1
Falling Apart
A REMEDY
I dedicated a week to intentional falling, in a dance studio, in 2013. For three hours each day, I fell down: slowly at first, then gradually getting faster, then tumbling, crashing and sliding, my body finding its confidence and becoming looser and freer as the week progressed. I fell while standing still, from chairs and from walking, running and rolling down stairs. I felt tired, bruised but exhilarated. After five days I stood still in the studio and imagined myself falling, remembering in my body the distance, energy, impact and sensations of dropping to the ground. I did not need to keep falling to know I could fall. I was standing up, but with the sensations of letting go always present. My body, gravity and the ground were interconnected. I experienced a state of continuously dropping while standing still. Falling was now âimprinted and distilled as a sense and remembered on my body as potencyâ (Claid 2018).
âPotencyâ is a term I appropriate from homeopathy and homeopathic remedies. The British Homeopathic Association describes homeopathy as âa form of holistic medicine ⊠based on the principle of âlike cures likeâ â in other words, a substance taken in small amounts will cure the same symptoms it causes if it was taken in large amountsâ (Hahnemann [1842] 2001). The amounts are, in fact, minuscule. The remedies are diluted and vigorously shaken until the original substance has all but disappeared, a process called âpotentizationâ. A homeopathic remedy is a form of potency.
My week in the studio led me through a similar process of potentization. As the week continued and I fell less, I was diluting falling until I was left with an infinitesimal sense of surrendering my weight to the force of gravity. I was forming a potency â diluted from extensive repetitions â as a remedy for my fears of falling. Living with the potency of gravity as an embodied experience mitigates my psychological fears, especially as I get older, and helps me reconsider the top-down polarity of values enshrined in many linguistic metaphors.
UP IS GOOD
âFallingâ, as a verb, adjective and noun, infuses the English language, conceptually, metaphorically and psychologically. The addition of another word creates meaning other than literal, physical falling: falling apart, falling asleep, falling ill, falling over yourself, falling pregnant, falling about laughing and falling in â and out of â line. Falling in love conjures the notion of swooning: passing out, fainting or being overcome with emotion.
Through a metaphorical, conceptual medium â such as the English language â âwe understand things in terms of other things. Concepts are metaphorically structured ⊠Every experience takes place within a vast background of cultural presuppositionsâ (Lakoff and Johnson 1980: 56â7). In English, the conceptual understanding of space is often framed by human motor functions. Perhaps the most basic example is that standing is up and falling is down. Emotions are also often processed through metaphor, especially those where motor functions serve as vehicles for conveying meaning. Because falls are considered by definition dangerous and painful, falling is both metaphorically and conceptually associated with negative emotions. In Western culture, as a result, standing up is happy, falling down is sad (Lakoff and Johnson 1980). These spatial orientations structure other sets of binary values: good is up, bad is down, brightness up, gloom down, rationality both up and good, emotional behaviour both down and bad. Linguistic theorist ZoltĂĄn Kövecses develops the theme: âControl is up, lack of control is down: Iâm on top of the situation. He is under my control. That was a low-down thing to do. Sheâs an upstanding citizen, the discussion fell to an emotional level. He couldnât rise above his emotionsâ (2000: 36).
Synchronized with language, Western culture persists in an endeavour to rise, to resist falling, to strive towards institutional control, upwardly focused verticality, linearity and steadfast uprightness, pinned up by morality, spirituality, propriety and virtue. The metaphorical binary from rising to falling infiltrates aesthetics, religion, psychology, economics and race relations. Being bigger, stronger, more knowledgeable, and moving forward in time are associated with growing up and considered to be life-giving and positive. Upward-ness is structured through social hierarchies; getting to the top is the goal, associated with pride, class, economic success. Rise to new heights, aspire to lofty status within halls of academia, achieve flights of excellence, become high flyers. Western culture is immersed in positive rising. Heights of wealth and happiness are measured in rising pop charts, commodity sales, wealth registers, interest rates, careers and each countryâs economic status.
Contrarily, sinking to the lowest of the low, feeling down in the dumps, being down-and-out or dirt-poor, plumbing new depths, being labelled as a fallen woman, falling from grace â these phrases appropriate falling as a metaphor for failure and shame. Economic depression is inundated with falling metaphors: crash, deflation, downturn, plunge, collapse, slump, plummeting demand. Social, political and economic success depends on rising, not falling, and a persistent binary of positive/negative flourishes between the two terms.1
Within the confines of Western civilization, there is universal agreement, a world view, a cosmology, that up is good and down is bad. This cosmology is deeply embedded in religious mythology and metaphor. Christianity abounds with falling myths â Adam and Eve, Satan â and narratives that foster a notion of a good self as pre-existent, divinely created, an essence given by God. Across the world, East and West, goodness â god-ness â has been associated with sun, sky, moon and stars. Most readers will agree that religions have developed underworld narratives, where evil, dark and hellish events occur. In religious art, failing goodness is depicted as falling, affirming goodness as transcendent.
These values are consistently reinforced through linguistic repetition and in turn influence peopleâs daily lives and outlook, movements and social interactions. Embodying upward-ness as a life well led, means falling is smeared with fear, failure, vulnerability, uncertainty and shame. Minds and bodies are trained not to fall, producing fixed resistance in human bodies to their otherwise fluidly kinaesthetic responses to gravity and the environment. Through the entwining of body and language, movement and metaphor, Western culture has developed an attachment to physical and psychological upward-ness that denies the potential of falling and failure as creative sources for being present in the world.
An acknowledgement of the perpetually interwoven relations between language, metaphor and human movements, and a reconsideration of ways of moving, can potentially both influence language and reconfigure the values given to up and down. Change is happening. For instance, the North American phrases âgetting downâ, a metaphor for enthusiastic engagement with something, and âIâm down with thatâ, meaning positive agreement, have now entered the English lexicon. Both emerge from black American culture and demonstrate not only the relationship between movement and metaphor but also the importance of creative interdependence of cultural differences, as ways of changing the values given to linguistic metaphors.
The earth is indifferent to falling and rising. It doesnât care to rise and fall. It rises and falls all the time â mountains, cliffs, coastal paths â but it doesnât have a feeling about this. Thatâs what we bring to the equation.
HALLETT and SMITH 2017: 30
SUPREME FEATS
I arrive in Manhattan in 1969, plunging into a marijuana-flowering, hippie-wandering, bedraggled, hot, multi-cultural Lower East Side. I lodge in a nineteenth-century tenement block. Six heavy locks decorate the front door; the kitchen sideboard hinges upwards to reveal a bath; dark sweltering rooms are divided with bead curtains. Cockroaches chatter incessantly every dawn and dusk, tut-tutting about sharing space with humans. I had been offered a scholarship at the Martha Graham School: free dance classes in return for looking after Marthaâs garden â the school backyard. Apparently, English girls know about gardens. I had mentioned something about tying daffodil stalks together when they finish flowering so that the plants grow straight up the following year. That had been enough to award me the scholarship.
In the daily class, I am wearing leotard and footless tights, sitting on the floor in a studio â with pieces of Noguchi furniture stacked in the corners. Martha is teaching. We begin with our feet drawn in, knees dropped outwards, hands clasping ankles, furiously contracting our torsos, spines curved over, eyes focused on the pelvis. Martha speaks. âAs you release, you call out I AM.â We all obligingly release our spines upwards, stretch our legs out wide to the side, feet pointed, knees locked, buttocks clenched. We open our arms out the side, palms up, backs arched, chests to the ceiling. In high release, pushing off the floor with all our earnest might, we murmur âI AMâ. We repeat the gesture again and again until the room resounds with voices proclaiming âI AMâ in coordination with movements of ecstatic physical release. The idea that I can take up space in this way is an adrenalin-filled and seductive scenario after years of classical ballet. I am struck by how muscular tension and gestural power inspire me with a sense of agency.
Embodying daily imposed ritualistic movements of individual hedonism is how I learnt Marthaâs falls, which she worked on for fifty years: ârefining complex ways to descend and ascend ⊠they grew astonishingly beautiful, varied and complexâ (de Mille 1991: 101). To execute Marthaâs classic fall requires momentous effort, technical rigour and an ability to retain complex choreography, as the following description suggests.
Begin standing with feet in balletic first position. Take a deep plié (knee bend), arms lifting sideways to overhead. In plié, contract your pelvis, and as you contract, your left knee turns inwards to meet the right knee and your hands clasp overhead. Turn your left foot over so that the instep meets the floor and reach high into your clasped hands. Remain in contraction and lower your body onto the left hip and thigh, but do not let your knees touch the floor. Deepen your contraction while folding your upper body over your folded legs, arms sweeping down to complete the curve. Release by lengthening your torso flat like a plank on its side, knees bent, arms down, one under your body, one above. Contract again, curving your back onto the floor, knees still bent, arms stretched out parallel to your body with hands cupped. Your head is arched back onto the floor so that you are looking to the ceiling. This is the lowest point of the fall. From here a further series of complex movements bring you back up to standing. The final movement is a lunge forward onto your left leg on a diagonal, foot parallel, weight shifted into left hip. Your body turns to face front, twisted in opposition to your left leg and you look backward towards your right foot.
Graham technique has standing, sitting and travelling falls, as well as forward, back, side and split falls, all requiring different physical requirements (Graff 2004). There are attack falls, which hit the floor, and dramatic falls where narratives affect their quality. There are knee falls and âdead manâ falls â four stilted zombie-like walking steps before a split fall â and the spiral fall. Even though Martha writes that âno real dancer I know learns countsâ (Graham 1991: 243), in class these falls were practised on counts, each count dictating a shift in gesture towards, and away from, the ground, emphasizing the control required to accomplish a successful fall.
No movements in the Graham technique yield to gravity without excessive resistance in the opposite direction. âThe bodyâs energies are never (or rarely) allowed to seep into the floor, but remain gathered, mobilized for a quick recovery, a renewal of the power of the dancer. In Graham technique, the fall is rarely a true surrenderâ (Graff 2004: 3). By 1969, when I was there, falls had been incorporated into training, practised in isolation, set apart from other phrases of movement, usually at ...