Luke 18:35-24:53, Volume 35C

John Nolland, Bruce M. Metzger, David Allen Hubbard, Glenn W. Barker, John D. W. Watts, James W. Watts, Ralph P. Martin, Lynn Allan Losie

• Éditeur: Zondervan Academic
• Année: 2018
• ISBN:
  9780310588504
• Sujet: Théologie et religion
• Sous-sujet: Commentaire biblique

The Word Biblical Commentary delivers the best in biblical scholarship, from the leading scholars of our day who share a commitment to Scripture as divine revelation. This series emphasizes a thorough analysis of textual, linguistic, structural, and theological evidence. The result is judicious and balanced insight into the meanings of the text in the framework of biblical theology. These widely acclaimed commentaries serve as exceptional resources for the professional theologian and instructor, the seminary or university student, the working minister, and everyone concerned with building theological understanding from a solid base of biblical scholarship.

Overview of Commentary Organization

• Introduction—covers issues pertaining to the whole book, including context, date, authorship, composition, interpretive issues, purpose, and theology.
• Each section of the commentary includes:
• Pericope Bibliography—a helpful resource containing the most important works that pertain to each particular pericope.
• Translation—the author's own translation of the biblical text, reflecting the end result of exegesis and attending to Hebrew and Greek idiomatic usage of words, phrases, and tenses, yet in reasonably good English.
• Notes—the author's notes to the translation that address any textual variants, grammatical forms, syntactical constructions, basic meanings of words, and problems of translation.
• Form/Structure/Setting—a discussion of redaction, genre, sources, and tradition as they concern the origin of the pericope, its canonical form, and its relation to the biblical and extra-biblical contexts in order to illuminate the structure and character of the pericope. Rhetorical or compositional features important to understanding the passage are also introduced here.
• Comment—verse-by-verse interpretation of the text and dialogue with other interpreters, engaging with current opinion and scholarly research.
• Explanation—brings together all the results of the discussion in previous sections to expose the meaning and intention of the text at several levels: (1) within the context of the book itself; (2) its meaning in the OT or NT; (3) its place in the entire canon; (4) theological relevance to broader OT or NT issues.
  • General Bibliography—occurring at the end of each volume, this extensive bibliographycontains all sources used anywhere in the commentary.

The Passion Narrative (22:1–23:56)

The foci of the passion narrative are the final Passover meal (with its intimately linked “farewell discourse”), the arrest and trial of Jesus (prepared for in prayer on the Mount of Olives), and the crucifixion (with its appended burial narrative). At the instigation of Satan, the passion events are precipitated by Judas’ move to betray Jesus, but Jesus remains supremely in charge even as he goes to his death. The disciples stumble, but do not entirely fall away. Luke binds the passion narrative and the resurrection narrative very closely together.

Conspiracy to Arrest Jesus (22:1–2)

Bibliography

GENERAL PASSION NARRATIVE:

Aletti, J. N. “Mort de Jésus et théorie du récit.” RSR 73 (1985) 147–60. Allison, D. C. The End of the Ages Has Come: An Early Interpretation of the Passion and Resurrection of Jesus. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1985. Bammel, E., ed(s). The Trial of Jesus. FS C. F. D. Moule. SBT 2/13. London/Naperville, IL: SCM/Allenson, 1970. Bartsch, H.-W. “Historische Erwägungen zur Leidensgeschichte.” EvT 22 (1962) 449–59. ———. “Die Ideologiekritik des Evangeliums dargestellt an der Leidensgeschichte.” EvT 34 (1974) 176–95. Bastin, M. Jésus devant sa Passion. LD 92. Paris: Cerf, 1976. Beauchamp, P. “Narrativité biblique du récit de la passion.” RSR 73 (1985) 39–59. Bednarz, M. Les éléments parénetiques dans la description de la Passion chez les synoptiques. Rome: Pont U S. Thomae de Urbe, 1973. Benoit, P. The Passion and Resurrection of Jesus. tr. B. Weatherhead. New York: Herder and Herder, 1969. Bertram, G. Die Leidengeschichte Jesu und der Christuskult: Eine formgeschichtliche Untersuchung. FRLANT ns 15. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1922. Best, E. The Temptation and the Passion: The Markan Soteriology. SNTSMS 2. 2nd ed(s). Cambridge: University Press, 1990. xxiii–lxxiv. Biser, E. “Die älteste Passionsgeschichte.” GuL 56 (1983) 111–18. Bligh, J. “Typology in the Passion Narratives: Daniel, Elijah, Melchizedek.” HeyJ 6 (1965) 302–9. Borgen, P. “John and the Synoptics in the Passion Narrative.” NTS 5 (1958–59) 246–59. Bornhäuser, K. The Death and Resurrection of Christ. tr. A. Rumpus. London: Independent Press, 1958. Bovon, F. Les derniers jours de Jésus: Textes et événements. Collection ‘Flèches.’ Neuchâtel/Paris: Delachaux et Niestlé, 1974. Brown, R. E. A Crucified Christ in Holy Week: Essays on the Four Gospel Passion Narratives. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1986. Bruce, F. F. “The Book of Zechariah and the Passion Narrative.” BJRL 43 (1960–61) 336–53. Buse, I. “St John and the Passion Narratives of St Matthew and St Luke.” NTS 7 (1960–61) 65–76. Carmichael, J. The Death of Jesus. New York: Harper and Row, 1966. Catchpole, D. R. The Trial of Jesus. SPB 18. Leiden: Brill, 1971. Chabrol, C. “Analyse des ‘Textes’ des Passion.” In Erzählende Semiotik nach Berichten der Bibel. Munich: Kösel, 1973. 123–55. Chordat, J. L. Jésus devant sa mort. Lire la Bible. Paris: Cerf, 1970. Conzelmann, H. “Historie und Theologie in den synoptischen Passionsberichten.” In Zur Bedeutung des Todes Jesu: Exegetische Beiträge, ed(s). H. Conzelmann et al. 3rd ed(s). Gütersloh: G. Mohn, 1968. 35–53. ———. “History and Theology in the Passion Narratives of the Synoptic Gospels.” Int 24 (1970) 178–97. Cousin, H. Le prophète assassiné: Histoire des textes évangélique de la Passion. Paris: Delarge, 1976. Crespy, G. “Recherche sur le signification politique de la mort du Christ.” LumVie 20 (1971) 110–21. Culpepper, A. “The Passion and Resurrection in Mark.” RevExp 75 (1978) 483–600. Czerski, J. “Die Passion Christi in den synoptischen Evangelien im Lichte der historisch-literarischen Kritik.” CollTh 46 (1976 Sonderheft) 81–96. Danker, F. W. “The Literary Unity of Mark 14:1–25.” JBL 85 (1966) 467–72. Delling, G. Der Kreuztod Jesu in der urchristlichen Verkündigung. Berlin: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt,1971. Delorme, J. “Sémiotique du récit et récit de la passion.” RSR 73 (1985) 85–109. Dibelius, M. “Das historische Problem der Leidensgeschichte.” ZNW 30 (1931) 193–201. ———. “La signification religieuse des récits évangéliques de la passion.” RHPR 13 (1933) 30–45. Dillon, R. J. “The Psalms of the Suffering Just in the Accounts of Jesus’ Passion.” Worship 61 (1987) 430–40. Donahue, J. R. Are You the Christ? The Trial Narrative in the Gospel of Mark. SBLDS 10. Missoula: Scholars, 1973. ———. “Introduction: From Passion Traditions to Passion Narrative.” In The Passion in Mark: Studies on Mark 14:16, ed(s). W. H. Kelber. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1976. 1–20. Dormeyer, D. Die Passion Jesu als Verhaltensmodell: Literarische und theologische Analyse der Traditions- und Redaktionsgeschichte der Markuspassion. NTAbh ns 11. Münster im W.: Aschendorff, 1974. Downing, J. “Jesus and Martyrdom.” JTS 14 (1963) 279–93. Dungan, D. L. “Jesus and Violence.” In Jesus, the Gospels, and the Church. FS W. R. Farmer, ed(s). E. P. Sanders. Macon, GA: Mercer, 1987. 135–62. Evans, C. F. “The Tradition of the Passion.” In Explorations in Theology. London: SCM, 1977. 2:3–17. ———. “The Event of the Passion.” In Explorations in Theology. London: SCM, 1977. 2:18–33. Feigel, F. K. Der Einfluss des Weissagungsbeweises und anderer Motive auf die Leidensgeschichte: Ein Beitrag zur Evangelien Kritik. Tübingen: Mohr, 1910. Finegan, J. Die Überlieferung der Leidens- und Auferstehungsgeschichte Jesu. BZNW 15. Giessen: Töpelmann, 1934. ———. “A Quest for the History behind the Passion.” JBTh 16 (1962) 102–4. Flesseman, E. van Leer. “Die Interpretation der Passionsgeschichte vom Alten Testament aus.” In Zur Bedeutung des Todes Jesu, ed(s). F. Viering. Gütersloh: Mohn, 1967. 79–96. Flusser, D. Die letzten Tage Jesu in Jerusalem: Das Passionsgeschehen aus jüdischer Sicht. Bericht über neueste Forschungsergebnisse. Lese-Zeichen. tr. H. Zechner. Stuttgart: Calwer, 1982. Galvin, J. P. “Jesus’ Approach to Death: An Examination of Some Recent Studies.” TS 41 (1980) 713–44. Garland, D. E. One Hundred Years of Study on the Passion Narratives. NABPR Bibliographic Series 3. Macon, GA: Mercer University, 1989. Geoltrain, P. “Les récits de la Passion dans les Synoptiques.” FV 65 (1966) 41–49. Gese, H. “Psalm 22 und das Neue Testament: Der älteste Bericht vom Tode Jesus und die Entstehung des Herrenmahles.” ZTK 65 (1968) 1–22. Girard, R. “The Gospel Passion as Victim’s Story.” Cross Currents 36 (1986–87) 28–38. Goguel, M. “Juifs et Romains dans l’histoire de la passion.” RHR 62 (1910) 165–82, 295–322. Gollwitzer, H. The Dying and Living Lord. London: SCM, 1960. Grappe, C. “Essai sur l’arrière-plan pascal des récits de la dernière nuit de Jésus.” RHPR 65 (1985) 105–25. Green, J. B. The Death of Jesus: Tradition and Interpretation in the Passion Narrative. WUNT 2/33. Tübingen: Mohr, 1988. Guillet, J. “Les récits de la Passion.” LumVie 23 (1974) 6–17. Haulotte, E. “Du récit quadriforme de la Passion au concept de Croix.” RSR 73 (1985) 187–228. Hendrickx, H. The Passion Narratives of the Synoptic Gospels. Revised London: Chapman, 1984. Hillmann, W. Aufbau und Deutung der synoptischen Leidensberichte: Ein Beitrag zur Kompositionstechnik und Sinnbedeutung der dreiälteren Evangelien. Freiburg im B.: Herder, 1941. Horbury, W.“The Passion Narratives and Historical Criticism.” Th 75 (1972) 58–71. Innitzer, T. Kommentar zur Leidens- und Verklärungsgeschichte Jesu Christi. 4th ed(s). Vienna: Herder, 1948. Isaac, J. “Problèmes de la Passion d’aprés deux études récentes.” Revue Historique 85 (1961) 119–38. Janssen, F. “Die synoptischen Passionsberichte: Ihre theologische Konzeption und literarische Komposition.” BibLeb 14 (1973) 40–57. Jeremias, J. The Eucharistic Words of Jesus. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1977. 89–96. Kelber, W. H. “Conclusion: From Passion Narrative to Gospel.” In The Passion in Mark: Studies on Mark 14–16, ed(s). W. H. Kelber. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1976. 153–80. ———, ed(s). The Passion in Mark: Studies in Mark 14–16. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1976. ———, Koenkow, A., and Scroggs, R. “Reflections on the Question: Was There a Pre-Markan Passion Narrative?” In SBL Seminar Papers 1971, ed(s). J. White et al. Missoula, MT: Scholars, 1971. 2:503–85. Kertelge, K., ed(s). Der Prozess gegen Jesus: Historische Rückfrage und theologische Deutung. QD 112. Freibourg/Basel/Vienna: Herder, 1988. Kiehl, E. H. The Passion of Our Lord. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1990. Kremer, J. Das Ärgernis des Kreuzes: Eine Hinführung zum Verstehen der Leidensgeschichte. Stuttgart: Katholisches Bibelwerk, 1969. Kümmel, W. G. “Jesusforschung seit 1965: Der Prozess und der Kreuzestod Jesu.” TRu 45 (1980) 293–337. Kurichianil, J. “Jesus’ Consciousness of His Passion and Death according to the Synoptic Gospels.” Biblebhashyam 9 (1983) 114–25. Lacomora, A., ed(s). The Language of the Cross. Chicago: Franciscan Herald Press, 1977. Lange, H. D. “The Relationship between Psalm 22 and the Passion Narrative.” CurTM 43 (1972) 610–21. Leenhardt, F. J. La mort et le testament de Jésus. Essais bibliques 6. Geneva: Labor et Fides, 1983. Lehmann, M. Synoptische Quellenanalyse und die Frage nach dem historischen Jesus. BZNW 38. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1970. Lentzen-Deis, F. “Passionsbericht als Handlungsmodell? Überlegungen zu Anstössen aus der ‘pragmatischen’ Sprachwissenschaft für die exegetischen Methoden.” In Der Prozess gegen Jesus, K. Kertelge. 191–232. Léon-Dufour, X. “Autour des récits de la Passion.” RSR 48 (1960) 1419–92. Limbeck, M., ed(s). Redaktion und Theologie des Passionsberichtes nach den Synoptikern. WF 481. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1981. Linnemann, E. Studien zur Passionsgeschichte. FRLANT 102. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1970. Lohfink, G. The Last Days of Jesus: An Enriching Portrayal of the Passion. tr. S. Attanasio. Notre Dame: Ave Maria, 1984. Lohse, E. History of the Suffering and Death of Jesus Christ. tr. O. Dietrich. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1967. Marin, L. The Semiotics of the Passion Narrative: Topics and Figures. PTMS 25. tr. A. M. Johnson. Pittsburgh: Pickwick, 1980. Marshall, I. H. “The Death of Jesus in Recent New Testament Study.” WW 3 (1983) 12–21. Mays, J. L. “Prayer and Christology: Psalm 22 as Perspective on the Passion.” TToday 42 (1985) 322–31. McCafferey, U. P. “Psalm Quotations in the Passion Narratives of the Gospels.” Neot 14 (1981) 73–89. Michl, J. “Der Tod Jesu: Ein Beitrag zur Frage nach Schuld und Verantwortung eines Volkes.” MTZ 1 (1950) 5–15. Moberly, W. “Proclaiming Christ Crucified: Some Reflections on the Use and Abuse of the Gospels.” Anvil 5 (1988) 31–52. Moo, D. J. The Old Testament in the Gospel Passion Narratives. Sheffield: Almond, 1983. Navone, J., and Cooper, T. The Story of the Passion. Rome: Pontifica Università Gregoriana, 1986. Nickelsburg, G. W. E. “The Genre and Function of the Markan Passion Narrative.” HTR 73 (1980) 153–84. O’Collins, G. The Calvary Christ. Philadelphia/London: Westminster/SCM, 1977. Oswald, J. “Die Beziehungen zwischen Psalm 22 und dem vormarkinischen Passionsbericht.” ZKT 101 (1979) 53–66. Pesch, R. “Die Überlieferung der Passion Jesu.” In Rückfrage nach Jesus, ed(s). K. Kertelge. QD 63. Freiburg: Herder, 1974. 148–73. ——— and Kratz, R. So liest man synoptisch: Anleitung und Kommentar zum Studium der synoptischen Evangelien. VI und VII. Passionsgeschichte: Erster Teil und zweiter Teil. Frankfurt: Knecht, 1979–80. Prigent, P. “Les récits évangéliques de la Passion et l’utilisation des ‘Test...