1. Consumer Science: A Historical Perspective
Sensory and consumer science emerged in the early half of the 20th century, mostly as a support tool to product development, to study perceptual reactions to ingredients, chemicals, and product modifications (Moskowitz, 2017). From its inception, scientists strived to make sensory science robust and valid by standardizing procedures and strengthening the ties to statistical sciences.
Sensory science rapidly grew in the second half of the 1990s, paralleling the growth of the food industry (Lawless & Heymann, 2010). The main methodological developments during those years were related to inferring differences between products, with the triangle test as one of the most popular methods (Helm & Trolle, 1946; Peryam & Swartz, 1950), as well as to describing the sensory qualities of products via various profiling methods, with quantitative descriptive analysis probably the most widespread method (Stone, Sidel, Oliver, Woolsey, & Singleton, 1974; Szczesniak, Loew, & Skinner, 1975). In addition, sensory scientists were also interested in understanding consumer perception, and started measuring consumer acceptability, or degree of liking. For this purpose, the 9-point hedonic scale, a cornerstone of our field, was developed (Jones, Peryam, & Thurstone, 1955; Peryam & Pilgrim, 1957). The end of the 20th century was all about âself-affirmation as a scientific discipline,â with the widespread dissemination of procedures for standardization, checking panel performance, and establishing correlations between chemical, instrumental, and sensory measurements. Moskowitz (2017) argues, in his opinion piece on trained and consumer panels, that descriptive analysis might have been an âinbuilt historical phase unavoidable in intellectual history.â
Sensory scientists thought that consumers could provide information only about how much they liked/disliked a product, so sensory information was obtained from trained assessors (Lawless & Heymann, 2010). When preference mapping emerged (Carroll, 1972; Horsfield & Taylor, 1976; MacFie, 2007), it provided researchers, particularly from industrial research and design, with a great tool for product optimization by linking trained panel data to consumer appreciation. However, research showed that consumers were able to accurately evaluate the sensory characteristics of products (Ares & Varela, 2017), which prompted the development of new methodological approaches based on consumer perception. Product development research started, slowly but increasingly faster, to use optimization techniques based on consumer input, such as âjust-about-rightâ scales (Popper, 2014), the ideal profile method (Worch, LĂȘ, Punter, & PagĂšs, 2013), or âcheck-all-that-applyâ-based optimization (Ares, Dauber, FernĂĄndez, GimĂ©nez, & Varela, 2014; Plaehn, 2012). Davide Giacalone, in Chapter 7, Product Performance Optimization, gives a thorough overview of the recent advances in the use of consumer-based methodologies for product development and optimization.
Going back to the historical perspective, most of the developments that occurred in consumer science during the late 1990s were related to trying to answer innumerable questions about how consumers perceive products, how they choose, and why they prefer what they prefer. However, hedonic perception remained the focus of consumer research, and the sensory characteristics of products continued to play a key role in the field. In this regard, Chapter 2, Complexity of Consumer Perception, by Ep Koster and Jos Mojet, provides an overview of when consumer researchers started questioning the focus on this structuralist, static view of sensory properties as a driver of all consumer perceptions, as well as why and how they started to look into additional variables underlying food choice.
1.1. Understanding Perception
Understanding perception has had a key role in the historical development of sensory and consumer science. Different areas of knowledge have focused on different aspects of perception. Psychophysics was developed in the late 19th century and can be regarded as a precursor of experimental psychology. These two areas of knowledge provided the basis for many of the consumer methods that are used today. Interestingly, psychophysics and sensory evaluation developed very much in parallel, sharing many techniques: one studying the person and the other focusing on the product (Lawless & Heymann, 2010). Anatomy, physiology, and genetics followed perception from a functional perspective, looking further than physical bases and going into functional consequences, such as adaptation, suppression, chemosensory integration, and multimodal interaction. Research in this field opened the door to understanding how some individuals live in a particularly intense taste world: perceiving more intense tastes, feeling more burn from pungent foods, being more sensitive to creaminess, and also experiencing more intense oral pain (Bartoshuk, 2000). Although the concept of âdifferent taste worldsâ produced by genetic variation was first introduced by Blakeslee and Fox in 1932, the development of psychophysical tools in the last half of the 20th century allowed the discovery of supertasters and their relation to genetic variation. Chapter 16, Oral Processing: Implications for Consumer Choice and Preferences by Lina Engelen, and Chapter 17, Consumer Segmentation Based on Genetic Variation in Taste and Smell by Mari Sandell, Ulla Hoppu, and Oskar Laaksonen, give an updated look into the physiological and genetic bases of consumer perception and preferences. These individual differences in perception have been increasingly recognized as more than noise in the data, and they have been recognized as drivers of food behaviors. In this sense, Chapter 10, Affect-Based Discrimination Methods by John Prescott, reports that consumers probably select foods partly based on their individual phenotypes and discusses the importance of acknowledging this in consumer testing. Prescott focuses on discrimination methods that have been adapted for studying affective-based decision-making, such as rejection threshold and the authen...