faith is simply the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.
(Irvin G. Wyllie, The Self-Made Man in America: The Myth of Rags to Riches)1
Images of the toxic encroachment of the âage of the machineâ into pristine rural landscapes litter Cormac McCarthyâs first novel, The Orchard Keeper (1965). The opening section finds a âmangled fragment of fenceâ embedded in the flesh of a rotting tree, and the aging orchard keeper, Arthur Ownby, haunts a peach orchard now âgray limb[ed]â and abandoned, abutted to a concrete insecticide pit which is being used as a crypt for a murdered body (3, 52). That crypt-pit provides one of the final, grotesque scenes in the novel, as Ownby, now in an assisted care home, imagines the âgreen cadaver grin sealed in the murky waters of the peach pit, slimegreen skull with newts coiled in the eyesockets and a wig of mossâ (224). The visceral horror and beauty of this image are the quintessential stuff of the American southern gothic tradition. Perhaps that is all it is. Some early reviewers of this debut novel certainly thought so. In a review in the New York Times on May 12, 1965, Orville Prescott claims, âSome novelist [sic] can write with brillianceâ about pastoral idylls lost to industrialization. âOthers,â he says, âalthough they are highly gifted too, are sorely handicapped by their humble and excessive admiration for William Faulkner. Cormac McCarthy ⊠is one of these.â2 However, a closer examination of the role of the âage of the machineâârepresented by the literal and metaphorical poison leaching into the pastoral landscapeâreveals the complexity of McCarthyâs eco-critical vision, as well as capturing his critique of the role of market capitalism and the myth of the âself-made manâ in American culture.
In her authoritative reading of McCarthyâs earliest works, Reading the World: Cormac McCarthyâs Tennessee Period, Dianne C. Luce pays attention to the signs and portents of an emerging âecocentric vision.â McCarthyâs first four novels depict a gothic rural past threatened by the onslaught of the industrial and economic modernization of Appalachia in the 1930s through the 1950s. âIn its remembered healthiest state, before the opening of [The Orchard Keeper],â Luce explains, the titular peach orchard âwas an emblem of the fruitful collaboration between man and nature, specifically of the traditional, forest-dependent, pastoral culture of East Tennesseeâs mountain people.â3 These early themes resurface in the Border Trilogy, where characters and places are haunted by memories of a wild or rural past and threatened by the tide of second-wave industrialization, modernization, and mechanized warfare. They recur in most of McCarthyâs works, and are a central theme of his post-apocalyptic The Road.
Luce frames her analysis with Leo Marxâs The Machine in the Garden: Technology and the Pastoral Ideal in America, originally published in 1964, to categorize McCarthyâs novels as participating in what Marx calls the literary tradition of complex pastoralism, as opposed to sentimental pastoralism. The spinal column of the American literary canon is formed by this latter category, in which Herman Melvilleâs, Nathaniel Hawthorneâs, and Mark Twainâs works fall. The defining image of this type of pastoral is the âmachine in the garden,â an image that poses stringent critiques of American national character. Specifically, Marx says, â[I]t is industrialization, represented by images of machine technology, that provides the counterforce in the American archetype of the pastoral design.â4 That counterforceâthe threat of and resistance to encroaching industrializationâadds complexity to thematic content in American literary pastorals.
In terms of McCarthyâs use of the pastoral as cultural critique, Marxâs most helpful insight is his description of the machine as the force of disruption and instability in the American psycheâand it is a force that is always gendered. In this complex pastoral tradition, the machine functions as âa sudden, shocking intruder upon a fantasy of idyllic satisfaction.â That rupture of assumed innocence or safety is âinvariably ⊠associated with crude, masculine aggressiveness in contrast with the tender, feminine, and submissive attitudes traditionally attached to the landscape.â5 That the pastoral is always a âvirginalâ landscape is a given.6 Why the machineâs toxicity is masculine is less easily explained, for Marx, than the femininity of the land. In order to understand the reason for the machineâs masculine characterization, it is necessary to turn to a broader examination of the role of industrialism in the US economy, and its relationship to the false premise of American economic philosophy: the myth of the self-made man.
Irvin G. Wyllieâs The Self-Made Man in America: The Myth of Rags to Riches, originally published in 1954, provides a succinct narrative summary of that myth, its durability through the 1929 economic collapse, and its sticking power through sufficient data to turn any intelligent being away from belief in such a construct. But belief is not so easily lost. In the end, Wyllie concludes, the myth of the self-made man is not really about economic philosophy but is rather a quasi-religious system, the heart of which is a peculiarly American love of wealth. How âsuccessâ is defined varies from person to person, he points out, but âno one of these concepts enjoys such universal favor in America as that which equates success with making money.â7 Wyllieâs sociological assessment of wealth as the marker of âmaking itâ in America corresponds with economistsâ descriptions of the role of capital in Western nations. Ernest Mandel, for example, connects the driving force of capitalism to this fundamental belief that success can be defined best by an accumulation of wealth, particularly wealth as surplus profit (as opposed to less liquid forms of wealth, more common in hereditary land-based economies in old Europe). Technological advances are necessary processes through which capital surplus is increased. âIn capitalism, under the whip of competition and the constant quest for surplus-profits,â Mandel says, âefforts are continually made to lower the costs of production and cheapen the value of commodities by means of technical improvements.â8 The machine in McCarthyâs works, then, represents not only the processes by which men become wealthy but also the voracious appetite for wealth that characterizes a society that correlates the value of a man to his capacity to generate and accumulate wealth.
In this regard, the complex pastoral imagery in McCarthyâs works can be read as extended metaphors for that which is lost to human and nonhuman animal societies in the age of the machine, and the looming threat of industrialization brought by the âwhip of competitionâ that drives the production lines and the manufactured goods that feed the engines of the American consumer economy. Specifically, McCarthyâs representations of the effects of the âage of the machineâ on human flourishing and the flourishing of the natural world are codified in a series of metaphors. Among the most obvious and most frequently occurring are contrasting, metaphoric depictions of engine-driven vehicles such as cars and trucks, and horses. That is, McCarthyâs works code this critique of capitalism in familiar images of American industry against equally familiar images representing a pastoral or agrarian way of life: cars and trucks on the one side, and horses on the other.
This image-driven, largely implicit critique draws readersâ attention to the suppression of alternative notions of âsuccessâ or human flourishing under the hegemony of Americaâs capitalist consumer economy. What possible alternative value system can survive, McCarthyâs novels seem to ask, given American quasi-religious devotion to the myth of the self-made man? McCarthy imagines this question through attention to the gendered implications of industrialization of the late nineteenth through mid-twentieth centuries, and through those coded images poses this question: what happens to âmanâ in an industrialized world? More importantly, what happens to humanity in an increasingly inhuman(e) world?
This chapter examines McCarthyâs depictions of the âmachine in the gardenâ in his screenplay The Gardenerâs Son and in two early Appalachian novels, The Orchard Keeper and Child of God, and then traces its spore through the Border Trilogy, ending finally with a nod to the latter part of the twentieth century in No Country for Old Men, the contemporary world of The Counselor, and the apocalyptic future in The Road. First, a brief explanation for which texts are examined and which are not. In The Gardenerâs Son, set during Reconstruction and before the advent of the automobile, McCarthy levels his gaze on a critical era in American capitalism driven by the second industrial revolution and sets the stage, as it were, for his persistent critique of the myth of the self-made man. Next, his early Appalachian novels set up the function of complex pastoral imagery, with its threatening machine, which continues and expands in the Border Trilogy, recurs in No Country, and undergirds the central arguments of The Counselor, before arriving at a âworst caseâ imagined future in The Road. Blood Meridian and Outer Dark are not represented in this discussion, as both are situated in engine-less worlds, although Blood Meridian focuses on the very economic question that emerges from this chapter: what is it that drives the violent dispossession inherent in American capitalism?9 Because Blood Meridian traces the answer to that question back to the era of Manifest Destiny, the next chapter focuses on this novel in an historical examination of the theme of American capitalism in McCarthyâs fiction forward from the mid-nineteenth century.
The primary historical context for this chapter is, first, the second industrial revolution; then the technological boom of the early twentieth century; the collapse and rebirth of the USâs consumer-driven capitalist economy during the Great Depression and the Second World War; and finally the shift toward global capitalism in the 1980s. The Gardenerâs Son, based loosely on the true crime story of Robert McEvoy, who shot and killed a textile mill owner in Graniteville, South Carolina, in 1876, contends directly with the myth of the self-made man during the height of the second industrial revolution, shortly after the completion of the transcontinental railroad (1869) and shortly before the end of the Reconstruction Eraâs limited civil rights advances. The Orchard Keeper traces the collapse of rural, agrarian communities in East Tennessee during the boom era of the Tennessee Valley Authority and through Prohibition; Child of God reinforces its examination of rural collapse following the Second World War. The Border Trilogy spans the Second World War and the first decade following, with attention to the implications of nationalism and the military-industrial complex in the atomic age. No Country for Old Men revisits many of the themes of The Orchard Keeper, its nostalgia for a rural Texas homesteading past (instead of an eastern Tennessee rural past) undercut by brutal observations about the implications of market economics during the boom of the transnational marketplace in the 1980s. The Counselor picks up many of the same narrative threads from No Country, but transposes them to the first decades of the twenty-first century. And, finally, The Road offers a retrospective look at the end of human existence and the tenacity of the violence and aggression that, even at the end of civilization, dominate American masculinity.
Throughout each of these texts, the âmachine in the gardenâ and its implicit economic critique are represented by a sort of metaphoric shorthand in which trucks and cars and horses, critical forms of transportation in post-industrialized or industrialized societies on the one hand and rural or pre-industrial communities on the other, reflect larger themes about definitions of success, value, and meaningfulness. In McCarthyâs metaphoric lexicon, this notion of innate value is described as a matter of souls; yet this is not, strictly speaking, a theological argument. Wild animals are consistently described as possessing souls, but when domesticated they lose access to the universal soul that grants them a profound communal connection with each other and a place in the matrix of the natural world. By implication, human beingsâ souls are damaged and fragile, quickened in the natural world but alienated, perhaps lost entirely, in the machine that cranks the engines of a market economy.10
Cars, trucks, complexity, and masculinity
Analysis of recurring motifs that speak to capitalist processes and environmental losses reflects the driving ideas of complexity economics. Complexity economics pushes against the pre-2008 dominant model, which reads market economies as systems with determinable âoptimalâ functions and representable agents (market forces), and which accounts for irregularities by calculating in random stochastic processes (typically modeled on calculations of Brownian motion, random behaviors that are unpredictable yet measurable). Complexity theory applied to economics, however, reads markets as complex adaptive systems (CAS). It understands economic systems to be dynamic, with âoften abrupt transitions between some temporary order and volatile disorder.â11 Rongqing Dai offers a more philosophical explanation: social collaboration is always a fraught contest between âmutual reliance and mutual competitionâ for survival.12 What may seem random irregularities in marketplaces in fact derive from the irreducibly complex interrelationship between âsocial effects of production and distribution,â the ârelationship bet...