Chapter One
Generations
āTechnology shows up and changes the culture. The culture then enables new industries and movements, which further change the culture. And then technology shows up and puts an end to the system we were all used to.ā
āSeth Godin
Generations come and generations go.
Itās been that way since the beginning of time. Itās the āstoryā in history. Every generation contributes a phrase or paragraph, a comment or chapter to the greater digest of mankind. In the larger book of recorded history, the lines can eventually blur, fade, and disappear. Unless highlighted by the conscientious, a generation can easily be forgotten once the reader turns pages into the future.
And yet, without the contribution of each generation, just like a single sentence in a book, the overall work can suffer. That doesnāt mean every generation should be treated the same. Some generations live in the shadows of greater ones. Others are marked by negative circumstances, horrific struggles, and misplaced values. Still others prove idealistic, positive, and influential. Every generation has its own psyche and personality.
Itās what flavors and colors history. The stories within the story create the chronicles of a generation, a people, and mankind.
It wasnāt until the last half of the twentieth century that sociologists seriously charted, studied, and considered generations. At best, certain distinctive birth cohorts were labeled in the literature of their day. For example, the term āGen Xā was employed by Douglas Coupland in his 1991 fiction novel titled Gen X: Tales for an Accelerated Culture. Prior to 1991, this cohort of babies were known as ābaby busters.ā6 In the same year as Couplandās novel, William Strauss and Neil Howe penned Generations: The History of Americaās Future, 1584ā2069, a landmark book that launched a national conversation about who we really are. In this epic historical and sociological tome, the authors reimagined generations into cycles with four āturningsā inside each cycle. Not only did Strauss and Howe create fresh boundary lines and labels for various generations, but they also saw patterns and repetitions. Strauss and Howe inspired the tag of āMillennialā for the generational cohort being born at the time their book was published (supplanting the generic āGeneration Yā label).7
āāāāā
āAs is the generation of leaves, so too of man
At one time the wind shakes the leaves to the ground but then the flourishing woods
Gives birth, and the season of spring comes into existence, so it is with the generations of men, which alternately come forth and pass away.ā
Homer, The Illiad, sixth book
āāāāā
While there is academic criticism regarding Strauss and Howeās socio-historical views, particularly in how certain generations are framed and labeled, there has also been general acceptance of their theoretical ideas.8
Talkinā āBout My Generation
What exactly constitutes a āgeneration?ā How is a generational cohort defined? How long is a generation? What is its sociological nature? These are critical questions that form the foundation for any conversation about āgenerations.ā
According to social scientists, developmental psychologists and cultural historians, a new generation is born approximately every twenty years. Since the majority of babies are born during our āyoung adultā years (ages twenty-forty)āa span of two decadesāitās fair to conclude a different generation emerges approximately every twenty years.9 This seems sensible at face value, but itās also problematic. After all, every year a new cohort of people turn twenty. Essentially, that could mean every year a new generation is being born.
Itās why we need additional markersāhistorical and societalāto demarcate a generation. Human development only gives the length of a generation (approximately twenty years), but it cannot provide an accurate āstartā and āfinishā to a generational frame.
āāāāā
āA generation is composed of people whose common location in history lends them a collective persona. The span of one generation is roughly the length of a phase of life. Generations come in four archetypes, always in the same order, whose phase-of-life positions comprise a constellation.ā
William Strauss and Neil Howe
āāāāā
Historically, the best frames are created by circumstance. A generation is a group of people who experienced a similar life path; that is, they endured the same events over time.
One of the earliest numerical references to a generation is in the Old Testament: āThe Lord is slow to anger, abounding in love and forgiving sin and rebellion. Yet he does not leave the guilty unpunished; he punishes the children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generationā (Numbers 14:18). This framework will eventually prove true for the ancient, disobedient Israelites, who wandered in the desert and were prohibited entrance into their āpromised landā for four decades or two generations of twenty years (Numbers 32:13). In other biblical texts, a twenty-year-old is considered an adult and subject to āadultā roles and responsibilities, from military service (Numbers 1:20) to taxation (Exodus 38:25ā27). Consequently, at least from a biblical view, there is merit to a generation lasting two decades.
In addition, every generation also possesses a collective personality that drives cultural attitudes and behaviors. This persona is influenced via the social, political, spiritual, and historical contexts in which a cohort of people journey. Consequently, every generation inherits a unique cultural clock and cloak that they wear their entire life. A Baby Boomer raised in a post-World War II landscape differs from a Millennial raised during the War on Terror. There might be similar stressors and even occasional common themes (fear of nuclear war) but, in general, no one would see these two generations as being similar.
This is where technology offers some help. Baby boomers experienced a radio and primitive television world in their youth and these technologies shaded their generational psyche all their lives. Boomers tend to see things more āblack and whiteā and idealistic. They marched for peace and āflower powerā in the 1960s, promoted womenās rights and sexual revolution in the 1970s, and became soccer moms and āconscientiousā politicians in the 1980s and 1990s. In contrast, Millennials grew up in a web and digital culture with email, texting, downloads, and uploads. In adolescence and young adulthood, Millennials were the first adopters of social media. The world for them is more multi-dimensional, multi-cultural, and multi-visual. Consequently, Millennials view life with more ācolorā (diversity, harmony, and tolerance).
Itās the technology of a generation that influences its personality.
Furthermore, every generation is framed by certain major socio-historical events that mark their inner psyche. These events guide each generation with a collective historical consciousness. Using Strauss and Howeās generational frames, in part, itās easy to witness the impact and influence of these cultural events10:
- ā¢G.I. Generation (1901ā1924): World War I, Great Depression, Pearl Harbor, World War II
- ā¢Silent Generation (1925ā1942): Great Depression, Pearl Harbor, World War II, and Korea
- ā¢Boomer Generation (1943ā1960): Sputnik, Eisenhower, JFK, Vietnam, man on the moon, Watergate
- ā¢Gen X (1961ā1981): Man on the moon, Watergate, Iran hostages, Reagan, Challenger, Desert Storm
- ā¢Millennials (1982ā1999): Desert Storm, OJ, Columbine, Clinton, 9/11/01, Katrina, War on Terror, Great Recession
- ā¢iTech (2000āpresent): Great Recession, War on Terror, Parkland school shooting
In fact, what we canāt historically remember might be as important as what we do. Every generation is tattooed by a certain āmegaā event that the next generation cannot recall, and itās precisely because we canāt remember it that we differ from the previous generations.
Every Boomer, for example, can recount where they were on November 22, 1963. John F. Kennedyās assassination galvanized an emerging generation of young Americans. On the other hand, Gen X was too young to remember Kennedy. Itās why the classic Boomer birth frame (1946ā1964) fails. The post-WWII baby boom actually began in 1943 (not 1946) when soldiers initially returned home from European battlefields.11 Furthermore, the post-war ābaby boomā culturally ended in 1960 with the introduction of oral contraception.12 Strauss and Howe rightly reset the āBoomerā birth years to 1943ā1960 for this reason. Gen X (or the āBaby Bustersā for their lower generational birth rate) is more appropriately framed between 1961ā1981.
āāāāā
āThere is a mysterious cycle in human events. To some generations much is given. Of other generations much is expected. This generation has a rendezvous with destiny.ā
Franklin D. Roosevelt
āāāāā
Most of us begin to retain memory of cultural events between the ages of five and seven.13 Consequently, itās very difficult for anyone to truly recall the Kennedy assassination if they were born after 1958! What we remember most from our preschool years are āpassed onā memories from significant adults through stories and photographs. Iām a classic case of this misidentification. I was born May 29, 1963. I was six months old when President Kennedy was assassinated. I donāt remember anything about that tragic day. And yet, Iāve been tagged a ābaby boomerā (1946ā1964) all my life. Itās not true. My generational psyche was formed by other events, most notably man walking on the moon in 1969 (the first significant news story I recall). From this perspective, every generation has an experience they canāt remember, and this event is so big in the American cultural fabric that it powerfully shapes the emerging generation:
- ā¢G.I. Generation (1901ā1924) cannot recall: Great San Francisco Earthquake (1906)
- ā¢Silent Generation (1925ā1942) cannot recall: Stock Market Crash (1929)
- ā¢Boomer Generation (1943ā1960) cannot recall: Hiroshima/Nagasaki atom bomb (1945)
- ā¢Gen X (1961ā1981) cannot recall: Assassination of John F. Kennedy (1963)
- ā¢Millennials (1982ā1998) cannot recall: Challenger explosion (1986)
- ā¢iTech (1999āpresent) cannot recall: Terror attacks on New York and Washington (2001)
In this book, Iāll argue for a technological framework to understand American generations. Nevertheless, we cannot underestimate the power of historical events. There are just certain occurrences that change us and how we look at our world.14
Another interesting twist on generational cohorts are the identifiable phases or āwaves.ā Every generation...