The Bradford Model
In 2002 Bradford was awarded a Ā£1m grant from the New Opportunities Fund to set up a Healthy Living Centre based on menās health. The foundation of the grant application was the work being undertaken by the Bradford Health HoM key workers, a group of practitioners who had developed innovative menās health services for some of the hardest to reach groups in society.
This grant, with matched funding from the local trusts, enabled a cross-city programme of activities. At the time when the HoM project began, there were four primary care trusts (PCTs) in Bradford and Airedale which have now merged into a single trust, Bradford and Airedale Teaching PCT. Within each PCT there was one full-time key worker, part-funded by the Big Lottery. The Lottery also funded a āhalf postā based within the Bradford District Public Health Partnership. Each PCT also provided additional support to the project as an āin-kindā contribution. In one PCT this included two additional dedicated key workers. HoM is a cross-city initiative, with key workers originally being employed within one of the four PCTs, but having the ability to work across the city, sharing expertise and jointly setting up events.
HoM have delivered a broad range of projects, including projects in schools, work with the Youth Offending team, health drop-in sessions for homeless men, sexual health outreach work in male saunas, health-related pub quizzes, and health checks in workplaces and community settings known as health āMOTsā (see Chapter 4). This book highlights the main principles for working effectively in this area by featuring a sample of some of the most successful projects, however the possibilities for delivering new types of innovative menās health services are essentially limitless.
Traditionally, health care has been delivered in clinics where the healthcare professionals have configured services for their own convenience. The expectation is that the patient will learn to use the service and will conform to its structures and ways of working. Within the majority of the work of the HoM team there is a reversal of this expectation, with the team generally going into the menās environment and engaging with the men on their terms. This alters significantly the nature of the relationship that the team have with the men and the way the men use their services.
During the time that the HoM team have been working with funding from the Big Lottery Fund, researchers from the Centre for Menās Health at Leeds Metropolitan University have been exploring with the team and with the men who use their services the decision making that men go through in choosing to attend. The intention of the study was to uncover why it was that a man would access these alternative approaches as opposed to going to the traditional mainstream services on offer. The study involved interviews with boys and men who had used the services as well as fieldwork, where the researchers were present at the sessions run by the team to see what was happening at first-hand (White & Cash 2005). There were also interviews with the team members to get their perspective on what was being achieved, or not, and the latest phase of this study is to now seek the main stakeholdersā opinions on the service.
BOX 1.1 Key findings from team member interviews
āŖ The team tended not to discuss menās health in terms of disease processes or life expectancy, more in terms of lifestyle and public health issues such as smoking, alcohol and drugs.
āŖ Where health issues were identified as being particularly problematic for men, such as the issue of prostate and testicular cancer, hypertension, diabetes etc., these were from an educational or screening context rather than from a treatment perspective.
āŖ Men do care about their health, whether it be their physical, sexual or emotional health.
āŖ Men are more than willing to discuss issues such as fatherhood, relationship problems and other broader issues as well as their physical health, but men lack the opportunities to discuss these concerns with health professionals because they perceive the health service as a place you go to when you are āpoorlyā, or because of the social constraints placed on them through being a man.
āŖ The team did recognise that there was a difference between how younger men and older men saw their health and that there is a tendency for men to take the body for granted until age becomes a factor.
āŖ The use of āincentivesā (such as time out of work, free condoms, or special events) was very helpful in getting men and boys to access the services The team were able to link the men to other services, either to explain how the systems worked or through direct referral to the general practitioner (GP) etc.
āŖ It is important to be seen as a professional with expert knowledge and to be offering the services that men want.
The interviews with the team gave an insight not only into how they viewed the health of men and what did and didnāt work, but also the personal attributes that are required to undertake this form of work and to be successful in outreach work with men (see Box 1.1) (this theme is developed in Chapter 14).
From the interviews with the men and from the fieldwork there were findings that supported the views of the team (see Box 1.2).
BOX 1.2 Key findings from men
āŖ There was a perception that the GPs were an āillness serviceā where you went when āpoorlyā.
āŖ The men were reluctant to ābother the doctorā with what they perceived to be trivial or potentially embarrassing problems.
āŖ A common response was that they would āgo if it was neededā but the tendency was to āsee what it's like tomorrow'.
āŖ Some men seemed to have a lack of confidence in the doctorās ability, with a āwhat do they know?ā mentality being present.
āŖ The men did not see the GP surgery as a place they felt comfortable taking the kinds of issues that they would talk to the HoM team about.
āŖ There was anxiety in some of the younger men that the GPs were too close to their families, so that there was a strong possibility that parents or others might get to know that they had been to the surgery.
āŖ Health centres donāt fit with the way that men like to work ā men make more snap decisions. They worry about this ache or pain and when they do decide to do something about it they want to do it there and then, a spontaneity that is rare or diffi cult to manage at a health centre.
āŖ Health centres tend to close early and not open at the weekend, so there appear to be barriers to the working man in accessing clinics. This is a specifi c problem for men as they are more likely to be working full time, more likely to be working over 48 hours a week and less likely to have a job that involves fl exitime.
The picture that emerged was that by the way in which the team were structuring their services and by their own personal attributes they made it easier for the men to come forward and receive support that they acknowledge they wouldnāt have sought if that service wasnāt being provided.
A key factor in the work of the HoM team is that they were able to structure their services in a way that overcame some of the difficulties the men were experiencing in using conventional health care. For instance, some of the Asian lads interviewed were very worried that if they spoke to their GP their parents would find out and so they avoided going with anything other than a medical condition that would not cause them problems. With the provision of the anonymity of the Ladsā Room they felt safe in discussing issues relating to their sexual health.
The HoM services seemed to provide a safe space that enabled the men to feel more secure in coming forward for a health check and in part this appeared to be a result of the team working on the same wavelength and talking the same language as the men. This required the team to use strategies that made them and their messages sufficiently appealing so that the men were willing to take the risk of exposing their vulnerabilities to these strangers. In part, this was achieved by having the perseverance to be able to keep a service going whilst it developed a reputation within the local male community. It was also through the use of appropriate incentives, for instance handing out free condoms or arranging for the local lads to have weekends away. The team also went into the menās environment, which the men referred to as their ācomfort zoneā.