Economics
Crowding Out
Crowding out is an economic phenomenon where increased government spending leads to a decrease in private investment. This happens because the government borrows more money, which increases interest rates and makes it more expensive for businesses to borrow money. As a result, private investment decreases, which can lead to slower economic growth.
Written by Perlego with AI-assistance
Related key terms
1 of 5
5 Key excerpts on "Crowding Out"
eBook - PDF- Steven A. Greenlaw, Timothy Taylor, David Shapiro(Authors)
- 2017(Publication Date)
- Openstax(Publisher)
Government borrowing can reduce the financial capital available for private firms to invest in physical capital. However, government spending can also encourage certain elements of long-term growth, such as spending on roads or water systems, on education, or on research and development that creates new technology. Crowding Out Physical Capital Investment A larger budget deficit will increase demand for financial capital. If private saving and the trade balance remain the same, then less financial capital will be available for private investment in physical capital. When government borrowing soaks up available financial capital and leaves less for private investment in physical capital, economists call the result Crowding Out. To understand the potential impact of Crowding Out, consider the U.S. economy's situation before the exceptional circumstances of the recession that started in late 2007. In 2005, for example, the budget deficit was roughly 4% of GDP. Private investment by firms in the U.S. economy has hovered in the range of 14% to 18% of GDP in recent decades. However, in any given year, roughly half of U.S. investment in physical capital just replaces machinery and equipment that has worn out or become technologically obsolete. Only about half represents an increase in the total quantity of physical capital in the economy. Investment in new physical capital in any year is about 7% to 9% of GDP. In this situation, even U.S. budget deficits in the range of 4% of GDP can potentially crowd out a substantial share of new investment spending. Conversely, a smaller budget deficit (or an increased budget surplus) increases the pool of financial capital available for private investment. Visit this website (http://openstaxcollege.org/l/debtclock) to view the “U.S. Debt Clock.” Figure 31.7 shows the patterns of U.S. budget deficits and private investment since 1980.
eBook - PDF- Steven A. Greenlaw, David Shapiro, Daniel MacDonald(Authors)
- 2022(Publication Date)
- Openstax(Publisher)
then to pull their funds out and cause a depreciation of the exchange rate and a financial crisis as well. It depends on whether funding comes from international financial investors. 31.4 Fiscal Policy, Investment, and Economic Growth LEARNING OBJECTIVES By the end of this section, you will be able to: • Explain Crowding Out and its effect on physical capital investment • Explain the relationship between budget deficits and interest rates • Identify why economic growth is tied to investments in physical capital, human capital, and technology The underpinnings of economic growth are investments in physical capital, human capital, and technology, all set in an economic environment where firms and individuals can react to the incentives provided by well- functioning markets and flexible prices. Government borrowing can reduce the financial capital available for private firms to invest in physical capital. However, government spending can also encourage certain elements of long-term growth, such as spending on roads or water systems, on education, or on research and development that creates new technology. Crowding Out Physical Capital Investment A larger budget deficit will increase demand for financial capital. If private saving and the trade balance remain the same, then less financial capital will be available for private investment in physical capital. When government borrowing soaks up available financial capital and leaves less for private investment in physical capital, economists call the result Crowding Out. To understand the potential impact of Crowding Out, consider the U.S. economy's situation before the exceptional circumstances of the recession that started in late 2007. In 2005, for example, the budget deficit was roughly 3% of GDP. Private investment by firms in the U.S. economy has hovered in the range of 14% to 18% of GDP in recent decades.
eBook - PDF- David Shapiro, Daniel MacDonald, Steven A. Greenlaw(Authors)
- 2022(Publication Date)
- Openstax(Publisher)
then to pull their funds out and cause a depreciation of the exchange rate and a financial crisis as well. It depends on whether funding comes from international financial investors. 18.4 Fiscal Policy, Investment, and Economic Growth LEARNING OBJECTIVES By the end of this section, you will be able to: • Explain Crowding Out and its effect on physical capital investment • Explain the relationship between budget deficits and interest rates • Identify why economic growth is tied to investments in physical capital, human capital, and technology The underpinnings of economic growth are investments in physical capital, human capital, and technology, all set in an economic environment where firms and individuals can react to the incentives provided by well- functioning markets and flexible prices. Government borrowing can reduce the financial capital available for private firms to invest in physical capital. However, government spending can also encourage certain elements of long-term growth, such as spending on roads or water systems, on education, or on research and development that creates new technology. Crowding Out Physical Capital Investment A larger budget deficit will increase demand for financial capital. If private saving and the trade balance remain the same, then less financial capital will be available for private investment in physical capital. When government borrowing soaks up available financial capital and leaves less for private investment in physical capital, economists call the result Crowding Out. To understand the potential impact of Crowding Out, consider the U.S. economy's situation before the exceptional circumstances of the recession that started in late 2007. In 2005, for example, the budget deficit was roughly 3% of GDP. Private investment by firms in the U.S. economy has hovered in the range of 14% to 18% of GDP in recent decades.
eBook - PDF- Steven A. Greenlaw, Timothy Taylor(Authors)
- 2014(Publication Date)
- Openstax(Publisher)
When government borrowing soaks up available financial capital and leaves less for private investment in physical capital, the result is known as Crowding Out. To understand the potential impact of Crowding Out, consider the situation of the U.S. economy before the exceptional circumstances of the recession that started in late 2007. In 2005, for example, the budget deficit was roughly 4% of GDP. Private investment by firms in the U.S. economy has hovered in the range of 14% to 18% of GDP in recent decades. However, in any given year, roughly half of U.S. investment in physical capital just replaces machinery and equipment that has worn out or become technologically obsolete. Only about half represents an increase in the total quantity of physical capital in the economy. So investment in new physical capital in any year is about 7% to 9% of GDP. In this situation, even U.S. budget deficits in the range of 4% of GDP can potentially crowd out a substantial share of new investment spending. Conversely, a smaller budget deficit (or an increased budget surplus) increases the pool of financial capital available for private investment. Visit this website (http://openstaxcollege.org/l/debtclock) to view the “U.S. Debt Clock.” The patterns of U.S. budget deficits and private investment since 1980 are shown in Figure 18.4. If greater government deficits lead to less private investment in physical capital, and reduced government deficits or budget surpluses lead to more investment in physical capital, these two lines should move up and down at the same time. This pattern occurred in the late 1990s and early 2000s. The U.S. federal budget went from a deficit of 2.2% of GDP in 1995 to a budget surplus of 2.4% of GDP in 2000—a swing of 4.6% of GDP. From 1995 to 2000, private investment in physical capital rose from 15% to 18% of GDP—a rise of 3% of GDP.
eBook - PDF- R. Po-chia Hsia(Author)
- 1990(Publication Date)
- Yale University Press(Publisher)
An in-crease in the claims of inherited programs can preempt the fiscal dividend of growth. When recession causes a shortfall in tax revenue, increased expenditure on inherited programs can exceed any increase in tax revenue, thus boosting the public deficit. If spending on inherited programs increases as fast or faster than the growth of public revenue, this can lead to a Crowding Out of new programs, for everything else being equal, the greater the total in-crease in the claims of inherited programs, the less money is available for the government of the day to spend on new programs of its own choice. Even though public expenditure grows in aggregate, there is no revenue free to finance new programs, because the whole of the year's increase in taxation is already committed to inherited programs. *7.1 (Crowding Out). As claims of inherited programs increase, the scope for new programs decreases. Economic Constraints on the Scope for Choice 146 This hypothesis implies that the lower the growth rate, the greater the extent of Crowding Out. The fiscal dividend of a high rate of economic growth tends to offset the effects of Crowding Out. *7.2 (Growthfinances more growth). As the gross national product increases, new programs increase. Many politicians regard it as self-evident that the growth in public policy is desirable. Public choice theorists often assume that politi-cians want to buy reelection by introducing more and bigger pro-grams. Advocates of a constitutional limit upon public expenditure believe that if spending is not thus constrained, the cumulative effects of the choices of hyperactive politicians cannot be sustained econom-ically. In Britain the ceiling imposed by economic growth is lower than in the average advanced industrial nation, because growth in the British economy has been below the international average.
Index pages curate the most relevant extracts from our library of academic textbooks. They’ve been created using an in-house natural language model (NLM), each adding context and meaning to key research topics.
