Law
Intention to Create Legal Relations
Intention to create legal relations refers to the parties' intention to be legally bound by their agreement. In contract law, this principle is used to determine whether an agreement is legally enforceable. It involves assessing whether the parties intended to create a legally binding contract or if their agreement was merely a social or domestic arrangement.
Written by Perlego with AI-assistance
Related key terms
1 of 5
6 Key excerpts on "Intention to Create Legal Relations"
eBook - PDF- Richard Stone, James Devenney(Authors)
- 2017(Publication Date)
- Routledge(Publisher)
Chapter contents 4.1 Introduction 132 4.2 Objective approach to intention 132 4.3 Domestic or social agreements 133 4.4 Commercial agreements 139 4.5 Collective agreements 144 4.6 Is a requirement of intention necessary? 144 Additional reading 146 Chapter 4 Intention to Create Legal Relations Intention to Create Legal Relations 132 | 4.1 Introduction As well as evidence of an agreement, for a contract to be enforceable, the courts need to be sure that it was intended to be legally binding. In most cases where there is offer, acceptance and considera-tion, this is not an issue, but in some cases a party to an agreement that has all those characteristics may wish to claim that they did not intend to create legal relations. English law deals with such an assertion by means of presumptions. If the alleged contract is a social or domestic agreement, the courts will presume that it was not intended to be legally binding. If, on the other hand, the alleged contract was a commercial agreement, the courts will presume that it was intended to be legally binding. In either case the presumption is rebuttable by appropriate evidence, and most of the case law is concerned with what provides sufficient evidence for this. Statute provides that collective agreements between employers and trade unions should not generally be regarded as intended to be legally binding – see section 4.5, below. 4.2 Objective approach to intention As with most areas within the English law of contract, the courts purport to use an objective approach to the question of determining what the parties ‘intended’ at the time they entered into an agreement. It is what the parties have said or done, and how a reasonable person would view that, which is important.
eBook - ePub- Richard Stone, James Devenney(Authors)
- 2022(Publication Date)
- Routledge(Publisher)
Chapter 4 Intention to Create Legal Relations
Chapter contents 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Objective approach to intention 4.3 Domestic or social agreements 4.4 Commercial agreements 4.5 Collective agreements 4.6 Is a requirement of intention necessary? Additional reading4.1 Introduction
As well as evidence of an agreement, for a contract to be enforceable, the courts need to be sure that it was intended to be legally binding. In most cases where there is offer, acceptance and consideration this is not an issue, but in some cases, a party to an agreement that has all those characteristics may wish to claim that they did not intend to create legal relations. The law of England and Wales deals with such assertions largely by means of presumptions. If the alleged contract is a social or domestic agreement, the courts will presume that it was not intended to be legally binding. If, on the other hand, the alleged contract was a commercial agreement, the courts will presume that it was intended to be legally binding.In either case, the presumption is rebuttable by appropriate evidence, and much of the case law is concerned with what provides sufficient evidence for this. Statute also provides that collective agreements between employers and trade unions are not intended to be legally binding unless certain requirements are met – see section 4.5, below.4.2 Objective approach to intention
As with most areas within the law of contract in England and Wales, the courts purport to use an objective approach to the question of determining what the parties ‘intended’ at the time they entered into an agreement. It is what the parties have said or done, and how a reasonable person would view that, which is important. This was confirmed by Lord Bingham in Edmonds v Lawson
eBook - ePubContract as Assumption II
Formation, Performance and Enforcement
- Brian Coote, John Carter(Authors)
- 2016(Publication Date)
- Hart Publishing(Publisher)
ab extra, upon contracting parties to agreements so that any assumption by them must be of obligations which at that point are necessarily less than contractual. The truth, it is submitted, is that while the law of contract defines and prescribes the legal consequences of entering into a contract, the parties must first appear to have taken those consequences upon themselves by the act of assuming specifically contractual obligations. This they are able to do at common law by promising for consideration with an intention to contract.On this view, rather than being (other than consequentially) an instrument for the regulation of conduct, contract is first and foremost a facility to enable the effective assumption of contractual obligation. Although other purposes might be grafted onto it, its incidents for the most part flow from that initial function. And while its existence could have any number of justifications, which might vary from time to time and as between one legal system and another, it seems likely that the principal reason for the institution in all societies is its usefulness, and that it is made available for the classic reasons of peace, order, and good government. If that is accepted, an approach to intention that differed from that of the criminal law, in the regard it paid to such utilitarian concerns as communication, reliance, certainty, and the needs of third parties, would be not only appropriate but also required. It would also mean that, at common law, the emphasis should primarily be on what obligations the parties assumed, and only then on what additional obligations the law itself imposed on them.Intention to ContractIf the traditional contract theories are suspect, what are the real reasons why intention should be so important in contract? Almost certainly the answers lie in the nature of the institution itself. A party can enter a contract reluctantly or unwillingly, but she must always intend to do so or at least give that appearance. If it were otherwise, contract would just be another means, like torts and restitution, by which obligations were imposed ab extra
eBook - PDFLaw
Made Simple
- D. L. A. Barker, C. F. Padfield(Authors)
- 2014(Publication Date)
- Made Simple(Publisher)
7 THE LAW OF CONTRACT In his book Principles of the Law of Contracts, Sir William Anson defined a contract as a legally binding agreement made between two or more parties, by which rights are acquired by one or more to acts or forebearances on the part of the other or others. Shortly it may be defined as an agreement between two or more parties which is intended to have legal consequences. The agreement referred to in the definition means a meeting of minds, called in law consensus ad idem, signifying that the parties are agreed together about the same thing. The definition also emphasizes that the parties to the contract must intend that their agreement shall be legally enforceable. Unless the law regognizes this and enforces the agreements of parties, it would be impossible to carry on commercial or business life. For this reason the law of contract plays a leading role in courses on business studies. These contractual agreements give rise to rights and obligations which the law recognizes and enforces. But certain agreements, such as domestic and social arrangements, are not intended by the parties to be legally binding. The law allows for this. Thus, if Cumming and Gowing agree to meet for dinner and Gowing fails to turn up, the law will do nothing in the matter. The agreement was not intended to create legal rights and duties, and, as such, it is not a contract in law. Every contract is an agreement, but not every agreement is a contract. The object of the law of contract is to identify those agreements which it will enforce and those which it will not. This is of prime importance and will be referred to later in more detail. 1. Essentials of a Valid Contract An agreement will be enforced when the following essential elements exist: (a) Offer and Acceptance. There must be an offer by one party and an acceptance of it by the other. (b) Intention to Create Legal Relations. (c) Capacity of the parties. Each party must have the legal capacity to make the contract.
eBook - PDFVanishing Contract Law
Common Law in the Age of Contracts
- Catherine Mitchell(Author)
- 2022(Publication Date)
- Cambridge University Press(Publisher)
This becomes apparent when we consider the attempt in English law to create a relational contract jurisprudence. 7.2 Developing Relational Contract Law Though the concept of relational contracts is known in the law, especially in the employment context, 26 the idea gained more sustained attention following Mr Justice Leggatt’s judgment in Yam Seng Pte Ltd v. International Trade Corporation Ltd. The judge implied a term of good faith in a distributor- ship agreement between two sole traders on the basis that it was a relational contract, that is, the agreement involved ‘a longer term relationship 25 David Campbell, ‘Ian Macneil and the Relational Theory of Contract’ in Ian Macneil, The Relational Theory of Contract: Selected Works of Ian Macneil, David Campbell (ed.) (Sweet and & Maxwell, 2001), pp. 3, 21. 26 Johnson v. Unisys Ltd [2003] 1 AC 518, per Lord Steyn at [20]; Braganza v. BP Shipping Ltd [2015] 1 WLR 1661, per Lord Hodge at paras [54] and [61]; Lizzie Barmes, ‘Common Law Implied Terms and Behavioural Standards at Work’ (2007) 36 Industrial Law Journal 35, 42. 181 7.2 Developing Relational Contract Law between the parties which they make a substantial commitment’. 27 The judge remarked: Such “relational” contracts . . . may require a high degree of communication, co-operation and predictable performance based on mutual trust and confidence and involve expectations of loyalty which are not legislated for in the express terms of the contract but are implicit in the parties’ understanding and necessary to give business efficacy to the arrangements. Examples of such relational contracts might include some joint venture agreements, franchise agreements and long term distributorship agreements. 28 The judge noted that many contractual contexts are informed by implicit but shared norms of behaviour, including trust and honesty.
eBook - PDF- Maria Hook(Author)
- 2016(Publication Date)
- Hart Publishing(Publisher)
For example, the parties’ mutual subjective intentions will usually be given effect, even if they do not accord with the agreement’s objective meaning. 52 Conversely, the subjective approach, which requires a subjective meeting of the minds, is shaped to a significant degree by objective considerations. 53 Ordinarily the parties’ intention to choose the applicable law will be free from doubt, and the distinction between subjective and objective intention will not assume any relevance. But there are some cases in which the distinction has the potential to be determinative. For example, is party A bound by a choice of law inferred from its mistaken reliance, before court, on the law of the forum, in circumstances where party B could reasonably understand party A’s conduct to manifest an intention to choose the law of the forum? What if party B knew that 143 Subjective or Objective Intention? 54 cp Cass soc, 24 November 2004, no 02-42660 ( Hoegaerden v Horphag Research (UK) Ltd) . 55 See ch 5, s III.C. 56 See also I Schwander, ‘Subjektivismus in der Anknüpfung im internationalen Privatrecht’ in C Dominicé et al (eds), Etudes de droit international en l’honneur de Pierre Lalive (Basel, Helbing & Lichtenhahn, 1993) 181, 183–84, in relation to IPRG, Art 116. 57 OLG Saarbrücken, OLGZ 1966, 142. party A did not intend the law of the forum to be applicable? Is party C bound by a choice of law clause included in a pre-negotiation document even though party C did not intend the document to be legally binding? 54 Provided there is evidence of the parties’ subjective intention, these questions cannot be answered without at least implicit reference to the type of agreement—subjective or objective—that is considered relevant. A. Relevance of the Law of Contract The law of contract is an appropriate source of regulation to determine which kind of intention is necessary to establish agreement.
Index pages curate the most relevant extracts from our library of academic textbooks. They’ve been created using an in-house natural language model (NLM), each adding context and meaning to key research topics.
