1
Backgrounds of King’s Preaching Theology
The Influence of the Black Church Tradition
From birth, King was surrounded and influenced by the black faith community. Both his maternal grandfather and his father were successful African-American Baptist preachers in Atlanta, Georgia. Put simply, “King was a product of the black church in America.” How exactly, then, did the black Baptist church—or the black church in general—influence King’s reconciliatory preaching theology? There are at least three significant elements of the black church tradition that influenced King: the freedom tradition, open-ended Christian practices, and the particular interpretative tools of allegory and typology.
First is the black church’s “freedom tradition.” Long before the birth of King, black people had been singing hymns such as the one below:
And,
And,
As seen in the songs above, a fundamental motif of freedom and liberation permeated black Christians’ lives from their first exposure to Christianity in America. They found both spiritual enhancement for their oppressed lives and eschatological hope by singing and dreaming of their own liberation from oppression. In fact, it was none other than this spiritual enhancement and eschatological hope that propelled early African-American Christians to walk out of the churches of white slave owners and start black churches. The African Methodist Episcopal Church (A.M.E.) in 1787 was the first example of such a walkout. Richard Allen, founder and first consecrated bishop of the A.M.E. church, departed from St. George’s Methodist Church in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and started the first African-American denomination.
By the time of King’s birth, black Christians in America had already been actively engaging in social movements to improve black lives and, therefore, most black churches in America functioned as both spiritual homes and social-movement base camps. So, it comes as no surprise that King was surrounded and influenced by this spiritual and social ethos while being raised as a pastor’s son. Consequently, it was deeply rooted in King’s mind, theological thoughts, and preaching from his childhood. When King was led to public service, that ethos was evidently present in his preaching and various speeches, as we can see in the following excerpt:
These words sound almost like the lyrics of an old-time black spiritual, which evidently proves King’s inheritance of the black church’s freedom and liberation tradition.
The second influential element on King’s preaching is that of the black church’s open-ended Christian practices. These practices include extending biblical narratives into the church’s own worldly experience, performing Scripture in its music, its rhythmic pattern of call and response, and rhetorical adornments. Richard Lischer observes that all of these are techniques that King “exported from the church’s Sunday worship to political mass meetings around the country.” Quite understandably, these practices enabled King to find God revealed and speaking through the whole universe, that is, both sacred and secular realms. Above all, extending the Bible into the church’s own worldly experience affirms God’s universal reign in the world. Performing the Scripture in music creates the Scripture’s common virtue in the secular world thanks to the universality of music itself. And black worship’s pattern of call and response enables people’s active engagement with divinity, whether the listeners are Christian or not (therefore, universal engagement!), by appealing to human beings’ most common desire for communication with each other and with the divine. Lastly, various rhetorical adornments help King inflate “local conflicts into the titanic battle of universals.” With the underlying influence of the black church’s open-ended practices, King was able to transform “the Judeo-Christian themes of love, suffering, deliverance, and justice from the sacred shelter of the pulpit into the arena of public policy.”
Thirdly, King’s theology was informed by the black church’s interpretative tools of allegory and typology. Regarding this matter, Lischer says:
What is evident in Lischer’s observation is that by utilizing the interpretative tools of the black church’s tradition, King succeeded in intertwining the realm of divine revelation with the secular realm, wherein the civil rights movement is perceived as a divine claim. In doing so, King eventually came to confront the God revealed through the whole universe again and again.
King was a product of the black church, and his own theological identity was deeply influenced by the black church tradition. Specifically, King found his God revealed through the whole universe as a result of the three major influences of the tradition that we discussed above. However, the influence from the black church was not enough for King to develop his own homiletic theology, which he needed in order to confront the cruel reality of the America in which he lived. He needed more than influence itself. He needed a deeper articulation of the human condition, a broad and comprehensive understanding of God, and his own homiletic voice to confront this violent reality. As one can guess, all of these higher disciplines came from his advanced theological studies. Therefore, it is now time to turn to King’s theological background and how it deepened his understanding of theology and preaching of reconciliation.
The Influence from Contemporary Theologies
King went through three influential academic institutions: Morehouse, Crozer Seminary, and Boston University (where he wrote his dissertation in theology). These...