I Sarpam Tullal: A Ritualistic Performance of Kerala
Vayala Vasudevan Pillai
India is a country with innumerable forms of performing arts. A review of the vast panorama of our performing culture across the length and breadth of the country shows us an amazing number of well-known classical forms as well as uncountable lesser-known folk forms. These traditions, whether āgreatā or ālittleā, have contributed significantly to the cultural identity, creativity and development of the nation. It is this creative life which gave Indian folk an alternative for social expression, found in their ecstatic body movements, their singing, their expression of colour combination and rhythm, their use of musical instruments, their creativity in modelling gods, demons and humans of their imagination and acquaintance, etc. All these were integrated into a wholesome way of life, not as a particular art form for a certain commercial purpose.
This way of life was also their worldview, which was a strong fortress against all foreign or alien invasions. Here the terms āforeignā or āalienā stand for the socio-cultural and political structures within the country which they were either unable to understand or which relegated them. Thus the folk living close to nature, following their instinctive ways in habitual conditions prescribed by the wild earth, sky and all other natural elements, were branded as untouchable, black, primitive and uncivilised. But studies have shown that there have been close networks of organic relationships among the artistic performances of these untouchables or outcastes all over India. They, in fact, have drawn on the rich traditions flowing from the Vedas, Upanishads, Ramayana, Mahabharata and other major traditions. It was a living tradition creative enough to hold the downtrodden communities together against oppression inflicted by the upper castes and against natural calamities. This tradition has survived through oral practices necessitated by their linguistic, ecological and agricultural conditions.1 These folk forms, whether music, dance, sculpture, painting or modelling, have been a source of sustenance for the practitioners.
Traditional performances present a complex structure of meaning, which is multilayered and multifaceted. It cannot be explained away as simple, lucid, folk, etc. Far from being simple and narrow, it codifies a system of living which speaks of the performerās link with many phenomena of life, both natural and created. It relates to their sense of independence, courage and readiness during an emergency and in the face of all sorts of onslaughts by forces superior to theirs. The energy created by these performances pervades the entire life system of belief, sacrifice, propitiation, fertility, longevity, salvation and liberation from the shackles of illness, drought, starvation and sin. Thus, a performance stands for a spiritual declaration of freedom and is, in a way, a rebirth for both the performer and the spectator.
These performances are classified as tribal, folk and classical depending upon the style, rules and the method of imparting instructions. But a closer analysis will show that all these are knowingly or unknowingly interrelated, and while maintaining their own social identity, have, over time, drawn on other forms for their own development. The issue to be considered today is how far these performers have been able to maintain their identity against the new trends in a changing society brought about by modernisation and globalisation.
An interesting aspect is that in spite of cultural conflicts at one level and unity in other spheres, the ālow-casteā performers played a significant role in the total structuring of Indian society and arts. In a way it is this ādark forceā as the primeval energy which invigorates India even today. That is why scholars like Kapila Vatsyayan endorse the organic link between the folk and the classical Sanskrit traditions:2 āFor a fuller understanding of the Indian artistic tradition one must remember that the evidence from all these sources of high classical literature bears testimony as much to a flourishing, collective, participative, tribal-rural-cultural as to a highly esoteric, closed, sophisticated cultureā (Vatsyayan 1977: 15ā18).
The two go hand in hand, reinforcing and supplementing each other, rather than mutually negating. The performances of the āfolkā or the weaker sections were a source of education for their community. They used different means such as folktales, parables, proverbs, folklore, songs and a vast area of knowledge embedded in the oral tradition from time immemorial, thus unravelling the inner pattern and motive of Indian society.
The folk performances of India have been highly enriched by regional variations, and those from Kerala are no exception. Kerala has the oldest Sanskrit tradition of theatre-acting still preserved in the form of koodiyattam performed by the Chakiars, a t...