eBook - ePub
Compromise and Resistance in Postcolonial Writing
E. M. Forster's Legacy
Alberto FernĂĄndez Carbajal
This is a test
Partager le livre
- English
- ePUB (adapté aux mobiles)
- Disponible sur iOS et Android
eBook - ePub
Compromise and Resistance in Postcolonial Writing
E. M. Forster's Legacy
Alberto FernĂĄndez Carbajal
DĂ©tails du livre
Aperçu du livre
Table des matiĂšres
Citations
Ă propos de ce livre
Compromise and Resistance in Postcolonial Writing offers a new critical approach to E. M. Forster's legacy. It examines key themes in Forster's work (homosexuality, humanism, modernism, liberalism) and their relevance to post-imperial and postcolonial novels by important contemporary writers.
Foire aux questions
Comment puis-je résilier mon abonnement ?
Il vous suffit de vous rendre dans la section compte dans paramĂštres et de cliquer sur « RĂ©silier lâabonnement ». Câest aussi simple que cela ! Une fois que vous aurez rĂ©siliĂ© votre abonnement, il restera actif pour le reste de la pĂ©riode pour laquelle vous avez payĂ©. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Puis-je / comment puis-je télécharger des livres ?
Pour le moment, tous nos livres en format ePub adaptĂ©s aux mobiles peuvent ĂȘtre tĂ©lĂ©chargĂ©s via lâapplication. La plupart de nos PDF sont Ă©galement disponibles en tĂ©lĂ©chargement et les autres seront tĂ©lĂ©chargeables trĂšs prochainement. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Quelle est la différence entre les formules tarifaires ?
Les deux abonnements vous donnent un accĂšs complet Ă la bibliothĂšque et Ă toutes les fonctionnalitĂ©s de Perlego. Les seules diffĂ©rences sont les tarifs ainsi que la pĂ©riode dâabonnement : avec lâabonnement annuel, vous Ă©conomiserez environ 30 % par rapport Ă 12 mois dâabonnement mensuel.
Quâest-ce que Perlego ?
Nous sommes un service dâabonnement Ă des ouvrages universitaires en ligne, oĂč vous pouvez accĂ©der Ă toute une bibliothĂšque pour un prix infĂ©rieur Ă celui dâun seul livre par mois. Avec plus dâun million de livres sur plus de 1 000 sujets, nous avons ce quâil vous faut ! DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Prenez-vous en charge la synthÚse vocale ?
Recherchez le symbole Ăcouter sur votre prochain livre pour voir si vous pouvez lâĂ©couter. Lâoutil Ăcouter lit le texte Ă haute voix pour vous, en surlignant le passage qui est en cours de lecture. Vous pouvez le mettre sur pause, lâaccĂ©lĂ©rer ou le ralentir. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Est-ce que Compromise and Resistance in Postcolonial Writing est un PDF/ePUB en ligne ?
Oui, vous pouvez accĂ©der Ă Compromise and Resistance in Postcolonial Writing par Alberto FernĂĄndez Carbajal en format PDF et/ou ePUB ainsi quâĂ dâautres livres populaires dans Literature et African Literary Criticism. Nous disposons de plus dâun million dâouvrages Ă dĂ©couvrir dans notre catalogue.
Informations
Sujet
LiteratureSous-sujet
African Literary Criticism1
âHe is one of your hollow menâ: Homosexuality and Sublimation in Paul Scottâs The Raj Quartet and Ruth Prawer Jhabvalaâs Heat and Dust
In a critical survey of English literature of the 1960s, Patricia Waugh offers one of the most succinct joint dismissals of Paul Scottâs and J. G. Farrellâs fiction:
The novels of Scott and Farrell, though innovatory, remained broadly within the Eurocentric paradigm, challenging but remaining situated within the consciousness of the British characters. This tendency of earlier fictions of empire was questioned in the 1980s by the literary attention given to the problems and existence of post-colonial peoples whose histories had been subsumed by and identities forcibly generated in relation to former colonial powers.
(1995, p. 202)
Waughâs lukewarm statement constitutes the totality of her studyâs engagement with these two Booker Prize-winning authors. Whereas the charge of remaining situated within British consciousness is valid to an extent, the implication that only Indian perspectives can fruitfully undermine imperialism not only forecloses any potential counter-hegemony implicit or explicit in Scottâs and Farrellâs texts, but also obviates the distinctness of their literary projects, for their interrogation of the role of the British in India could not be more different. On the one hand, Scottâs fiction investigates the ideology of imperialism, its motives and attitudes, with a keen focus on sexuality and class dilemmas; on the other, Farrell is invested in a more irreverent deconstruction of the myth of the Raj and in considering the epistemic and metaphysical fragmentation of the British in India in a manner that is textually playful and satirical. The distinctness of such projects requires a careful critical approach which does not conjoin them with holistic impetus merely on the grounds of their Britishness or of their shared focus on colonial India.
Both writers engage, in effect, with different aspects of Forsterâs legacies, for Scott is interested in the ethics and personal motivation involved in colonial violence, whilst Farrell is more focused on previous representations of the Raj and on the ironic incongruities of the Empireâs despairing agents. It is the proliferation in the 1980s of popular film and television depictions of India, I suspect, that has relegated Scottâs and Farrellâs writings to the realm of imperial nostalgia. Randall Stevenson offers an illustration of the critical bias against books because of the populist appeal of their visual adaptations:
recent media successes â and to some extent the novels on which they are based â can [âŠ] be seen to owe their popularity to nostalgia for vanished Empire and uneasiness with Britainâs diminished world role. [âŠ] This [regret] also figured in the television series The Jewel in the Crown, based on Paul Scottâs The Raj Quartet (1966â75). A certain nostalgia is apparent in these novels even at the level of form, in Scottâs distinctive reliance on retrospection. [âŠ] Rather like Scott, [Ruth Prawer Jhabvala] relies on retrospection [in Heat and Dust], showing a girl trying to discover the historical truth about a distant relativeâs romance, years before, while partly re-enacting its circumstances in her own life.
(1993, pp. 128â9)
Stevenson is finally divorcing Scott from Farrell and aligning him with Jhabvala, not for the sake of pointing out any useful commonalities in their critical approaches to colonial or postcolonial histories, but in order to underline their pandering to British readersâ and viewersâ thirst for representations of the lost Empire. He is conflating here, however, the onset in the late 1960s and 1970s of a revisionary approach to the Empire triggered by a wave of political independence from Britain with the peak of Thatcherism in the 1980s and its troubling implications for British morale. I would agree with Stevenson on the nostalgia of the TV dramatization of Scottâs work, and would extend his point to include Jhabvalaâs later self-penned adaptation of Heat and Dust, directed by James Ivory in 1982: their production at a time when Britain had started questioning its political prowess seems to offer a diversion away from the contemporary political climate to times when Britainâs global role was more prominent and seemingly glamorous.
It must also be stated, however, that Stevenson is too eager to equate popularity with normativity, and retrospection with nostalgia: the TV series and films, as well as the novels on which they are based, may have been popular, but being favoured by their readership or their audience should not occlude the distantiation from imperial ideologies of the original literary narratives of The Raj Quartet and Heat and Dust. Furthermore, retrospection can only be construed as nostalgia when the past is merely mourned or glorified, whereas Scott and Jhabvala pose important questions about British sexualities and ideologies which continue the dialogue started by dissenting colonial writers such as Forster. Forsterâs death in 1970 took place while Scott was in the midst of writing The Raj Quartet and before the publication of Heat and Dust, and hence these narratives could be interpreted as being affected by the revulsive of Forsterâs posthumous âcoming outâ in 1971 with the publication of Maurice. There is a growing and gradually more explicit examination of the experiences of British homosexuals in India in Scottâs work, and Jhabvalaâs subtler depiction of homosociality adds to her more manifest inheritance of Forsterâs exploration of female self-expression in his fiction. Although both Scott and Jhabvala also use a form of sexual sublimation akin to Forsterâs in their exploration of femininity and heterosexuality in their novels, their respective emergent and opaque representations of homosexuality demand an interpretive approach that remains sensitive to the compulsory covering of homosexuals and their relationships during the colonial period.
In Between Men: English Literature and Homosocial Desire (1993), Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick acknowledges that before the onset of gay and lesbian social activism in the 1960s and the critical inception of queer theory in the 1980s, there had existed a good and steady tradition of gay writing whose compulsory subtlety since the nineteenth-century backlash against homosexuals necessarily relied on cunning decoding by its knowing readers. Sedgwickâs book purposefully celebrates the âinveterate, gorgeous generativity, the speculative generosity, the daring, the permeability, and the activism that have long been lodged in the multiple histories of queer readingâ (p. x; original italics). In this chapter, I undertake queer readings of The Raj Quartet and Heat and Dust that demonstrate the ways in which postcolonial re-imaginings of the Raj contribute to this tradition of queer reading, not only through the spectral emulation of Forsterâs texts, but also in their own encouragement of queer interpretation. I will do so by examining how these texts welcome the debate on heterosexual relations and burgeoning or embattled femininity which are the manifest legacy of Forsterâs novels about India and Italy, as well as the more spectral elements of Forsterâs purposefully encoded homosexual subtexts and his posthumously published homosexual writings, all of which add ideological and moral complexity to Scottâs and Jhabvalaâs representations of colonial India.
Paul Scottâs The Raj Quartet
Commencing an appraisal of Forsterâs legacy in postcolonial writing by examining the work of Paul Scott could be regarded as critically outdated and purposefully polemical: outdated on account of the comparisons frequently drawn between Scottâs and Forsterâs writing due to their shared interest in probing British attitudes in colonial India; polemical with regard to the counter-hegemonic but arguably postcolonial status of Scottâs work. In a manner similar to previous appraisals of Forsterâs writing, critical discussions of Scottâs representation of the Raj have been divided between those that try to look beyond India and see some intimations of universalism and those who suspect it of being far too indebted to colonial tropes. Francine S. Weinbaum (1992), for instance, paints a highly positive image of Scott, whilst her emphasis on the universal qualities of his writing clouds the historicity and British inception of his work. M. M. Mahood (1983) offers a more lukewarm reaction to Scott, and although encouraging close readings of his work in order to spell out its complex ideological stance, she finds his symbolism overwhelmingly trite. I argue here that Scottâs deployment of Indian religious symbolism in relation to marginal female characters is one of the most prominent legacies of Forsterâs writing, which, albeit more emphatically articulated than the religious symbolism of Passage, constitutes Scottâs own sublimated strategy of cultural syncretism, whereby British characters attempt to merge with the cultural landscape of India in a fatal manner symptomatic of the crumbling of the Raj. I also propose that Scott does not undertake a mere imitation of Forsterâs characters and their metaphysical quandaries, but rather that he enacts a troubled critique of British homosexuality in India that reverberates with Forsterâs spectral legacies; it is in this latter aspect of Scottâs work that The Raj Quartet starts outgrowing Forsterâs lengthy shadow and treads new revisionist ground, unravelling a form of spectral cultural inheritance that, as I show in Chapter 3, will reach as far as Michael Ondaatjeâs The English Patient.
If Weinbaum and Mahood offer praiseful and moderate approaches to Scottâs literary efforts, then on the other side of the spectrum we have Salman Rushdieâs total undermining of Scottâs work. In the essay âOutside the Whaleâ from Imaginary Homelands, Rushdie describes Scottâs fiction as âpure leadâ because of its unashamed act of âborrowingâ from Forsterâs writing (1992, p. 89), a claim that seems slightly overblown considering the highly cross-referential nature of Rushdieâs own fiction. Rushdie accuses Scott of using repetitive character types, although recurrent types of characters, as we will see, have a purpose in Scottâs fiction. These qualms notwithstanding, and in keeping with Stevensonâs later claim, Rushdie regards The Raj Quartet as having a key role in what he calls a âRaj revivalâ, a period of renewed interest in the Raj which is symptomatic of the crisis in British morale brought about during the economic recession of the 1970s and 1980s. Rushdieâs cursory dismissal of Scottâs work as a second-rate and clichĂ©d patchwork of literary references is carried out in an essay which, like Stevensonâs commentary, is concerned not so much with literary representations of the Empire as with the cultural impact of popular film and television. Rushdieâs critique is driven by his anxiety about grand visual recreations of the Raj, especially given the quick succession of the TV adaptation of Scottâs The Jewel in the Crown, and big-budget films such as Richard Attenboroughâs Gandhi and The Far Pavilions, and David Leanâs A Passage to India. Rushdieâs damning of Scott belies a more pressing irritation with these visual representations; in fact, he does not interrogate the transposition of The Raj Quartet from the page to the screen with the same urgency as he reacts to David Leanâs conscious changes to the plot and purport of Forsterâs Passage, which I will consider in more detail in my examination of Midnightâs Children and The Moorâs Last Sigh in Chapter 4.
Postcolonial critiques of Scott have tended to mirror those levied at Forster himself, particularly regarding the allegedly ambivalent political stance of his work and his choice of specific character types to represent both British and Indian positions. For example, Benita Parry (1975) states close to the publication of the tetralogyâs last volume that Scott was right in investing in colonial âtaboosâ, such as the illicit relationship between the Indian Hari Kumar and the young British lady Daphne Manners, whose ill-fated affair constitutes the gravity centre of the whole Raj Quartet; but, also according to Parry, although willing to challenge colonial attitudes, Scott also remains too ambivalent about his charactersâ particular agendas, his apparently neutral juxtaposition of individual perspectives denoting a lack of commitment to a strong critique of imperialism. More recently, Peter Morey (2000) concurs with Parry and praises Scottâs multiplicity of viewpoints, which destabilize the totalizing character of British official knowledges of India, whilst remaining critical of Scottâs apparent perpetuation of colonial literary conventions in favouring the perspective of seemingly apolitical Indian characters such as the westernized Hari Kumar and Ahmed Kasim. Leaving aside the contentious issue of why choosing westernized Indian subject positions should fail to convince readers â a point which ignores the fact that prominent Indian writers and politicians, such as Rushdie himself, Jawaharlal Nehru or Mahatma Gandhi, had Western educations â it would appear we need to look deeper into the personal ethics and cultural politics of Scottâs characters in order to appreciate how his novel cycle may be providing an intermediate epistemic bridge between colonial and postcolonial writing that transcends strict political lines.
The lack of clear political endorsement, however, has perturbed a number of Scottâs critics looking for a strong political stance in The Raj Quartet. Jacqueline Banerjee (2009) has noted in particular the mixed critical reception given to Scott on account of his depiction of the school missionary Edwina Crane, whose location within two political currents epitomizes Scottâs â and Forsterâs â preference for moderate stances. Miss Craneâs equal disenchantment with Gandhiâs âQuit Indiaâ campaign and with Queen Victoriaâs staunch imperialism forces her to take off the wall her portrait of Gandhi and the titular engraving, The Jewel in the Crown, featuring the former Empress of India. Banerjee exclaims: âNo wonder Scottâs work has angered Indian nationalists and British conservatives alike!â(2009, p. 74). Scottâs position as a moderate commentator on the fall of the Raj renders him an author of the interstices not dissimilar to Forster; his liberalism, which engages with the legacies of Forsterâs ideological position, is the informant of his reluctance to endorse any particular political faction. Scott relies instead on the multiple and sometimes conflicted perspectives on the Raj of his troubled characters to make a case for its political downfall and its moral fragmentation, to the chagrin of those postcolonial critics trying to find in fiction a literary springboard for political lobbying.
Beginning to understand Scottâs reluctant and yet demonstrable indebtedness to Forsterâs work is one of my main aims here. I propose that, however diffidently, Scott articulates the manifest legacies of Forsterâs representation of British women in India as an initial sublimation of the progressively more explicit exploration of queer sexualities provided by the character of Ronald Merrick and his associates. Although I suggest that Scott also re-inscribes the ideological limitations of Forsterâs approach due to his obsessive focus on colonial trauma,1 I also propose that the candid exploration of homosexuality constitutes a spectrally indebted deployment of those issues Forster could not formally explore in his own fiction. It will become apparent that Scottâs representation of the demise of his disaffected female characters and his critique of the contradictions of imperial ideologies enable his dissenting position. Although Scott himself became somewhat irritated by constant critical comparisons with Forster, The Raj Quartet engages in both explicit and implicit ways with the legacies of Forsterâs Indian novel and non-fictional Indian writings. Forsterâs legacies seem to imbue Scottâs writing with the closest thing to an âanxiety of influenceâ in this study, since Forsterâs Passage provides Scott with one of the most prominent prior British explorations of intercultural syncretism and latent queer sexualities.
Scottâs narrative cycle is inspired by his activities with the British Army in India between 1943 and 1946. Almost all of Scottâs earlier novels were already set in the Indian subcontinent: Johnnie Sahib, The Alien Sky, A Male Child, The Chinese Love Pavilion and The Birds of Paradise are all infused with Scottâs impressions of the place during the Second World War. After finishing The Birds of Paradise, Scottâs biographer Hilary Spurling observes that â[Scott] himself said he knew [âŠ] that he could never write another book about India without revisiting the subcontinentâ (1991, pp. 243â4). His passages to India between the 1940s and the 1960s had taken place, crucially, through books by authors such as Forster. A second visit in 1964 and a third one in 1969 were the research trips that Scott undertook to write The Raj Quartet. The four books that constitute Scottâs mature work are The Jewel in the Crown, The Day of the Scorpion, The Towers of Silence and A Division of the Spoils.2 Scott also wrote a âgentle afterthoughtâ (Weinbaum, 1992, p. 192) to The Raj Quartet entitled Staying On, which was awarded the Booker Prize in 1978.3 The historical span covered by the quartet ranges from the âQuit Indiaâ campaign of 1942 to the events surrounding Partition in 1947. The narrative elucidates a set of episodes in the lives and motivations of a more or less recurrent cast of characters by offering revealing and non-chronologically arranged insights into their particular situations. The novels are highly interested in the colonial history of India, especially the Sepoy War of 18574 and the Amritsar Massacre of 1919, two events whose echoes we also find in Passage and which reveal Scottâs fascination with the period indexed by Forster.
The sheer length of Scottâs literary cycle, nourished by its minuteness of detail and its wide range of character and situation, can be slightly misleading. Without attempting to undermine the workâs complexities, I would argue that the thematic core of The Raj Quartet comprises two events that take place in its first instalment and which retain imaginative momentum throughout the rest of the tetralogy: firstly, there is the rape of Daphne Manners by a gang of Indian men in the Bibighar Gardens, reported in the very first page of Jewel and wrongly imputed to Daphneâs Indian lover Hari Kumar, who had made love to her in the Bibighar before being surprised by their faceless assaulters; secondly, taking place before Daphneâs rape, there is the attack on the school missionary Edwina Crane by a crowd of Indians during a nationalist uprising. Her Indian colleague Mr Chaudhuri tries to save her life but loses his own at the hands of the insurgent Indians. This incident leads Miss Crane into mental and metaphysical disturbance, resulting in her suicide by fire. These two events echo throughout the four novels, the latter being restaged by other comparable disturbed female characters who, as we will see, are also marginal agents of the Empire.
It is mostly in Scottâs deployment of troubled British characters that we can appreciate his articulation of Forsterâs manifest legacies. Their prominence is perhaps the reason for Rushdieâs critique of Scottâs preference for British perspectives, for a handful of well-intentioned British female figures and one particularly vicious British male, complemented by some salient Indian characters, are give...