Business

Tax on Dividends

A tax on dividends is a tax imposed on the income received by shareholders from the profits of a company. This tax is typically levied by the government and can vary based on the individual's tax bracket and the type of dividend received. It is an important consideration for investors and can impact the after-tax return on investment.

Written by Perlego with AI-assistance

8 Key excerpts on "Tax on Dividends"

  • Book cover image for: Applied Corporate Finance
    • Aswath Damodaran(Author)
    • 2014(Publication Date)
    • Wiley
      (Publisher)
    In effect, this will mean that only individuals with marginal tax rates that exceed the corporate tax rate will be taxed on dividends. Australia, Finland, Mexico, and New Zealand allow individuals to get a full credit for corporate taxes paid. Canada, France, the United Kingdom, and Turkey allow for partial tax credits. • Lower tax rate on dividends. Dividends get taxed at a lower rate than other income to reflect the fact that it is paid out of after-tax income. In some countries, the tax rate on dividends is set equal to the capital gains tax rate. South Korea, for instance, has a flat tax rate of 16.5% for dividend income. This is the path that the United States chose in 2003 to grant relief from double taxation to stock investors. In summary, it is far more common for countries to provide tax relief to investors than to corpo-rations. By focusing on individuals, you can direct the tax relief only toward domestic investors and only to those investors who pay taxes in the first place. Timing of Tax Payments When the 1986 tax reform was signed into law, equalizing tax rates on ordinary income and capital gains, some believed that all the tax disadvantages of dividends had disappeared. Others noted that even with the same tax rates, dividends carried a tax disadvantage because the investor had no choice as to when to report the dividend as income; taxes were due when the firm paid out the dividends. In contrast, investors retained discretionary power over when to recognize and pay taxes on capital gains, because such taxes were not due until the stock was sold. This timing option allowed the investor to reduce the tax liability in one of two ways. First, by taking capital gains in periods of low income or capital losses to offset against the gain, the investor could now reduce the taxes paid. Second, deferring a stock sale until an investor’s death could result in tax savings, especially if the investor is not subject to estate taxes.
  • Book cover image for: Corporate Finance
    eBook - PDF

    Corporate Finance

    Theory and Practice in Emerging Economies

    An increase in the share price leads to capital gains and is taxable at the rate applicable to capital gains. In most countries, capital gains tax is lower than income tax. Second, capital gains tax is payable only when the shares are sold; a mere increase in value is not taxable. Capital gains tax can thus be postponed to the time when shares are eventually 220 | Corporate Finance sold. Most investors prefer share buyback which results in an increase in the share price so as to reduce and postpone their tax liability. The tax on dividend, in fact, amounts to double taxation since the company has already paid corporate tax on its profits earlier. Dividend payments are a mere distribution of what remains with the company after corporate taxes have been paid. Dividend represents the distribution of a portion of the net profits that anyway belong to the shareholders, and taxing distribution after the earnings have already been taxed is unfair in the eyes of many people. Over the years, different countries have resolved the problem in different ways. Currently, in India, the tax provision pertaining to dividends are as follows. Shareholders are not liable to pay Tax on Dividends received by them. The company, declaring the dividends, must pay tax on their behalf, termed dividend distribution tax (DDT). This tax rate currently is 15 per cent (gross). Thus, if a company decides to pay dividends amounting to ₹1 billion, it must pay a DDT of ₹150 million to the government and only the balance of ₹850 million will accrue to the shareholders. Assuming that the company has 100 million shares outstanding, each share will be entitled to receive ₹8.5. The only other relevant provision is that any shareholder who receives a total dividend of more than ₹1 million in a year must pay an additional 10 per cent tax. Depending on whether the capital gains tax is lower or higher than 15 per cent, the choice of payment in terms of dividends or buyback can be made.
  • Book cover image for: What Every Engineer Should Know About Starting a High-Tech Business Venture
    • Eric Koester, Philip A. Laplante(Authors)
    • 2009(Publication Date)
    • CRC Press
      (Publisher)
    Once a cash dividend has been declared, the corporation will not have to recog-nize gain or loss on the distribution. However, if the dividend comes out of the corporation’s net earnings, the shareholder will have to report dividend income for the year and will owe tax on that income. If the dividend comes out of paid-in capital, the liquidating dividend is treated as a return to capital for the share-holder. The shareholder must reduce his basis in his stock by the amount of the dividend. If the amount of the dividend exceeds his basis in the stock, according to any adjustments, then he must pay capital gains on the dividend. Until 2010, the difference between dividend income and capital gain income will essentially be immaterial for shareholders because corporate dividends are taxed at capital gains rates. Stock dividends: • A stock dividend results in a decrease in the corporation’s retained earnings and an increase in the corporation’s paid-in capital. Stock dividends serve several purposes: (1) satisfying shareholders’ dividend expectations without expending cash; (2) increasing the number of shares in the market, which consequently reduces the share price and makes the stock more marketable to small investors; and (3) reinvesting stockholders’ equity in the corporation so that it is not available for cash distributions. Stock divi-dends are generally tax free to shareholders until the stock is sold, at which time the sale is taxed at capital gains rates. The corporation also will not be taxed on the stock dividend. A corporation is not permitted to deduct the expenses of issuing a stock dividend. Tax Considerations for a Startup 495 If a corporation issues a dividend, it must report the distribution on a Form 1099-DIV. For dividends that are nontaxable because they come out of paid-in capital, the corporation must file a Form 5452, Corporate Report of Non-Dividend Distributions.
  • Book cover image for: Introduction To Accounting And Managerial Finance, An: A Merger Of Equals
    From a financial analysis viewpoint, these accounting entries are irrelevant. Dividends and Stock Value With no income taxes and with other well-defined assumptions (such as perfect knowledge and certainty), a dollar retained is equal in value to a dollar distributed; thus, dividend policy is not a relevant factor in determining the value of a corpora-tion. However, when taxes are allowed in the analysis, dividend policy affects the value of the stockholders’ equity. In practice, corporations appear to be influenced in setting dividend policy by a desire to have a relatively stable dividend. A common stock dividend is a distribution of a portion of the assets of a cor-poration to its common stock shareholders. The amount received by each investor is proportional to the number of shares held by the investor. In most cases, cash is distributed. When a corporation pays a dividend, its assets are reduced by the amount of the dividend. In publicly traded stock, the price per share declines by a fraction of the amount of the dividend on the day that the stock goes “ex-dividend”. A person who buys the stock on or after the ex-dividend date will not receive the dividend. Because of other factors affecting the stock price, as well as tax consid-erations, the decline in the share price will not be exactly equal to the amount of dividend paid. The change will be a percentage of that amount. Dividend Policy A corporation is not legally obligated to declare a dividend of any specific amount.A firm’s board of directors makes a specific decision every time a dividend is declared. Once the board declares a dividend, the corporation is legally obligated to make the payments. Therefore, a dividend should not be declared unless a corporation is in a financial position to make the payment. The expectation of receiving dividends (broadly defined as any distribution of value) ultimately determines the market value of the common stock.
  • Book cover image for: Corporate Tax Law
    eBook - PDF

    Corporate Tax Law

    Structure, Policy and Practice

    Where dividend relief is provided at the shareholder level it is calculated by reference to the same standard as tax levied at the shareholder level (i.e. the shareholder tax base). This simplicity erodes where relief provided at the shareholder level is sought to be measured by elements of the corporation tax equation. 2.4.3.1 Dividend exclusion system A corporate tax system providing dividend relief at the shareholder level by excluding dividends from taxable income is referred to as a dividend exclusion system (see Box 2.4). The level of dividend relief provided  taxation of corporate income when distributed Box 2.4: Dividend exclusion system Corporate tax rate of 30%, corporate profits of 100 and a dividend of 70: Corporation tax is 100 × 30% = 30 tax payable Dividend of 70 does not constitute taxable income of the shareholder depends on the percentage of dividends excluded from taxable income for shareholder tax purposes. The dividend exclusion system removes the shareholder tax base, not the corporation tax base. Where all dividends are excluded from tax- able income, shareholder tax is removed completely. Further, assuming the percentage of dividends excluded is similar for all shareholders, the reduction in shareholder tax is made according to each shareholder’s marginal tax rate. Shareholder tax relief is greatest for shareholders sub- ject to high marginal tax rates and is nil for shareholders exempt from income tax. Therefore, to the extent that dividends are excluded from tax- able income, the effective tax suffered by corporate income is corpora- tion tax. As a result, the dividend exclusion system is often objected to on equity grounds in that it contains no progression according to the ability to pay of shareholders. Historically, the simplicity of the dividend exclusion system meant that it was often used when the income tax was first imposed.
  • Book cover image for: Dividend Stocks For Dummies
    • Lawrence Carrel(Author)
    • 2010(Publication Date)
    • For Dummies
      (Publisher)
    In the following sections, I explain some of the tax issues that affect investors, particularly investors who focus on dividend stocks. I reveal the negative effects of double taxation on corporate profits and dividend returns, the posi-tive effects of the JGTRRA, and how you (as a dividend investor) benefit from the tax changes provided for in the JGTRRA. I explain how to tell the differ-ence between a qualifying and nonqualifying dividend and how to make sure you hold shares long enough to take advantage of any available tax breaks. Dividends are taxed in the year they’re received. The time the payment arrives, not the date of declaration (date the board of directors announces the dividend payment), determines when the dividend is taxed. Head to Chapter 2 for more on the date of declaration and other important dividend-related dates. Recognizing the drawbacks of double taxation In taxing dividends, the government engages in a form of double dipping, more commonly referred to as double taxation. With double taxation, the govern-ment collects taxes on the same money twice — it taxes the company’s prof-its (typically at a rate of 35 percent) and then taxes the dividends investors receive, which come out of the company’s after-tax profits. Prior to JGTRRA, this arrangement meant the government could receive 35 percent of a com-pany’s profits and then up to another 38.6 percent of each investor’s cut! Double taxation has several effects on how companies do business and where investors choose to put their money: ✓ To dodge the double-taxation bullet, many corporations choose to invest all of their profits in research, development, and other ventures rather than distribute a portion of the profits to investors. 289 Chapter 20: Tuning In to Changes in Tax Laws ✓ Investors also are motivated to dodge the double-taxation bullet by invest-ing in companies that don’t pay dividends.
  • Book cover image for: St James's Place Tax Guide 2008-2009
    (3) Capital distributions made in cash, such as dividends, paid out of the capital profits of a company. (4) Scrip dividend options (8.9). The gross amounts of your dividends including tax credits (and taxed interest) receivable in the tax year are included with your investment income for total income purposes (5.2). 8.1.1 Rules applying after 5 April 1999 Where your dividends, taken to be the top slice of your income, fall within your basic rate (20 per cent) band, although the tax credit is only 10 per cent, you pay no more tax. To achieve this effect, the income tax rate on your divi- dends is taken to be 10 per cent. (Prior to 6 April 1999, dividends in your basic rate band were subjected to a 20 per cent rate.) Any dividends in the higher rate band (40 per cent) effectively bear the same tax as before. This is done by charging 32.5 per cent on the grossed dividend and offsetting the 10 per cent tax credit (8.1.7). Charities are no longer able to reclaim dividend tax credits, but transitional relief applied up to 5 April 2004 (15.2.1). The dividend tax credits ceased to be reclaimable by pension funds and the position of trusts was also affected (21.5). 8.1.2 Example: Income Tax on Dividends Mr A has a taxable income for 2008–09 of £40,000 after allowances.This comprises dividends of £9,000 together with tax credits of £1,000 and £30,000 salary. Mr A will be liable to tax as follows for 2008–09: £ £ Salary 30,000* at 20% 6,000.00 Dividends 6,000* at 10% 600.00 4,000 at 32.5% 1,300.00 7,900.00 Less:Tax credits 1,000.00 Net tax payable 6,900.00 * Basic rate band £32,370. 8.1.3 Tax credits on dividends after 5 April 1999 (TA S231 & F2A 1997 S30) As seen, radical reforms have taken place regarding the repayment of tax credits on dividends. This was stopped from 2 July 1997 regarding dividends on shares held by pension funds, including occupational (14.3) and personal pension (14.6) schemes. Regarding individuals (8.1), nothing changed until 5 April 1999.
  • Book cover image for: Trends in the Distribution of Stock Ownership
    V The Distribution of Stock Ownership as Revealed by Dividend Income Reported on Federal Income Tax Returns A s A BY-PRODUCT OF THE OPERATION OF THE FEDERAL INCOME TAX laws there is available a large body of statistical data compiled from the tax returns filed by individuals, corporations, fiduci-aries, and other legal entities as required by the law. Each year these data are published by the Treasury Department in several volumes, collectively referred to as the Statistics of Income. The earliest year for which information is available is 1913. Since then volumes have appeared annually, the coverage varying slightly from year to year but generally increasing in scope and detail. Starting with 1916 the data covering individual returns have shown income reported according to source. Except for 1944 and 1945, when dividends and interest were reported together, the amount of dividend income shown on all the returns in each of a number of income-size classes has been tabulated. Additional detail on dividend income has frequently been published. The purpose of this chapter is to explore ways in which these data can be used in measuring changes in the distribution of stock ownership. We must recognize that while receipt of dividend income implies ownership of stock by the recipient (or by a trust under which he is a beneficiary), ownership of stock does not neces-sarily imply receipt of dividend income. It is true, as critics have observed, 1 that if the distribution of non-dividend paying stocks 1 Butters, Thompson, and Bollinger, Effects of Taxation: Investment by Individuals, p. 436. 99 100 Trends in the Distribution of Stock Ownership by income of the owner is different from that of dividend paying stocks, the distribution of dividend income receipts does not accurately reflect the distribution of stock ownership.
Index pages curate the most relevant extracts from our library of academic textbooks. They’ve been created using an in-house natural language model (NLM), each adding context and meaning to key research topics.