eBook - ePub
Video Games and Storytelling
Reading Games and Playing Books
Souvik Mukherjee
This is a test
Partager le livre
- English
- ePUB (adapté aux mobiles)
- Disponible sur iOS et Android
eBook - ePub
Video Games and Storytelling
Reading Games and Playing Books
Souvik Mukherjee
DĂ©tails du livre
Aperçu du livre
Table des matiĂšres
Citations
Ă propos de ce livre
The potential of video games as storytelling media and the deep involvement that players feel when they are part of the story needs to be analysed vis-Ă -vis other narrative media. This book underscores the importance of video games as narratives and offers a framework for analysing the many-ended stories that often redefine real and virtual lives.
Foire aux questions
Comment puis-je résilier mon abonnement ?
Il vous suffit de vous rendre dans la section compte dans paramĂštres et de cliquer sur « RĂ©silier lâabonnement ». Câest aussi simple que cela ! Une fois que vous aurez rĂ©siliĂ© votre abonnement, il restera actif pour le reste de la pĂ©riode pour laquelle vous avez payĂ©. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Puis-je / comment puis-je télécharger des livres ?
Pour le moment, tous nos livres en format ePub adaptĂ©s aux mobiles peuvent ĂȘtre tĂ©lĂ©chargĂ©s via lâapplication. La plupart de nos PDF sont Ă©galement disponibles en tĂ©lĂ©chargement et les autres seront tĂ©lĂ©chargeables trĂšs prochainement. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Quelle est la différence entre les formules tarifaires ?
Les deux abonnements vous donnent un accĂšs complet Ă la bibliothĂšque et Ă toutes les fonctionnalitĂ©s de Perlego. Les seules diffĂ©rences sont les tarifs ainsi que la pĂ©riode dâabonnement : avec lâabonnement annuel, vous Ă©conomiserez environ 30 % par rapport Ă 12 mois dâabonnement mensuel.
Quâest-ce que Perlego ?
Nous sommes un service dâabonnement Ă des ouvrages universitaires en ligne, oĂč vous pouvez accĂ©der Ă toute une bibliothĂšque pour un prix infĂ©rieur Ă celui dâun seul livre par mois. Avec plus dâun million de livres sur plus de 1 000 sujets, nous avons ce quâil vous faut ! DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Prenez-vous en charge la synthÚse vocale ?
Recherchez le symbole Ăcouter sur votre prochain livre pour voir si vous pouvez lâĂ©couter. Lâoutil Ăcouter lit le texte Ă haute voix pour vous, en surlignant le passage qui est en cours de lecture. Vous pouvez le mettre sur pause, lâaccĂ©lĂ©rer ou le ralentir. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Est-ce que Video Games and Storytelling est un PDF/ePUB en ligne ?
Oui, vous pouvez accĂ©der Ă Video Games and Storytelling par Souvik Mukherjee en format PDF et/ou ePUB ainsi quâĂ dâautres livres populaires dans Scienze sociali et Scienze della comunicazione. Nous disposons de plus dâun million dâouvrages Ă dĂ©couvrir dans notre catalogue.
Informations
Sujet
Scienze socialiSous-sujet
Scienze della comunicazione1
Introduction: Video Games and Storytelling
Video Games telling stories: A debate revisited
Imagine being told to âstart this mission by entering the red marker at the Johnson Houseâ (GTA Net, 2015) and then as you, Carl Johnson or CJ, meet your brother Sweet, a rival gang performs an unexpected drive-by shooting and you are to âhop on a bicycle and follow Sweet, repeatedly tapping âXâ to build up momentumâ (GTA Net, 2015). Is this a story, is it another violent episode in a soap opera or is the reader being mistaken for a member of a real-life criminal gang? The uninitiated reader will probably be having serious doubts about what is happening in the above quote. At first sight, this extract seems to be the story of a certain gangster, Carl Johnson; if it is, then the story strangely seems to be waiting for the reader to create all the events that follow. You, the player (or reader, one could say), are suddenly thrown into someone elseâs story and are expected to continue the tale. The part about ârepeatedly tapping âXâ to build up momentumâ makes it seem even stranger: it is as if, besides all the possibilities described above, there is also some kind of interaction with a machine. Given this hybrid scenario, the reader must be excused if she does not guess that this is an extract from a âwalkthroughâ, or a set of possible strategies for playing the video game Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas (Rockstar North, 2004).
Paradoxical as this may sound, this book is about playing stories and reading games. As the extract from the Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas walkthrough shows, video games have begun to raise questions about their own ludicity (or âgamelike-nessâ; ludus is the Latin word for âgameâ) and about whether this intrinsically involves storytelling. In simple words, this is an analysis of whether video games tell stories and if so, of how they do this. The relevance of such discussions has increased manifold in recent years: the Entertainment and Software Association (ESA) declares that âno other sector has experienced the same explosive growth as the computer and videogame industryâ (Interactive Games & Entertainment Association, 2013) and almost as if to prove them right, Grand Theft Auto V (Rockstar North, 2013) sales reached a billion US dollars in just three days â a global record. With the soaring profits and the burgeoning user-base of the video game industry, games have now attracted the attention of researchers from various disciplines the world over and issues relating to gaming culture and the gamerâs experience have gained more relevance. Despite the increased research focus, one crucial issue â that of storytelling in video games â retains its complexity and still remains hotly debated.
The popularity and currency of the issue is clear from the fact that critics from other media have entered the discussion: a good example is the late Roger Ebertâs famous (or notorious) assertion that video games are not art. Other celebrities from the film industry, the directors Steven Spielberg and George Lucas, have commented directly on the storytelling potential of video games. Lucas claims that the game industry is now beginning to discover how to build characters but that âby its very nature there cannot be a plot in a game. You canât plot out a football game. You canât plot out feeding Christians to lions. Itâs not a plotâ (Empire Online, 2015). For him, the story is author-driven: âyou are leading the audience along [ ⊠] if you just let everybody go in and do whatever they want then itâs not a story anymore [but] itâs simply a gameâ (Empire Online, 2015). Spielberg, who himself has a past with gaming, feels that the bottleneck is simple: once the game-controller itself is gone, the storytelling experience will improve. He states that the game has âgot to put the player inside the experience, where no matter where you look youâre surrounded by a three-dimensional world. And thatâs the futureâ. Will Wright, the designer of The Sims (Maxis, 2000) games, declared in a CNN interview that âgames are not the right medium to tell storiesâ (Millan, 2011) but conceded that they are about âstory possibilitiesâ.
However, gamers from all over the world think differently. In his recent book on video games, A Mind Forever Voyaging, Dylan Holmes comments: âGames are bringing something new to the table. As the first widely adopted form of interactive media, video games have served as the testing ground for interactive storytelling techniquesâ (Holmes, 2012, p. 10). Celebrity game designer and creator of the Metal Gear series, Hideo Kojima, has no illusions about the storytelling potential of games. He believes that âgames are able to achieve something neither movies nor novels can do, itâs a unique form of story tellingâ (Metal Gear Informer, 2012). Intriguingly, Wright states that he does not like playing the Metal Gear games that Kojima is famous for (Millan, 2011). Other game designers, however, agree that storytelling is important. When asked about stories in video games, Tim Schafer, the creator of legendary games such as Monkey Island and Grim Fandango, states, âI put story in my games just because I like making up stories. I think it makes the world real and makes the experience more immersive and engaging for the player. Also, the desire to see the story unfold provides a motivation for the playerâ (Kasavin, 2005). Ragnar Tornquist, designer of Dreamfall, adds that although âall games donât need stories [ ⊠] the fact is, once youâre dealing with quests, characters, worlds, role-playing â and more complex human (or, hey, alien) emotions â then you need to tie everything together with some sort of narrativeâ (Kasavin, 2005). Adding his influential voice to the argument of the literariness of video games is the author Salman Rushdie. Rushdie famously announced that he played video games during the trauma of his fatwa years. In his recent novel, Luka and the Fire of Life (Rushdie, 2010), video games feature importantly and in an interview about the novel, Rushdie declares:
There is all kinds of excursions and digressions that you can choose to go on and find many stories to participate in instead of the big story, the macro story. I think that really interests me as a storyteller because Iâve always thought that one of the things that the Internet and the gaming world permits as a narrative technique is to not tell the story from beginning to end â to tell stories sideways, to give alternative possibilities that the reader can, in a way, choose between.
(Rushdie, 2010)
Given the contentiousness of the issue, it is hardly surprising that the academic discussions around gaming as a cultural phenomenon should have started off by framing themselves around storytelling and that storytelling in video games continues to provoke critical debates. Writing on his blog âThe Ludologistâ, eminent game studies academic and one of the pioneering researchers in the area, Jesper Juul gently dismisses Rushdieâs comments on storytelling in video games as being âa bit on the short sideâ although he concedes that Rushdie âunderstands Rockstarâs typical mostly-linear + sandbox game structureâ (Juul, 2011). Juulâs earlier work clearly delineates a âclashâ between games and narratives and his reservations about Rushdieâs claim for storytelling in video games are understandable if one delves into the history of game studies.
The establishment of game studies as an academic discipline is a very recent phenomenon and the initial academic responses to seeing video games as an emergent storytelling medium were markedly polarised into the theoretical camps of the so-called Ludologists and the Narratologists. The Ludologists, mainly academics such as Juul, Espen Aarseth and Markku Eskelinen, argued that although some video games may have âartistic ambitionsâ, they are âfundamentally gamesâ (Aarseth, 2006, p. 45). The so-named Narratologists, such as Janet Murray and Marie-Laure Ryan, argue that video games are a storytelling medium because they âpromise to reshape the spectrum of narrative expression, not by replacing the novel or the movie but by continuing their timeless bardic work within another frameworkâ (Murray, 1997, p. 10). In 1997, Murray and Aarseth were writing separate pioneering studies on video games. Both recognised the capacity of video games to form multicursal structures and also their potential to be recognised as texts (although Aarseth later altered his position somewhat), but their respective approaches were very divergent.
In Hamlet on the Holodeck, Murray argued for an approach wherein the âinteractor in digital environments can be the recipient of an externally authored worldâ (Murray, p. 275). For her, âTo play Mario Brothers or Kingâs Quest is to open ourselves to the vision of the shaping author in the same way we open ourselves to the authorâs voice in the novelâ. The externally authored world of the video game is described by her as a proto-Holodeck. The ambitiousness of Murrayâs agenda for video games emerges more clearly in the following assertion:
As the most powerful representational medium yet invented, it should be put to the highest tasks of society. Whether or not we will one day be rewarded with the arrival of the cyberbard, we should hasten to place this new compositional tool as firmly as possible in the hands of the storytellers.
(Murray, p. 284)
As the title of her book suggests, she sees the video game as a step towards achieving literature of the calibre of Hamlet in a Holodeck-like electronic media. The Holodeck metaphor itself has major shortcomings when applied to video games but a deeper exploration of this is reserved for later. This section focuses instead on Murrayâs intention to place the video game âfirmly in the hands of storytellersâ. Aarseth, for one, poses a strong objection to such a claim.
In his early study of video games in Cybertext: Perspectives on Ergodic Literature, Aarseth describes his attempt to define âa perspective on all forms of textuality, a way to expand the scope of literary studies to include phenomena that today are perceived as outside of, or marginalised by, the field of literature â or even in opposition to itâ (Aarseth, 1997, p. 18). It is understandable that for such an enterprise he needed to develop a different notion of textuality. As he states: â[i]nstead of defining text as a chain of signifiers, as linguists and semioticians do, I use the word for a whole range of phenomena, from short poems to complex computer programs and databasesâ (Aarseth, 1997, p. 20). Aarseth maintains that the video game is an âergodicâ medium, which means that it requires the reader/player to experience the text actively and use skills which go beyond using âeye movement and the periodic or arbitrary turning of pagesâ (Aarseth, 1997, p. 2). Surprisingly, however, in a later essay, he asserts that âgames are not textual or at least not primarily textualâ (Aarseth, 2006, p. 47). Ergodicity, therefore, gets a different connotation, and as ergodic media, video games are not seen as texts per se and even less so as stories. Following Aarseth, commentators like Markku Eskelinen, Gonzalo Frasca, Juul and Greg Costikyan came up with a sustained (and often harsh) criticism of attempts to see video games as storytelling media, which they variously termed âNarrativistâ or âNarratologicalâ.1 Their own position came to be known as âLudologyâ, a neologism coined by Frasca meaning the âstudy of gamesâ. The âLudologistsâ found their most vocal representative in Eskelinen who declaims:
If I throw a ball at you I donât expect you to drop it and wait until it starts telling stories. On the other hand, if and when games and especially videogames are studied and theorised they are almost without exception colonised from the fields of literary, theatre, drama and film studies.
(Eskelinen, 2001)
For the firmer adherents of Ludology such as Eskelinen, the video game needs to be studied in isolation as a game and as nothing else.
Eskelinen attributes a kind of extraneousness to the story â he believes that the story in the computer game is like a prosthesis that simply enhances the marketability and is not essential to the gameplay. Aarseth, predictably, supports this idea: âthe artistic elements are merely supports for what the Finnish avant-garde writer and game theorist Markku Eskelinen (2001) calls âthe gaming situationâ, the gameplayâ (Aarseth, 2006, p. 47). In a rather hyperbolic attack on stories in video games, he states: â[e]ven the most entertaining of these games, like Warren Spectorâs Deus Ex (1999), contains a clichĂ©d storyline that would make a B-movie writer blush, and characters so wooden that they make The Flintstones look like Strindbergâ (Aarseth, 2004, p. 51). This statement is, needless to say, rather extreme in its assertiveness and would probably upset many Deus Ex fans who enjoy the storyline of Deus Ex. In a recent lecture, Aarseth has spoken of the possibility of a âbrokenâ fictionality in video games; he still does not agree that video games tell stories. For the Ludologists, the story is still shown as an extraneous element: for the Ludologists, it is a prosthesis. Lending more weight to the Ludologist position, popular video game commentator Steven Poole (2000, p. 170), in his book Trigger Happy, refers to the back-story of a computer game as the âmeatâ of the game, the actual storyline of which is nothing more than a record of steps and jumps. This idea of the prosthesis, however, is itself one that has come under scrutiny. A subsequent section shall explore it in detail.
Game designers have also started losing patience with the LudologyâNarratology debate because of the polarisation of opinions. As designer Ernest Adams complains:
Thereâs a lack of a common vocabulary; a lack of a common approach. And there are turf wars. Literary theorists of narrative â ânarratologistsâ believe that narrative is rightly their turf, so itâs up to them to decide what interactive narrative will be. Theorists of gameplay â âludologistsâ â believe that interactive entertainment is their turf, and only they can properly decide what interactive narrative will be.
(Adams, 2005)
Adams is right in pointing out that the sparring between rival academic camps does not help at all and that such extreme positions, whether they are Murrayâs holistic claims for narratives in electronic media or the Ludologist argument against it, had game studies critics locked in a decade-long impasse regarding the nature of video games. Recently, however, Ludologists such as Juul, and those on the Narratologist (or rather âNarrativistâ) camp, such as Marie-Laure Ryan and Celia Pearce, make much more moderate claims than those being made in the late nineties. In Avatars of Story, Ryan claims that storytelling in video games âmust resist the temptation to try to rival the great classics of literature â a temptation that finds its expression in the title of Janet Murrayâs well-known book Hamlet on the Holodeck â and it must learn instead how to customize narrative patterns to the properties of the mediumâ (Ryan, 2006, p. xviii). She prefers what she calls âthe middle groundâ in engaging with the problem. She defines narrative as a cognitive construct that can take a variety of shapes or what she calls âavatars of storyâ. Pearce also recognises the importance of the ludic element in games and that â[n]arrative, again, operates at a fundamentally different level in games than it does in other mediaâ (Pearce, 2004). Such a response perhaps complements and extends Henry Jenkinsâs concept of transmedial storytelling that he defines as being âbased not on individual characters or specific plots but rather complex fictional worlds which can sustain multiple interrelated characters and their storiesâ (Jenkins, 2007). Jenkinsâs description fits the complex worlds of the story-based (and especially sandbox-type) video games well. Pearceâs recognition of the importance of the ludic element develops the transmedial angle that Jenkins introduced earlier on.
In a similar more moderate Ludologist response perspective, Gonzalo Frasca advocates Ludology as another important method besides Narratology in analysing games where the intention is ânot to replace the narratologic approach, but to complement itâ (Frasca, 1999). In a later work, Juul contends that video games are âhalf realâ (Juul, 2005, p. 166). He agrees that most video games âproject a fictional worldâ and that the fiction is contingent on the gameâs rules. Juulâs shift in the Ludologist position is important â fiction is not defined as a prosthesis as it was in the earlier writings of the Ludologists, including Juul himself. Neither is the game and fiction seen as being mutually exclusive (as his masterâs thesis, titled âA Clash between Game and Narrativeâ, claims). Rather surprisingly, Juul does not agree that video games tell stories; he argues that fiction is different from storytelling. Unlike the âmiddle groundâ advocated by Ryan, for Juul the story simply does not exist in multiple kinds: he believes that fiction is any kind of imagined world but âstoryâ is necessarily a fixed sequence of events.
Such a restrictive definition inevitably opens more avenues for more debate and storytelling in video games remains as contested as ever despite many attempts to resolve the problem. In his recent book, Steven E. Jones echoes other theorists, such as Ian Bogost and Rune Klevjer, in describing the LudologyâNarratology debate as being an exaggeration on both sides and Ludology as a reductive formalism. However, he expresses his sympathy with the Ludologists in recognising the uniqueness of games as a form although he does not wish to âcut them off from the larger cultureâ (Jones, 2008, p. 6). In trying to locate the âmeaningâ of video games, Jones concludes that these games are complex social networks and that meaning flows through these games and link up to other forms of media such as texts, institutions and groups. One could argue that there is a similarity here with Rushdieâs idea of video games allowing a âsidewaysâ reading of the text and its multiple alternatives.
As mentioned earlier, though, eminent critics (such as Juul) still do not agree with such a description, often ma...