Governing Corporate Tax Management
eBook - ePub

Governing Corporate Tax Management

The Role of State Ownership, Institutions and Markets in China

Chen Zhang, Rajah Rasiah, Kee Cheok Cheong

Partager le livre
  1. English
  2. ePUB (adapté aux mobiles)
  3. Disponible sur iOS et Android
eBook - ePub

Governing Corporate Tax Management

The Role of State Ownership, Institutions and Markets in China

Chen Zhang, Rajah Rasiah, Kee Cheok Cheong

DĂ©tails du livre
Aperçu du livre
Table des matiĂšres
Citations

À propos de ce livre

This book focuses on corporate sector development in the context of transition economies, such as China. In doing so, the book uses quantitative methods to test several hypotheses that are salient to the Chinese economic situation.
Topics covered in the book include the relationship between tax management and firm performance, the extent to which a short-term focus on tax management can lead to long-term vulnerabilities, the impact of government ownership on tax management impact, and the link between the co-evolution of marketization and corruption, and institutional change and tax management.
With that the book offers rich empirical evidence to examine tax management, firm performance and corruption in a broad context, while permitting comparison between the Chinese experience and the market economies.

Foire aux questions

Comment puis-je résilier mon abonnement ?
Il vous suffit de vous rendre dans la section compte dans paramĂštres et de cliquer sur « RĂ©silier l’abonnement ». C’est aussi simple que cela ! Une fois que vous aurez rĂ©siliĂ© votre abonnement, il restera actif pour le reste de la pĂ©riode pour laquelle vous avez payĂ©. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Puis-je / comment puis-je télécharger des livres ?
Pour le moment, tous nos livres en format ePub adaptĂ©s aux mobiles peuvent ĂȘtre tĂ©lĂ©chargĂ©s via l’application. La plupart de nos PDF sont Ă©galement disponibles en tĂ©lĂ©chargement et les autres seront tĂ©lĂ©chargeables trĂšs prochainement. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Quelle est la différence entre les formules tarifaires ?
Les deux abonnements vous donnent un accĂšs complet Ă  la bibliothĂšque et Ă  toutes les fonctionnalitĂ©s de Perlego. Les seules diffĂ©rences sont les tarifs ainsi que la pĂ©riode d’abonnement : avec l’abonnement annuel, vous Ă©conomiserez environ 30 % par rapport Ă  12 mois d’abonnement mensuel.
Qu’est-ce que Perlego ?
Nous sommes un service d’abonnement Ă  des ouvrages universitaires en ligne, oĂč vous pouvez accĂ©der Ă  toute une bibliothĂšque pour un prix infĂ©rieur Ă  celui d’un seul livre par mois. Avec plus d’un million de livres sur plus de 1 000 sujets, nous avons ce qu’il vous faut ! DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Prenez-vous en charge la synthÚse vocale ?
Recherchez le symbole Écouter sur votre prochain livre pour voir si vous pouvez l’écouter. L’outil Écouter lit le texte Ă  haute voix pour vous, en surlignant le passage qui est en cours de lecture. Vous pouvez le mettre sur pause, l’accĂ©lĂ©rer ou le ralentir. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Est-ce que Governing Corporate Tax Management est un PDF/ePUB en ligne ?
Oui, vous pouvez accĂ©der Ă  Governing Corporate Tax Management par Chen Zhang, Rajah Rasiah, Kee Cheok Cheong en format PDF et/ou ePUB ainsi qu’à d’autres livres populaires dans Law et Tax Law. Nous disposons de plus d’un million d’ouvrages Ă  dĂ©couvrir dans notre catalogue.

Informations

Année
2019
ISBN
9789811398292
Sujet
Law
Sous-sujet
Tax Law
© The Author(s) 2019
C. Zhang et al.Governing Corporate Tax Managementhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9829-2_1
Begin Abstract

1. Introduction

Chen Zhang1 , Rajah Rasiah2 and Kee Cheok Cheong3
(1)
Institute of Belt and Road, Business School, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
(2)
Asia-Europe Institute, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
(3)
Institute of China Studies, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Chen Zhang (Corresponding author)
Rajah Rasiah
Kee Cheok Cheong
End Abstract
China’s experience with economic transition from central planning to a more market-oriented economy is unique, Vietnam being the only other country that most closely resembles China’s experience almost a decade later. Because of the gradualist approach adopted—Deng Xiaoping’s famous characterization of “feeling the stones to cross the river” —parts of the economy had remained unreformed at any time. This juxtaposition of reformed and unreformed parts of China would have created problems and incurred costs that may not have existed in a market economy that is equipped with strong institutions . At the same time, China was spared the pain that countries that subscribed to the “big bang approach” to use Vaclav Havel’s caption, “you cannot cross a chasm in more than one leap” that was principally undertaken by Russia (Bramall, 1995; Chang & Nolan, 1995). Indeed, China’s growth spurt stood in sharp contrast to Russia’s economic collapse when both countries liberalized (Ellman & Kontorovich, 1998).
The purpose of this book is neither to compare the experiences attendant upon these contrasting approaches nor to assess the merits of the Chinese approach to corporate tax management. Rather, the objective is to examine economic reforms that contributed to marketization and corporate tax management in China. To do so requires appreciation of economic reforms that have been undertaken since 1978 but especially from 1994. This is what the next section sets out to explain.

From Plan to Market

The story of China’s successful liberalization began by Deng Xiaoping in 1978 has been told many times. While this story began with the opening-up of the agricultural sector, much of the subsequent liberalization has been targeted at enterprises that saw the rise of the corporate sector. Economic reforms proceeded on several separate but interrelated tracks.

Ownership Reform

The first track is ownership reform that saw first greater autonomy given to state enterprises that dominated all production. Before 1978, the state controlled the whole economy; all enterprises were owned and managed by the state, with planned pricing instead of market pricing. Under this system, there was little incentive to perform. The earliest reforms were in corporate governance, but the limited success achieved by these partial reforms forced the government to introduce broader ownership reforms in 1993. That year saw the consolidation of the state enterprise sector, with many unprofitable state enterprises sold to private investors and large numbers of workers retrenched. In 1996, a policy of “grasping the large, letting go the small” was announced to reduce the size of the state sector, with the state retaining ownership and control of the largest state enterprises. Some state enterprises were also corporatized through the sale of equity to private interests in the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges set up in 1991–1992.
However, shares in listed enterprises were separated into tradable shares and non-tradable shares, with the state and “legal persons” (e.g., the state, statutory bodies, and corporations) holding the latter, effectively giving the government unchallenged control over listed enterprises despite dilution of state ownership. In contrast, tradable shares were open for trading in the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges owned by institutional and individual shareholders. However, this system was open to abuse in that the state in listed state enterprises could ignore the interests of tradable shareholders. To address this, another ownership restructuring occurred under the “split-share reform” in 2005 whereby non-tradable shares held by the state were converted to tradable shares the public can purchase in the stock markets. As the state reduced its ownership of enterprises, it retained control of what it considered to be the most important ones. This consolidation process also saw the size of state enterprises increase. Nevertheless, the non-state sector, consisting of local government collectives, private enterprises, and foreign companies, grew.

Institutional Reforms

The second track is associated with institutional reform. Institutions were defined by (North, 2005) as the “rules of the game” , and firms and organizations as the players who act by these rules. Like Coase (1937) and Williamson (1985), North (2005) considered markets to be the superior institution that left spaces for other institutions (both formal and informal) to correct market failure. However, following Rasiah (2011), in this book we accept markets, which refers to relative prices, as a critical institution but consider other institutions to not only play key roles at times, but also collectively solve coordination problems. Just as we need institutions to solve government failures, we also need institutions to check market failures (see also Zhang & Rasiah, 2015).
Given the early dominance of state enterprises, institutional reforms naturally began with these enterprises. In as early as the Third Plenary Session of the Eleventh National Congress in December 1978 , it was announced that the management autonomy of state enterprises would be expanded by linking managers’ performance to their rewards. The year 1984 saw the dissociation of state enterprises from the government and the separation of ownership rights and control rights. In January 1987, the contract responsibility system allowed managers to share part of the profits. In November 1993 , the Third Plenum Session of the Fourteenth National Congress of the Communist Party of China (CPC) set the target that enterprises would be legal entities in a modern enterprise system. Together with the corporatization of state enterprises, a corporate governance structure was adopted (see Qian & Wu, 2003). In that year, Chinese listed firms were to have a main board of directors and a supervisory board, the latter responsible for monitoring firm behavior (Dahya, Karbhari, & Xiao, 2002). However, unlike the German–Japanese model, a supervisory board in China had no right to appoint and evaluate managers. It was not until after amendment of the Chinese co...

Table des matiĂšres