eBook - ePub
Inside Campaigns
Elections through the Eyes of Political Professionals
William J. Feltus, Kenneth M. Goldstein, Matthew J. (Jeremy) Dallek
This is a test
Share book
- 368 pages
- English
- ePUB (mobile friendly)
- Available on iOS & Android
eBook - ePub
Inside Campaigns
Elections through the Eyes of Political Professionals
William J. Feltus, Kenneth M. Goldstein, Matthew J. (Jeremy) Dallek
Book details
Book preview
Table of contents
Citations
About This Book
Take your students on a journey into the world of campaign managers. Powered by scores of interviews and surveys of political professionals, the book considers the purpose, potency, and poetry of modern political campaigns in the US.
Frequently asked questions
How do I cancel my subscription?
Can/how do I download books?
At the moment all of our mobile-responsive ePub books are available to download via the app. Most of our PDFs are also available to download and we're working on making the final remaining ones downloadable now. Learn more here.
What is the difference between the pricing plans?
Both plans give you full access to the library and all of Perlegoâs features. The only differences are the price and subscription period: With the annual plan youâll save around 30% compared to 12 months on the monthly plan.
What is Perlego?
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1 million books across 1000+ topics, weâve got you covered! Learn more here.
Do you support text-to-speech?
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more here.
Is Inside Campaigns an online PDF/ePUB?
Yes, you can access Inside Campaigns by William J. Feltus, Kenneth M. Goldstein, Matthew J. (Jeremy) Dallek in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in Politics & International Relations & Political Campaigns & Elections. We have over one million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.
Information
1 Losing and Winning The Craft and Science of Political Campaigns
There are three people that I want to acknowledge tonight because if it wasnât for them, we would not be here . . . whenever the history is written about Alabama politics, remember those names, Giles Perkins, Doug Turner and Joe Trippi.âDemocratic US senator-elect Doug Jones credited his upset victory to his campaign managers in a nationally televised victory speech on the evening of December 12, 2017.1
Political campaigns are like new restaurants: Most of them will fail. Of the more than 140 campaign managers we interviewed for this book, nearly all had lost electionsâand many of them more than once. Even the most experienced and successful campaign manager can lose unexpectedly and even spectacularly.
Consider the case of a campaign manager we will call âTW.â For three decades, he managed his candidateâhis client and his best friendârising from the New York legislature, to the governorâs mansion, and on to the US Senate.2 Along the way, TW had worked for other candidates who were nominated for or won the presidency.3 TWâs skills as a campaign manager had earned him national renown and a very comfortable living. He was the undisputed American political wizard behind the curtain.
Now at the peak of his craft, TW was in Chicago at the Republican Partyâs nominating convention. His client of thirty years was the front-runner to win the nomination. TW was so certain of the result that he had sent his candidate out of the country on a preconvention tour of European capitals. The news media and the buzz on the convention floor held that TWâs candidate was assured the nomination. But when the voting finally got under way, TW and his candidate were stunned when they led the first roll call with only 37 percent of the delegates and were forced into a second ballot.4 The aura of inevitability so carefully cultivated with the media and party leaders began to dissipate, and there was no Plan B. On the third ballot, a dark-horse candidate wrested the nomination from TWâs grasp.5 The political wizard was no more.
The dark-horse candidate was Abraham Lincoln, and the year was 1860 (see Figure 1.1).6 It was only the second national convention for the Republican Party, and Senator William H. Seward of New York had been expected to emerge with the nomination. Sewardâs manager was fellow New Yorker Thurlow Weed, who had earlier worked on the presidential campaigns of William Henry Harrison (1840), Henry Clay (1844), Zachary Taylor (1848), Winfield Scott (1852), and John Charles Fremont (1856).
Weed was a national figure, but even the most successful managers rarely achieve that status. This book is not about celebrity campaign managers and consultants who achieve notoriety on presidential campaignsâalthough weâve interviewed a number of those. Instead, we aggregate the insights of a wide swath of people who have run winning and losing races for both parties and at all levels of politicsâfrom the courthouse to the White House.
The managers we heard from share a number of common traits and skills, including the ability to play multiple roles in the pursuit of victory on election day. And, in this book, we examine the many responsibilities, decisions, and experiences that managers canâalthough donât alwaysâuse to drive the success or failure of campaigns. This is not a how-to handbook but instead the collected insights from scores of political professionals, supplemented with our own knowledge of campaign mechanics and core scholarly findings about the fundamental factors that influence campaigns and elections in America. Through this synthesis, we can gain not only a greater understanding of what managers do and the array of roles they play but also the workings of the most important mechanism in a democracyâfree and fair elections.
A Tale of Two Managers
The science and mechanics of political campaigns have changed since Weedâs heyday. Yet many of Weedâs skills remain essential in twenty-first-century electoral politics. For example, compare Weed to President Barack Obamaâs adviser David Axelrod, one of todayâs best-known political strategists.
Before entering politics, both Weed7 and Axelrod8 worked in the newspaper business where they learned the degree to which the news media can shape public opinion. During Weedâs career, the printed newspaper was king. In his media world, all newspapers were partisan organs like todayâs Fox News Channel, Drudge Report, MSNBC, or the Huffington Post. With almost no formal schooling, Weed started out as a teenage typesetter and press operator for the Albany Register in the state capital.9 There, he learned the ways of the political machine that ran the state legislature and government offices of New York. Much like todayâs political bloggers, Weed launched his own Evening Journal in 1830, using the paper and his bylined column to first support the Anti-Mason Party, then the Whig Party, before finally joining the newly formed Republican Party in 1856 in opposition to the Southern-dominated Democratic Party.10
Senator Seward himself said, âWeed is Seward, and Seward is Weed, each approves of what the other says or does.â11 No candidate today would publicly say such a thing, but trust and mutual dependence between candidate and manager remains essential in politics. Even after the wrenching 1860 defeat in Chicago, Seward reached out to console Weed and sustain their relationship. âYou have my unbounded gratitude for this last [campaign], as for the whole life of efforts in my behalf. I wish that I was sure that your sense of disappointment is as light as my own,â Seward wrote in a letter to Weed after their 1860 defeat in Chicago.12
After losing the 1860 Republican nomination to Abraham Lincoln, Seward and Weed both became actively involved in Lincolnâs general election campaign. Seward went on to serve as Lincolnâs secretary of state.13 Weed also continued to be politically involved. In fact, Lincoln asked for Weedâs help in supporting Republicans in the 1862 congressional elections.14
Like Weed, Axelrodâs first job was at a newspaper. After graduating from the University of Chicago in 1977, Axelrod worked for the Chicago Tribune, becoming the paperâs youngest political writer before leaving journalism and joining the 1984 Illinois campaign of Democratic candidate Paul Simon for the US Senate.15 After starting as communications director, Axelrod eventually was named campaign manager. The underdog Simon went on to upset the popular three-term Republican incumbent, Senator Charles Percy, in a year when Republican Ronald Reagan carried Illinois and every other state except Minnesota. In the same state where Weed lost his final campaign, Axelrod won his first.
Journalism made Axelrod a better manager and strategist, he says now. âBecause so much of what modern campaigns involve is about message and communications, having been a journalist was helpful to me.â He added, âWhen I was parachuted into campaigns as a reporter, I went in with some presumptions. But to me the job was to get on the ground and really understand what the political terrain was . . . to figure out what people were thinking, what voters were thinking. Those skills were very helpful as a strategist and as a manager.â16
Those skills came up short in 1988 when Axelrod, now playing the role of campaign consultant instead of manager, was the chief strategist for Senator Paul Simonâs (D-IL) campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination. Simonâs campaign gained early momentum with a stronger than expected second-place finish in Iowa, the first round of the nomination contest. But, in the next round, Simon lacked the cash to put Axelrodâs television ads on the air in New Hampshire, which includes the expensive Boston media market. Simon came in third in the Granite State behind eventual nominee Governor Michael Dukakis of neighboring Massachusetts.
Axelrod also lost with his next presidential candidate, Senator John Edwards (D-NC). It wasnât until the third try that an Axelrod client made it to the White House. âYou have to choose your candidates well . . . . But you also have to go in knowing that none of that guarantees victory in a very dynamic process in which so many factors can impact on the outcome,â said Axelrod. âYouâre never as smart as you look when you win, and never as dumb as you look when you lose.â17
Learning and Experimenting
After President Obamaâs 2012 campaign outmaneuvered challenger Mitt Romney, the postelection coverage and conversation was dominated by talk of how much more sophisticated Democrats were with modern campaign mechanics and tools like big-data analytics. And, when it came to the use of the Internet, just about everybody thought the Democ...