eBook - ePub
Defending Nazis in Postwar Czechoslovakia
Life of K. Resler, Defense Councel Ex Officio of K. H. Frank
Jakub DrĂĄpal
This is a test
Partager le livre
- English
- ePUB (adapté aux mobiles)
- Disponible sur iOS et Android
eBook - ePub
Defending Nazis in Postwar Czechoslovakia
Life of K. Resler, Defense Councel Ex Officio of K. H. Frank
Jakub DrĂĄpal
DĂ©tails du livre
Aperçu du livre
Table des matiĂšres
Citations
Ă propos de ce livre
In this book, Czech lawyer and scholar Jakub DrĂĄpal tells the story of the life of Kamill Resler, an attorney who defended the most prominent Nazi tried in postwar Czechoslovakia: Karl Hermann Frank, who would go on to be executed for his role in organizing the massacres of the Czech villages Lidice and LeĆŸĂĄky in 1942. Celebrating Resler's lifelong commitment to justiceâto honoring even the most nefarious criminals' right to a defenseâDrĂĄpal highlights events that influenced Resler's outlook and legal career, important cases that preceded Frank's trial, Resler's subsequent defenses of other Nazi criminals, and the final years of Resler's life under the communist regime.
Foire aux questions
Comment puis-je résilier mon abonnement ?
Il vous suffit de vous rendre dans la section compte dans paramĂštres et de cliquer sur « RĂ©silier lâabonnement ». Câest aussi simple que cela ! Une fois que vous aurez rĂ©siliĂ© votre abonnement, il restera actif pour le reste de la pĂ©riode pour laquelle vous avez payĂ©. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Puis-je / comment puis-je télécharger des livres ?
Pour le moment, tous nos livres en format ePub adaptĂ©s aux mobiles peuvent ĂȘtre tĂ©lĂ©chargĂ©s via lâapplication. La plupart de nos PDF sont Ă©galement disponibles en tĂ©lĂ©chargement et les autres seront tĂ©lĂ©chargeables trĂšs prochainement. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Quelle est la différence entre les formules tarifaires ?
Les deux abonnements vous donnent un accĂšs complet Ă la bibliothĂšque et Ă toutes les fonctionnalitĂ©s de Perlego. Les seules diffĂ©rences sont les tarifs ainsi que la pĂ©riode dâabonnement : avec lâabonnement annuel, vous Ă©conomiserez environ 30 % par rapport Ă 12 mois dâabonnement mensuel.
Quâest-ce que Perlego ?
Nous sommes un service dâabonnement Ă des ouvrages universitaires en ligne, oĂč vous pouvez accĂ©der Ă toute une bibliothĂšque pour un prix infĂ©rieur Ă celui dâun seul livre par mois. Avec plus dâun million de livres sur plus de 1 000 sujets, nous avons ce quâil vous faut ! DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Prenez-vous en charge la synthÚse vocale ?
Recherchez le symbole Ăcouter sur votre prochain livre pour voir si vous pouvez lâĂ©couter. Lâoutil Ăcouter lit le texte Ă haute voix pour vous, en surlignant le passage qui est en cours de lecture. Vous pouvez le mettre sur pause, lâaccĂ©lĂ©rer ou le ralentir. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Est-ce que Defending Nazis in Postwar Czechoslovakia est un PDF/ePUB en ligne ?
Oui, vous pouvez accĂ©der Ă Defending Nazis in Postwar Czechoslovakia par Jakub DrĂĄpal en format PDF et/ou ePUB ainsi quâĂ dâautres livres populaires dans History et World History. Nous disposons de plus dâun million dâouvrages Ă dĂ©couvrir dans notre catalogue.
Informations
Sujet
HistorySous-sujet
World History1. THE FIRST REPUBLIC
Defending K. H. Frank was the biggest case in Kamill Reslerâs legal career. Although it wasnât the most time-consuming or the most complicated case he handled, from a legal perspective, and it did nothing to secure him financially, but rather cost him a lot of money, it was exceptional in terms of the energy he had to put into it, and the effort it took to overcome his own and othersâ distate. Kamill Resler had to defend a man who had been responsible for the death of his own relatives and acquaintances, a man whom he deeply detested. This is what makes Reslerâs defence of K. H. Frank so interesting.
There is, however, far more to Resler and his life, than his defence of Frank. Prior to the notable Frank trial, Reslerâs career and character had been formed over many interesting years. Examples of aspects of Reslerâs life and work that are well worth a look at include his defence of politically and ethnically troublesome individuals during the First Republic, his assistance to his Jewish colleagues during the Second Republic, and the part he played in the resistance movement during the war. These events were certainly not just a prelude or prequel to the Frank defence, although it is clear that Reslerâs character was shaped by these situations and that his stance in the Frank trial reflected his previous experience. Rather, it is worth seeing these events separately from their relationship with the later Frank trial. Several of Reslerâs actions, such as the disciplinary suit Resler brought against Aryan lawyers on the day Bohemia and Moravia were occupied by the German army, arguably demanded greater courage and had a greater influence on the lives of others than his more famous defence of K. H. Frank. Therefore, while focusing on the Frank trial as the most interesting and significant of Reslerâs career for the Czech nation, we will also look in detail at the rest of Reslerâs life, which is necessary to give a fair and full picture of who Resler really was, and what he experienced as a lawyer. Kamill Reslerâs legal career began at the time of the First Czechoslovak Republic, a time when Czechoslovakia was an island of democracy in Central Europe.8
DEFENCE OF ANTONĂN KIESEWETTER IN A TREASON CASE9
Three years before the start of the Second World War, Kamill Resler defended a client in a case that served as a model for the Frank trial. His client was a Czech German who was accused of treason, and the public therefore did not look positively on his defence lawyer. This was Reslerâs most high profile pre-war case.
His client was arrested under the law on the protection of the Republic. This led to criminal proceedings in defence of the basic constitutional ideas and institutions of the state. AntonĂn Kiesewetter, general manager of the bank Kreditanstalt der Deutschen (KdD),10 was accused in 1935 of his bank having financed the subversive magazine Der Weg, and been complicit in other subversive acts.11 The accusation was connected with a charge brought against Dr. Patscheider, a professor from Opava who had moved to Silesia from the Tyrol before the First World War, and had allegedly led a group that were preparing to annex German populations from the Silesia, North Moravia and North-Western Bohemia regions to the German Reich. This case was particularly fiery in the tense period leading up to the Second World War.12
For example, unsubstantiated threats were made that the court files would be stolen while being transferred from Opava to Ostrava (resulting in them having a police escort), and that certain imprisoned individuals would be forcibly freed. None of this in fact took place, and Resler was quite used to these sorts of threats; in one of his previous cases, similar messages had been sent by personal enemies of the accused himself, in order to make his time in custody more difficult.
In a later letter about the trial, Resler wrote: âthe entire proceedings were dominated by strong-mindedness and rigorousness, which is rare for our courts; I recall only the decision, whereby all anonymous reports and statements were dismissed, which is and will long remain unique, and was sufficient on its own to inspire respect. Indeed, the way they handled personal contact with the defendant was also refined.â
Resler had at first been reluctant to take on the defence of a German accused of disloyalty to the Republic, and the only reason why he agreed to do so in the end was that a Czech colleague of his asked him to, personally vouching for Kiesewetter, and assuring Resler that he had not been part of any treacherous plots. Resler was also somewhat attracted by the opportunity the case offered for him to see how the Germans did things.13 And it was for this very reason that Kiesewetter had chosen him: it was important for him that someone should look at his case from the Czech perspective and be persuaded that he had not committed any wrongdoing.
After the year 1926, when Kiesewetter had resigned from a prominent position in the German National party and gone into banking, he had not been at all involved in politics. The magazine Der Weg had indeed been funded by the KdD bank, which he represented, but its purpose was to give a positive picture of contemporary political, cultural and social events â and not to promote subversive acts, as Resler argued in his submission to the Regional Criminal Court.
Resler worked on the defence together with Ostrava-based barrister JUDr. Rudolf Prchal, whom he had known for many years. They made sure they left out certain details from their written communication, however, for fear that third parties might intercept and misuse their letters. This applied in particular to their dealings with officers of the Ostrava court: they were trying to have the case assigned to judge Dr. Hahn, not so that he would in any way favour them, but because he was considered a very objective judge. They kept this strictly to themselves. In the end, the case was presided over by chief counsel Emil KĂ€mpf, who Resler reported did a very good job of it.14
Reslerâs opinion of the public prosecutorâs handling of the case, on the other hand, was somewhat different. He considered the prosecutorâs speech in court to have been weak, of little legal value, and of a style more fitting to a political speech in parliament or at a gathering.15 The presiding judge managed to quell the defenceâs discomfort with the speech, but did so in such a way that it was clear to Resler that he could not hold it against the defendant. Ironically, Resler observed during the main hearing that the prosecutorâs speech was the most persuasive defence that could have been made.
Resler reported that the trial was very tiring and tense. The defence lawyers were extremely good, and so it was not easy even for Resler to compare favourably with them. Resler succeeded, however, despite the newspapers misnaming him as Rössler (an occurrence he had become familiar with).
Resler gave the last of the defenceâs closing speeches, and therefore had a task somewhat harder than the others, since, as he claimed, he had âtherefore not only to close the defence of his own client but the whole case.â In his speech he pointed out that according to the Code of Criminal Procedure, the final speech in a trial is the most compelling, and it was therefore not undignified for him to speak last. He was the only defence counsel to give his closing speech in Czech, which a number of newspapers reported as a surprise, especially as he was known to speak perfect German. List NĂĄrodnĂ politika reported that âthe gallery was full to bursting for his speech. (âŠ) As the last speaker, he then appealed to the court to uphold its reputation as a democratic court by making a fair judgement that both Czechs and Germans would recognize as good work. Defender Dr. Resler concluded by proclaiming the honour of the Czechoslovak process.â16 Reslerâs words were: âIt is my wish that of the verdict that will here be made every person, whether Czech or German, might be able to say: âThat is work worthy of creditâ.â17 In his closing speech he also praised the careful handling of the trial, and mentioned that t...