PART I
Revealing the Total Job Role
1 Purpose at Work: The Two Journeys
Norman Lear is a renowned American television writer and producer behind many of the 1970sā most popular sitcoms, including All in the Family, Sanford and Son, and The Jeffersons. He is also known for his profound comments about how the desire to lead a more purposeful life, to search for ultimate meanings, is a central theme of the human experience.
āI think that weāre on two journeys,ā observed Mr. Lear. āWe are on a horizontal journey, and we are on a vertical journey. A horizontal journey is, Iām studying this, Iām studying that, Iām learning more about all of these things as life goes on. The vertical journey is into oneself and into the meaning of oneself and oneās being. That is the longer, I find, and perhaps more rewarding in a spiritual sense, [the] more rewarding journey.ā1
That imagery resonates with me. I think heās right that there are two journeys: a journey of self-improvement and a journey of self-discovery. The latter journey is the one that (ideally) leads you to your existential purpose in life.
It is healthy to be introspective and to think deeply about the purpose of your life. People who self-reflect, determine where their passions lie, and crystalize a purpose for their life tend to concentrate their effort and energy on what matters most. A clear purpose provides a foundation on which to base decisions, allocate your time, and use your resources. And there are documented health benefits for those who cite having a clear purpose about what makes their lives meaningful, such as fewer strokes and heart attacks, better sleep, and a lower risk of dementia.2 People with a sense of purpose, a sense of control, and a feeling that what they do is worthwhile, also tend to live longer.3
That said, most people are unaware of their purpose in life. Only around 25 percent of Americans cite having a clear sense of purpose about what makes their lives meaningful.4 They havenāt done the work or, more accurately, they are unaware of the work to be done to discover their purpose. And those who are attuned to their lifeās purpose may spend a lifetime coaxing it out of the universe.
Although a good chunk of us may never discover our existential purpose in life, thatās not true for organizations. They have a responsibility to identify and articulate their purpose from their beginnings, usually in the form of mission, vision, and purpose statements. Organizations must be intentional about their purpose, communicate it to employees at all levels of the organization, and imbue it in every process, including job design, employee selection, onboarding, and performance management.
In contrast to much that has been written on the topic, I disagree that organizations should endeavor to align their employeesā life purpose with their purpose at work. Itās not that itās impossible. But it is exceedingly difficult, costly, and time-consuming, not to mention presumptuous, as Iāll explain. Especially in industries that experience high turnover and labor shortages, attempting to align employeesā life purpose with the purpose of their job role is an exercise in futility.
There are, as always, exceptions. One American health care company uses an app for its people to make connections between their personal values and life purpose and the values and purpose of the organization. An Asian insurance company devotes time in its leadership programs to reflect on the link between employeesā individual life purpose and that of the corporation. And in an effort to reexamine its purpose, a Scandinavian bank listened to more than seven thousand people in and around its organization over a period of six months in workshops, via online surveys, and in more than 1,500 coffee corner discussions.5 If your organization has the time and expertise to execute similar initiatives and feels it is the best use of your limited resources, then donāt let me discourage you. In this book, however, my focus will be on purpose at work, not life purpose. Specifically, I will challenge you to articulate for your employees a credible job purpose and to make it an actionable part of their job roles.
Part I, āRevealing the Total Job Role,ā consists of chapters 1 and 2. The objective of chapter 1 is for the reader to be able to distinguish between peopleās existential life purpose and their purpose at work. These are often melded to form a single convoluted and inaccurate view of oneās purpose at work. The objective of chapter 2, āThe Anatomy of a Job Role,ā is for the reader to be able to reveal the totality of an employeeās job role, which includes two dimensions and three parts. Here, I will illustrate how job purpose completes the third, often overlooked, element of every job role.
JOB PURPOSE VERSUS LIFE PURPOSE
Job purpose is a job roleās reason for being. It unifies team members by clarifying their single highest priority at work and pointing them toward an aspirational goal. For example, the job purpose of servers at a high-end restaurant might be to surprise and delight every customer. Think about your own experience as a diner. Can you recall an evening when an interesting chefās taste was brought to your table, or an engaged sommelier made connections between your global travels and the region from which the wine you chose originated? Or when you had a tableside chat with a charming restaurant manager, received a complimentary dessert and, perhaps, even a card signed by the staff on your birthday? Or when your conscientious server directed you to the gluten-free options or recommended that the kitchen hold the beurre blanc sauce to accommodate your intolerance for dairy?
There is a tendency to be overly literal in ascribing a job roleās purpose by suggesting, for example, that a housekeeperās job purpose must be linked to cleanliness, a flight attendantās job purpose must pertain to safety, and an accountantās job purpose must relate to accuracy. A job roleās purpose is not the technical or literal reason a job role exists in the same way that oneās life purpose is not merely to continue breathing. A job purpose is a roleās aspirational reason for being. Itās the job roleās North Star.
Although there is merit to examining both job and life purpose, anticipating a match is not realistic. It is presumptuous, even arrogant, to expect that employeesā life purpose will align with their purpose at work and that the degree to which thereās a match, indicates a good fit. To expect alignment ignores the fact that oneās life purpose is intensely personal and unknowable to many employers. Oneās life purpose is unique, even singular. As Viktor Frankl wrote in Manās Search for Meaning: āLife ultimately means taking the responsibility to find the right answer to its problems and to fulfill the tasks which it constantly sets for each individual. These tasks, and therefore the meaning of life, differ from [person to person] and from moment to moment.ā6 He concludes that a personās search for meaning āis unique and specific in that it must and can be fulfilled by [him or her] alone.ā7
Now letās say someone has done the work and that after hours of contemplation and weeks of rewrites, arrives at the following statement of purpose for their life: āMy lifeās purpose is to live my truth, uninhibited by fear, and to live authentically.ā
I doubt that this life purpose, which is not an outlier, is aligned with the purposes of most organizations. This reality should not disqualify this person from having a rewarding career at a company whose purpose does not include references to truth, fearlessness, or authenticity.
You may be thinking, āBut what about a calling? Doesnāt that imply alignment between oneās life and job purpose?ā It might be useful at this juncture to clarify some terms that often get blurred in these discussions:
ā¢ A hobby or avocation (elective) you do for enjoyment. Itās fun.
ā¢ A job (necessity), whether or not itās enjoyable and fulfilling, you do in order to earn money to pay for things.
ā¢ A career (status) is an occupation that is undertaken for a significant period of your life. Itās rewarding to the extent that itās enjoyable, fulfilling, and affirming.
ā¢ A vocation (meaning) is a sacred calling and is not dependent on anyone else. Unlike a job, it cannot be taken away from you. A symphony might lose its funding, an art studio might close, and a publication may cease printing. Nevertheless, as Abraham Maslow wrote, āA musician must make music, an artist must paint, a poet must write, if he is to be ultimately happy.ā8
And now, to answer the question above: Yes, I do believe a personās job purpose and calling, or vocation, can be one and the same. However, they donāt have to be for an employee to be engaged and fulfilled at work. And, most importantly, companies shouldnāt expect it or even strive for it. As Derek Thompson observed in The Atlantic, āItās hard to self-actualize on the job if youāre a cashierāone of the most common occupations in the USāand even the best white-collar roles have long periods of stasis, boredom, or busywork.ā9 The overwhelming majority of employees come to work to trade their time for compensation. In other words, they have a jobānot a calling. And thatās okay. Their work can still be purposeful.
People have limitless imagination with which to imbue their work with meaning and purpose. You might recall the oft-told story about the mason who did not see his job as laying bricks, but rather as building a cathedral. Or the tale of the janitor at NASA who told President Kennedy that he did not see his job as mopping floors, but rather as helping to send a man to the moon. These stories show that a fulfilling job purpose is not reserved for the arts or sacred callings. It is also not limited to volunteer or cause organizations, nonprofits, or B Corporations that aspire to balance profit and purpose. No matter the job role, articulating its purpose can lead to greater engagement within the role and organization.
To return to Mr. Learās two journeys, think of your own life in terms of a horizontal journey of self-improvement and a vertical journey of self-discovery. These journeys are concurrent. You are on both journeys even while youāre at work or reading a book like this one that is intended for self-development. What distinguishes these journeys is that only one of them is readily available to your employer. For instance, when you are in nature contemplating your existential purpose in life, you are primarily on a vertical journey āinto the meaning of oneself and oneās being.ā Here you may be alone, and your reflections and discoveries are deeply personal. When you are at work, however, you are primarily on a horizontal journey āstudying this, studying that, and learning more about all of these things.ā Your coworkers are also on their own journeys. Although their vertical journey of self-discovery is private and inaccessible (unless they choose to share it), their horizontal journey of self-improvement is awaiting your input and guidance.
Itās my ambition, with this book, to focus on the horizontal journey, the very real opportunities that managers and leaders have to influence their employeesā journey of self-development at work, improve business outcomes, and inspire greater employee engagement.
EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT AND JOB PURPOSE
Itās no secret that most employees are disengaged at work. The same troubling statistics are compiled and released monthly by Gallup and other workplace analytics companies. As of this writing, the latest Gallup survey found that only 36 percent of employees are engaged at work.10 And the situation is even more bleak internationally, with global employee engagement decreasing by 2 percentage points from 2019 to 2020 to only 20 percent. Employee engagement in Latin America and the Caribbean averaged 24 percent, Southeast Asia averaged 23 percent, Eastern Europe 21 percent, Australia and New Zealand 20 percent, and Middle East and North Africa 16 percent.11 The UK and Western Europe have the lowest employee engagement levels globally at just 11 percent.12
Gallupās analysis of US employee engagement reveals that gains have been made over the past two decades as corporations invested in engagement surveys, employee wellness programs, and other levers designed to increase employee engagement and retention. Even so, are we really content with only a third of American workers being highly involved in, enthusiastic about, and committed to their work and workplace while the other two-thirds are either not engaged or, worse, actively disengaged. Employees who are not engaged are psychologically unattached to their work and company. These employees put time, but not energy or passion, into their work. They typically show up to work and contribute the minimum effort required. They are also on the lookout for better employment opportunities and will quickly leave their company for a slightly better offer.
Actively disengaged employees make up, on average, three out of every twenty employees. These employees arenāt just unhappy at work; they are resentful that their needs arenāt being met and are acting out their unhappiness while enduring miserable work experiences and spreading their unhappiness to their colleagues.13
Organizations pay a hefty price ...