For Creative Geographies
eBook - ePub

For Creative Geographies

Geography, Visual Arts and the Making of Worlds

Harriet Hawkins

Share book
  1. 310 pages
  2. English
  3. ePUB (mobile friendly)
  4. Available on iOS & Android
eBook - ePub

For Creative Geographies

Geography, Visual Arts and the Making of Worlds

Harriet Hawkins

Book details
Book preview
Table of contents
Citations

About This Book

This book provides the first sustained critical exploration, and celebration, of the relationship between Geography and the contemporary Visual Arts. With the growth of research in the Geohumanities and the Spatial Humanities, there is an imperative to extend and deepen considerations of the form and import of geography-art relations. Such reflections are increasingly important as geography-art intersections come to encompass not only relationships built through interpretation, but also those built through shared practices, wherein geographers work as and with artists, curators and other creative practitioners. For Creative Geographies features seven diverse case studies of artists' works and exhibitions made towards the end of the twentieth and the beginning of the twentieth-first century. Organized into three analytic sections, the volume explores the role of art in the making of geographical knowledge; the growth of geographical perspectives as art world analytics; and shared explorations of the territory of the body, In doing so, Hawkins proposes an analytic framework for exploring questions of the geographical "work" art does, the value of geographical analytics in exploring the production and consumption of art, and the different forms of encounter that artworks develop, whether this be with their audiences, or their makers.

Frequently asked questions

How do I cancel my subscription?
Simply head over to the account section in settings and click on “Cancel Subscription” - it’s as simple as that. After you cancel, your membership will stay active for the remainder of the time you’ve paid for. Learn more here.
Can/how do I download books?
At the moment all of our mobile-responsive ePub books are available to download via the app. Most of our PDFs are also available to download and we're working on making the final remaining ones downloadable now. Learn more here.
What is the difference between the pricing plans?
Both plans give you full access to the library and all of Perlego’s features. The only differences are the price and subscription period: With the annual plan you’ll save around 30% compared to 12 months on the monthly plan.
What is Perlego?
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1 million books across 1000+ topics, we’ve got you covered! Learn more here.
Do you support text-to-speech?
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more here.
Is For Creative Geographies an online PDF/ePUB?
Yes, you can access For Creative Geographies by Harriet Hawkins in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in Ciencias sociales & Geografía humana. We have over one million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.

Information

Publisher
Routledge
Year
2013
ISBN
9781135139759

Part I Art and the Making/Transforming of Geography

DOI: 10.4324/9780203769283-2
“The descriptive geographer is nothing other than a landscape painter and a map drawer in words” (Wimmer 1885).1
“We expect of him (sic) that he should have in him something of the poet and the painter” (Younghusband 1920).2
“We shall not have a humanistic geography worthy of the claim until we have some of our most talented and sensitive scholars deeply engaged in the creation of the literature of the humanities. Geography will deserve to be called an art only when a substantial number of geographers become artists” (Meinig 1984).3

Introduction: Some Vignettes

In concluding his 1983 guest lecture to the Royal Geographical Society Annual General Meeting, held in Edinburgh, Scotland, Donald Meinig issued geographers a rallying call to creativity.4 This is not, he summarised, “a call for geographers to become novelists … it is a call only for greater openness, a clearing away of the pedantic barriers, for a toleration of geographical creativity wherever it may lead.”5 While he steps back from the brink of asking geographers to become creative practitioners, Meinig desired that the relationship between geography and the humanities become one that was more complex than that he was witnessing. In place of what he, and others in this era, saw to be a supplemental relationship wherein humanities offered the “spice” or “flavouring” for a geographical science, Meinig desired a more wholesome relationship. He saw in a disciplinary alignment with the arts ways for geography to grow, shape, and extend itself, until it could stand as much as one of the arts as one of the sciences. But, he noted for this to be the case, it was crucial that the discipline move beyond the arts “as a resource, something we borrow from rather than contribute to, something we use rather than something we create as part of the vocation of geography.”6
Opening this discussion of the place and possibilities of artistic practice in making and transforming geographical knowledge, will be a series of further short vignettes that between them start to explore the relationship between geography and the arts. Drawn from a number of presidential addresses and plenaries of the Association of American Geographers and the Royal Geographical Society (with Institute of British Geographers), these brief sketches serve to illustrate moments in what is a much longer, and often overlooked, history of relations between geography and the arts. To review this history in any depth is far beyond the scope of this text, but these selected moments serve to indicate some of the critical disciplinary work that these relations can be understood to do. Not least because, if nothing else, the place of the arts within these disciplinary addresses indicates the place and value that pondering geography-art relations has had at points of disciplinary self-reflection. As such, and whilst cognoscent of the dangers of reading too much into the place these addresses give to the arts, when set alongside contemporaneous examples of broader empirical work and thinking, they become a useful barometer of shifts within the discipline.7
In concluding his presidential address to the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers (30 December 1946), John Kirt-land Wright proposed a new subfield of geographical inquiry: geosophy.8 Geosophy was “the study of geographical knowledge from any or all points of view,” what “historiography is to history,” its focus was an attention to “the nature and expression of geographical knowledge both past and present.”9 Two features of J.K. Wright’s study stand out in the context of discussions of creative geographies. Firstly, in outlining who he counted as the producers of geographical knowledge Wright offers us an expanded field of geographers, moving beyond the “core” producers and concerns of “scientific geographical knowledge, or of geographical knowledge as it is otherwise systemized by geographers.”10 Indeed, Wright included artists amongst those who created geographical knowledge, arguing we should take into account “the whole peripheral realm,” covering:
Geographical ideas, both true and false, of all manner of people—not only geographers, but farmers and fishermen, businesses executives and poets, novelists and painters, Bedouins and Hottentots.11
Secondly, accompanying this broadening of the base of geographical praxis, Wright was also adamant that study should be made of what he termed “aesthetic geosophy,” in other words, “the study of the expression of geographical conceptualizations in literature and in art.”12 For Wright, the place of literature and arts within geography was, he considered, and as Keighren demonstrates, not a repudiation of the logical positivism of a scientistic geography; rather, he sought to enroll artists and others on the “periphery” into the core of geography’s scientific endeavor only if their work was to the advancement of the latter.13 Thus, Wright divides the arts three ways: into work he deems legitimate—work that is of no threat to scientific geography—work that he deems desirable, in other words art work that will contribute to the progression of scientific geography, and illegitimate work, which, by contrast, is seen to do damage, to undermine the coordinates of scientific knowledge and the discipline.
Moving forward forty odd years to Meinig and others of his era, we find a rather different set of relations cast between the arts and a scientistic geography. Meinig’s rallying cry for the arts was far from a lone call, for, as the quantitative revolution was waning, a (re)turn to the arts by geographers, and a recognition of the need to query and develop geography’s own artfulness was in the air. During his presidential address at the same 1983 RGS conference as that Meinig spoke at, John Wreford-Watson extolled the need to get in touch with the “soul” of geography.14 Taking the fifty-year anniversary of the founding of the Institute of British Geographers as an occasion to look back, he asserted the value of the arts against the systematic studies that had come, over the course of his career, to replace geography’s topographic tradition. His attention was a little different to Meinig’s, noting his interest less in “geography as literature, but to the value of literature for geography.”15 This was a value that, as his writings demonstrate, he “found in virtually every field, physical, human and regional,” and its source lay in how the arts “supplanted mere description” and, how in the face of an ever more rational discipline, “literature stresses those empirical traits geographers wanted most vehemently to escape … it was based in personal experience, whereas geography was marching forward to categorize abstractions.”16 Far from “mere” description for Wreford-Watson, the “images of America” created in literature, and “held in the American mind, were transforming the American Landscape,” artists and writers were thus “fashioners” and “perpetrators” of a form of geographical knowledge that reached far beyond the academy.17
Less than a year earlier, and 5,000-odd miles away in Los Angeles, John Fraser Hart had, in his presidential address to the 77th Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers, also deployed the arts to hit back against the forces of positivist science.18 He read the exclusionary scientism that the quantitative revolution had installed at the heart of the discipline as a damaging expression of disciplinary insecurities. Providing us with that well-known phrase “the highest form of the geographer’s art is the production of good regional geography—evocative descriptions that facilitate an understanding and appreciation of places, areas and regions,” Hart positioned the arts to enable an appreciation of regions as “subjective artistic devices,” in whose study a solely “scientific” approach would fall short.19 For Hart, at least, the arts as both a source, but also as representative of a particular epistemology, offered the “proper” means to assert a regional geography and to counter the ascension of disciplinary scientism.
Nearly thirty years later, Stephen Daniels, writing in a forum on the futures of cultural geography, tellingly detours the title of Peter Jackson’s careful interpretations of ideologies in Maps of Meaning, to explore the growing interest in “Maps of Making.”20 Daniels’ discussion, together with other contributions to the forum, point towards a (re)newed form of geography and arts engagement.21 Together these discussions would suggest that studies and practices of creative making have come to sit alongside the interpretative registers that had, in the intervening three decades, come to dominate geographical studies of the arts. This focus on making takes many forms: ranging from studies of processes of inspiration, and the spaces and sites of creative practice, to a growing interest in conducting creative practice-based research.22 For Daniels, the materiality of these making processes develops interesting parallels with older traditions of cultural geography concerned with the material making and shaping of landscapes and environments.23 For others, this contemporary proximity between geography and creative practice is celebrated for its enmeshing of different critical practices, and the coalescence of these practices around, a series of conceptual themes (e.g. place) or around critiques of knowledge, or by providing “beyond academy” impact. All of these different valuations of the arts of geography, are, as this section will develop, eminently traceable from longer histories of these interdisciplinary relations.24
Beginning this discussion with some very brief vignettes of the much longer history of geography-art relations has a number of benefits, primary amongst these being to situate this text’s study of creative geographies. For, despite the increasing popularity of geographers working with a range of forms of the arts, whether as interpreter and/or practitioner, very little attention has been paid to the historical underpinnings of these relationships. While the Introduction began the work of situating the creative geographies in this text in relation to the history of geography-art relations it did so through a relatively recent history. In the remainder of this introduction to Part 1 I want to offer, albeit in necessarily a curtailed manner, selected periods from a history of geography-arts engagements.
Offering even selected moments from the history of creative geographies aids in the exploration of the form and nature of contemporary geography-art intersections. While I am primarily interested here in geography-visual art relations, thinking historically also helps bring into view the more expansive field of the “geohumanities,” folding visual arts together with the arts more generally.25 Some commentators made a feature of parsing the singularities and differences between forms of arts practices (e.g., the value of written word versus the sketched/painted scene), while for others these differences are covered over and turned away from in more general “statementing” on the arts.26 These issues are further complicated by the need to remain aware of the changing nature of both art and geography. In other words, to reflect on these forms of practice and bodies of knowledge, and their sorting and grouping into disciplinary categories, as an ongoing, evolving process. Thus, as this discussion unfolds, it does so not only against the backdrop of the making of modern-day geography, but also the institutionalisation of a European academic arts scene and evolution of forms of artistic practice.
Clearly, it is beyond the scope of this text to develop a comprehensive aesthetic geosophy pace J.K. Wright, further, his particular formulation of geography-arts relations is arguably not necessarily the most helpful register with respect to their current configuration. For, I am less interested in taking preformed geographical conceptualisations—whatever these may beand finding them within the arts, as Wright suggests, rather I am concerned here with incidences where arts practices, of various different forms, have influenced the making and shaping of modern geography itself. In short, I am interested in how the arts, and in particular visual or fine art, have been deployed, often strategically, within the progression of geography, and concepts normally defined as geographical, within and without the academy. The discussion will focus on three particular issues wherein the critical potential of the arts with respect to epistemological questions and issues ideas of research practice and methods can be most clearly seen. Firstly, the arts as a form of geographical “data,” secondly, the arts as enabling ways to think about, but also to reconfigure the politics and relations of working with audiences and stakeholders beyond the academy. And, thirdly, the final section of this discussion will explore explicit instances where art has been deployed by geographers as the means to question disciplinary habits and posit new values in the face of normative methods and approaches. The two empirical chapters that follow this discussion take up these sets of ideas through their exploration of the politics and possibilities of exhibitions and installations with respect to the histories of geographical knowledge and our contemporary modes of knowledge production.

Art as Geographical Data Source

Reflecting, in the 1970s on the relationship between humanistic geography and the arts, Yi Fu ...

Table of contents