Christianity, Globalization, and Protective Homophobia
eBook - ePub

Christianity, Globalization, and Protective Homophobia

Democratic Contestation of Sexuality in Sub-Saharan Africa

Kapya Kaoma

Partager le livre
  1. English
  2. ePUB (adapté aux mobiles)
  3. Disponible sur iOS et Android
eBook - ePub

Christianity, Globalization, and Protective Homophobia

Democratic Contestation of Sexuality in Sub-Saharan Africa

Kapya Kaoma

DĂ©tails du livre
Aperçu du livre
Table des matiĂšres
Citations

À propos de ce livre

This book examines how socio-political assumptions inform and shape the contestation of sexuality on the African continent. Across Africa, the idea that homosexuality is un-African, un-Christian, un-natural, and un-cultural is now well established. This book analyzes politically- and religiously-inspired protective homophobia within the context of Africa's socioeconomic and political place in the global community. The author builds upon on-the-ground research and his groundbreaking previous studies on the cultural politics of globalization in Africa to present a wide, complex, and interdisciplinary understanding of Africa's sexual politics.

Foire aux questions

Comment puis-je résilier mon abonnement ?
Il vous suffit de vous rendre dans la section compte dans paramĂštres et de cliquer sur « RĂ©silier l’abonnement ». C’est aussi simple que cela ! Une fois que vous aurez rĂ©siliĂ© votre abonnement, il restera actif pour le reste de la pĂ©riode pour laquelle vous avez payĂ©. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Puis-je / comment puis-je télécharger des livres ?
Pour le moment, tous nos livres en format ePub adaptĂ©s aux mobiles peuvent ĂȘtre tĂ©lĂ©chargĂ©s via l’application. La plupart de nos PDF sont Ă©galement disponibles en tĂ©lĂ©chargement et les autres seront tĂ©lĂ©chargeables trĂšs prochainement. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Quelle est la différence entre les formules tarifaires ?
Les deux abonnements vous donnent un accĂšs complet Ă  la bibliothĂšque et Ă  toutes les fonctionnalitĂ©s de Perlego. Les seules diffĂ©rences sont les tarifs ainsi que la pĂ©riode d’abonnement : avec l’abonnement annuel, vous Ă©conomiserez environ 30 % par rapport Ă  12 mois d’abonnement mensuel.
Qu’est-ce que Perlego ?
Nous sommes un service d’abonnement Ă  des ouvrages universitaires en ligne, oĂč vous pouvez accĂ©der Ă  toute une bibliothĂšque pour un prix infĂ©rieur Ă  celui d’un seul livre par mois. Avec plus d’un million de livres sur plus de 1 000 sujets, nous avons ce qu’il vous faut ! DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Prenez-vous en charge la synthÚse vocale ?
Recherchez le symbole Écouter sur votre prochain livre pour voir si vous pouvez l’écouter. L’outil Écouter lit le texte Ă  haute voix pour vous, en surlignant le passage qui est en cours de lecture. Vous pouvez le mettre sur pause, l’accĂ©lĂ©rer ou le ralentir. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Est-ce que Christianity, Globalization, and Protective Homophobia est un PDF/ePUB en ligne ?
Oui, vous pouvez accĂ©der Ă  Christianity, Globalization, and Protective Homophobia par Kapya Kaoma en format PDF et/ou ePUB ainsi qu’à d’autres livres populaires dans Politik & Internationale Beziehungen et Afrikanische Politik. Nous disposons de plus d’un million d’ouvrages Ă  dĂ©couvrir dans notre catalogue.

Informations

© The Author(s) 2018
Kapya KaomaChristianity, Globalization, and Protective Homophobiahttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66341-8_1
Begin Abstract

1. Is Homosexuality an African or Un-African Human Rights Issue?

Kapya Kaoma1
(1)
Center for Global Christianity & Mission, Boston University School of Theology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
End Abstract
“Is homosexuality an African or un-African human rights issue?” This question is not only central to the examination of Christian-informed homophobia but also the lens through which this study explores African disputes on homosexuality. In both religious and political circles, the argument that homosexuality is un-African and thus not a human rights issue is now an established mantra. Sexual minorities and human rights advocates, however, contest such claims—leading to what this study terms the contestation and externalization of sexuality . By “contestation,” I refer to the competing socio-political claims—homosexuality is un-African and un-Christian vis-à-vis a human rights issue. Externalization, however, refers to attempts to present homosexuality as a foreign vice imported into Africa. The study understands homophobia as the stigmatization and discrimination directed at people who demonstrate sexual diversity (West et al. 2016: 1).
Although the study acknowledges the life-threatening effects of homophobia on sexual minorities , it nonetheless contends that the desire to protect an “African identity ,” culture, religion , and the youth from an assumed Western “assault” of the “homosexual movement” drives African religious and political opposition to same-sex intimate relations. This attitude or stance may be considered protective homophobia— that is politically and religiously organized opposition to homosexuality as an attempt to protect Africa’s traditional heritage, Christianity/Islam , and children from the “global homosexual agenda ” (Broqua 2016; Ndzovu 2016). The result is restrictive national legislations enacted under the banner of protecting African culture, religions , and children. On the political front, however, protective homophobia is driven by the growing influence of Christianity and democratic human rights cultures in sub-Saharan African politics (Kaoma 2015; Katongole 2011; Sanneh 2003).
During my 2009 visit to Abuja, for example, I interviewed Canon Joshua Taiwo, a Nigerian Anglican priest, about same-sex intimate relationships. “If they are doing it, they are doing it privately. They dare not come to the open. They will be shot. I can assure you that they will be stoned to death. We don’t do it in Africa. It is only in the West that they are doing rubbish,” the visibly angry reverend told me on camera. Addressing his supporters in 2013, President Mugabe of Zimbabwe also warned, “Let Europe keep their homosexual nonsense there and live with it. We will never have it here. The act 
 is not humane” (Newsweek 2015). In these words, Canon Taiwo and Mugabe are simultaneously contesting and externalizing homosexuality.
The visit to Abuja was part of a study which sought to under-stand African --> sexual politics as it relates to American mainline Protestant churches —Episcopalian/Anglican, United Methodist, and Presbyterian. In addition to Nigeria , the study took me to Malawi , Kenya , Uganda , Zambia , and Zimbabwe . During my research, I realized that the topic was beyond inter-continental church affairs—it included both domestic and interstate politics. Some of the findings were published in Globalizing the Culture Wars (2009), Colonizing African Values (2012), and American Culture Warriors in Africa (2014).
The scapegoating of sexual minorities and the number of African nations adopting or expanding anti-gay laws, as well as international responses to the same, invite scholarly analysis—something this study undertakes. It locates sexual politics within the broader historical, socio-economic, and the political context of postcolonial Africa. The study further explores the implications of sexual politics on Africa’s self-understanding.
To some extent, the US Christian conservatives ’ involvement in Uganda ’s Anti-Homosexuality Bill 2009 increased global academic interest in Africa’s sexual politics (van Klinken and Chitando 2016; Bosia and Weiss 2013; Bob 2012; Kaoma 2009). The publicization of the plight of sexual minorities (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex [LGBTI] persons) in Africa attracted international involvement in African sexual politics. The US government, Canada, the United Nations , the European Union , human rights organizations, and some churches did not just condemn the persecution of sexual minorities but also sided with, and funded, sexual rights advocacy in Africa. This response, however, provoked militant homophobia in sub-Saharan Africa.
The opposition to sexual diversity , the study contends, benefits from the free democratic space brought about by the post-one-party state civil society organizations dedicated to human rights (Mutua 2000; Schwab 2002). In other words, the democratization of Africa increased the church’s involvement in governance. But this involvement has a post-independence history. At the time when the press and political opposition were suppressed by nationalist leaders, the church became the most important institution to challenge African dictators. In this regard, the 1990s’ democratization of Africa institutionalized the church’s socio-political role in domestic affairs, specifically, human sexuality.
The church’s initial involvement in sexuality politics became critical in the fight against HIV/AIDS . As Africa negotiated the HIV/AIDS crisis, the church emerged as the major partner in government efforts to combat the HIV/AIDS pandemic. Aside from providing home-based care to AIDS patients, the church intensified its HIV/AIDS awareness programs for both the infected and affected while promoting “abstinence”-only programs. Since sexual promiscuity is linked to HIV/AIDS , the church insists on changing heterosexual attitudes as key to arresting this epidemic.
African Christian contestation of homosexuality benefits from this established social history. Indeed, the advent of HIV/AIDS forced the issue of sexuality into African political and social discourses. However, the subject was/is deeply entrenched in, and limited to, heterosexual relationships—sex between males and females. In this context, sexuality is defined in heteronormative terms—leaving out non-heterosexuals.
The identification or “medicalization” of men who have sex with men (MSM) as among the key risk populations in contracting and transmitting HIV expanded the definition of sexuality (UNAIDS 2006; Bosia 2014; Roehr 2010; Beyrer et al. 2012). In Africa, however, it unwittingly increased the stigmatization of sexual minorities . As Bosia (2014: 258) observes, the medicalization of same-sex intimate relations is “a frequent trope for political action and political contestation.” In Africa, for example, it aids protective homophobia —by opposing homosexuality, we are protecting Africa from AIDS.
The aforementioned context informs how sexual rights are perceived in Africa and across the globe. How international and local groups negotiate this landscape is critical to overcoming the global divide on homosexuality (Pew Research Center 2013). It is tempting, however, to conclude that this divide will not change—cultural change is slow and fragile. Moreover, the West has wrestled with se...

Table des matiĂšres