eBook - ePub
Beat Feminisms
Aesthetics, Literature, Gender, Activism
Polina Mackay
This is a test
Partager le livre
- 172 pages
- English
- ePUB (adapté aux mobiles)
- Disponible sur iOS et Android
eBook - ePub
Beat Feminisms
Aesthetics, Literature, Gender, Activism
Polina Mackay
DĂ©tails du livre
Aperçu du livre
Table des matiĂšres
Citations
Ă propos de ce livre
This is the first book-length study to read women of the Beat Generation as feminist writers. The book focuses on one author from each of the three generations that comprise the groups of female writers associated with the Beats â Diane di Prima, ruth weiss and Anne Waldman â as well as on experimental and multimedia artists, such as Laurie Anderson and Kathy Acker, who have not been read through the prism of Beat feminism before. This book argues that these writers' feminism evolved over time but persistently focussed on intertextuality, transformation, revisionism, gender, interventionist poetics and activism. It demonstrates how these Beat feminisms counteract the ways in which women have been undermined, possessed or silenced.
Foire aux questions
Comment puis-je résilier mon abonnement ?
Il vous suffit de vous rendre dans la section compte dans paramĂštres et de cliquer sur « RĂ©silier lâabonnement ». Câest aussi simple que cela ! Une fois que vous aurez rĂ©siliĂ© votre abonnement, il restera actif pour le reste de la pĂ©riode pour laquelle vous avez payĂ©. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Puis-je / comment puis-je télécharger des livres ?
Pour le moment, tous nos livres en format ePub adaptĂ©s aux mobiles peuvent ĂȘtre tĂ©lĂ©chargĂ©s via lâapplication. La plupart de nos PDF sont Ă©galement disponibles en tĂ©lĂ©chargement et les autres seront tĂ©lĂ©chargeables trĂšs prochainement. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Quelle est la différence entre les formules tarifaires ?
Les deux abonnements vous donnent un accĂšs complet Ă la bibliothĂšque et Ă toutes les fonctionnalitĂ©s de Perlego. Les seules diffĂ©rences sont les tarifs ainsi que la pĂ©riode dâabonnement : avec lâabonnement annuel, vous Ă©conomiserez environ 30 % par rapport Ă 12 mois dâabonnement mensuel.
Quâest-ce que Perlego ?
Nous sommes un service dâabonnement Ă des ouvrages universitaires en ligne, oĂč vous pouvez accĂ©der Ă toute une bibliothĂšque pour un prix infĂ©rieur Ă celui dâun seul livre par mois. Avec plus dâun million de livres sur plus de 1 000 sujets, nous avons ce quâil vous faut ! DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Prenez-vous en charge la synthÚse vocale ?
Recherchez le symbole Ăcouter sur votre prochain livre pour voir si vous pouvez lâĂ©couter. Lâoutil Ăcouter lit le texte Ă haute voix pour vous, en surlignant le passage qui est en cours de lecture. Vous pouvez le mettre sur pause, lâaccĂ©lĂ©rer ou le ralentir. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Est-ce que Beat Feminisms est un PDF/ePUB en ligne ?
Oui, vous pouvez accĂ©der Ă Beat Feminisms par Polina Mackay en format PDF et/ou ePUB ainsi quâĂ dâautres livres populaires dans Literatura et CrĂtica literaria para escritoras. Nous disposons de plus dâun million dâouvrages Ă dĂ©couvrir dans notre catalogue.
Informations
1 Female Subjectivities in Beat Textuality by Male Authors
DOI: 10.4324/9781315744438-1
The first step in a study of the work of women of the Beat Generation should surely be an examination of the depiction of women in works by iconic Beat texts, such as Jack Kerouacâs On the Road (1957), Allen Ginsbergâs âHowlâ (1956) and William Burroughsâ Naked Lunch (1959). Collectively, they offer narratives of gender that are relevant to women of the Beat Generation as they perpetuate certain mythologies of masculinity and femininity that female Beats had to confront in their own works.
Helen McNeil writes that gender in the Beat movement needs to be seen as an âarchaeology,â as âa synchronic study which places content, context and discursive terminology equal to any unity of genre, author or movementâ (179). Depictions of men and women in Beat texts written during the groupâs heyday, then, are reflections of the wider culture and can be traced to the understandings of gender in the 1950s and 1960s. Thus a snapshot of the culture of the time, as McNeil does (178â199), reveals that Ginsbergâs idea of the âboy gang,â Kerouacâs narratives of male bonding, or Burroughsâ monopolizing male identities that exclude women are consistent with existing prevailing models of masculinity and femininity at the time. However, even as reflections of a wider (normative) culture, Beat representations of gendered identities feed into models of rebellion in modern and contemporary culture. As Barbara Ehrenreich has shown in her analysis of media narratives of the Beats in the 1950s, even the negative coverage created an image of the Beats as âmad to live:â âMen looked to the Beats for a vision of themselves and, even after the imagined viewers had been discredited, the vision remained compellingâ (64).
The media hype around Beat rebellion speaks to the kind of sensationalism that has always followed the Beats: from Kerouacâs boasting of writing On the Road in just three weeks1 to Burroughsâ killing of his wife in a drunkard game in 1951 and getting away with it. This chapter argues that depictions of men and women in works by male Beat writers need to be seen within this wider context of sensationalist narratives of gender in Beat textuality. Further, I argue, iconic authors such as Kerouac, Ginsberg and Burroughs, who collectively make up the bulk of the Beat legacy for the wider public, have used the hype to advance self-serving mythologies about masculinity and femininity. In order to chart the extent to which these mythologies have permeated the legacy of the Beat Generation, I explore depictions of Joan Vollmer in iconic Beat texts as illustration of the ways in which men write female subjectivity in Beat discourses.
(Not)Telling a Dead Woman's Story: ΀he Case of Joan Vollmer
I was reminded of how much of an impact the figure of Joan Vollmer and her story have had in Beat studies at a creative homage to her at an academic conference in Paris in 2009 to celebrate 50 years from the first publication of Naked Lunch.2 In addition to academic lectures and panels on Naked Lunch, the conference also hosted a performance by British poet Ian MacFadyen of his book-length poem about Burroughsâ wife entitled Point of No Return (2009). The poem is a retelling in verse of Vollmerâs life and death, offering an interesting proposition by changing the emphasis from the impact of her death on Burroughsâ work to her story instead. The poet highlights this shift in perspective by offering several instances where Vollmer is made to speak for herself, as when she reflects on her status in Beat/Burroughs studies as âa case in history, a piece of pathology/a captivating story of decadence and infamyâ (Point of No Return, 13). Much of the fascination with the life and death of Vollmer and the impact this may have had on Burroughsâ life and writing has been perpetuated endlessly by the Beat writerâs many biographers. Over the years, these investigators have tried to decipher how much her tragic death may have influenced the author (e.g. Barry Miles, Call Me Burroughs, 147â250), while literary critics have attempted to analyse her presence/absence as a trope in his texts (e.g. Jorge GarcĂa-Robles, 100â135; Aaron Nyerges, 158â171).
Burroughs met Joan Vollmer in the 1940s in New York when her apartment was a meeting point for many Beat writers and friends, including Jack Kerouac, Allen Ginsberg, Lucien Carr and Herbert Huncke. Vollmer was addicted to Benzedrine at the time and became prone to psychotic breakdowns. Her son, William S. Burroughs, Jr (also known as Billy Burroughs), portrays her in his autobiographical novel, Kentucky Ham (1973), as a self-destructive addict who behaved recklessly. Neal Cassady offers a similar picture of her in his description of his visit of the Burroughsâ in New Orleans in the late 1940s. He writes to Ginsberg that
Joan is brittle, blasĂ© brittleness is her forte. With sharpened laughs and dainty oblique statements she fashions the topic at hand. You know these things, I need not elaborate. But, you ask for an angle, well, Julieâs [Joanâs daughter] hair is matted with dirt I am told; oh fuck it, normal disintegration of continued habit patterns (child raising here) has Joan laboring in a bastardized world wherein the supply of Benzedrine completely conditions her reaction to everyday life. (Neal Cassady: Collected Letters, 1944â1967, 117)
In the early 1950s, she and Burroughs moved to Mexico City where she would stay with the children as he travelled around South America in search of yage (ayahuasca), the drug that Burroughs saw as inducing the ultimate high.
Given Vollmerâs struggles with addiction, her story and untimely death seems like the last act in a long tragedy. On September 6, 1951, a few days after Burroughs returned from his South American trip, he accidentally shot and killed his wife as they were apparently playing a game at a party in Mexico City. With so many witnesses at the party and with Burroughsâ eventual admission to the killing, it should have been a straightforward case for the police leading to Burroughsâ conviction. However, to this day, the events on the night remain unclear. Burroughs first admitted to Mexican police that he was âplaying William Tellâ when he accidentally shot his wife in the head but denied the statement a day later. In an interview in 1965, he claimed to have been trying to show a gun to a potential buyer when it went off and hit Vollmer:
And I had that terrible accident with Joan Vollmer, my wife. I had a revolver that I was planning to sell to a friend. I was checking it over and it went offâkilled her. A rumor started that I was trying to shoot a glass of champagne from her head William Tell style. Absurd and false. (Burroughs Live: The Collected Interviews, 76).
The people who were at the party gave varying accounts of what happened: Lewis Marker told Ted Morgan, one of Burroughsâ first biographers, that the author said âhe was going to do his William Tell Actâ (Morgan, 195) before his wife put the glass on her head; another eyewitness, Eddie Woods, told Morgan that he did not remember anything about such an act (Morgan, 196). Burroughs himself told Morgan in the early 1980s: âI said to Joan, âI guess itâs about time for our William Tell act.â She took her highball glass and balanced it on top of her head. [âŠ]. I fired one shot, aiming at the glassâ (Morgan, 194). Obviously, these different versions (with Burroughs himself creating at least two) offer a mixture of reality and fantasy to the story.3
Burroughsâ time in South America, and particularly his quest for yage, is recorded in Queer, written between 1951 and 1953 but not published until 1985. The book is now seen as a significant contribution to Burroughsâ oeuvre as it serves as a precursor of the techniques Burroughs would develop fully later in such novels as Naked Lunch (Harris, âEditorâs Introduction,â ixâxiv). As Bradway has suggested, the novel also feeds into the wider history of queer literature in recent American fiction (1â49). Surprisingly, the narrative excludes Vollmer, despite its biographical focus and the proximity of the action to her death. Oliver Harris has pointed out helpfully that âit is simply not the case that Joanâs death is âcarefully avoidedâ in Queer: in terms of its fictionalization of autobiographical events, the shooting falls outside the narrative chronologyâ (xii). However, Vollmerâs exclusion has loomed large over the text, largely due to Burroughsâ mention of her death in the 1985 introduction of the first edition of the book (Queer, 18). In terms of the impact of her death on the reception of the text, her exclusion adds to the mythologization of a woman by omission, whereby the gap in the text fills in the blanks in her story.
Burroughs would continue to add to the expanding myth of Vollmer sporadically from the early 1980s all the way to his death. In a journal entry on December 2, 1996 (only eight months before his death), he writes: âTell any feminist I shot Joan in a state of possession, and she will scream: âNonsense! No such thing. HE did itââ (Last Words, 17). Grauerholz reads this admission as the moment we see Burroughs âprosecuting himself, defending himself, and finally, convicting himselfâ (69). But this comment does not imply admission of responsibilityâfar from it. Burroughs here shifts the focus on a rather different issue, which is the idea that his reasoning for accidentally killing his wife would not be accepted by feminists (Queer, 18). He describes their hypothetical reaction using emotive language, evident in the use of exclamation marks and words such as âscream.â This kind of language is used here to imply that womenâs critique of men is determined by their emotions rather than reason. Obviously, this is straightforward sexism and not an admission of responsibility.
Burroughsâ comments about Vollmer and his overall treatment of her memory are part of a wider pattern of misogynistic attitudes he expressed even more clearly in a few essays from the late 1960s (Wermer-Colan and Hawkings, 21). What is more, Burroughsâ emotive language reveals a systematic attempt to sensationalize Vollmerâs death. It is precisely as a sensationalist piece of Beat history that Vollmerâs brief life and tragic death would be passed on to other Beats and later generations of writers. MacFadyenâs verse drama, Point of No Return, written over 50 years after Vollmerâs death, captures the endless fascination with her story when it states in the introductory note that it is written âin the hope that a number of different women performers and singers would interpret the role of Joan Burroughs [âŠ]âa palimpsest moving through cultures and through timeâ (1). The poem/performance is largely appropriative, in the sense that it recycles already known information about Vollmer, mainly drawn from Grauerholzâs âThe Death of Joan Vollmer Burroughs: What Really Happened?â (2002) and Jorge Garcia-Roblesâ La Bala Perdida: William S. Burroughs en MĂ©xico (1995). However, the author creates a new frame for Vollmerâs story as he introduces ironic distance in the poem between Vollmer as the speaker and Vollmer as the poemâs topic. The piece acknowledges this disparity by having Vollmer end her soliloquy with âfascination is my curse, I want it overâ [âŠ] Forget about meâ (Point of No Return, 14). Of course the poem itself undermines this argument to forget as it perpetuates the myths and narratives surrounding the figure of Vollmer not just in the words of the piece itself but also in its subtitle, which is To the Memory of Joan Burroughs. These ironic reversals in the treatment of Vollmerâas both subject and object of fascination, as a woman whose story is both told and untold in the pages of Beat texts, or as a figure who is realized both as a gap and as a symbol of Beat textualityâserve as a good introduction to the way in which iconic male Beat authors write female subjectivity in their works.
Burroughs: Writing Women/Erasing Women
Burroughsâ work strives to erase female subjectivity in order to make room for the emergence of an exclusively male authorial self. To understand the inner workings and structure of this erasure, I will further trace the presence/absence of the figure of Joan Vollmer in Burroughs. Burroughsâ treatment of Vollmer illustrates a significant feature of his work: in Burroughs, the male voice emerges when female presence is written out.
In his analysis of modes of masculinity in contemporary American culture, David Savran writes of Burroughs as an author who âhas constructed a fictive self much more self-consciously than his associatesâ (85). Nowhere in Burroughsâ oeuvre is this fictive self more visible than in his introduction to his novel, Queer, written some 35 years after the book. Intended as an introduction to explicate some of the events near the time of the writing of the book in the early 1950s, including Vollmerâs accidental shooting, Burroughsâ accompanying piece for the first publication of Queer in fact does a good job of obscuring further the boundary between reality and fiction. He introduces the idea of another consciousness present in his mind at the moment of the shooting, writing that he shot his wife as if he was possessed. He claims,
I am forced to the appalling conclusion that I would never have become a writer but for Joanâs death, and to a realization of the extent to which this event has motivated and formulated my writing. I live with the constant threat of possession, and a constant need to escape from possession, from Control. So the death of Joan brought me in contact with the invader, the Ugly Spirit, and maneuvered [sic] me into a lifelong struggle, in which I have had no choice except to write my way out. (Queer, 18)
As Oliver Harris argues, âAs a traumatic report of the real, his revelation also had the perverse effect of framing the text with such a sensational context that is all but obscured both the fiction itself and any other reality behind itâ (âEditorâs Introduction,â xii). Putting the effect of these conflations aside, Burroughsâ introduction determines Queer as, to use Harrisâ words, the book âbest known for a death it does not even describeâ (âEditorâs Introduction,â x). But Burroughsâ explanation remains relevant because it explains away Vollmerâs shooting in terms of the biography that shapes the writerâs mind and determines their authorial intentions. In short, writing about Vollmerâs death as a catalytic event narrativizes the presumed trauma in the writerâs life and turns it into a literary trope. In this context, it makes sense that Burroughsâ introduction is potentially more fiction than reality and, at the very least, that it brings into the spotlight the grey and murky areas created in textualities that write the life into the work.
Burroughsâ introduction in Queer constructs the narrative of the traumatic event in the writerâs past that brings him into contact with his inner demons, after which point his life is a struggle to tame these demons, a process he has put down on paper for everyone to see. This narrative fits into a well-established literary tradition, which is the literature of addiction. In Thomas De Quinceyâs Confessions of an English Opium Eater (1821), for instance, the narrator often refers to the struggle of overcoming his physical and mental disintegration, as well as to the alien, ghostly presences that seem to have taken over the mind of the addict-speaker:
Then came [âŠ] trepidations of innumerable fugitives, I knew not whether from the good cause or the bad: darkness and lights: tempest and human faces: and at last, with the sense that all was lost, female forms, and the features that were worth all the world to me. (113)
The difference between De Quinceyâs image of a mind being taken over by hallucinations and Burroughsâ labelling of the effect of a traumatic experience as being possessed by the Ugly Spirit is context. De Quinceyâs account serves to enrich the addictâs narrative by showing how his sense of reality is destabilized by visions and the mindâs interpretation of these. In Burroughsâ case, the possession of the authorâs mind by another consciousness becomes a rhetorical argument against a prosecutor. As opposed to helping the reader make sense of the effect of Vollmerâs death on Burroughs, it further obscures the historical record of the incident.4
Contrary to the introduction to Queer, which suggests that Vollmer is central to his work, Burroughs never openly refers to her death in his fiction, though there are a small number of passing tangential references, scattered throughout his oeuvre. One instance occurs towards the beginning of Naked Lunch at the end of the first section, where the narrator describes a vision of a character called Jane induced by smoking drugs. He writes,
I take three drags, Jane looked at him and her flesh crystallized. I leaped up screaming, âI got the fear!â and ran out of the house. Drank a beer in a little restaurantâmosaic bar and soccer scores and bullfight postersâand waited for the bus to town.A year later in Tangier I heard she was dead. (Naked Lunch, 30)
As a hallucination or a vision, Janeâs brief appearance in the text and her swift disappearance a few words later, serves the purpose of destabilizing of what is already a warped narrative, which has no central plot apart from the addict-hustlerâsâWilliam Leeâincreasingly desperate attempts to score drugs and the narratorâs extended expositions on such subjects as government control, capitalism or alien viruses. The disorder is part of the unreality of the novel. Writing of Naked Lunchâs material history, Harris maps Burroughsâ resistance to Ginsbergâs attempts at introducing some chronological order to the pages that make up the novel, and points out that â[Ginsbergâs] plan would have naturalized Burroughsâ materials, making its unbound energies and its radical diversity strictly accountable in terms of the authorâs autobiographical identity as the point of origin and responsibilityâ (William Burroughs and the Secret of Fascination, 241). Indeed Naked Lunch is more of an âanti-novelâ than a novel, in that it resists ânovelistic unitiesâ (Harris, Fascination, 242, 241). The extract in which Jane appears is typical of the novelâs disunity, starting by introducing the uncertainty surrounding Leeâs geographic position (he was âin Cuernavaca or was it Taxco?â), which is underscored by Janeâs subsequent âdisappear[ance] into a cloud of tea smokeâ...